
Government pauses plans to ease slot machine rules across Great Britain
Plans to liberalise rules governing high street slot machine shops have been shelved, amid concern about the sector's treatment of vulnerable customers.
Ministers were widely expected to allow adult gaming centres (AGCs), many of which allow customers to play slots 24 hours a day, to install more higher-stakes machines.
But, in a rare setback for the fast-growing AGC sector, which declared itself 'frustrated' by the decision, relaxation of the rules will not go ahead this year and could be dropped altogether.
Under a regulation known as the '80/20 rule', no more than 20% of the terminals in arcades and bingo premises can be category B3, a class of slot machine that allows stakes of up to £2, promising prizes of up to £500.
The remaining 80% must be category C or D, where maximum stakes are £1 and the highest jackpot is £100.
The land-based gaming sector has complained that this stifles growth because most customers don't play the lower-stakes machines, meaning shops are wasting floorspace and electricity costs.
The previous Conservative government was preparing to ease the rule as part of a wider series of regulatory changes, published in a gambling white paper in 2023, that cracked down on online operators but were generally kinder to high street venues.
In May last year, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said it was considering either a new 50/50 ratio or abandoning the 80/20 rule altogether.
But in a letter seen by the Guardian, DCMS officials said the government would 'not be introducing changes to the 80/20 rule this year'.
They did not rule out reviving the plan but said the department recognised 'concerns about the strength of protections for vulnerable people in the adult gaming centre sector'.
This year, the slot machine firm Merkur was fined almost £100,000 by the gambling regulator after the Guardian revealed how staff allegedly exploited a vulnerable cancer patient.
Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative party leader who chairs a parliamentary group examining gambling harm, said: 'Given the insufficient protections in place for people in these venues and the addictive nature of these machines, increasing their numbers should be ruled out entirely and the current widespread breaches of regulations by AGCs, which are now proliferating on our high streets, must be urgently looked into.'
John Bollom, the president of the arcades trade body, Bacta, said: 'We are frustrated with the delay in resolving the 80/20 issue, which was a key modernising proposal in the gambling white paper, but we remain hopeful that we will see the same progress as other sectors; and that when the minister looks again she will see this reform for what it is – common sense, safe for players and good for our ailing high streets.'
Bacta said its members adhered to the highest standards of player protection.
Beccy Cooper, a Labour MP, welcomed the move and called for the government to go further to restrict AGCs.
'Local councils also need more powers to enable them to restrict the number of gambling outlets in local communities to prevent gambling harms,' she said.
DCMS has been approached for comment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
10 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Tories struggle to be heard after election skelping
'We stopped Nicola Sturgeon converting her gender bill into law. And we have watched Labour try government — but Sir Keir Starmer keeps dropping the ball.' But for all the jibes, the problem facing Mr Findlay's party is that they are struggling to even get on the pitch. READ MORE Findlay: Tories can win seats at Holyrood election despite polls pointing to drubbing Tories unveil plans for 'Scottish first' medical student training policy For Women Scotland threaten SNP with fresh legal action over Supreme Court ruling The party suffered its worst-ever defeat at last year's general election, slumping to just 121 seats UK-wide — a loss of 244. In Scotland, the scale of the collapse was slightly masked. Despite a chaotic campaign that saw Douglas Ross alienate members and then quit before polling day, the party managed to hold on to five of its six seats. Although the Tory vote halved, support for the SNP — the main challengers in each Conservative-held seat — declined even more sharply. The ghosts of Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak continue to haunt the party, while the spectre of Nigel Farage looms ever larger. The latest projections from Professor Sir John Curtice, based on last month's Survation poll, paint a bleak picture for next year's Holyrood vote. His modelling has the Tories slumping to fourth place with just 13 MSPs — less than half their current tally of 30. The SNP would return 58 seats, while Reform UK would leapfrog the Conservatives to become the main opposition on 21. Labour would win 18 seats, with the LibDems and Greens on 10 and 8 respectively. Mr Findlay did not shy away from the scale of the challenge, admitting that a huge effort would be needed to even earn the right to be heard. Yet despite the grim outlook, the party is hopeful. 'You would think we had no right to be as upbeat as we are, but it is the phenomena of the Conservative Party,' said Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland. 'Against all of the odds, we are feeling genuinely optimistic and positive.'I think we knew that 2024 was going to be terrible. Having taken that skelping, I think people are back to renew the party — and that is the strong statement of both Russell and Kemi's remarks.' 'We are sitting in a much diminished form at Westminster, our worst ever election result in over 250 years of the Conservative Party really being in existence. And really beginning the fightback,' shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie told Unspun Live, The Herald's politics podcast. 'And that is where we are right now — beginning that long, hard slog of regaining the trust of the British people, hopefully with a view to getting back into power in short order in four years' time.' Mr Findlay has settled into the role of party leader. He is much more relaxed and less like the deer trapped in the headlights he resembled when he took over from Douglas Ross last September. He is putting the effort in. One Tory staffer said the boss had rehearsed his 42-minute address at least eight times before delivering it to party members on Saturday lunchtime. It was an unashamedly Conservative speech with a raft of policies rooted in the party's traditional values: tax cuts funded by £650 million in savings from slashing quangos and civil service jobs; scrapping the SNP's 2045 net zero target; and a pledge to train more Scottish medical students to reduce NHS reliance on immigration. For years, Scottish Tory speeches at conference have been dominated by saying no to indyref2. That was in Mr Findlay's speech, of course — but it was his programme for government that was to the fore. 'The way we beat Reform is by having good, proper policies in place. We have not seen very much from Reform policy-wise,' North East list MSP Douglas Lumsden told The Herald on Sunday. 'I still think there is enough time [to turn things around]. It is 11 months before the election and this is about building a positive message we can take next year. 'We absolutely need to move on from the past.' The scale of the party's challenge — and the threat from Reform — was made painfully clear earlier this month at the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, where the Tories came a distant fourth. In a seat where they had won 17.5% at the last Holyrood election, they only just managed to hold on to their Reform took 26% of the vote. While Labour's surprise win has led to grumblings in the SNP, Mr Lumsden insists the party is united behind Mr Findlay. 'We are 100% behind Russell. There is no briefing at all from anyone. Russell has a brilliant personality and the more people who get to know him the more they like him — so we need to promote Russell.' READ MORE While Mr Findlay's position might be safe, the same cannot be said for Kemi Badenoch. Potential leadership hopefuls are on manoeuvres. The leader of the opposition delivered her speech on Friday. It was only her second trip to Scotland since becoming leader in November. 'There is a lot of work to be done, a lot of messaging, a lot of renewal — and she has got the runway that Russell and the rest of us do not have,' Mr Kerr said. 'I am not worried about threats to her leadership. She is letting her colleagues get on with it. She is not a leader who is lying awake worrying about a challenge to her leadership,' he added. 'Anybody who is going to contest Kemi or Russell for leadership right now is mad — because the challenges will not change.' Mr Kerr compared Ms Badenoch to Margaret Thatcher: 'I am old enough to remember our first female leader and the same stuff was being said about her in terms of her role as Leader of the Opposition and her performance and PMQs — and look what happened to her.' 'You know, we have been written off as a party before,' Mr Findlay told The Herald on Sunday. 'There are many people at this conference who have been around for a very long time, and they have seen some pretty dark days. 'And you know what keeps people going? You know that resilience that we all saw in the hall today — it is because we know that what we stand for is right. 'We stand for personal responsibility, lower taxation, fairer taxes for people, integrity and ensuring the very best public services. We want a Scottish Parliament that is entirely focused on delivering for Scotland — not the fringe obsessions of the SNP and Labour.'So we will be fighting for every single vote.' Murrayfield is used to resilience and fighting talk — it is also, however, no stranger to the wooden spoon, a fate Mr Findlay will be desperae to avoid next May.

South Wales Argus
11 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Newport City Council offices 'not fit for purpose'
Newport City Council has previously looked into relocating from the Civic Centre to a smaller premises, details released under a Freedom of Information Act request show. A council spokesman said a potential relocation is no longer on the cards – but Conservative councillor David Fouweather claimed the local authority should give serious consideration to the benefits of finding a new home. He said any new council HQ would 'have to be' a central location in Newport, which would have the added bonus of helping 'boost city centre trade at lunchtimes'. The historic Westgate Hotel or the former Admiral building could both prove to be suitable locations, he suggested. A recent Freedom of Information Act request, by Conservative campaigner Michael Enea, found it cost the council around £1.05 million to run the Civic Centre last year. The response also showed there were typically between 200 and 350 staff working daily at the building – which has around 380 'office rooms'. 'I think the Civic Centre is not fit for purpose anymore,' said Cllr Fouweather. 'The running costs are horrendous. But what do you do with the building? That is a major problem. A lot of it is listed.' On the condition and current use of the building, he added: 'If you go down where the staff canteen used to be, it's totally abandoned. There's nothing there. It fell into a state of disrepair. Staff have to rely on vending machines.' Moving to a new, more appropriately-sized building would streamline the council's running costs – and should also spell the end of current remote working policies, according to Cllr Fouweather. 'There's absolutely no need now for working from home', he said, claiming that if more people worked in the office, 'you get a better service, deal with people directly, the public are able to come in rather than [deal with] remote staff where you've got to wait and wait for a response'. But a council spokesperson defended current working arrangements. 'The majority of Newport City Council staff have fixed places of work and do not work remotely,' they said. 'The council, as a modern and mature employer, has enabled those staff who can work from multiple locations to do so. 'While we keep all operational decisions under review, there are no plans to revert to a pre-pandemic position. There is no evidence that remote working from multiple locations has had a negative impact on productivity, while there are clear benefits to it around recruitment and retention, congestion and climate change.' The spokesperson said the previous consideration of relocating from the Civic Centre was part of its 'routine management of our estate… to ensure all of the office space we maintain is fit for purpose for what we need as an organisation'. 'We can confirm that at this moment, the council has no plans to relocate from the civic centre to another location,' they added.


STV News
21 hours ago
- STV News
PM announces national inquiry into grooming gangs scandal
Sir Keir Starmer has announced the government will launch a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal, despite resisting calls for one for months. It comes after the government commissioned a review into the scandal by Baroness Louise Casey, which has recommended a national inquiry and is due to be published in full next week. The prime minister told reporters as he travelled to the G7 summit in Canada: 'I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation. That is the right thing to do.' Since the scandal became a point of fierce political discussion earlier this year, the government has repeatedly insisted there was no need for a national inquiry, instead launching five locally-led investigations. The prime minister had previously argued another inquiry would delay justice for the victims of the scandal, saying the government wanted to get on with implementing the recommendations of a 2022 inquiry into child sexual exploitation. Baroness Louise Casey was commissioned to carry out a 'rapid' national audit on the scandal. / Credit: James Manning/PA 'From the start I have always said that we should implement the recommendations we have got,' the PM told reporters. 'I have never said we should not look again at any issue – I had wanted to be assured that on the question of any inquiry, that's why I asked Louise Casey, who I hugely respect, to do an audit.' Pressed on the detail of the inquiry, the PM said: 'It will be statutory under the inquiries act, that will take a bit of time to sort out exactly how that works and we will set that out in an orderly way.' Debate around tackling grooming gangs raged earlier this year after tech billionaire and X owner Elon Musk began attacking Sir Keir Starmer and his government, accusing them of being 'complicit' in the scandal. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK have repeatedly called for a national inquiry into the scandal. Starmer previously accused Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch of 'jumping on the bandwagon', by calling for a national investigation. The Conservatives had tabled an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill that was due to be voted on in Parliament next week, calling for the government to set up a national statutory inquiry within three months. In response to the announcement on a statutory inquiry Badenoch said: 'Keir Starmer doesn't know what he thinks unless an official report has told him so. 'Just like he dismissed concerns about the winter fuel payment and then had to u-turn, just like he needed the Supreme Court to tell him what a woman is, he had to be led by the nose to make this correct decision here. 'I've been repeatedly calling for a full national inquiry since January. It's about time he recognised he made a mistake and apologise for six wasted months.' The government had previously argued that there had already been a national inquiry into the grooming gangs, referring to the 2022 Jay Inquiry into child sex abuse. Debate around grooming gangs was reignited this year after tech billionaire Elon Musk attacked Starmer and his government. / Credit: AP The Jay inquiry described the sexual abuse of children as an 'epidemic that leaves tens of thousands of victims in its poisonous wake'. It looked into abuse by organised groups following multiple convictions of sexual offences against children across the UK between 2010-2014, including in Rotherham, Cornwall, Derbyshire, Rochdale and Bristol. In November last year, Professor Jay said she felt 'frustrated' that none of the probe's 20 recommendations had been implemented more than two years after its conclusion. Reports in The Times newspaper suggest the Casey review will say that white British girls who were targeted by grooming gangs were 'institutionally ignored for fear of racism'. The Casey audit was originally due to take three months from when it was announced in January. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country