logo
$1.1B California Capitol to include hidden corridors for lawmakers

$1.1B California Capitol to include hidden corridors for lawmakers

Daily Mail​23-04-2025

A new $1.1 billion capitol building in California will have secret corridors for lawmakers to use to avoid the press, according to a state senator. The construction of the massive building, known as the Capitol Annex Project, was first introduced in 2018 with an estimated cost of $543.2 million to complete. Now, the building will cost more than a billion dollars, and that price tag will be footed by Golden State taxpayers, KCRA 3 reported. The structure will house 120 lawmakers, including the governor, lieutenant governor and other staff members.
Newsom did not commission the project, which was started before he even took office. He and several other lawmakers will not be housed there as they will be out of office by its completion date in the second half of 2027. It will also house committee hearing rooms for lawmakers to meet and debate on pressing issues related to the liberal state. Although details about the project have remained under wraps, Pro Tempore State Senator Mike McGuire confirmed there will be private hallways in the building for lawmakers to access so they can avoid the public and the media. 'Secure corridors have always been included in plans for the new annex (as they already exist in the swing space) and are designed to help ensure the safety and security of lawmakers, which is even more important today given the events that unfolded on January 6th at our nation's capital building and the active threats public officials continue to face,' McGuire told the outlet.
Despite the hidden tunnels, he said all legislators 'will continue to be accessible and responsive.' 'Regardless, legislators will continue to be accessible and responsive to the public, staff, and reporters no matter what hallway, elevator or stairwell they choose to use. The same is true when they're working in their communities or at events around town,' the Democrat said. Presently, lawmakers have their own private entrances to elevators and hearing rooms, but they still have to walk through a public hallway to get from one to the other - something McGuire called their 'swing space.' With the new corridors, the space in between will be no more - ultimately blocking journalists and lobbyists from getting to lawmakers after a hearing or vote.
The new addition has sparked anger in many Californians, including local lawmakers like Assemblyman Josh Hoover (pictured). He referred to the corridors as 'the height of hypocrisy,' adding: 'You are using taxpayer dollars for a taxpayer-funded facility and yet you are going to design it in a way that shields you from the public and shields you from accountability.' The project has long caused trouble, as it just got past a lawsuit that was filed by Cowan, the ex-chairman of the Historic State Capitol Commission, environmentalists and project opponents who claimed lawmakers did not get enough feedback from the public to move forward with the west side construction of the building.
The group also voiced concerns about the uprooting of several palm trees and the all-glass façade for the building. The lawsuit was recently settled after the California Supreme Court ruled last fall that lawmakers could exempt the project from the California Environmental Quality Act, which was passed and signed by former President Ronald Regan in 1970. With news of the new passageways, Cowan (pictured) said extra security expenses were made after the January 6 US capitol attack - when a mob of Donald Trump supporters stormed the building. 'The Capitol police in Washington D.C., were able to escort our nation's legislators safely through some corridors into safe rooms at the Capitol while the rioters were occupying the Capitol,' Cowan said. 'Shortly after that, managers for the Capitol annex project announced the project was 5 percent to 10 percent over budget.'
Following the attack, former Joint Rules Committee Chairman Ken Cooley said the budget for the Annex Project needed 10 percent more money for security purposes. He then lost his seat in the Assembly to Hoover in 2022, leaving many critics to think he was ousted for the handling of the project. 'We are just guessing, but if one were to say, "Yeah, we had to invest an additional $100,000,000 to create these potential escape corridors," that would make sense,' Cowan explained.
It is unclear how much money will actually be spent on security features for the project as these conversations took place in 2021, the outlet reported. The costly price tag of the building aside, many have been left frustrated for barely knowing any details about the new structure. In fact, lawmakers had to sign non-disclosure agreements that legally force them to keep all details of the project a secret. 'At this time, our priority is to complete the Annex. There is no discussion or construction occurring on the West side,' Lia Lopez, the chief administrative officer for the Joint Rules Committee, told KCRA 3.
Despite that, Cowan is skeptical if the legislature will actually not build on the west side of the building, which would save about $100,000 for taxpayers. The hefty price tag is said to also go toward a new visitor's center and parking garage on the west side, per the outlet. Meanwhile, Hoover is frustrated with his lack of knowledge on the project as a whole. 'What frustrates me is, as a lawmaker that is going to potentially be in this building some day, we have almost zero information about what's going on there and I think we deserve that information, and so do our taxpayers and constituents,' he said. DailyMail.com contacted Lopez for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meet the Press NOW — June 11
Meet the Press NOW — June 11

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Meet the Press NOW — June 11

Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the ranking member on the House Armed Services Committee, responds to President Trump's decision to send troops to Los Angeles amid ongoing protests over the administration's immigration enforcement actions. NBC News National Political Correspondent Steve Kornacki analyzes the New Jersey gubernatorial primary results, setting the stage for a contest between Republican Jack Ciattarelli and Democrat Mikie Sherrill. Francesca Chambers, Ameshia Cross and T.W. Arrighi weigh in on how the public is responding to the 11, 2025

Fox News dishonestly spins Trump's ‘receipts' about Newsom call, which actually prove governor is right
Fox News dishonestly spins Trump's ‘receipts' about Newsom call, which actually prove governor is right

The Independent

time7 hours ago

  • The Independent

Fox News dishonestly spins Trump's ‘receipts' about Newsom call, which actually prove governor is right

After Gavin Newsom pushed back on Donald Trump's claim that the two had a phone call 'a day ago' about the ongoing protests in Los Angeles, Fox News published what it called 'receipts' from the president that supposedly proved that the California governor was 'lying.' Instead, the call log that Trump handed over to Fox News anchor John Roberts Tuesday showed that Newsom was right all along. That didn't seem to matter to the right-wing network, though, as multiple hosts and reporters still dishonestly spun for the president despite their 'receipt' supporting the governor's claim. Speaking to reporters at the Oval Office on Tuesday afternoon, the president was asked when he last spoke to the governor, who is currently suing the administration for federally deploying the National Guard to LA in response to the demonstrations over Trump's immigration raids. 'A day ago,' the president responded. 'Called him up to tell him, got to do a better job, he's doing a bad job. Causing a lot of death and a lot of potential death.' Captioning a clip of Trump's remarks, Newsom immediately disputed the president in a social media post. 'There was no call. Not even a voicemail,' the governor wrote. 'Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying the Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to.' Following Newsom's denial that a call had taken place within the past day, Trump quickly called up Roberts and told him that the governor was lying. The Fox News anchor then posted on X the president's comments as well as a screenshot of Trump's phone showing the latest call activity with Newsom. 'President Trump just contacted me from Air Force 1 to say this: 'First call was not picked up. Second call, Gavin picked up, we spoke for 16 minutes. I told him to, essentially, 'get his a** in gear,' and stop the riots, which were out of control. More than anything else, this shows what a liar he is - Said I never called. Here is the evidence,'' Roberts tweeted. The screenshot on the president's phone log, meanwhile, showed two calls made to Newsom, one of which was not picked up and the other lasting for over 16 minutes. Both of these calls took place at 1:23 a.m. ET on June 7, which would have been late Friday night in California - days earlier then Trump claimed in the Oval Office. Newsom had already publicly discussed that call with multiple reporters in recent days, including in an interview with NBC News that featured the governor daring the administration to 'come get me' after Trump's border czar threatened to arrest him. The governor told NBC News on Sunday that he had a 'very decent conversation' with Trump late Friday night that lasted roughly 20 minutes, adding that the president never brought up the prospect of mobilizing the National Guard. While the call log from the president clearly supported Newsom's timeline, Roberts framed the matter as the president bringing the 'receipts' to disprove the governor during an on-air report. At the same time, he massaged the president's Oval Office remarks to give Trump a bit more cover. 'After Trump said in the noon hour in the Oval Office that he called him yesterday or the other day, Gavin Newsom tweeted the following: 'There was no call. Not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying the Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to,'' Roberts stated, suggesting the president said something he never uttered. Going through the president's screenshot and comments to him, Roberts conceded that this showed the call happened on June 7 and that it would have been late Friday night where the governor was located. Still, the segment was framed as the president catching Newsom in a lie. 'We're waiting to see if Gov. Newsom has a response to the president's – essentially what he has there is the receipts for what he says is the call that was made,' co-anchor Molly Line declared, prompting Roberts to add: 'It's all about the receipts!' That Fox News segment was quickly picked up by MAGA media personality Charlie Kirk, who tweeted that it was 'gold' because it revealed that Trump had dropped 'the receipts on his call with Gavin Newsom.' The governor, however, promptly pushed back. 'If only he had shown the right ones... Trump doesn't even know what day it is,' he posted on X. Meanwhile, in response to Roberts' initial tweet of the president's screenshot, Newsom's press office flatly pointed out that 'this call was from 3 days ago.' Despite it being clear at this point that Trump had not refuted Newsom's claim that a call did not take place the previous day, the network continued to frame the president's comments and phone log as proof to the contrary. 'Trump brings receipts he called Newsom amid LA riots as California gov claims there wasn't 'even a voicemail,'' the headline read of Fox News' digital story on the back-and-forth, which was co-bylined by Roberts. While the digital story includes comments from Newsom and his press office pointing out that the governor was 'clearly' responding to Trump's 'comment this morning of 'a day ago,'' the report largely revolves around how the president 'hit back' at the governor's 'claims that the president did not recently call him.' The network's senior White House correspondent Peter Doocy, in multiple reports on Fox News and its sister network Fox Business, essentially just pretended that the disagreement wasn't over when the president last called Newsom, but rather if Trump had ever phoned him. 'Newsom then claimed that there was no call, not even a voicemail,' Doocy said on Special Report after airing a clip of Trump's Oval Office comments. 'A screenshot of an iPhone call log to Fox News' John Roberts shows two calls from the president to Newsom on Saturday. One lasted for 16 minutes!' With the network's 'straight news' division laying the groundwork, the conservative cable giant's pro-Trump opinion hosts were then apparently given free rein to get even more deceptive with their own spin. During his primetime show Tuesday night, Jesse Watters – who had already asserted on The Five hours earlier that Newsom was 'lying' because he 'can't control the narrative' – presented an edited clip of Trump's Oval Office remarks that completely excised the president's assertion that it was 'a day ago' that he called the governor. 'Newsom responded, and he said there wasn't a phone call. He said Trump never called him. Not even a voicemail, he said,' Watters proclaimed after airing the edited video. 'But John Roberts got Trump's call logs, and it shows Trump called him late Friday night and they talked for 16 minutes,' the MAGA host added. 'Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him? Why would he do that?!' The president, in the end, made sure to reference his text to Roberts when he was asked on Tuesday night about Newsom disputing his claim that the two had talked on Monday. 'Gov. Newsom says he did not speak to you a day ago, as you said in the Oval Office earlier. What's your response to that?' a reporter wondered after Trump returned from his Fort Bragg speech. 'It wasn't a day ago, a little longer than that, and I presented the phone conversation to Fox News' John Roberts and Molly Line at Fox News, because they were the ones that said it,' Trump responded. 'And we actually spent 16 point something minutes on the phone. And I told him, he's got to get his act together. …. We had a pleasant conversation. …. I'm sure you all saw it. You saw them, yeah? But why would you ask me that question if you saw it?'

LA police enforce curfew as protests against Trump's crackdown continue
LA police enforce curfew as protests against Trump's crackdown continue

Belfast Telegraph

time11 hours ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

LA police enforce curfew as protests against Trump's crackdown continue

Members of the National Guard stood watch behind plastic shields, but did not appear to participate in the arrests. Hours later, many of the protesters had dispersed, although sporadic confrontations continued that were much smaller than in previous nights. Officials said the curfew was necessary to stop vandalism and theft by agitators looking to cause trouble. Democratic governor Gavin Newsom earlier accused Mr Trump of drawing a 'military dragnet' across the nation's second-largest city with his escalating use of the National Guard. He also deployed marines, though none were seen on the streets. Mr Newsom asked a court to put an emergency stop to the military helping federal immigration agents, with some guardsmen now standing in protection around agents as they carried out arrests. He said it would only heighten tensions and promote civil unrest. The judge set a hearing for Thursday, giving the administration several days to continue those activities. The change moves troops closer to engaging in law enforcement actions like deportations as Mr Trump has promised as part of his administration's immigration crackdown. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers but any arrests ultimately would be made by law enforcement. Mr Trump has activated more than 4,000 National Guard members and 700 marines over the objections of city and state leaders. They were originally deployed to protect federal buildings. Demonstrations have spread to other cities nationwide, including Dallas and Austin, Texas, Chicago and New York, where a thousand people rallied and multiple arrests were made. Mr Trump left open the possibility of invoking the Insurrection Act, which authorises the president to deploy military forces inside the US to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. It is one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a US president. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' he said from the Oval Office. Later the president called protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy' in a speech at Fort Bragg ostensibly to recognise the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Mr Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Mr Newsom says are nowhere close to the truth. In a public address Tuesday evening, Mr Newsom called Mr Trump's actions the start of an 'assault' on democracy. Mr Newsom warned people against inciting violence, but urged them to stand up to the president's actions. The protests began on Friday after federal immigration raids arrested dozens of workers in Los Angeles. Protesters blocked a major freeway and set cars on fire over the weekend, and police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. The demonstrations have been mostly concentrated downtown in the city of four million. Thousands of people have peacefully rallied outside City Hall and hundreds more protested outside a federal complex that includes a detention centre where some immigrants are being held following workplace raids.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store