logo
Delhi court sentences 2 men to life imprisonment in 2015 murder case

Delhi court sentences 2 men to life imprisonment in 2015 murder case

Hindustan Times27-05-2025

New Delhi, A court here has sentenced two men to life imprisonment in a 2015 murder case, saying that undue sympathy to impose an inadequate sentence would harm the justice system by undermining public confidence in the efficacy of law.
Additional Sessions Judge Virender Kumar Kharta observed that although the aggravating circumstances outweighed the mitigating factors, the case was beyond the purview of the 'rarest of the rare' doctrine to award the death penalty.
The court was hearing a case against Gurcharan Singh and Sheesh Ram, who had been earlier convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code .
Additional public prosecutor Pankaj Kumar Ranga argued that both the convicts in furtherance of their common intention committed heinous offence of murder of the victim, Manish, on April 1, 2015, and hence, they deserved maximum punishment.
In an order dated May 13, the court cited a 2005 Supreme Court judgment, according to which, "Undue sympathy to impose an inadequate sentence would do more harm to the justice system to undermine the public confidence in the efficacy of law. It is therefore the duty of every court to award a proper sentence."
The court said, "In the present case, the aggravating circumstances have outweighed the mitigating circumstances, but still the present case does not fall within the purview of the rarest of rare doctrine."
It then sentenced the duo to life imprisonment under IPC Section 302.
"This court is of the considered opinion that family members of deceased Manish have suffered mental trauma, inconvenience, hardship, disappointment and frustration, and adequate compensation needs to be granted to them," said the judge, referring the case to the Delhi State Legal Services Authority for determination and award of compensation to the legal heirs of the victim.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cash controversy: SC should allow filing of FIR against justice Varma, says Dhankhar
Cash controversy: SC should allow filing of FIR against justice Varma, says Dhankhar

Hindustan Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Cash controversy: SC should allow filing of FIR against justice Varma, says Dhankhar

Vice president Jagdeep Dhankhar on Friday asserted that in the backdrop of the indictment of justice Yashwant Varma by a panel appointed by the Supreme Court in the 'cash' seizure case, the judiciary should have given permission for launching criminal proceedings against him. Dhankhar, during a meeting with the executive committee members of Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association led by president, Sartej Narula at Punjab Raj Bhawan in Chandigarh on Friday morning, also said that the present government at the Centre is 'handicapped' in the given scenario and can't register an FIR due to a Supreme Court judgment, passed three decades ago. 'It (judgment) provides virtually impregnable cover. Unless permission is accorded by a functionary at the highest level in the judiciary, an FIR can't be registered,' Dhankhar remarked. 'The permission (to register FIR) should have been given on the very first day. …A compulsive, expedient situation should have been there because the mechanism evolved is the same. Second, it could have been given at least after the report,' added Dhankhar, who arrived in Chandigarh on Thursday. After spending a day at the Punjab Raj Bhawan, he headed to Himachal Pradesh. Dhankhar emphasised that judges need protection because they make 'tough decisions and cannot be subjected to investigation in a routine way. 'But the facts of this case warranted a proper probe,' he stated. While referring to the panel of three judges set up by the Supreme Court, Dhankhar, questioned the sanctity of the committee and said, whether the report submitted is 'actionable' and whether this committee can substitute for an FIR investigation. Dhankhar equated those indulging in corruption with 'sharks' and said that they must not be spared. He underlined that no other constitutional office has immunity from facing criminal action while in office. The President and the governors have immunity from prosecution only till they are in office, he further remarked. Dhankhar appreciated the role of Bar associations in the country in picking up this issue and said that lawyers are 'watchdogs' of democracy. On May 5, a three-member in-house enquiry committee submitted its report to the then CJI confirming that cash was indeed found at the residence of justice Varma in March, then a sitting Delhi high court judge. Acting on the same, then CJI Sanjiv Khanna initiated the process for the removal of justice Varma by writing to the government. Reports suggest that the government might move an impeachment motion against justice Varma in the Monsoon session.

Supreme Court slaps notice on KTR over alleged Musi scam
Supreme Court slaps notice on KTR over alleged Musi scam

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

Supreme Court slaps notice on KTR over alleged Musi scam

Hyderabad: The Supreme Court on Friday issued notices to KT Rama Rao in the case related to the BRS leader's allegations of corruption by the Congress government to the tune of Rs 25,000 crore in Musi. A hearing was held in the Supreme Court on Friday on the petition filed by Congress leader Atram Suguna. A bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma heard the petition. Rama Rao had previously alleged that the Congress government had committed a scam of Rs 25,000 crore in the name of Musi rejuvenation. Expressing strong objection to the allegations made by KTR, Congress leader Atram Suguna filed a complaint at the Utnur police station. The police registered a case against KTR based on the complaint of the Congress leader. KTR had earlier approached the Telangana High Court to quash the case registered against him. After hearing the arguments, the High Court gave a verdict quashing the FIR registered against KTR. However, Suguna filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the High Court verdict. The hearing on this was held on Friday and the Supreme Court issued notices to KTR asking him to reply to the petition.

UP man gets life term for killing wife over 'affair'
UP man gets life term for killing wife over 'affair'

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

UP man gets life term for killing wife over 'affair'

AGRA: A court in Agra sentenced a 32-year-old man to life imprisonment for murdering his 25-year-old wife with the help of his minor friend in 2023, after suspecting her of having an affair. Additional district govt counsel Vijay Verma said Akash Kumar's marriage to Rekha deteriorated after he began suspecting her of an affair with a neighbour. On Aug 15, Akash and his friend lured Rekha to Agra's Malpura area, where Akash slit her throat with a sharp weapon. The body was found on Aug 17, and a case was registered the next day based on a complaint by Rekha's sister, Indravati Devi. Akash and the minor were arrested on Aug 19 under IPC sections 302 (murder). A chargesheet was filed on Nov 7. The verdict was delivered on Friday by additional district judge Shiv Kumar who also imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on him. The minor's case is ongoing before Juvenile Justice Board. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store