Latest news with #KCRA3
Time of India
2 days ago
- Business
- Time of India
Air Canada strike update: Airline cancels flights and issues lookout notice as 130,000 may face daily disruptions
Air Canada is bracing for a major disruption as tensions with its flight attendants escalate. The airline has already begun canceling flights in case of a possible work stoppage that could leave thousands of people stuck. Given the current standoff between both sides, the next 72 hours could determine whether Canada's largest airline completely ceases operations. What effect will the strike have on travelers? Air Canada has started to cancel flights ahead of time after its flight attendants gave a 72-hour strike notice, which could mean that all of the airline's operations will be grounded across the country. The airline says that the stop could affect about 130,000 passengers every day, and by the end of Friday, hundreds of flights had already been canceled. All Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flights should be stopped by early Saturday morning, as quoted in a report by KCRA 3. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo ALSO READ: Orca attack mystery: What really happened to marine trainer Jessica Radcliffe Mark Nasr, the Chief Operations Officer, said that the decision to slowly stop flights will make it easier to start them up again if an agreement is reached. Live Events He said, "which under the best circumstances will take a full week to complete." Several long-haul international routes have already seen the first wave of cancellations, and about 25,000 Canadians could be stuck overseas every day, as quoted in a report by KCRA 3. Long-haul international flights that were scheduled to depart Thursday night will be impacted by the first round of cancellations, he said, which involved several dozen flights. "By tomorrow evening we expect to have cancelled flights affecting over 100,000 customers,' Nasr said. 'By the time we get to 1 a.m. on Saturday morning, we will be completely grounded.' By the end of Friday, 500 flights are anticipated to be canceled, as quoted in a report by KCRA 3. ALSO READ: Tesla abruptly ends Dojo supercomputer as Musk shifts focus to next-gen AI chips - what went wrong with the project? What are the union's main requests? The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), which speaks for about 10,000 flight attendants, says that the disagreement is mostly about low pay and not getting paid for time spent on the ground. Some of the attendants held up signs at a press conference that said "Unpaid work won't fly" and "Poverty wages = UnCanadian," showing how angry they were. Air Canada recently offered a 38% raise in total pay, which includes wages, pensions, and benefits, over four years. But the union says this still doesn't cover all of their worries. Natasha Stea, a spokesperson for the union, said that management might be counting on the federal government to step in instead of having real talks. She said, "There's still time to reach an agreement if we sit down and talk." ALSO READ: Apple's iPhone 17 color lineup leaks: Stunning new hues spark frenzy online Can the government step in to stop the shutdown? The airline suggested binding arbitration, but the union turned it down and insisted on direct negotiations that all members can vote on. Patty Hajdu, the federal jobs minister, has told both sides to reach an agreement at the table, but she hasn't ruled out government action if things get worse. This strike is coming up almost a year after Air Canada narrowly avoided a similar problem with its pilots, who reached a contract deal before a strike notice was sent out. The pilots' union has spoken out in support of the flight attendants and asked that their right to negotiate as a group be respected without government interference. Air Canada is currently offering full refunds to passengers whose flights have been canceled. The airline is also working with other airlines to find other ways for people to travel when possible. But as the deadline gets closer, the future of Canada's busiest airline is still up in the air, and the effect on travelers could be huge. FAQs How many people might the strike affect? The strike could potentially impact approximately 130,000 individuals daily. What is the main cause of the disagreement? Concerns about remuneration and unpaid work hours are the primary causes of this disagreement.
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
50th Father's Day Bluegrass Festival in Nevada County underway this week
Looking for something to do for Father's Day weekend? A Nevada County live music tradition may have you covered. KCRA 3 was joined on Wednesday morning by Theresa Gooding, the president of the California Bluegrass Association, who talked about the things the 50th Bluegrass Festival has to offer.
Daily Mail
09-06-2025
- Sport
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Defiant trans athlete AB Hernandez hits out at 'weird' protests from furious parents after pummeling girl rivals
Transgender high school athlete AB Hernandez has branded protests over her inclusion in female track events 'weird' amid controversy over her latest victory. Hernandez, who is a biological male, was met with fresh protests after claiming gold in the high jump and triple jump at the California Interscholastic Federation state finals at the end of May. In previous meets, the 17-year-old has faced controversy from her own competitors - with a teenage girl she beat to first place even waiting for her to get down from the top of the podium before posing up there herself. And with the outrage showing no signs of slowing down, Hernandez has spoken out in an interview with Sacramento television station KCRA-3. 'It's definitely crazy, I get a lot of hate comments but I'm like, "I don't care,"' she said. '[I'm a] 16-year-old girl with a mad attitude. You think I'm going to care?' Hernandez added about the protests: 'It's just weird at this point.'
New York Post
30-04-2025
- Politics
- New York Post
Calif. lawmakers block bid to make paying for sex with 16- and 17-year-olds a felony
California lawmakers gutted a bill Tuesday that would have made paying for sex with 16- and 17-year-olds a felony charge. Under current state law, creeps who buy sex from minors under 16 face extra fines, jail time, and either a misdemeanor or felony charge. A new bill meant to protect sex trafficking victims, AB 379, would have upped that age to 18, but Democratic committee members demanded the clause be cut before they let the bill move forward in the California State Assembly. Advertisement Nick Schultz is chairman of the Assembly Public Safety Committee, which blocked a key piece of AB 379. Facebook / Nick Schultz The bill's author, Democrat Maggy Krell, who spent two decades overseeing human trafficking cases for the state, called the move a 'disgrace.' 'I've been doing this for 20 years, and I'm not going to quit now. And I am going to bring this part of this bill back every year until I get the books to protect children. That's what I'm going to do,' she told KCRA 3. Krell added that she still supports the current version AB 379, which imposes harsher penalties on 'loitering with intent to purchase sex' — i.e., prowling street corners for hookups — and establishes a fund for sex trafficking victims. Democrat Assemblymember Maggy Krell wrote the bill. Assemblymember Maggy Krell Advertisement Last year, Republican lawmakers pushed for a similar bill to crack down on Johns prowling for underage streetwalkers. They managed to cut a deal with Democrats to lower the felony age cutoff from 18 to 16. Democrat Nick Shultz, chairman of the Public Safety Committee, said the watering-down of AB 379 was a direct result of that previous deal. 'My perspective as chair, there was a carefully crafted deal last year,' Shultz told KCRA 3. 'We're not saying 'no,' but what we're saying is, if we're going to be thoughtful policy makers, we really need to dive deep into this issue.'
Daily Mail
23-04-2025
- Politics
- Daily Mail
$1.1B California Capitol to include hidden corridors for lawmakers
A new $1.1 billion capitol building in California will have secret corridors for lawmakers to use to avoid the press, according to a state senator. The construction of the massive building, known as the Capitol Annex Project, was first introduced in 2018 with an estimated cost of $543.2 million to complete. Now, the building will cost more than a billion dollars, and that price tag will be footed by Golden State taxpayers, KCRA 3 reported. The structure will house 120 lawmakers, including the governor, lieutenant governor and other staff members. Newsom did not commission the project, which was started before he even took office. He and several other lawmakers will not be housed there as they will be out of office by its completion date in the second half of 2027. It will also house committee hearing rooms for lawmakers to meet and debate on pressing issues related to the liberal state. Although details about the project have remained under wraps, Pro Tempore State Senator Mike McGuire confirmed there will be private hallways in the building for lawmakers to access so they can avoid the public and the media. 'Secure corridors have always been included in plans for the new annex (as they already exist in the swing space) and are designed to help ensure the safety and security of lawmakers, which is even more important today given the events that unfolded on January 6th at our nation's capital building and the active threats public officials continue to face,' McGuire told the outlet. Despite the hidden tunnels, he said all legislators 'will continue to be accessible and responsive.' 'Regardless, legislators will continue to be accessible and responsive to the public, staff, and reporters no matter what hallway, elevator or stairwell they choose to use. The same is true when they're working in their communities or at events around town,' the Democrat said. Presently, lawmakers have their own private entrances to elevators and hearing rooms, but they still have to walk through a public hallway to get from one to the other - something McGuire called their 'swing space.' With the new corridors, the space in between will be no more - ultimately blocking journalists and lobbyists from getting to lawmakers after a hearing or vote. The new addition has sparked anger in many Californians, including local lawmakers like Assemblyman Josh Hoover (pictured). He referred to the corridors as 'the height of hypocrisy,' adding: 'You are using taxpayer dollars for a taxpayer-funded facility and yet you are going to design it in a way that shields you from the public and shields you from accountability.' The project has long caused trouble, as it just got past a lawsuit that was filed by Cowan, the ex-chairman of the Historic State Capitol Commission, environmentalists and project opponents who claimed lawmakers did not get enough feedback from the public to move forward with the west side construction of the building. The group also voiced concerns about the uprooting of several palm trees and the all-glass façade for the building. The lawsuit was recently settled after the California Supreme Court ruled last fall that lawmakers could exempt the project from the California Environmental Quality Act, which was passed and signed by former President Ronald Regan in 1970. With news of the new passageways, Cowan (pictured) said extra security expenses were made after the January 6 US capitol attack - when a mob of Donald Trump supporters stormed the building. 'The Capitol police in Washington D.C., were able to escort our nation's legislators safely through some corridors into safe rooms at the Capitol while the rioters were occupying the Capitol,' Cowan said. 'Shortly after that, managers for the Capitol annex project announced the project was 5 percent to 10 percent over budget.' Following the attack, former Joint Rules Committee Chairman Ken Cooley said the budget for the Annex Project needed 10 percent more money for security purposes. He then lost his seat in the Assembly to Hoover in 2022, leaving many critics to think he was ousted for the handling of the project. 'We are just guessing, but if one were to say, "Yeah, we had to invest an additional $100,000,000 to create these potential escape corridors," that would make sense,' Cowan explained. It is unclear how much money will actually be spent on security features for the project as these conversations took place in 2021, the outlet reported. The costly price tag of the building aside, many have been left frustrated for barely knowing any details about the new structure. In fact, lawmakers had to sign non-disclosure agreements that legally force them to keep all details of the project a secret. 'At this time, our priority is to complete the Annex. There is no discussion or construction occurring on the West side,' Lia Lopez, the chief administrative officer for the Joint Rules Committee, told KCRA 3. Despite that, Cowan is skeptical if the legislature will actually not build on the west side of the building, which would save about $100,000 for taxpayers. The hefty price tag is said to also go toward a new visitor's center and parking garage on the west side, per the outlet. Meanwhile, Hoover is frustrated with his lack of knowledge on the project as a whole. 'What frustrates me is, as a lawmaker that is going to potentially be in this building some day, we have almost zero information about what's going on there and I think we deserve that information, and so do our taxpayers and constituents,' he said. contacted Lopez for comment.
