Global media reports Israel-Iran ceasefire with caution, speculation
A lot of uncertainty surrounds Trump 's announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran after 12 days of war. The language in the press is very cautious. The New York Times website's front page reads "Iran announces ceasefire, but status is unclear". There's no comment from Israel, which warns of continued Iranian attacks, while Iranian state television is making the announcement of a ceasefire, hours after Trump's comments. The Washington Post is also reiterating this message, albeit cautiously: "Iran appears to confirm it'll cease attacks on Israel". Haaretz, the Israeli centre-left daily, reports that six waves of missiles have hit Israel since daybreak, killing several people.
The conservative magazine National Review has published an exclusive report which looks at why Trump is particularly wary of the Iranian threat. If US strikes against Iran appear to be an escalation of the conflict, the National Review explains that this stems from a personal fear. The article details how seriously the Trump team has taken the threat of Iran. It feared Iranian retaliation against him after the 2020 assassination of Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. As far back as 2022, Trump's team cancelled certain international events for fear of exposing him to Iranian threats. The magazine even says that the failed 2024 Pennsylvania assassination attempt on Trump never yielded a culprit, but that senior campaign staff suspect it may have been part of an Iranian murder-for-hire plot. This takes on new importance given Trump's approval of US strikes against Iran. The National Review says that those who have worked for Trump for years speculate that the regime's assassination plots against him have "hardened his resolve against Iran".
The Financial Times says the last 48 hours have been a real headspin. On Sunday, Trump appeared open to regime change in Tehran, alarming his isolationalist allies on the right. On Monday, he called for a complete ceasefire. It appears, the FT says, that the trigger for this about-face was the limited nature of Iran's response: attacking a US military base in Qatar, but giving ample notice beforehand. For the Emirati paper The National, it's clear that Trump has gone from being a "peacemaker to a wartime president". It also notes a biting coincidence: just as Trump authorised the US strikes on Iran, Pakistan announced it would be putting his name forward for a Nobel Peace Prize for his "pivotal leadership and peacemaker role in the recent Kashmir conflict". If Trump's goal by attacking Iran was peace, it's a roaring success, the Guardian says ironically with a cartoon of the US president depluming a dove.
All these developments come just as NATO leaders prepare to meet at The Hague for a summit beginning this Tuesday. La Croix, the French daily, is looking at the summit on its front page. "NATO under pressure", the paper says. La Croix's editor says the conflict in the Middle East has forced a change in the order of things to discuss at this summit and it will cause an upheaval in European defence, inevitably shifting some focus away from what the bloc believed was the immediate threat: Russia.
The editors of the Washington Post, meanwhile, reiterate a common gripe of Trump's – that Europe needs to more for its security. Spain has already rejected NATO's calls for the Alliance to dedicate 5 percent of its budget to defence spending, with NATO chief Mark Rutte agreeing to exempt Madrid. A somewhat exasperated Post says that Spain's obstinance gives Trump fodder to call into question the US's commitment to NATO and gives other European countries an excuse to drag their feet down the road on the issue of defence spending.
As Politico advises: "If you ask European officials, the goal is simple at this summit. Keep it short, keep it smooth and keep Donald Trump from blowing it up."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Iran nuclear programme only setback by months
A new US intelligence report found that Iran's nuclear programme has only been set back a few months after US strikes targeted three of the country's nuclear sites last week. The report released by the US Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) – intelligence arm of the Pentagon – contradicts statements made by US President Donald Trump on Saturday night immediately following the conclusion of what he called a 'targeted and precise' operation. Trump said in a televised press conference along with his Vice President JD Vance, State Secretary Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth that Washington's strikes had 'completely and fully obliterated' Iran's nuclear sites. Trump stated that Iran's Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities were dealt damage that sets them back years. The sites were attacked by the US' 30,000 pound (13,600 kg) 'bunker buster' bombs. While satellite imagery showed significant damage to the sites, the report suggests that most of the damage was contained to above ground structures. At the Fordo uranium enrichment facility, Iran's most well-protected site, located deep underground, the entrance has collapsed and the infrastructure has sustained damage, necessitating time for repairs. However, the underground infrastructure remains intact, as stated by an official familiar with the situation. The report's findings also showed that some of Iran's highly enriched uranium was moved out of multiple sites before the US strikes began and survived. The report asserted that Tehran had moved the uranium to other secret nuclear facilities it maintains. The DIA also found that most of Iran's centrifuges are largely intact. The White House strongly pushed back on the assessment, calling it 'flat-out wrong.' 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration,' she added. Trump has said in comments and posts on social media in recent days, including Tuesday, that the strikes left the sites in Iran 'totally destroyed' and that Iran will never rebuild its nuclear facilities. Netanyahu said in a televised statement on Tuesday that, 'For dozens of years I promised you that Iran would not have nuclear weapons and indeed ... we brought to ruin Iran's nuclear programme." Netanyahu, speaking a day after Trump announced a US, Qatari-brokered ceasefire between the two nations, claimed that their 12-day campaign on Iran was a 'historic victory'. 'We removed two imminent existential threats – the annihilation threat by nuclear bombs and the annihilation threat with 20 thousand ballistic missiles.' Iran said on Tuesday that it was ready to return to the negotiating table with the United States. Tehran however asserted that it will always continue to defend its 'legitimate rights' and will respond to any Israeli breach of the current truce.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Trump plays deft hand with Iran-Israel ceasefire but doubts remain
Israel, Iran and Trump himself all declared victory after 12 days of conflict that culminated Saturday in the United States bombing Iran's key nuclear sites. After facing criticism -- even within his base -- for breaking his campaign promises against military intervention abroad, Trump was able to show a quick way out, and to portray himself, despite the bombing, as a peacemaker. "I don't think the Israeli government was able to sustain a long-term war, but I think the main factor here was President Trump. He did not want to see a new war in the region break out under his watch," said Will Todman, a senior fellow at the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "That is what changed the calculation for Israel and for Iran as well." Trump startled even close aides and allies by announcing the ceasefire on social media late Monday -- the middle of the night in the Middle East -- just after Iran fired missiles at a US base in Qatar, in what appeared to be a choreographed response as the rockets were easily shot down. Trump chose not to retaliate against Iran and on Tuesday, returned to his electronic bully pulpit to urge Israel to abort new attacks on Iran. Iran needed an off-ramp as it suffered its worst assault since the 1980-88 war with Iraq. Trump also appeared to offer incentives to sanctions-bound Iran by suggesting an easing of US pressure on China to stop buying Iranian oil. Israel's military, while proving itself to be the region's strongest, has been stretched by campaigns in Gaza, Syria and Lebanon, and with Iranian strikes this month, the Israeli population endured the most prolonged, deadly air attacks seen in decades. After Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed Trump's intervention, the president's warning Tuesday likely also showed him the limits to US support, Todman said. What was achieved? Trump hailed his intervention as a monumental success, although critics have long warned that an attack could make Iran rush, more clandestinely, to a nuclear bomb. While Trump claimed Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated," a classified report found that the US bombing did not destroy the core parts of the three nuclear sites, according to CNN and The New York Times. Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, said it's too early to know if the ceasefire would hold, either. He said that Gulf Arab powers, led by well-connected Qatar, did the hard work of quiet diplomacy as they sought a return to calm in their region. "Trump vocally used his troll power to try to restrain the actions of Israel and Iran, but that matters less compared with the role that these countries continuously play," Katulis said of Gulf Arab states. Katulis, who worked on the Middle East for former president Bill Clinton, said the Trump administration's tactical military operations, combined with "a heavy dose of strategic communications" confused Americans and global actors alike "about what it is we're actually trying to get done." Showing heft at home One area where Trump's diplomacy had clear -- if short-term -- benefits was at home. A prolonged US military campaign "had the potential to really fracture President Trump's own base of support," said Jonathan Panikoff, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. But now, "my guess is the majority of his MAGA and other Republican base will stay relatively unified, even if they were unthrilled in some quarters," he said. While traditional hawks of Trump's Republican Party largely cheered the Iran strikes, they were widely but not universally denounced by rival Democrats. Annelle Sheline, who resigned from the State Department to protest policies under former president Joe Biden and is now at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said it was critical for Trump to enforce the ceasefire. She noted Israel has bombed Lebanon and Gaza during truces, saying Netanyahu believed he enjoyed "America's unconditional support." "Trump demonstrated that he can rein in Israel when he chooses to do so. Now he must do the same to insist on a ceasefire in Gaza," she said.
AFP
2 hours ago
- AFP
Image of Obama bowing to Khamenei is doctored
"Sums it up," says a June 22, 2025 post sharing the image on Facebook. Image Screenshot from Facebook taken June 24, 2025 The post comes from conservative comedian Terrence Williams, whom AFP has previously fact-checked for spreading other misinformation. Similar posts spread across X after Trump said June 21 that the US military had executed a "very successful attack" on three Iranian nuclear sites, including the underground uranium enrichment facility at Fordo. The operation, dubbed "Midnight Hammer," added to a more than week-long Israeli campaign that also targeted Tehran's top military brass, fueling fears of a wide regional conflict. The US president announced a fragile ceasefire in the war between Iran and Israel June 23 after Tehran fired ballistic missiles at a US base in Qatar. The escalation came almost a decade after Obama and other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council sealed a deal with Iran called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. The agreement placed significant restrictions on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. in 2018 during his first term, and his administration had been seeking to chart a new deal before Israel's June 13 strikes on Iran. The US president had long criticized his predecessor's signature foreign police achievement and campaigned in 2016 on torpedoing the deal. But the image purporting to show Obama bowing to Khamenei is a fake, with two separate photos edited together to create a composite picture that has circulated online for years. Reverse image searches revealed that the original photo of Obama is a famous shot, captured by then-official White House photographer Pete Souza, of the Democrat bending over so that the young Black son of another White House staffer could feel his head and see if they had the similar hair (archived here and here). Souza took the photo in May 2009 -- years before Obama signed the Iran nuclear accord in 2015. Image Screenshot from Flickr taken June 24, 2025 An AFP photojournalist snapped the picture of Khamenei even earlier, in August 2005, during a ceremony to inaugurate former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who served until 2013. In the real photo, Ahmadinejad is standing to Khamenei's left -- not Obama. Image Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei (C) attends the presidential inaugural ceremony of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Tehran August 3, 2005 (AFP / ATTA KENARE) AFP has debunked other misinformation about Iran here.
