Newport City Council offices 'not fit for purpose'
A council spokesman said a potential relocation is no longer on the cards – but Conservative councillor David Fouweather claimed the local authority should give serious consideration to the benefits of finding a new home.
He said any new council HQ would 'have to be' a central location in Newport, which would have the added bonus of helping 'boost city centre trade at lunchtimes'.
The historic Westgate Hotel or the former Admiral building could both prove to be suitable locations, he suggested.
A recent Freedom of Information Act request, by Conservative campaigner Michael Enea, found it cost the council around £1.05 million to run the Civic Centre last year.
The response also showed there were typically between 200 and 350 staff working daily at the building – which has around 380 'office rooms'.
'I think the Civic Centre is not fit for purpose anymore,' said Cllr Fouweather. 'The running costs are horrendous. But what do you do with the building? That is a major problem. A lot of it is listed.'
On the condition and current use of the building, he added: 'If you go down where the staff canteen used to be, it's totally abandoned. There's nothing there. It fell into a state of disrepair. Staff have to rely on vending machines.'
Moving to a new, more appropriately-sized building would streamline the council's running costs – and should also spell the end of current remote working policies, according to Cllr Fouweather.
'There's absolutely no need now for working from home', he said, claiming that if more people worked in the office, 'you get a better service, deal with people directly, the public are able to come in rather than [deal with] remote staff where you've got to wait and wait for a response'.
But a council spokesperson defended current working arrangements.
'The majority of Newport City Council staff have fixed places of work and do not work remotely,' they said. 'The council, as a modern and mature employer, has enabled those staff who can work from multiple locations to do so.
'While we keep all operational decisions under review, there are no plans to revert to a pre-pandemic position. There is no evidence that remote working from multiple locations has had a negative impact on productivity, while there are clear benefits to it around recruitment and retention, congestion and climate change.'
The spokesperson said the previous consideration of relocating from the Civic Centre was part of its 'routine management of our estate… to ensure all of the office space we maintain is fit for purpose for what we need as an organisation'.
'We can confirm that at this moment, the council has no plans to relocate from the civic centre to another location,' they added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
20 minutes ago
- Daily Record
'Hyperbolic word salad': Row breaks out as Reform UK politician urges Scots council to rule out low emission zone
Councillor Jamie McGuire labelled the schemes in four Scottish cities as "little more than cash cows" in a blistering statement. A row has broken out after a Reform UK politician urged Renfrewshire Council to rule out ever introducing congestion charges or a low emission zone (LEZ). Councillor Jamie McGuire labelled the schemes as "little more than cash cows" and said the local authority "must have no part in this" in a blistering statement. But the elected member for Renfrew North and Braehead has been accused of "hyperbolic word salad" on an issue that was settled almost two years ago. In September 2023, the SNP administration confirmed it was not considering the introduction of an LEZ in Paisley or any other part of Renfrewshire at a full council meeting. Councillor McGuire, who defected from Labour to Nigel Farage's Reform in June, said: "Scotland's four main cities already have LEZs in place and their experience should be a warning. "These schemes have acted as little more than cash cows, generating income for councils while hitting those who can least afford it. "People on the lowest incomes, who are far more likely to drive older vehicles, have been penalised simply for trying to get to work, take their children to school or care for relatives. "Renfrewshire must have no part in this. A congestion charge or LEZ in our towns would be a hammer blow to local households and businesses. We are a working community that depends on accessible, affordable transport. "Many residents travel across Renfrewshire for work, education, and caring responsibilities, while small enterprises rely heavily on vans and cars to serve customers and move goods. "Imposing extra charges on them is not just unreasonable, it risks undermining our local economy and making it harder for people to live and work here." He added: "The SNP-led Renfrewshire Council must act now to rule out – clearly, unequivocally and permanently – ever introducing either a congestion charge or a low emission zone in our area. "Residents deserve certainty, not the constant threat of new charges hanging over them." Councillor Jim Paterson, SNP convener of the planning and climate change policy board, claimed Councillor McGuire was "trying to raise his profile" with the comments. The elected member for Renfrew South and Gallowhill said: "Another day, another fabricated outrage from Councillor McGuire. "The position of the SNP administration and indeed Councillor McGuire on this issue was settled in 2023 when the Conservative group called on the council to rule out establishing any form of LEZ in Paisley and wider Renfrewshire for the duration of this council term. "The SNP position along with a Labour amendment was agreed then by the vast majority of councillors which stated that the council would not consider the introduction of a low emission zone (LEZ/ULEZ) in Paisley or any other parts of Renfrewshire. That position remains unchanged. "Councillor McGuire, like his newfound political hero Nigel Farage, may like to trade in misinformation but to imply that there has been any change to the agreed position of 2023 is just nonsense and to suggest there is a 'constant fear' hanging over residents is just hyperbolic word salad from a councillor desperately trying to raise his profile to secure the top spot in his party's internal list for Holyrood 2026."
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
We feel duped and insulted by this Labour government
Lord Falconer's assessment of the government (Starmer's team seen as 'tired, same-again politicians', says Labour peer, 9 August) does not acknowledge the depth of feeling on current issues, and his advice for the future is itself 'same-again' and 'tired'. After the last general election, Keir Starmer promised us hope and an assurance that the 'broadest shoulders' would help to turn around the country after 14 years of disastrous and deeply damaging Conservative rule. However, the public clearly didn't think that axing disabled people's benefits or removing heating allowances from pensioners fitted the 'broadest shoulders' definition. Rather large 'fuck-ups', as Falconer puts it, in a handful of weeks. The pro-Israel, pro-US foreign policy agenda, while a terrible genocide unfolds in Gaza, has also proved deeply unpalatable. The public feel duped and insulted by this 'blue' Labour government, with its unashamedly authoritarian assault on democracy. I agree with the 'same old, same old' sentiment: same lower- and middle-income earners paying the same price for the same old financiers, political lobbyists, rightwing campaign groups, global corporations, arms manufacturers and their vested interests. Yes, the 10-year NHS plan is welcome, but the failure to tax the super-rich and initiatives such as the environmentally catastrophic planning reforms outweigh any positive steps. Falconer suggests No 10 should unapologetically drive through ideological change, but that approach is doomed. Less of the tone-deafness and failure to read the room, and more consultation, more humanity, are what the people BorgesStowmarket, Suffolk Charles Falconer's critique of Labour in government sums up the situation very well. I would just add that disillusionment and absence of hope combine to make this an unhappy, uneasy country. Yet our government apparently fails to see any link with increasing polarisation, conflict and crime. It's proving a costly failure for us all, but especially for the people who are marginalised and vulnerable. We should expect JonesLondon
The National
30 minutes ago
- The National
JD Vance hosting Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick during UK holiday
The US vice president invited the Tory shadow justice secretary to join him in Oxfordshire on Tuesday and will also meet with the Reform UK leader, The Telegraph reports. A Tory spokesperson told the paper that Kemi Badenoch and Vance had discussed meeting but 'just couldn't make it work with schedules'. READ MORE: Top author says Nicola Sturgeon book launch could 'seriously' harm his sales Jenrick, widely seen as a potential future Tory leader, had a one-on-one chat with Vance at an 18th-century Georgian manor in the Cotswolds before the pair went to a drinks event. It will further fuel speculation that Jenrick (below) is coming for Badenoch's job as Conservative leader. She took over from Rishi Sunak following last year's historic election defeat. Her time at the top has seen her criticised for failing to make a mark, while Jenrick's energetic campaigning has often directed the news agenda. READ MORE: JK Rowling responds as Nicola Sturgeon blames her for 'vile' gender row abuse Vance is himself tipped as a successor to Donald Trump, who is barred from running for re-election once his second presidential term is up in 2029. His meeting with Farage, who is seen as a likely candidate for Britain's next prime minister, may be read as a sign he is preparing for the eventuality both ascend to the highest political office in their respective countries. Vance is expected to visit Scotland in the coming days.
