
Soldiers have a huge stake in Ukraine-Russia drone-tech arms race
Ukrainian drone warfare has evolved from improvisation to a high‑volume, precision‑strike ecosystem that Russia often struggles to match. With some operators flying up to 15 missions a day and factories now producing millions of drones, Ukraine's domestic drone production has reached an unprecedented scale.
These drones have become central to Ukraine's battlefield strategy – pinpointing, punishing and relentlessly pushing back Russian forces – even as some analysts question how long Ukraine can hold its technological advantage.
Russian troops, by contrast, are often starved for drones. Some battalions receive just 10 to 15 FPV (first-person view) drones per week. 'We know where they are flying from, but there is nothing to kill with,' lamented one Russian operator. A Russian drone developer recently admitted, 'Modern combat realities prompt us to modernize and iterate on drones practically every month.'
Regulatory bottlenecks have made matters worse. 'Heavy drones now require state approval,' wrote a Russian blogger, noting that units have begun constructing their own drones to fill the vacuum left by the faltering domestic drone industry. An FPV drone is being prepared for combat operations in Eastern Ukraine. Photo: David Kirichenko
One of the standout innovations has been Ukraine's development of the Vampire – a heavy multirotor drone the Russians have nicknamed Baba Yaga after a mythical Slavic witch. Russian forces have attempted crude countermeasures, attaching long sticks to their FPV drones to intercept Ukraine's bulky bombers. Russian soldiers, when the Baba Yaga drone flies overhead, are terrified of the resulting impact.
While Ukraine continues to develop newer platforms, it has also refined older systems to enhance their impact on the battlefield. Mavic drones pioneered the use of light bombing in Ukraine, serving as lethal anti-personnel systems early in the war.
But FPVs have since taken over the role, offering greater payload capacity and flexibility. Some FPV drones now carry up to six VOG high-explosive grenade bombs – compared with the two typically deployed by Mavics – allowing for more impactful strikes with greater reach and frequency. Ukrainian drone operators are loading T-62 anti-tank mines onto a heavy bomber drone. Photo: David Kirichenko
One of the more recent innovations pushing that edge is the emergence of mothership drones. Ukraine is using mothership drones – large unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) capable of carrying and launching multiple FPV drones – to conduct long-range strikes behind enemy lines.
In the (translated) words of one Russian commentator,
FPV drones are about tactical dominance. They bring chaos, fear and uncertainty to close combat. They are not feared, they are hated. They are cheap, massive and deadly effective. And their potential grows with each passing day: AI guidance, automated launches, swarms. These are no longer makeshift weapons, but new close-combat artillery.
FPV drones have emerged as a key interceptor weapon to target Russian reconnaissance drones for the Ukrainian military. The Russians use the FPV drones to target Ukrainian Baba Yaga drones. Yurii, a drone pilot in Ukraine's 23rd Mechanized Brigade, has been fighting since 2014 and is regarded as one of the best pilots in the unit. Photo: David Kirichenko
Much of Ukraine's operational drone success stems from specialized units. The Birds of Magyar, one of Ukraine's most prolific drone units, released some data from the outfit's drone operations. In March 2025 alone, the unit executed more than 11,600 sorties, hitting over 5,300 targets. Most of these were achieved with FPV drones (67%) and heavy bombers (31%). While viral FPV strike videos captivate online audiences, the less glamorous Baba Yaga night bombers may in fact inflict the bulk of real-world damage.
These UAVs specialize in demolishing infrastructure and personnel shelters, not just enemy armour. The March tally: 1,701 strikes on Russian infantry, resulting in 1,002 confirmed kills, and dozens of bunker-busting missions. Furthermore, in April, Ukrainian drone brigades reported striking 83,000 Russian targets – marking a 5 percent increase compared to March.
Dmytro Lysenko, a drone pilot with the 109th Separate Territorial Defense Brigade, before he was killed in combat in 2024 stated: 'Even when we drop explosives from drones on Russians, I sometimes shiver and feel discomfort because I remember all those times I was sitting in a trench.' He added, 'The Russians would shoot at us with everything possible. But the drone was the scariest. A shell can fly and miss and that's it. But a drone pilot aims and will be very accurate when they drop an explosive.'
Russian milblogger 'Vault 8' highlighted how Ukrainian FPV and reconnaissance drones dominate territory up to 25 kilometers behind the front line, making road travel highly dangerous and turning rear areas into what he calls a 'highway of death,' where even vehicles far from the front are frequently destroyed. Both sides are having to adapt to this reality.
In 2024, one drone pilot told me that at some point in the near future, heavy armor won't be able to get within 10km (six miles) of the front and that 'Autonomous drones will patrol the skies and will be taking out all the heavy armor.' Now, Ukraine is using these drones to build a 'drone wall' along the front line, extending the no-man's land for dozens of kilometers and deterring Russian advances through constant aerial threat.
Russia, for months, has been using motorcycles to spearhead its suicidal offensives, mainly due to a shortage of armored vehicles because of Ukrainian drones.
Ukraine's 425th Skala Assault Regiment recently established its own motorcycle assault company. With FPV drones acting as the new artillery of modern warfare, motorcycles now offer one of the best chances for assault units to quickly break through. A Ukrainian FPV drone loaded with small explosives in Chasiv Yar. Photo: David Kirichenko
Beyond direct attacks, the unit also lays mines, conducts drone reconnaissance (more than 10,000 missions to date) and is testing jamming-resistant drones. With national production surging to 200,000 drones a month, the kill rate of Birds of Magyar has soared, from under 300 targets a year ago to over 5,000 now. The drone unit is now averaging one Russian killed every 6.5 minutes.
Even Ukraine's logistics have gone airborne. 'Vampire drones have now started to be used as logistics drones in some directions,' said Oleksii, a drone unit commander in the 108th Separate Territorial Defense Brigade. (The Ukrainian military protocol is for active duty personnel to provide only their given names.) They carry food and ammunition to frontline units, flying at low altitudes to avoid detection.
'FPVs ranging from 10 to 15 inches are being used,' Oleksii said. 'Unlike the Vampire, the FPV crew is much more mobile.' And while bombers must drop payloads from high altitudes to avoid small arms fire, FPVs can dive directly into a one-meter target.
'They're both effective, but each has its nuances,' said Danilo, a drone pilot for the 108th. 'FPVs are more effective against pinpoint targets, where the scale of damage doesn't matter but accuracy does.' For hardened positions, Danilo adds, FPVs fall short: 'A Vampire drone can drop a couple of TM-62 mines and take care of it. But it's a big drone, bulky, and requires a crew. It's harder to work with.'
Oleksii further described the challenge: 'With a Vampire, you still need to transport it by vehicle. That means you either have to get close to the position or fly it from a long distance. At long range, it's very visible in thermal cameras and can be intercepted, even shot down by another FPV, before it even crosses the line of contact.'
In some cases, however, FPVs outperform the Baba Yaga. 'FPVs, even with an effectiveness rate of 30-40%, cause more damage than the Vampire,' said Andrii of the 59th Brigade (Da Vinci Wolves). That's because Russian vehicles often stay far from the frontline. 'Not every Vampire can reach that far, but most FPVs can.' Moreover, FPVs fare better under Russian jamming, as they can switch control frequencies mid-flight, something the Vampire cannot do.
One Russian reported that Ukraine's heavy drone bombers – targeting artillery crews, tanks, and command posts – offer a major strategic advantage due to Ukraine's systematic development and deployment methods.
Ukraine also recently recorded its first confirmed kill using a drone-mounted grenade launcher, highlighting how the technological drone race continues to evolve.
Even Ukraine's logistics have gone airborne. 'Vampires have now started to be used as logistics drones in some directions,' said Oleksii. They carry food and ammunition to frontline units, flying at low altitudes to avoid detection. 'FPVs ranging from 10 to 15 inches are being used. Unlike the Vampire, the FPV crew is much more mobile.' And while bombers must drop payloads from high altitudes to avoid small arms fire, FPVs can dive directly into a one-meter target. Soldiers from Ukraine's 23rd Mechanized Brigade are setting up a heavy bomber drone to conduct operations in Chasiv Yar. Photo David Kirichenko
Russia, meanwhile, is still scrambling to respond. It lacks anything comparable to the Vampire/Baba Yaga. 'Ukraine invested in its fleet of larger, long-range drones as a response to Russia's investment in Shahed/Geran drones,' observed Samuel Bendett, an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.
'Russia seems to be satisfied with Geran performance to date, has invested heavily in their mass production (many thousands to date) and seems to be content with their relatively low cost,' said Bendett. However, he also noted that 'since these drones have different ranges and different missions, they should not be compared to smaller FPVs, which have a different range and different tactical applications.'
'Ukrainian Vampire-type heavy drones have a complementary role to FPVs,' explained Roy Gardiner, an open-source weapons researcher and former Canadian officer. 'While FPVs attack Russian logistics vehicles during the day, heavy drones attack the same vehicles at night by precision mining Russian roads. The Russians complain the Ukrainian Baba Yagas have significantly increased in numbers, sometimes attacking several at a time and increasingly during the day.'
'There have been indications that Russian drone units have been forbidden to make direct purchases without permission from above,' said Gardiner. In the meantime, Russian units have resorted to bizarre improvisations, including the 'Vobla,' a jerry-rigged drone with four quadcopters connected to a single flight controller.
'Russia has made a lot of noise about developing a domestic drone industry, which of course has failed to deliver,' wrote Gardiner.
With its drone innovation, Ukraine is positioning itself as a future defense hub for Europe. 'Ukrainians are training NATO in Poland and the UK, and have consulted with the Pentagon about their innovative use of US equipment,' said Branislav Slantchev, a political science professor at UC San Diego. 'Ukraine's defense industry will be massive,' he added. Ukraine 'was a critical hub in Soviet production and will now be part of Europe's.'
Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine's former commander-in-chief, said, 'Europe needs Ukraine as a shield. We have the biggest army on the continent. We are the only one with an army that knows how to contain Russia.'
Zaluzhnyi added, 'The only one with an army that knows how to wage modern, high-tech warfare.'
An associate research fellow of the London-based Henry Jackson Society think tank, David Kirichenko is a Ukrainian-American freelance journalist, activist and security engineer who, multiple times during the Ukraine War, has traveled to and worked in the areas being fought over. He can be found on the social media platform X @DVKirichenko

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTHK
3 hours ago
- RTHK
UK to build attack subs as part of defence review
UK to build attack subs as part of defence review Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer visited the BAE Systems' Govan shipbuilding site. Photo: Reuters Britain announced on Monday that it would build 12 new attack submarines as it launched a major defence review to move the country to "war-fighting readiness" in the face of "Russian aggression" and the changing nature of conflict. Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned that "the threat we now face is more serious, more immediate and more unpredictable than at any time since the Cold War," as he launched the review in Glasgow. "We face war in Europe, new nuclear risks, daily cyberattacks, growing Russian aggression in our waters, menacing our skies," he added. The Strategic Defence Review, which assesses threats facing the United Kingdom and makes recommendations, said that Britain was entering "a new era of threat". As a result, Starmer said his government aimed to deliver three "fundamental changes". "First, we are moving to war-fighting readiness as the central purpose of our armed forces," he said. "Every part of society, every citizen of this country, has a role to play, because we have to recognise that things have changed in the world of today. The front line, if you like, is here." Secondly, the prime minister insisted that UK defence policy would "always be Nato first", and finally that the UK "will innovate and accelerate innovation at a wartime pace so we can meet the threats of today and of tomorrow." The UK has been racing to rearm on a perceived Russian threat and fears that US President Donald Trump will no longer help protect Europe. Starmer said the review would serve as "a blueprint for strength and security for decades to come", taking into account the increasing use of drones and artificial intelligence on the battlefield. His government pledged in February to lift defence spending to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2027 in the "largest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War". And despite budget constraints, it aims for spending to rise to three percent in the next parliamentary term, due in 2029. (AFP)


RTHK
3 hours ago
- RTHK
Russia sets out strict terms at peace talks
Russia sets out strict terms at peace talks The second round of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine took place in Istanbul. Photo: Reuters Russia told Ukraine at peace talks on Monday that it would only agree to end the war, if Kyiv gives up big new chunks of territory and accepts limits on the size of its army, according to a memorandum reported by Russian media. The terms, formally presented at negotiations in Istanbul, highlighted Moscow's refusal to compromise on its long-standing war goals. The Russian memorandum, published by the Interfax news agency, said a settlement of the war would require international recognition of Crimea and four other regions of Ukraine that Moscow has claimed as its own territory. Ukraine would have to withdraw its forces from all of them. Option one, according to the text, was for Ukraine to start a full military withdrawal from the Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. Of those, Russia fully controls the first but holds only about 70 percent of the rest. Option two was a package that would require Ukraine to cease military redeployments and accept a halt to foreign provision of military aid, satellite communications and intelligence. Kyiv would also have to lift martial law and hold presidential and parliamentary elections within 100 days. Russian delegation head Vladimir Medinsky said Moscow had also suggested a "specific ceasefire of two to three days in certain sections of the front" so that the bodies of dead soldiers could be collected. Ukrainian Defence Minister Rustem Umerov, who headed Kyiv's delegation, offered no immediate comment on the memorandum. Delegations from the warring sides met for barely an hour for the second round of negotiations. They agreed to exchange more prisoners of war – focusing on the youngest and most severely wounded – and return the bodies of 12,000 dead soldiers. Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said he hoped to bring together Russia's Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskiy for a meeting in Turkey with Trump. But there was no breakthrough on a proposed ceasefire that Ukraine, its European allies and Washington have all urged Russia to accept. Ukraine has proposed holding more talks before the end of June, but believes only a meeting between Zelenskiy and Putin can resolve the many issues of contention, Ukrainian Defence Minister Rustem Umerov said. (Reuters)


Asia Times
8 hours ago
- Asia Times
Ukraine targets Russian bases to force Trump's hand
In a brilliant operation that the Ukrainians say took 18 months to pull off, Ukraine attacked five Russian strategic bases, destroying and damaging Russian nuclear bombers. This is not the first time that Ukraine has attacked a Russian nuclear bomber site and other nuclear installations, including strategic missile early warning radars and closer-in Russian bomber bases. But this time, the attacks were very deep inside Russia. The Russians do not use shelters for their bomber fleet, a measure that a number of Russian defense experts have demanded, but without success in persuading the authorities in Moscow. While shelters probably are inadequate against heavy missiles, they would more than suffice against small drones. The US has a similar problem. A new independent report says that US airbases have been left worryingly vulnerable, especially in the Indo-Pacific region, by a lack of investment in new hardened aircraft shelters, or even unhardened ones. ( There are some aspects of the attack that warrant attention. The first is that a strike deep inside Russia was in parallel to other large-scale Ukrainian drone attacks closer to their shared border with Russia. Additionally, there were attacks on rail bridges and rail lines in Bryansk and Kursk. While Russian President Vladimir Putin was being briefed on the rail line attacks in the middle of the night, his air bases were exploding elsewhere. It is also noteworthy that the bases under drone attack appear not to have air defenses, or at least air defenses capable of engaging small FPV drones. The Ukrainians probably learned this from NATO overhead intelligence sources. There are no reports of any of the drones aimed at the five bases being shot down. Early reports suggested that the drones used in the attack were connected by satellite to Ukraine's GUR (military intelligence) command centers. More recent information, and more reliable, is that the Ukrainian drones were operated through the LTE cellphone network in Russia. LTE (which stands for Long Term Evolution) is a 4G cellular network and serves as the backbone of Russia's cellular system. The Ukrainians had no difficulty acquiring SIM cards for the drones and the containers that contained them, which were carried in commercial trucks. Reports indicate that the containers opened when they were within range of the targets. There is at least one report where a container top opened prematurely and the truck driver tried to push it closed, leading to an explosion. In another case, a truck was stopped and captured. Drone carrying containers in an assembly warehouse. The Ukrainians also had no difficulty sending these large containers into Russia and putting them aboard trucks in a warehouse in Chelyabinsk. Chelyabinsk is a city in west-central Russia, close to the Ural Mountains. From there, the drone trucks were sent to pre-designated locations. To do this and run such an operation a good sized team would have been needed. Ukraine claims they were all exfiltrated from Russian territory before the launch of the operation. Allegedly, the truck drivers were hired without knowing the contents of the cargo. The brazenness of the operation, which risked exposure along the way but was never uncovered, suggests a massive failure of Russian intelligence and a completely incompetent internal security system. Russia's backside has been heavily exposed to infiltration and intelligence operations managed by Ukraine. While it has caught a number of relatively small fish, important government buildings, apartment blocks, theaters and military bases, along with frequent assassinations of Ukraine's military and political enemies, have been targeted and hardly been challenged. Conversely, Russia has been unable to threaten Ukraine in a parallel manner, relying on missile and drone strikes to 'retaliate.' Even intelligence on Putin's secret visit to Kursk was leaked to Ukraine, resulting in an attack on Putin's helicopter that came close to shooting it down. There are rumors that Putin is shaking up the FSB, Russia's successor to the KGB. It is impossible to determine whether this will improve Russia's internal security. There appears to be at least good circumstantial evidence that critical Russian civil and military institutions are infiltrated either by paid spies or by anti-Putin and anti-war factions. Russia's current troubles are, at least in part, not only a result of good Ukrainian intelligence operations, but also of years of effort by Western spy agencies, especially the UK's MI-6, to try and destabilize Russia and bring down the Putin regime. But there is even more. Trying to knock out strategic nuclear facilities, flirting even with a nuclear attack, is not very much in Ukraine's interest, as Ukraine would be the first victim of a fierce Russian reaction. Such an attack is, however, consistent with what appears to be the NATO program to destabilize the Russian government and kill Putin. In addition, and even more profoundly, the British and their European partners – the EU, France and Germany – are deeply concerned that the US is removing itself from the Ukraine war and possibly even pulling US troops out of NATO, at least some to start. The Europeans know that this exposes them to an angry and dangerous Russia, so it is in their interest to try and push the US back into its traditional role of Europe's protector. Of course, this conflicts with rising US concern about China and its growing military capability that threatens US interests much more directly than anything that can be conjured up on behalf of NATO expansion in Ukraine. If this assessment is right, US President Donald Trump is being worked over, and the air base and other attacks deep inside Russia are intended to grow the threat to Europe and Ukraine – and do so urgently. The above assessment is also consistent with other collateral information. The negotiations now underway again in Istanbul appear to have generated a split between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his defense minister, Rustem Umarov. Reports say that Umarov wants to find a way to make the Istanbul negotiations work while Zelensky is making every effort to scuttle them. Despite the latest attacks inside Russia, the Russians also appear to still want to try and see if progress can be made. In the previous round of negotiations, when the Russians launched heavy missile and drone attacks on Ukraine, President Trump complained bitterly about Putin, suggesting he had gone 'crazy.' This time, Trump is completely silent about the latest Ukrainian attacks on Russian territory. Was Trump caught by surprise? Did he have prior notice, and if he did, why did he agree? Axios initially reported that Trump was briefed ahead of time, but then hastily changed the story to reflect pushback from the US administration, stating that they did not know. One wonders where Axios got the original information, although it takes little guesswork that it came from some friendly foreign intelligence sources. The bottom line is that the Trump administration was caught by surprise and, in fact, does not know what to do right now. Perhaps that is because these reckless attacks were aimed more at Washington than Moscow. Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. This article, which originally appeared on his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.