New York woman sues Bath and Body Works after candles explodes, burns her face, eyebrows and eyelashes
Renita Francois in her lawsuit against the bathing essentials brand said that the candle exploded, sending 'searing' hot wax into her face and arms on January 19, 2023.
According to a New York Post report, Francois' life 'irrevocably changed' since the incident, when a three-wick 'Sweater Weather' candle exploded as she leaned in to take a whiff, sending a 'shockwave of fire and debris directly into her face', her lawsuit claimed.
In her lawsuit, the 41-year-old woman said that the heat of the blast left her skin 'sizzling', singed off her eyebrows, melted her eyelashes, and left her face and arms seriously scarred. She called the pain 'instant, unrelenting, and beyond anything she had ever experienced'.
In her lawsuit filed against the company, the woman's husband said he 'witnessed his wife's face catch fire, crackle, and blister as molten wax burned her skin".
The mother of two was rushed to the emergency room but said the aftermath of the incident has 'fractured' her confidence.
The second-degree burns ignited 'an emotional and psychological battle, an assault on her self-perception, and a daily reminder of a tragedy that could have been prevented,' she said in a Brooklyn Federal Court lawsuit against the retailer and the manufacturer, Premier Candle Corp.
According to the Post report, the candle, made in Canada, which sells for about $17 ( ₹ 1,500 approx) was manufactured with 'substandard materials, improper safety measures, and inadequate testing'.
The woman in her lawsuit said that this created an 'unreasonable risk of explosion' and the candle was especially dangerous because chemical additives made the wax 'highly flammable'.
The woman further said that the company knew its candles could be dangerous as far back as 2016, when it was forced to recall some of its votives for 'documented cases of candle explosions, glass shattering, and injuries caused by molten wax and fire hazards'.
Francois was the executive director for the Mayor's Action Plan for Neighbourhood Safety under Mayor Bill de Blasio from July 2018 to April 2002, the Post said in its report. She was a frequent public speaker but now 'dreads stepping in front of a room'.
'Before the explosion, Renita was bold, fearless, and effortless in commanding an audience. Today, she walks into public meetings, panel discussions, and leadership summits knowing that her scars speak before she does,' she said in court papers. The woman is seeking unspecified damages.
Bath & Body Works and Premier did not immediately return a message seeking comment, the Post said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
A Turning Point in Colon Cancer: Young People Are Finding It Earlier
People under age 50 have been appearing increasingly at doctor's offices in the past few decades, complaining of blood in their stool or bowel or of abdominal trouble or unexplained weight loss. The diagnosis: colorectal cancer . And by that time, it was often too late. But that paradigm is finally starting to shift, at least for patients in their 40s. There has been a jump in people aged 45 to 49 getting screened for colorectal cancer, after recent medical guidelines lowered the screening age for those at average risk. As a result, the disease is being caught sooner, when it is more curable and the treatment is less grueling, according to new research from the American Cancer Society. The recent screening recommendations designed to catch cases sooner appear to be working. 'It's thrilling to see this,' said Rebecca Siegel, an epidemiologist at the ACS and an author of the new research. 'It means fewer deaths and higher quality of life for people who are diagnosed.' The findings come in a flurry of research published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Colorectal cancer screening in the U.S. for adults age 45 to 49 increased by 62% from 2019 to 2023, according to one ACS paper. Early-stage diagnoses then surged, including a 50% relative increase from 2021 to 2022, according to another ACS report. A trial of more than 20,000 people in the same age bracket was published by a separate group of researchers, showing that testing uptake increases when people are mailed stool tests by default, versus when they are asked if they want a test or a colonoscopy. Screening rates in the trial were low, however, with 19% of people in the trial overall opting to get screened. 'We probably shouldn't be wasting time asking patients first; we should send them what they need,' said Dr. Folasade May, the trial's senior author and a gastroenterologist at the University of California, Los Angeles. 'We have a long way to go.' Colorectal cancer rates have been rising for people under age 50 since the 1990s, and the disease is now the leading cause of cancer death among men in that group. Researchers are investigating everything from diet and lifestyle to environmental contaminants, to figure out why colorectal and other cancers are rising in younger adults. The ACS in 2018 started recommending that people with average risk as young as 45 years old get screened for colorectal cancer, down from the previous start of age 50. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force followed in 2021; their guidelines carry particular weight among primary-care providers and often lead to health-insurance coverage. Suddenly, millions of people were newly overdue for screening. For people in that 45-to-49 age bracket, cases jumped, going from about a 1% increase in the incidence rate each year since 2004 to a 12% annual rise from 2019 to 2022, the data show. The rise was driven by diagnoses of early-stage disease. A post-Covid rebound in people seeking healthcare could contribute to some of the increase, researchers said, but the change in screening guidance is likely the bigger factor. The trend looks similar to what happened among people ages 50 and above in the late 1990s, after screening was first recommended for them, said Caitlin Murphy, a cancer epidemiologist and professor of pediatrics at the University of Chicago, who wasn't involved in the studies. It will still take time to see what the impact on deaths looks like for the newly eligible, she said. 'Ultimately, the goal of screening is to reduce mortality, and we haven't seen that quite yet, simply because not enough time has gone by.' Up-to-date screening via colonoscopy for those aged 45 to 49 rose from around 20% of people in 2019 to about 28% in 2023, according to one of the ACS reports. A colonoscopy is the gold-standard test that also helps doctors remove polyps to actually prevent the cancer from forming. Alternatively, use of tests that look for blood or DNA changes in the stool also increased, rising from 1.3% to 7.1% in that age group. Screening rates remained mostly stable in all other age groups, the report found. Screening rates also remained unchanged for people ages 45 to 49 with less than a high-school education or who are uninsured. And they still trail behind those for older adults, who remain at higher risk. Factors including genetics, excess body weight, smoking cigarettes and a diet heavy in red and processed meats also increase a person's odds of developing the disease. People in the 45-to-49 age bracket account for nearly half of all colorectal cancers under age 50, ACS said. But that still leaves a lot of people who are at risk and are too young to be screened. 'I have patients in their 20s in my practice that would never fit the guidelines,' said Dr. Michael Cecchini, a medical oncologist and colorectal cancer specialist at Yale Cancer Center. 'We need to be thinking about it on our list of possible diagnoses.' Write to Brianna Abbott at
Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk's Neuralink brain chip: What is it, how it helps paralysed patients and aims to merge humans with AI
Elon Musk 's Neuralink is revolutionising the way humans interact with technology by merging the power of thought with advanced computing. Its flagship innovation, a coin-sized brain implant called 'the Link,' enables individuals to control computers, smartphones, and even games just by thinking. The implant has already transformed lives, helping paralysed patients regain digital independence and communication ability. Early recipients like Noland Arbaugh, Audrey Crews, Alex, and RJ showcase how neural signals can bypass damaged pathways to restore essential functions. Beyond assisting people with disabilities, Neuralink envisions a future where humans could communicate brain-to-brain, boost memory, and even merge with artificial intelligence. However, this pioneering technology also faces significant challenges, including complex surgeries, device reliability, and ethical concerns over neural privacy and long-term brain safety. Check how Neuralink works , the individuals already benefiting from it, and how it could change the future of humanity. What is Neuralink? Inside Elon Musk's brain chip technology The Neuralink Link is a brain-computer interface (BCI) designed to record and interpret neural signals. It is implanted directly into the skull, with ultra-thin electrode threads (thinner than human hair) extending into the brain's motor cortex. These electrodes detect and interpret neural impulses associated with movement and thought processes. Once processed, the data is transmitted wirelessly to external devices like computers, tablets, and prosthetics, effectively allowing users to control technology with their minds. The implant charges wirelessly, ensuring convenience and continuous operation. How Neuralink works Surgical implantation A specialized surgical robot performs the implant procedure to ensure precision. The robot delicately inserts up to 1,024 flexible electrodes into specific brain regions without damaging nearby blood vessels or tissue. Signal detection The electrodes pick up tiny electrical impulses generated when the user thinks about performing specific actions, such as moving a cursor, selecting text, or clicking on applications. Data processing and transmission The neural signals are amplified, digitized, and processed by the implant's internal electronics. These processed signals are transmitted wirelessly to a receiver (a tablet or computer), converting thoughts into actionable commands. Adaptive learning system Neuralink's software uses machine learning to adapt to each user's unique neural patterns. Over time, accuracy improves, reducing errors and allowing faster digital control. Neuralink human trials reveal stunning breakthroughs for paralysed patients Source: New York Post Noland, paralysed from the shoulders down since a 2016 diving accident, became the first human Neuralink recipient in early 2024. The implant allowed him to play online chess, browse the internet, and use his laptop entirely via thought. Although some electrode threads retracted initially, software upgrades restored functionality, demonstrating Neuralink's ability to adapt to real-world challenges. Alex – Creativity unlocked The second recipient, known as Alex (pseudonym), used the implant for advanced digital tasks, including 3D modeling, digital art, and gaming. This success showed the device's potential beyond basic computer use, extending into professional and creative industries. Audrey Crews – The first female participant Paralyzed for over two decades, Audrey Crews became the first publicly identified female Neuralink recipient in mid-2025. She regained the ability to digitally sign her name and play interactive games for the first time in years. Her experience proved Neuralink's adaptability for different patient profiles. RJ – A Veteran's Independence restored RJ, a US military veteran, used Neuralink to control his smartphone and computer, enabling easier communication and daily digital tasks. His case highlighted Neuralink's potential in helping injured service members regain independence. Other participants (P6–P9+) By late 2025, at least nine people had received the implant as part of the PRIME clinical trial in the US and U.K. Though many remain anonymous, early reports confirmed that participants successfully executed binary commands and navigation tasks using only their thoughts. Neuralink future goals expand beyond medical applications While Neuralink's initial focus is medical restoring communication and independence for people with paralysis it has long-term ambitions that include: Memory enhancement: Storing and recalling digital memories directly from the brain. Brain-to-brain communication: Enabling direct mental communication between humans. Integration with AI: Allowing humans to interface with artificial intelligence for faster learning and cognitive enhancement. ` Neuralink's ethical and safety challenges The technology raises important questions: Privacy: Who controls neural data? Long-term health: What are the risks of chronic electrode implantation? Social impact: Could BCIs create inequality between enhanced and non-enhanced humans? Neuralink's research emphasises incremental progress, regulatory compliance, and patient safety, understanding that merging the human brain with machines requires caution as well as innovation. Also Read | Who is Arvinder Singh Bahal? The 80-year-old adventurer flying to space on Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin mission
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Is the protein craze making you healthier or just taking the joy out of eating? Behind the viral wellness trend
The Problem Isn't Protein You Might Also Like: Weight loss and muscle gain in one go: Research says this 7-minute exercise routine is more effective than HIIT Social Media's 'Wellness' Rabbit Hole You Might Also Like: 9 protein-rich superfoods that slow aging and are probably already in your kitchen Experts May Not Be Immune, Either When Food Becomes Math Walk into any grocery store today and you're likely to see it plastered across shelves like a nutritional badge of honor: 'High-Protein,' 'Packed with 18g,' or 'Fuel Your Day.' According to a report from New York Post, from pancake mixes to ice creams, even unlikely contenders like pasta sauces and dessert bars are riding the protein wave. It's no longer just a concern for bodybuilders or athletes — protein has become the modern health craze, dominating social media feeds, influencer recipes, and breakfast surge has reached near-religious fervor. But in our quest to eat "clean" and stay "fit," are we sacrificing common sense — and perhaps even health?Protein, of course, is essential. It helps repair tissues, builds muscle, balances hormones, supports immunity, and keeps us full longer. For kids, the elderly, pregnant women, or people recovering from illness or surgery, it's a vital as The New York Times health reporter Alice Callahan points out, the issue isn't the nutrient itself — it's our current cultural fixation on it. Quoting from her investigative report, she notes: 'The average man in the United States is overshooting the federal protein recommendation by more than 55%, and the average woman by more than 35%.'That's based on federal guidelines by the National Institutes of Health, which recommends 63 grams of protein per day for a healthy, active 175-pound man. Yet calorie-tracking apps like MyFitnessPal frequently advise upwards of 164 grams — more than where does all that extra protein go? Not into muscle, unless you're rigorously working out. The liver converts the surplus into energy, and if that energy isn't used, it's stored as new protein gospel is being preached not by scientists but by influencers — often young women promoting 'high-protein lunchboxes' and 'six ways to hit 100g of protein.' Protein-rich meal reels dominate Instagram, where the definition of health often becomes a performative exercise in one viral moment, a former vegan blogger stuffed half a rotisserie chicken into her mouth with the caption: 'Gotta hit those protein goals!' The message is clear: more protein equals better health — no questions this is where wellness culture starts resembling diet culture in disguise. "It's disordered eating with a veneer of health," observes even nutrition experts may not be safe from this obsession. A 2017 study published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics found that nearly 50% of registered dietitians were at risk for orthorexia nervosa — an unhealthy fixation on eating 'correctly.' An additional 13% were at risk for traditional eating disorders, and 8% had previously received those advising the public are themselves caught in the grips of disordered eating, it raises concerns about where this trend is past diet trends that promoted extreme restrictions — say, cutting carbs or fat entirely — the protein craze feels deceptively benign. But it carries the same emotional and psychological baggage. When every bite becomes a calculated equation, when indulgence is replaced by 'goals,' food ceases to be nourishing in the full sense of the a difference between mindful eating and micromanaging every meal. Eating well should prioritize balance, satisfaction and sustainability — not choking down dry chicken breasts or masking whey powder in your morning healthiest sources of protein haven't changed: eggs, fish, lentils, meat, dairy, nuts and beans. But in a culture chasing numbers, even these whole foods are being overshadowed by protein bars, processed powders and artificially fortified after all, isn't a competition. It's a lifelong relationship with food — one that works best when it's built on variety, moderation and joy.
