Louisiana's juvenile crime amendment draws bipartisan opposition, district attorney support
Voters leave the Bricolage Academy gym after casting their ballots in New Orleans, Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2024. (Matthew Perschall for Louisiana Illuminator)
It's not everyday that conservative activist Chris Alexander finds himself on the same side of a political fight as the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana. But a ballot measure that could make it easier to send minors to adult prisons has brought him together with many liberal advocates.
Alexander runs the Louisiana Citizen Advocacy Group and produces a podcast called 'State of Freedom.' He's known for his fights against vaccine mandates and denying the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
More recently, however, he has been campaigning against Constitutional Amendment 3 on the March 29 ballot. The proposal would give the Louisiana Legislature more authority to expand the list of crimes for which a person under 17 could be sent to an adult prison.
Persons age 14-16 can already be treated as adults in the criminal justice system when accused of one of 16 serious offenses, including murder, rape and armed robbery. If Amendment 3 passes, lawmakers would have the authority to add other felonies to that list without voters' permission.
'It's going to do nothing to reduce crime in Louisiana. Nothing,' Alexander said in an interview last week.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
A menagerie of groups who oppose Amendment 3 repeated that sentiment ahead of early voting, which started Saturday. They range from the Louisiana Federation of Teachers, one of the state's largest unions, to the Leaders for a Better Louisiana, made up of business leaders.
Among the most surprising opponents are eight retired Louisiana juvenile justice and prison officials, including two former heads of the state juvenile justice system, a previous director of probation and parole services, and a retired adult prison warden. They released a statement this week encouraging people to vote against Amendment 3.
'The professionals in corrections that worked in this field do not think this is a good idea,' said Mary Livers, former deputy secretary of juvenile justice under Gov. Bobby Jindal. 'We do not want to send more kids to adult prisons. That may get people elected but it's not good policy.' But Gov. Jeff Landry, the most powerful elected official in the state, is personally backing the amendment. He won his 2024 campaign by promising to bring a tough-on-crime approach back to Louisiana and capitalized on a crime spike during the COVID-19 pandemic to increase funding for law enforcement and lengthen prison sentences. Last week in Terrebonne Parish, the governor encouraged people at a business group luncheon to vote in favor of Amendment 3, characterizing it as another step toward increasing public safety.
'[R]ight now on the ballot, there are four amendments, and one of those amendments is Amendment 3 that is going to further aid us,' he said.
But opponents argue there is no evidence that putting younger teenagers in adult prisons makes communities safer as Landry claims.
The amendment opponents also point to scientific studies that show a person's brain doesn't fully develop until their mid-20s, meaning younger people who commit crimes have far more capacity for rehabilitation. Teenagers' lack of brain development also explains why they exhibit poor judgment and commit offenses they might not do once they reach adulthood. The U.S. Supreme Court has found this brain science so convincing, they ruled in multiple cases to limit criminal sentences for minors. The justices abolished the death penalty and life sentences for all crimes except murder for defendants in their adolescence.
Still, Amendment 3 has one powerful group of supporters: The Louisiana District Attorneys Association has endorsed the proposal, executive director Zach Daniels said.
Current restrictions in the Louisiana Constitution make it difficult for state lawmakers to respond to modern public safety concerns, Daniels said. He considers the list of crimes that allow someone under 17 to be transferred into adult outdated, and said lawmakers need to be able to revise it without having to go through a statewide vote each time.
'None of that should have been in the constitution to begin with,' Jefferson Parish Sheriff Joe Lopinto, who also supports the amendment, said in an interview.
Amendment supporters point to carjacking as an example of an offense that should be added to the list of crimes.
State Rep. Debbie Villio, a Republican who sponsored the legislation to get Amendment 3 on the ballot, said in January that she would likely file a bill to expand the types of carjackings that could land a younger teen in adult prison if voters approve the measure.
Minors as young as 15 can already go to adult prison for carjacking with a weapon under the state's armed robbery statute. Villio wants to add carjacking 'by use of force or intimidation' — in other words without a weapon — to the list of crimes could get a younger minor transferred to adult prison.
Should that happen, 15- and 16-year-olds could face much longer sentences. An adult found guilty of carjacking without a weapon can be put in prison five to 20 years for an initial conviction, a maximum sentence four times longer than the current guidelines for people under 17.
Amendment opponents argue putting more teens into adult facilities will be expensive for the state. Teenagers are easily influenced by older prisoners and more vulnerable to coercion and threats, they maintain. It takes more prison staff and more money to keep them safe in adult correctional facilities, according to Kelly Ward, a retired warden who managed the David Wade Correctional Center in Homer who is against the amendment. The federal government also requires adult prisons to house minors separate from incarcerated adults.
'If you are going to spend money on additional resources, then why not take those resources and apply them into a juvenile system that is designed for that age group?' Ward said.
It's not clear there's a formal political campaign in support of Amendment 3.
Daniels said it was be left up to individual district attorneys to decide how much they want to campaign for the proposal. Landry, who has vast political resources, could put up money for a late advertising push if he wanted, but there isn't a high-profile effort to do so yet.
The amendment's opposition has a more visible public campaign two weeks out from the election. A large coalition of mostly left-leaning organizations has launched a 'No on 3' website and has paid for digital advertising, yard signs and direct mail pieces across the state. 'The Legislature is asking for a blank check to fill our adult jails and prisons with children,' said Sara Omojola, a criminal justice advocate and coordinator for the 'No on 3' coalition. 'We can't really trust them with that judgement and that power.'
At least two influential, right-leaning groups working to pass the three other amendments on the March 29 ballot are sitting out the Amendment 3 fight. The Pelican Institute, a conservative think tank focused on Louisiana, is encouraging its followers to vote yes on every other proposal except Amendment 3, for which it hasn't taken a position. The Louisiana Association of Business and Industry also announced its support for every amendment except for No. 3 this month.
Will Greene, LABI's CEO and president, said the group decided not to take a stance because the amendment didn't touch upon the group's main mission to improve Louisiana's business climate.
Editor Greg LaRose contributed to this report.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Train service between Moscow and North Korea's Pyongyang to resume this month, says Russia
(Reuters) -Russia and North Korea plan to restart a direct passenger train service between Moscow and the North Korean capital Pyongyang this month for the first time since 2020, Russia's state-owned rail monopoly said on Monday. Russian Railways said it had agreed with North Korea's railways ministry to resume a twice-monthly service between the two capitals on June 17, a journey it said took eight days and which, at over 10,000 km (6,213 miles), was the longest direct rail journey in the world. Another service between Pyongyang and Khabarovsk, a Russian city close to China's northeastern border, will restart two days later. The services will be operated by Korean State Railway, the state operator, and in the case of the Moscow-Pyongyang route will see a North Korean passenger railcar hitched to the regular Moscow-Vladivostok service and then re-attached to another train. Passenger rail traffic between Russia and North Korea was suspended in February 2020 at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. Moscow and Pyongyang have since ratcheted up cooperation, including in the military sphere since President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un signed a comprehensive strategic partnership treaty last year. North Korea confirmed in late April that it had sent more than 10,000 troops and weapons to Russia to assist in its war in Ukraine, aid which proved crucial for Moscow in recapturing Russia's western Kursk region from Ukraine. The two countries already operate a passenger rail service between Vladivostok in Russia's Far East and Rason, a North Korean port city. The nations are also linked by freight rail networks, although Russia does not disclose the size of the cargo traffic.


New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
London's lefty mayor touts record numbers of Americans applying for British citizenship
They're trading their sneakers for trainers and elevators for lifts. A record number of Americans have applied to become British citizens, London's lefty mayor touted at an event in the UK Monday. 'I've got to say we're delighted that record numbers of Americans are applying for British citizenship or to live and work here, and that many are choosing to settle in London,' Sadiq Khan told the crowd at the Concordia Europe Summit, as he heralded the capital as a 'beacon of hope, progress and possibility.' Some 1,931 Americans applied for UK citizenship in the first three months of 2025, according to figures from the UK Home Office — marking the highest number since recordkeeping began in 2004. Advertisement REUTERS Meanwhile, the number of US citizens applying to settle in the UK as their permanent home — rather than just move there for an undefined period — also hit a record last year, with more than 5,500 Americans granted settled status, a 20% increase from 2023. 'Our city will always offer newcomers a warm welcome,' Khan added. Advertisement AP However, at the same time, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the government was planning to impose more stringent requirements on legal migrants, while also extending the time newcomers would have to wait to claim citizenship. In a news conference earlier this month, Starmer declared an end to a 'squalid chapter' that has seen migration to the UK more than triple over the last 10 years, which he called 'a failed experiment in open borders.' In a policy paper last month, Starmer — who previously championed the significant increase of migrants to the city — called the damage caused by immigration to the country 'incalculable.' Advertisement Around 5,800 Americans gave up their US citizenship during the first six months of 2020, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and at a time of widespread social and political upheaval in the country. However, taxes were also cited as another reason some made the decision, Alistair Bambridge, a partner at Bambridge Accountants, told CNN at the time. 'These are mainly people who already left the US and just decided they've had enough of everything,' he said. The surge in would-be expatriates in the first quarter of 2025 is a 12% increase from the previous quarter, continuing a sharp uptick in the trend which started in the middle of 2024.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Michigan proposal to tax the rich, fund schools raises questions with business groups
(Getty Images) A group of Michigan educational and labor organizations launched a ballot initiative to let Michigan voters decide if they want to place higher taxes on wealthy Michiganders to fund public K-12 schools this week and business groups are questioning how beneficial the change would be for the state. Michigan's 4.25% income tax rate has billionaires and teachers paying the same rate, Michigan Education Justice Coalition, one of the education groups behind the ballot initiative to add a 5% income tax hike for individuals with incomes over $500,000 and couples earning over $1 million said Thursday. One of the key questions business groups will be considering when evaluating the proposed additional increases in income tax rates is how any change would impact Michigan's competitiveness as a place to live and do business, Joshua Lunger, vice president of Government Affairs for the Grand Rapids Chamber, told Michigan Advance on Friday. The chamber will be reviewing the ballot initiative before taking any official position on it, but right away, Lunger said a lot of states that are growing have no income tax or are trying to reduce their income tax rates, so it's important to evaluate what the unique impact on Michigan would be. That's what the chamber did when it opposed the 2010 temporary income tax increase for Grand Rapids residents and then supported maintaining the tax increase with the condition that the city funded road repairs, Lunger said. 'It really comes down to, what is it being used for? What's the potential impact? And both positive and negative, are there any other unintended consequences?' Lunger said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Michigan's public school system has historically been underfunded with Michigan State University researchers finding that the state's funding for K-12 schools dropped further than any other state in the two decades before the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, Michigan students experienced some of the worst learning losses in the country, a 2025 report from EdTrust-Midwest, a Michigan-based, education advocacy nonprofit group, found. The report also noted Michigan ranked among the worst states in the country for funding the educational success of low-income students, who are testing lower in Michigan than national averages on 3rd grade reading tests and 7th grade math tests. Michigan's reading scores for younger students are some of the worst in the country, a pain point with decisionmakers in Lansing when discussing state budgets and spending decisions. But another focus area is Michigan's stagnating population growth and the necessity to entice businesses to come to Michigan and for Michiganders to remain in the state's workforce. In order for Michigan to get on track to grow, the state should be incentivizing economic success, not further taxing it, Jase Bolger, president and CEO of the West Michigan Policy Forum said in a statement in response to the ballot initiative Friday morning. Instead of throwing money at Michigan's educational system that is failing to address the needs of students, Bolger said parents should be provided more information about the status of their child's learning and if they're meeting expectations. 'Way too many kids in Michigan can't read, but it's clear these adults can't do simple math. Today in Michigan, the more you make the more you pay. But worse is that this proposal would drive Michigan further in the wrong direction,' Bolger said. 'While states that are growing are overwhelmingly cutting taxes on work, or don't tax work at all, this would double down on Michigan's lagging policies that have led to the fastest growing unemployment rate in the country.'