Big worry for US as China releases video of THIS missile for first time, missile is..., its speed, range and power...
This new Chinese missile is the DF-100, an anti-ship cruise missile. Its video was released by the PLA Rocket Force in 2019 and was later removed. The new video of the DF-100 missile is two minutes long. It was featured in the fifth and final episode of a People's Liberation Army documentary aired on Tuesday, 12 August. State media, including the China News Service and a social media account affiliated with state news agency Xinhua, later aired a video of the launch of the DF-100 cruise missile, officially confirming the model of the weapon.
According to the report, the documentary was shot during events held to commemorate the 98th anniversary of the PLA. The People's Liberation Army will also hold a massive parade in Beijing on September 3 to commemorate the 80th anniversary of China's victory over Japan in World War II. When was the DF-100 missile displayed?
The DF-100 was first displayed during the 70th National Anniversary Parade in 2019. However, the parade announcer referred to it as the CJ-100 despite its launch canister being marked 'DF-100'. The name DF – or Dong Feng – is commonly used for ballistic missiles, while CJ – or Chang Jian – refers to ground-attack cruise missiles. What is the range and speed of the DF-100?
The DF-100 missile was also displayed at the 2024 Zhuhai Air Show. At that time, the Chinese military made public the features of this missile for the first time. It was said that the range of the DF-100 missile is 3,000-4,000 km (1,865-2,485 miles). This missile can penetrate strong structures with great accuracy at Mach 4 (about 5000 kmph) cruising speed. China claims that this missile can hit its target about 40 minutes after launching. Why is America concerned by the DF-100 missile?
The maximum range of the DF-100 is far beyond the borders of mainland China. The range of this missile includes major military headquarters and major logistics centers in Taiwan, Japan and South Korea, as well as US bases in Okinawa and Guam. This poses a threat to America's key Pacific region and its aircraft carriers and can weaken America's ability to deploy troops west of the second island chain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
'Sovereignty violated, security undermined': China fumes after USS Higgins destroyer 'intrudes' into South China Sea
China has accused the United States of violating its sovereignty and undermining its security after a US warship entered the waters off the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, which China claims and calls Huangyan Island. The international community largely recognises the Philippines' claim on the island. The photograph shows the guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins conducting an independent deployer certification exercise off the coast of Southern California on April 30, 2015. (Photo: US Navy) China on Wednesday said that a US warship violated its sovereignty and undermined its security by 'intruding' into its territorial waters in the South China Sea. China said that USS Higgins, a destroyer part of the Japan-headquartered 7th Fleet of the US Navy, intruded into its territorial waters off the 'Huangyan Island' and was driven by Chinese navy. The United States has rejected the accusation. The navy mobilised forces to monitor, track, warn, and drive away USS Higgins, spokesperson Senior Colonel He Tiesheng said in a statement in in Chinese. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Huangyan Island' is what China calls the Scarborough Shoal, which is disputed between China and the Philippines. Much of the international community, including the United States and India, has recognised the Philippines' claim to the island, which considers it to be a part of its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). 'The path of the US warship seriously violated China's sovereignty and security, severely undermined peace and stability in the South China Sea, and contravened basic principles of international law and international relations. The Southern Theater Command Navy will maintain high alert at all times, resolutely safeguard national sovereignty, security, and regional peace and stability,' the Chinese statement further said. US rejects China's charge The United States has rejected China's version of events and the accusation and said USS Higgins was sailing in line with the international law. The USS Higgins was conducting a 'freedom of navigation operation' in accordance with international law, Sarah Merrill, a spokesperson for the 7th Fleet, told CNBC. 'China's statement about this mission is false…The United States is defending its right to fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows, as USS Higgins did here. Nothing China says otherwise will deter us,' Merrill further said. World rejects China's claims on Scarborough Shoal China lays claim to Scarborough Shoal, which it calls Huangyan Island, as part of its broader claims to nearly the entire South China Sea on the basis of its self-claimed maritime border based on self-written 'nine dash lines'. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) rejected Chinese claims to the South China Sea and the Scarborough Shoal in 2016 under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The PCA ruled that there was no legal basis to 'nine dash lines' and territorial claims arising from it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The PCA further held that China had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights in its EEZ by interfering with fishing and petroleum exploration and building artificial islands. The United States, India, Australia, Japan, the United Kingdom (UK), and the European Union (EU) have supported the PCA ruling, essentially supporting the Philippines' claim on Scarborough Shoal.
Economic Times
16 minutes ago
- Economic Times
'Can't depend on dollar': Brazil President Lula says 'Brics should test a new currency' amid trade tensions with US
Synopsis Amid escalating trade tensions with the U.S., Brazilian President Lula da Silva champions a BRICS trade currency to reduce reliance on the dollar. Despite Trump's tariff threats and refusal to engage directly, Lula seeks support from leaders like Xi Jinping and Modi. Brazil plans WTO action against U.S. tariffs while remaining open to diplomatic resolutions, emphasizing dialogue over economic retaliation. BRICS leaders with inset of commemorative currency note President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has reiterated his support for a BRICS trade currency, saying Brazil "cannot depend on the dollar" and must remain open to testing alternatives for trade among member nations. In social media videos circulating widely, Lula clarified, 'We do not want to mess with the dollar, it's an important currency. But we can have a currency for trade in BRICS — it's an idea we have to test.' He added, 'Not seeking to undermine the dollar, [we] recognize it as an important currency,' while maintaining that BRICS should be open to 'testing a common trade currency.'Amid Trump's tariff war, the Brazilian president has again brought up the issue of BRICS countries having their own currency. Lula has also proposed that BRICS nations begin discussions on creating such a shared trade currency, arguing it would reduce global dependence on the U.S. dollar. 'We need to test it,' Lula said. 'If it fails, then I was wrong — but someone would have to convince me that I was wrong.' His remarks come amid escalating trade tensions with the United States. The United States has imposed a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods, adding to an existing 10%, prompting Lula to announce that Brazil will seek recourse through the World Trade Organization (WTO) and other formal diplomatic channels. He also confirmed he will not engage directly with U.S. President Donald Trump in light of the January 2025, Trump publicly threatened a 100% tariff on BRICS countries if they pursued the creation of a shared currency. 'Any attempt by BRICS to form a trade currency that bypasses the dollar will be met with full-scale tariffs. 100% — no exceptions,' he said during a campaign early July, Trump reinforced his administration's hardline stance via social media: 'Any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy.' Lula emphasized Brazil's broader aim of reducing its dependency on the dollar. 'We want independence in our policies, we want freer trade, and things are progressing wonderfully. We are even discussing the possibility of creating our own currency, or perhaps using each country's national currency for trade, without relying on the dollar,' he a televised interview with Jornal da Record TV, Lula said Trump's actions reflect discontent over BRICS' rising global influence. 'I am not obliged to purchase dollars to trade with countries like Venezuela, Bolivia, Chile, Sweden, the European Union, or China. We can use our own currencies. Why should I be tied to the dollar, a currency I do not control? It's the United States that prints dollars, not us.'Rejecting Trump's earlier offer to speak 'anytime,' Lula said, 'He does not want to talk.' Instead, the Brazilian president stated, 'I will call Xi Jinping, I will call Prime Minister Modi, I won't call Putin, because he can't travel now, but I will call many Presidents.'Despite ongoing tensions, Lula confirmed that Trump will still receive an invitation to COP30, the United Nations climate summit set to take place in Belém, Pará this 50% tariff affects a wide range of Brazilian exports, though exemptions include civil aircraft and parts, aluminum, tin, wood pulp, energy products, and fertilizers. Trump said the decision was in response to what he called a 'witch hunt' against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is currently facing charges related to an alleged coup attempt following the 2022 the move 'the most regrettable' moment in Brazil, U.S. relations, Lula reaffirmed Brazil's intention to strengthen trade ties with BRICS nations and other global Lula has ruled out direct talks with Trump, he emphasized that Brazil remains open to negotiations through international bodies. 'In 2025, we will resort to all possible measures, starting with the WTO, to defend our interests,' he at the White House, Trump said Lula was welcome to contact him at any time and expressed admiration for the Brazilian people. 'The people running Brazil did the wrong thing,' he Finance Minister Fernando Haddad welcomed the tone of Trump's remarks, describing them as 'great,' and noted that Lula could be open to talks if approached through appropriate diplomatic called for differences to be resolved through dialogue rather than economic retaliation. 'If he [Trump] had a disagreement, the right thing to do would be to raise the issue at a G20 meeting, have a civilized discussion, convince us, and talk it through. What he can't do is act like he owns everyone else,' he said.
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Lesson for India in the China-EU freeze: Proceed with caution
The 50 per cent tariff shock on Indian exports to the United States has rattled exporters and policymakers alike. Garment manufacturers are scouting for alternative markets, while jewellery exporters are checking if their orders still stand. Meanwhile, the government plans credit measures to support SMEs and exporters who now potentially face a loss of their largest market. India now finds itself in a strategic bind. These developments come barely weeks before Prime Minister Narendra Modi's maiden visit to China since the Galwan clashes of 2020. The outreach aims to stabilise supply chains and secure critical technologies. Yet it coincides with Washington, India's key trading partner, tightening the screws over Delhi's Russia links, leaving India little room to manoeuvre. This is not dissimilar to the position the European Union finds itself in, vis-à-vis China and the United States. A summit marking 50 years of diplomatic ties in July ended in disappointment for Brussels. EU leaders raised concerns over China subsidising its EVs, market access issues, industrial overcapacity, and Beijing's support for Russia. On the other hand, President Xi Jinping warned against EU interference and criticised its de-risking policies. The EU-China diplomatic freeze has lessons for India. Only months earlier, with Donald Trump threatening sweeping tariffs on both the EU and China, Brussels and Beijing looked poised for closer ties. But that changed quickly when Trump paused tariffs on Chinese goods and Washington and Beijing agreed to resume cooperation on AI and critical minerals. The promise of renewed access to the US market dulled Beijing's appetite for compromise with Europe. Once China secured breathing space with Washington, it turned up the pressure on Brussels. It implemented anti-dumping tariffs on European brandy and expanded procurement restrictions on European medical equipment. The Chinese Commerce Minister called for the removal of EU sanctions on two Chinese banks alleged to have assisted Russia. Chinese export controls on rare earths were strengthened, and data localisation requirements affecting EU cloud and fintech companies were enforced. The EU and the US could have coordinated their leverage against China. Instead, the EU is under pressure from both sides, following the signing of a trade deal that imposes a 15 per cent tariff on its exports to the US. After years of border tensions and curbs on Chinese investment, New Delhi appears to be testing a modest thaw in relations. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's visit to Beijing in July coincided with the reopening of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, the resumption of direct flights, and the reinstatement of tourist visas for Chinese citizens. This revival is driven less by breakthroughs on the border and more by economic reality. The bilateral trade deficit reached a record $99.2 billion in FY25. Imports of solar components, lithium-ion batteries, electronics, and critical intermediaries surged by more than 25 per cent year-on-year. China's dominance in key sectors, such as EV components, green tech, APIs, and telecom equipment, keeps it entrenched in India's efforts to develop its own ecosystem. India is also exploring ways to ease curbs on Chinese investment, particularly in high-tech sectors. But this re-engagement is happening in the context of unresolved strategic issues. Despite an agreement last October, de-escalation along the LAC remains incomplete. Confidence-building measures are still minimal. And public sentiment remains wary. In this context, China may interpret India's opening as a sign of constraint rather than strength. If Beijing could pivot so quickly against the EU once Washington reopened its doors, it could just as easily do the same with India. India's best opportunity to avoid Europe's fate lies in direct negotiations with Chinese firms, ensuring a durable channel of communication, even when geopolitics turn cold. This does not necessarily mean filling out the calendar with high-level dialogues or offering joint ventures with Indian firms, to which Chinese companies may not freely transfer the latest technologies. Instead, India should identify critical supply chains integral to achieving its goals of economic growth, such as EV batteries, displays, EMS and connectors, solar wafers, precision machinery, and tooling. Subsequently, it should engage in dialogue with Chinese brands that have a strong global presence and established connections with upstream players in these fields. With strategic plans spanning two to three decades, these organisations are likely to assess commercial opportunities in India pragmatically and navigate political considerations in both countries as needed. India needs to establish a dedicated, multi-agency team to engage directly with key Chinese firms essential to its industrial goals. This team should comprise supply chain experts, Indian OEMs, state government representatives, and embassy staff, rather than general-purpose investment promotion bodies. Their focus should be on building strong, ongoing relationships with 25-30 major companies through private discussions and practical collaboration, rather than public initiatives. Currently, there is no coordinated outreach with these firms, and policies regarding Chinese companies in India are so unclear that only intermediaries can profit. To attract long-term investment, India needs to offer transparent and predictable guidelines that specify permitted activities, sectors, compliance requirements, and incentives. This clarity will encourage companies to invest, localise, and train for the future, resulting in knowledge and technology transfer. Not because it is mandated, but because companies will need to build for the long term. The Chinese establishment is likely to continue viewing India primarily from a strategic perspective. But when its firms and their shareholders stand to lose money by pulling out, the resistance to weaponising market access or regulatory tools will come from within. In a relationship marked by asymmetry, impassive commercial engagement may be India's strongest safeguard. The writer is Director, Geopolitics and Policy, at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi. These are his personal views
