logo
Grid modernization, cost concerns clash in debate on energy overhaul

Grid modernization, cost concerns clash in debate on energy overhaul

Yahoo09-03-2025

Amid a larger energy transition that promises a move away from fossil fuels alongside sharp increases in demand for electricity, Democratic lawmakers have zeroed in on the changes they say are needed for New Mexico's aging grid to handle increased capacity and changing technologies for generating and deploying electricity.
House Bill 13 — or the Power Up New Mexico Act — passed the House on Saturday afternoon after a long debate by a mostly party-line vote of 36-23.
Democrats argue it's an important step to bring the state's energy grid into the future, while Republicans pushed back on the potential costs for customers of the state's three privately owned utilities.
Bill sponsor Rep. Dayan Hochman-Vigil, D-Albuquerque, called it 'the single most important issue I have ever worked on' in a recent committee hearing, arguing the state's grid is among 'the worst in the nation.'
She pointed to the need for grid upgrades in Bernalillo County to accommodate fast chargers for increasing numbers of electric vehicles — including, potentially, electric semi-trucks — and even the need for attention to grids in the Permian Basin to support oil and gas operations.
A host of environmental and clean energy advocacy groups were involved in the creation of HB 13 and strongly support the bill, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, Western Resource Advocates and the Sierra Club. Hochman-Vigil pointed to dozens of other 'stakeholders' who were involved, such as unions, automobile manufacturers and more.
The bill will require the state's three investor-owned utilities to submit plans every three years to state regulators spelling out planned upgrades to their electric distribution systems, aiming to direct focus on building a better grid to handle more demand and to more efficiently connect new businesses and small-scale solar power systems, which put energy into the grid as well.
A similar bill passed last year in Colorado, also with strong support from the Natural Resources Defense Council.
GOP questions costs
Republicans have pushed back on the bill, objecting to possible rate hikes for electricity customers after increases and added charges have already bloated utility bills in recent years.
A request currently pending before regulators would increase average monthly bills for residential Public Service Company of New Mexico customers by about $10 a month.
HB 13 provides for utilities to recover the spending associated with their plans through rate increases or tariff riders, which increase the costs of electric bills with supplemental charges. Such added costs must be approved by the state Public Regulation Commission before they can be implemented.
Rep. Rod Montoya, R-Farmington, said at a recent committee hearing he had spoken with leaders of the utilities and heard 'a lot of concerns' about the bill, which he argued would pile more requirements and costs onto the companies and their customers in the years after the 2019 Energy Transition Act mandated a shift away from fossil fuels in New Mexico.
'Their concern is this is another set of separate expenses that will be passed onto their ratepayers,' Montoya said. 'Current ratepayers are not necessarily the target with this — folks who will benefit the most will be economic development ... but current ratepayers would bear the cost.'
El Paso Electric and Southwestern Public Service Company both expressed support for HB 13 during hearings on the bill. PNM was neutral on it, a spokesperson said, declining to comment.
On the House floor Saturday, Montoya urged all Republicans to vote against the bill, calling it 'an outrageous mandate to utility companies to increase beyond the current need of current customers, and the current customers will have to pay for it.'
All the Republicans who were present voted against the bill, and all of the Democrats — with the exception of Joanne Ferrary, D-Las Cruces — voted for it.
'Forward-thinking' bill
Advocates of HB 13 have said it won't necessarily raise rates but rather that it will ensure utilities make timely, necessary changes to the grid to comply with laws and regulations already in place. They've argued the incentives to move to more efficient appliances and spur economic development could result in lower energy costs.
'Most of this bill is about refining PRC processes and taking away roadblocks that have stopped us from refining our grid,' Hochman-Vigil said. 'Power Up New Mexico is about removing regulatory barriers to do this faster, better and more efficiently.'
Jim Desjardins, executive director of the Renewable Energy Industries Association, said the bill is a 'forward-thinking' measure that will prepare the state for inevitable shifts that are already underway.
'People don't think twice when we talk about investing in our roads,' Desjardins said. 'When was the last time we had an argument about that? People don't like the inconvenience, but it's kind of a similar thing — one moves cars and one moves electricity.'
Part of building a 'modern electric grid' is ensuring energy can efficiently move both ways on distribution lines. Desjardins pointed to roadblocks and delays in recent years in connecting PNM customers' rooftop solar systems — including in some neighborhoods in the Santa Fe area — saying recent new regulatory approaches have required the utility to retool interconnection processes to allow for more rooftop solar systems on some distribution lines.
The larger project of 'grid modernization' includes many other investments, including 'smart meters,' needed to prepare the grid for changing realities of energy use and generation.
'As we look to the future, we've got to be real and look at integrating these technologies and building a better system,' Desjardins said.
Former Public Regulation Commissioner Steve Fischmann expressed support for the bill, comparing the new requirement for distribution plans to the annual integrated resource plans utilities are already required to submit every year, which detail their plans for years to come for new generation resources including solar, wind and battery storage to cover increasing demand.
Fischmann said he sees regulators coming to focus more closely on the bigger picture of distribution investments, which he said have been 'virtually unregulated in the past.'
'They're starting to look at it seriously,' he said. 'And more importantly, they're looking at it holistically. They're trying to put all the pieces together, and there are going to be huge investments in distribution and grid modernization going forward.'
Gas stoves
Some questioned the bill's requirement for 'beneficial electrification' plans from utilities every six years, with approval from the PRC. The plans concern utilities' programs for providing incentives for converting from 'a non-electric fuel source to a high-efficiency electric source' as well as 'avoiding the use of non-electric fuel sources in new construction or industrial applications.'
New Mexico Gas Co. staunchly opposes the provision. A lobbyist for the state's largest natural gas utility argued in a hearing that encouraging customers to move away from gas-powered appliances would hurt their remaining customers, who he said would 'as a result, pay more for that system to be maintained.'
'Are you going to take my gas stove or my water heater?' Rep. Jonathan Henry, R-Artesia, asked during a committee hearing.
Hochman-Vigil said any switches from gas to electric appliances would be 'entirely voluntary.' She said the provision does not pass any new standards or lower the emissions goals already in place in the state, but rather requires the utilities to draft plans that state 'how we are going to get there.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gov. Evers responds to Republicans' decision to back out of bipartisan budget negotiations
Gov. Evers responds to Republicans' decision to back out of bipartisan budget negotiations

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Evers responds to Republicans' decision to back out of bipartisan budget negotiations

MADISON, Wis. (WLAX/WEUX) – Republicans in the Wisconsin State Legislature on Wednesday backed out of months' worth of bipartisan budget negotiations with Gov. Tony Evers toward reaching bipartisan compromise on the 2025-27 Biennial Budget. Despite having secured the governor's support for Republicans' half of the proposal, which included an income tax cut targeting Wisconsin's middle-class and working families and eliminating income taxes for certain retirees, Republican lawmakers are unable to reach consensus with their caucuses in order to support the governor's half of the proposal, which included meaningful increased investments in child care, K-12 schools, and the University of Wisconsin (UW) System. Republicans' decision to cease discussions comes after meetings between Gov. Evers and Republican leaders, as well as several staff-level meetings with leaders, have occurred over the span of several months and ramped up in recent weeks, including meetings every day this week. Gov. Evers Wednesday released the following statement responding to Republican leaders' decision: 'I am grateful to the legislators and legislative staff for their efforts over the past several weeks to reach a bipartisan agreement that would have delivered on key priorities for Wisconsinites. 'The concept of compromise is simple—everyone gets something they want, and no one gets everything they want. 'I told Republicans I'd support their half of the deal and their top tax priorities—even though they're very similar to bills I previously vetoed—because I believe that's how compromise is supposed to work, and I was ready to make that concession in order to get important things done for Wisconsin's kids. 'Unfortunately, Republicans couldn't agree to support the top priorities in my half of the deal, which included meaningful investments for K-12 schools, to continue Child Care Counts to help lower the cost of child care for working families, and to prevent further campus closures and layoffs at our UW System. So, today, Republicans decided not to move forward with any more bipartisan negotiations with me. 'We've spent months trying to have real, productive conversations with Republican lawmakers in hopes of finding compromise and passing a state budget that everyone could support—and that, most importantly, delivers for the people of Wisconsin. I am admittedly disappointed that Republican lawmakers aren't willing to reach consensus and common ground and have decided to move forward without bipartisan support instead. 'I will always try to do the right thing—and compromise in order to get good things done. Wisconsinites expect their elected officials to show up, act in good faith, and work together across the aisle to get things done—that's what I've been committed to doing in these bipartisan negotiations from the get-go, and that remains my commitment.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yeah... So... Here's How Fox News Is (Bizarrely) Talking About Donald Trump And Elon Musk's Breakup
Yeah... So... Here's How Fox News Is (Bizarrely) Talking About Donald Trump And Elon Musk's Breakup

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Yeah... So... Here's How Fox News Is (Bizarrely) Talking About Donald Trump And Elon Musk's Breakup

If you somehow missed it, President Donald Trump and his former advisor (and bestie) Elon Musk got into a back-and-forth spat on social media yesterday. A lot was said. Trump accused Elon of backing down on his support for the president's championed "One, Big Beautiful Bill" because "he found out we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate." And Elon called said Trump was showing "such ingratitude" considering, "without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." Not one to be upstaged, Trump threatened to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." And Elon volleyed back by accusing Trump of being "in the Epstein files," despite Trump denying connections to Jeffrey Epstein. Obviously, the sitting president and the world's richest man getting into a very public feud was widely covered by news outlets, including Fox News — a conservative outlet Trump has openly admired... and also one that appears to go light on the president. Related: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral So here's how they covered the quarrell: Fox News host Sean Hannity shared footage of Trump handing Elon a ceremonial, gold-colored key during Elon's government send-off last week. "That was less than a week ago," Hannity said. "These are two very talented individuals. Frankly, they don't need each other to be successful, but I do hope they work it out and set an example for the rest of the country." Related: This Republican Lawmaker's Embarrassing Lack Of Knowledge Of The Term "Intersex" Went Viral After He Proposed An Amendment To Cut LGBTQ+ Funding Host of her own Fox show, Laura Ingraham ran a segment on the pair called "When Friendship Gets DOGE'd," where she praised Elon while suggesting Trump should "simply disengage." "Musk is his own person," Ingraham said. "The government contracts that he has stand on their own merit. They shouldn't be called into question. Threatening to pull them, that's not wise, when five minutes ago you were hailing Musks work in helping rescue the stranded Americans in space. Elon Musk is like the Thomas Edison of our time. He sacrificed for America personally and professionally, and he wanted to make the Trump presidency happen, and it did." Fox News / Twitter: @Acyn And finally, we have Jesse Watters, who insisted that, "Sometimes when you're angry, you say things you don't mean." As an odd and hopefully tongue-in-cheek example, Watters pointed to peer Greg Gutfeld, saying, "Greg mocked my hair last week, and I said he's on the Epstein list." Continuing, Watters said, "Now, I didn't mean that. I made it up." "Sometimes guys fight," Watters pressed on. "Guys will sometimes punch you in the face, and the next night you're having a beer. Sleep with your girlfriend, and you patch things up. Not your wife, your girlfriend!" "These guys are like roommates. They were living in close quarters for like, the first six months of the year. They're just blowing off steam." Well! There you have it. What are your thoughts on the coverage? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share Also in In the News: "We Don't Import Food": 31 Americans Who Are Just So, So Confused About Tariffs And US Trade

Trump asks Supreme Court to green light Education Department firings
Trump asks Supreme Court to green light Education Department firings

Politico

time13 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump asks Supreme Court to green light Education Department firings

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to give the go-ahead to carry out a plan to fire almost 40 percent of the Education Department's workforce. In an emergency appeal filed Friday morning, Solicitor General John Sauer asked the high court to lift a preliminary injunction a federal judge in Boston issued last month after determining that such sweeping staffing cuts would cripple the agency's ability to carry out functions assigned to it by Congress. While Trump has vowed to eliminate the Education Department, Sauer insisted that the proposed, wide-ranging reductions in force target 'inefficiency' and are not an attempt to kneecap the agency as the president advocates for its demise. Sauer said Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's order was part of a pattern of federal judges overstepping their proper role and second-guessing executive branch decisions. The Constitution 'does not empower district courts to presume that all 1,400 employees must be reinstated to their previous jobs and functions based on anecdotal speculation about impairment of some of the Department's services,' Sauer wrote, adding: 'The Department remains committed to implementing its statutorily mandated functions.' Joun issued the injunction May 22 in connection with lawsuits brought by Democratic-led states, the Somerville, Massachusetts, public school system and several labor unions. Noting that Trump has repeatedly vowed to shutter the Education Department 'immediately,' the Biden appointee concluded that the layoffs amounted to 'an attempt … to shut down the Department without Congressional approval.' The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block Joun's order, although the administration's appeal remains pending. In April, the Supreme Court stepped in at the administration's request to block an order Joun issued in a separate lawsuit involving the Education Department. That directive required the agency to keep funding certain teaching-related grants that Trump appointees had sought to terminate. Four of the high court's nine justices dissented from the stay blocking Joun's order in that case. In an emergency appeal already pending at the Supreme Court, the Trump administration is trying to lift a block a federal judge in San Francisco issued on tens of thousands of layoffs at all major federal agencies except for the Education Department.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store