logo
Target boycott leaders plan protests on anniversary of George Floyd's murder

Target boycott leaders plan protests on anniversary of George Floyd's murder

USA Today18-05-2025

Target boycott leaders plan protests on anniversary of George Floyd's murder The protests are meant to pressure Target to re-establish its commitment to DEI and other demands by the organizers.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Consumer Boycotts target DEI retreats—are they working? What we know.
Consumer boycotts are targeting companies like Amazon and Target, who've rolled back DEI initiatives, but are they working? Here's what we know.
Leaders in the Black faith community who have called upon their followers to boycott Target after its retreat from diversity, equity and inclusion programs have announced a series of peaceful protests outside of Target stores on May 25 – the fifth anniversary of the murder of George Floyd.
Pastor Jamal-Harrison Bryant, senior pastor of New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Stonecrest, Georgia, said his church will protest outside a Target in Conyers, Georgia, an Atlanta suburb. Sixty-seven churches across the country will hold additional protests, he said during a May 18 church service. They are a way to continue pressuring Target to re-establish its commitment to DEI and other demands by the organizers of what was originally called the Target Fast and is now called the Target Boycott, said Bryant, an activist and author.
Target is headquartered in Minneapolis where Floyd died and after his death, the retailer made a pledge to the Black community to boost efforts in inclusion, Bryant said in an interview with USA TODAY. But since then, Target has fallen in the eyes of many in the Black community, Bryant said.
"They made this pledge not under political duress, not in response to protest, but we thought out of conscious and clean hands," Bryant said.
Target did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
What is the Target boycott?
There have been two boycotts specifically aimed at Target – one which began on Feb. 1 to coincide with Black History Month and another that started March 5 to coincide with Lent. Both were started by leaders in the Black community in response to Target's retreat from DEI initiatives and other measures of support.
The first indefinite Target boycott was launched at the start of February by Minnesota activists, including Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights attorney and founder of the Racial Justice Network. Armstrong has previously told USA TODAY that Target's DEI retreat was a slap in the face to many Black shoppers who supported the retailer.
A separate 40-day "Target Fast" started by Bryant began on March 5 to coincide with Lent. Since Target did not reinstate its DEI initiatives, the effort is ongoing and has been redubbed The Target Boycott.
Separately, there are also ongoing consumer boycotts led by The People's Union, which organized a Feb. 28 one-day economic blackout of all consumer spending. The group has since held several weekly boycotts of other businesses and had a three-day economic blackout in April.
The Latino community has also been active on social media using the hashtag #LatinoFreeze, encouraging supporters to "hold your money'' amid freezes on DEI initiatives, reduced funding for the National Institutes of Health and actions on immigration.
What does the Target Boycott group want Target to do?
The four demands of Bryant's group include:
Honor the $2 billion pledge to the Black business community that Target previously had in place, which entailed purchasing Black-owned products, services and investing in Black media. Deposit $250 million across 23 Black-owned banks to strengthen Black financial institutions. Establish community retail centers at 10 historically Black colleges and universities to educate and empower future Black entrepreneurs. Fully restore and recommit to DEI at every level of the company.
On April 17, the Rev. Al Sharpton, founder and president of the National Action Network (NAN) met with Target CEO Brian Cornell – at Cornell's request. Sharpton has since confirmed that Bryant was in attendance at the meeting.
Bryant told USA TODAY that the meeting was productive and Cornell said a commitment to re-establish the $2 billion pledge was underway and that it would be complete by July 31. No announcements have been made by Target or Bryant's group regarding the July 31 deadline. However, Bryant said since the other three demands have not been met, the boycott will continue.
Bryant also told USA TODAY that Cornell met with President Donald Trump a few days after their meeting and Bryant had not heard from Target since, but was still expecting the July 31 pledge to happen.
"I feel this has been impactful and effective," Bryant said of the initial boycott.
What is Target saying?
A Target spokesperson confirmed that the retailer in January said it "will complete its $2 billion commitment to invest in Black-owned brands and businesses through its REACH program in 2025 as planned." When asked for clarification if the initiative would be re-instated by July 31, as Bryant was told, a Target spokesperson said there has been no specific date set other than sometime this year.
The spokesman for Target, which had not responded to previous inquiries from USA TODAY about the consumer boycotts, also released this statement: "We are absolutely dedicated to fostering inclusivity for everyone – our team members, our guests and our supply partners. To do that, we're focusing on what we do best: providing the best retail experience for the more than 2,000 communities we're proud to serve."
The spokesman also provided an internal memo sent on May 5 from Cornell to Target's employees. In it, Cornell acknowledged a "tough few months."
"There's been a lot coming at us – macro challenges in the environment, but also headlines, social media and conversations that may have left you wondering: Where does Target stand? What's true? What's not?" Cornell wrote.
"I recognize that silence from us has created uncertainty, so I want to be very clear: We are still the Target you know and believe in—a company that welcomes all and aims to bring joy to everyone, every day."
Has the Target boycott been working?
Leaders of the consumer boycotts have been pointing to Target's stock plummeting since earlier this year and data showing online and in-person activity at Target and several other retailers being down, to point to success, as previously reported by USA TODAY.
But data from several firms show a mix of results, with sales at some retailers increasing or remaining flat for the first quarter.
Consumer boycott: Target boycott continues, more on the way
Conservative activists have successfully rallied in recent years to force retailers and companies to rein in their DEI efforts by staging boycotts to hurt sales.
In campaigns using hashtags and slogans like "go woke go broke," boycotts waged by conservative activists have taken aim at some of the nation's largest consumer names, including Target. Some have succeeded in slashing sales and forcing policy changes.
Now Target and other companies find themselves under attack from the other side, facing calls for boycotts from DEI supporters angry over the rollbacks.
What is happening with the May 25 protests?
Bryant said churches will walk out at 12 p.m. ET on May 25. Protestors are asked to be silent for 9 minutes and 40 seconds, according to Bryant, to symbolize the amount of time that Derek Chauvin's knee was on Floyd's neck.
Bryant told USA TODAY that he took extra precautions in planning the protests to ensure everyone's safety.
"I am very reticent in calling for a protest in mass of Black people under this administration," Bryant said, referring to protestors potentially getting arrested. Bryant said he has paired pastors in the various cities with members of the National Bar Association, "So that people have somebody to mitigate for them in the event that it goes a different way," he said.
Betty Lin-Fisher is a consumer reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at blinfisher@USATODAY.com or follow her on X, Facebook or Instagram @blinfisher and @blinfisher.bsky.social on Bluesky. Sign up for our free The Daily Money newsletter, which will include consumer news on Fridays, here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Arkansas families suing to block Ten Commandments in public classrooms, libraries
Arkansas families suing to block Ten Commandments in public classrooms, libraries

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Arkansas families suing to block Ten Commandments in public classrooms, libraries

Arkansas families suing to block Ten Commandments in public classrooms, libraries Show Caption Hide Caption Texas lawmaker challenges Ten Commandments bill on the 'Sabbath' A Texas state bill that would require public schools to post donated placards of the Ten Commandments created an "ironic" moment in debate. Seven Arkansas families have filed a federal lawsuit to block a new law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in all public school classrooms in the state, arguing that the law will infringe on their constitutional rights. In the complaint, filed June 11 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, the families challenged an upcoming state law that requires the Ten Commandments to be "prominently" displayed in every public classroom and library. The law, which takes effect in August, was signed by Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders in April. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of a multifaith group of families by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU), and the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF). The defendants include four school districts — Fayetteville, Springdale, Bentonville, and Siloam Springs — in northwest Arkansas. Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist, or non-religious, said the law "violates longstanding U.S. Supreme Court precedent and the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment." The attorneys are asking a federal judge to declare the state requirement unconstitutional. In addition to the complaint, the attorneys are planning to file a motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction to block the implementation of the law while the suit is pending. "By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children," Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a statement. The lawsuit was publicly released by the AU on June 11 and viewed by USA TODAY. The Arkansas Attorney General's Office did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment on June 11. Related: How the Supreme Court could still reshape religious liberty with decisions in two cases Lawsuit: Ten Commandments law interferes with religious freedom According to the complaint, the display of the Ten Commandments in public classrooms and libraries will interfere with parents' right to direct their children's religious education and upbringing. The lawsuit further argues that the state requirement will create a "religiously coercive" school environment for children. Under the state law, each classroom and library will be required to post the Ten Commandments 'in a conspicuous place," the lawsuit states. The display of the text must be at least 16 inches wide and 20 inches tall and be printed in a "typeface that is legible to a person with average vision from anywhere in the room," according to the complaint. The law also mandates that schools and libraries display a specific version of the Ten Commandments, which the suit states is associated with Protestant faiths and conflicts with the version followed by many Jews and Catholics. "Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library—rendering them unavoidable—unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture," the complaint states. "It also sends the harmful and religiously divisive message that students who do not subscribe to the Ten Commandments ... do not belong in their own school community and pressures them to refrain from expressing any faith practices or beliefs that are not aligned with the state's religious preferences," the complaint added. It's not the first time. GOP leaders are calling for religion in public schools. Republican-led states push for religion in public classrooms Authorities in Republican-led states across the country have been pushing to spread religious teachings into public school classrooms, including incorporating the Bible into lessons and requiring schools to post state-selected versions of the Ten Commandments. School administrators and civil rights advocates have expressed opposition to the mandates, saying they violate students' constitutional rights. "Our Constitution's guarantee of church-state separation means that families – not politicians – get to decide if, when and how public-school children engage with religion," Rachel Laser, president and CEO of the AU, said in a statement on June 11. "This law is part of the nationwide Christian Nationalist scheme to win favor for one set of religious views over all others and nonreligion — in a country that promises religious freedom. Not on our watch. We're proud to defend the religious freedom of Arkansas schoolchildren and their families," Laser continued. The Arkansas law is similar to a Louisiana requirement that was signed in June 2024 by Gov. Jeff Landry. The Louisiana law was later blocked by a federal judge who declared it unconstitutional. The case, which is currently on appeal, is also being represented by the same counsel as the Arkansas lawsuit, attorneys said. In November 2024, Texas officials proposed a curriculum that includes teachings from the Bible. The state legislature also recently passed a bill requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms. Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to sign the measure, which would take effect in September. In July 2024, Oklahoma's top education official ordered public schools to teach the Bible, which large state school districts have largely ignored. Despite the state's Republican-controlled legislature's rejection of his $3 million request to fund the effort, state schools Superintendent Ryan Walters has insisted classrooms would all have Bibles by fall 2025. Contributing: Murray Evans, The Oklahoman, part of the USA TODAY Network

ASICS Unveils GEL-KAYANO 12.1 "Black/Silver" Hybrid
ASICS Unveils GEL-KAYANO 12.1 "Black/Silver" Hybrid

Hypebeast

time3 hours ago

  • Hypebeast

ASICS Unveils GEL-KAYANO 12.1 "Black/Silver" Hybrid

Name:ASICS GEL-KAYANO 12.1 'Black/Silver'Colorway:'Black/Silver'SKU:1203A759.001Retail Price:$160 USDRelease Date:2025Where to Buy:ASICS Notes:ASICSis set to release theGEL-KAYANO 12.1'Black/Silver' in 2025, blending heritage design with modern performance. Priced at $160 USD, the new silhouette merges the upper of theGEL-KAYANO 12with the outsole of theGEL-NIMBUS 17, offering a lightweight mesh build and the brand's iconic tiger stripes. This hybrid model aims to deliver both comfort and stability in a sleek, monochrome package. Notable details include Japanese branding on the tongue and blacked-out 'ASICS' logos on the heels.

Poll shows low-profile New York City comptroller race narrowing in the home stretch
Poll shows low-profile New York City comptroller race narrowing in the home stretch

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Poll shows low-profile New York City comptroller race narrowing in the home stretch

NEW YORK — A new poll shows the race for New York City comptroller tightening, with Justin Brannan narrowing the gap in a contest still led by Mark Levine. And with less than two weeks until the Democratic primary, nearly half of New Yorkers remain undecided in the race to be the city's top fiscal watchdog, according to the poll Brannan's team commissioned and shared in full with POLITICO. It was conducted by Public Policy Polling, and queried 573 likely primary voters between June 6 and 7, with a 4.1 percent margin of error. Levine, the Manhattan borough president, led Brannan — the City Council finance committee chair — 30 percent to 19 percent among likely Democratic voters, according to the poll. That same survey showed state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani leapfrogging Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary. The 11-point gap was smaller than a May 27 survey from Honan Strategy Group that had Levine at 38 percent and Brannan at 13 percent, a shift that left the Brooklyn lawmaker's team feeling bullish. Both surveys found 44 percent of likely voters undecided. 'A race that was once considered locked up is now anything but,' Brannan campaign adviser Alyssa Cass wrote in a campaign memo shared with POLITICO. 'As nearly half the electorate remains undecided, Brannan is the candidate with the most room to grow and the clearest path to an upset.' Brannan's team believes the tides will continue to shift in his favor. They cited the smaller gap that came after 10 days of going on air with a television ad along with a niche stat from their poll: Of voters who had seen Brannan's ads, they preferred him 40 percent to 37 percent. Those viewers, however, made up a small slice of the electorate at 23 percent. And it was unclear how many of those people knew of Levine or his campaign. Levine's camp countered that the polls have consistently shown him ahead of Brannan by double digits. And they touted the endorsement Wednesday night of a major municipal labor group. 'Mark has all the momentum in this race. We just earned the endorsement of the United Federation of Teachers, representing hundreds of thousands of NYC public school educators — adding to the 180-plus elected officials, faith leaders, labor unions and community groups backing our campaign,' Campaign Manager Matt Rubin said in a statement. 'Right now, we're focused on connecting with New Yorkers where they are — on the streets, at subway stops and at their doors.' A person on Levine's team also took issue with the survey methodology, suggesting it over sampled Brannan's home borough of Brooklyn — especially with affluent voters — and under sampled Black voters Levine is doing better with. The Public Policy Polling showed few New Yorkers have barely tuned into the contest: More than half of those surveyed had no opinion about the favorability of the two candidates, and around half of the likely Democratic primary voters had not seen an ad for either. Brannan and Levine were the only two comptroller candidates to qualify for a pair of televised debates, which mainly showcased how little they differ on policy. During their first meeting, they engaged in several back-and-forths over President Donald Trump and New York City Mayor Eric Adams, but had a conspicuous aversion to talking about Andrew Cuomo, who at the time had been leading the mayoral Democratic primary in every poll.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store