
With ‘Hum,' Helen Phillips Embraces the ‘Vast Gray Area' of Modern Technology
The dish rags were disconcerting. In the fall of 2019, author Helen Phillips had already accumulated a hundred-plus-page document's worth of anecdotes about AI and surveillance for a potential book she wanted to write, the book that would become last year's Hum, now out in paperback. But it wasn't until Phillips herself experienced the slow creep of data tracking that the concepts of her book started feeling routinely manifest. During one particular walk home from work, she'd realized she needed to buy new dish rags; she'd opened her computer shortly after, and there they were, advertised for her. 'Had I ever searched for them? I didn't remember,' Phillips tells me now. 'Had I said something aloud? It was just that weird feeling of being surveilled.' She went ahead and bought the dish rags, but the purchase didn't rid her of 'that little ick feeling,' that sense of being watched.
'What if you took that kind of consumer surveillance to an extreme place?' Phillips asks. That question ended up forming the central premise of Hum, a taut work of literary science-fiction that's as much about the insecurities of intimacy and parenthood as it is the expanding scope of technology. The story takes place in a climate-ravaged near-future world, in which Phillips's protagonist, May, loses her job to the proliferation of AI, a proliferation that has led to the increasing presence of robots nicknamed 'hums.' After undergoing an experimental surgery that prevents her face from being recognized by surveillance tech, May uses her earnings to take her husband and kids to the Botanical Garden, a lush and luxurious paradise protected from the climbing temperatures outside its fortress. But even a world inside an insulated bubble isn't always a legible one, and soon May has to depend on a hum to keep her family intact.
Below, Phillips discusses how she tackled the big questions of technology, parenthood, and climate change in such a tight story; what working on Hum taught her about the future; and the common denominator amongst her books, including the 2019 National Book Award-longlisted The Need and 2015's The Beautiful Bureaucrat.
The first line of the book came to me early on: 'The needle inched closer to her eye, and she tried not to flinch.' There's a bit of the anxiety of the future that we are facing right there in that line. May is interested in the possibility of not being recognizable in a city where surveillance is so common. She's also doing it for money because she has lost her job to artificial intelligence. That's what she has to sell at this point in her life: herself as a test subject.
There's also a different answer to that question that's a little more personal. When I was 11 years old, I lost all of my hair due to alopecia. So I've been a bald woman for the vast majority of my life. And when I was about 13, my mom and I had the idea to get eyebrows and eyeliner tattooed on my face so that I wouldn't have to apply that in the morning. The process of having facial tattoos at that age—my sense memory of that is very present in [the book's] initial scene. So that was where the physical grounding of it came from.
When I am setting out to write a novel, it is, in a large part, a way of processing my own anxieties—a way of understanding them better. I was assembling the things that I'm concerned about as I look to the future; there's a long laundry list of those. And as I was reading and thinking about this plot, they all coalesced. The original draft of the book was twice as long and had a lot more research in it. I cut the book basically in half, because what I want is [the research] to be the iceberg that you feel under the book, but not the focus point of the book.
I certainly wanted to explore the vast gray area that I feel in my own life about technology.
It is actually encouraging or reassuring that you can know where your children are at all times. But, is it also troubling that we surveil our children by way of their devices? And always know where they are? Is there some loss of essential human exploration and adventure that they lose when they know that we're tracking them? I'm concerned about that.
The hums are an embodiment of that [dissonance]. My hope is that the reader experiences the hums in a lot of different ways and have a range of different feelings toward them: from finding them sinister to finding them comforting and cute. I think that's how technology is for us: It's nice that when I'm lost, I can find my way on my phone. I don't even know how I'd get around the world without it. But do I find it eerie that, in order for my phone to help me navigate a map, someone somewhere basically knows where I am at all times? It's such a double-edged sword; I wanted to get at that in the book.
Since I began writing Hum, climate change has accelerated and artificial intelligence—when I was writing, it was GPT-3, not ChatGPT, which is a whole leap. So these problems have only become thornier since I began researching the book. But in the interviews I did as I was researching the book, I would ask people, 'What can we do?' And a refrain I heard was that we have to have community; we have to have meaningful communities. It's only from that sense of interconnectedness and collective action that we can hope to have change. The book doesn't really get to that collective action place, but I do intend that, at the end—at least in the unit of the family—there's some sense of an interconnected body of care and wellbeing.
I do feel like The Beautiful Bureaucrat, The Need, and Hum are kind of in a series together. They all have female protagonists, and they're told in the close-third [point of view] with a real intimacy to that protagonist's anxiety and desire. They all have some element of speculation or science fiction that, for me, is reflecting back on the world we do live in. They also all have a very different element of scientific research. With The Beautiful Bureaucrat, I did a lot of mathematical research. With The Need, I did a lot of research about paleobotany because that was the profession of the protagonist. For this book, I did a lot of research about artificial intelligence and climate change. But they're speaking to each other in a deeper way, too. A reviewer recently said, 'Helen makes anxiety a genre,' which is maybe a dubious distinction. But I do think that—to some extent—these are books about confronting your anxieties.
This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
14 hours ago
- Business Insider
A protein researcher shares his easy go-to breakfast for strong muscles and good health
If nutrition expert Stuart Phillips could pinpoint just one time in your day when you could amp up the protein, he suspects it might be at the breakfast table. As one of the world's leading experts on protein and a nutrition scientist who's been studying this macronutrient for decades, he says the protein craze has gone a little overboard lately, with products like protein water and protein ice cream becoming trendy. "Protein's appearing in places where I don't think it has any business," Phillips, a professor of human physiology and nutrition science at McMaster University, recently told the Zoe nutrition podcast. "Nobody's truly — in our societies — deficient in protein." Instead, he says, some people might be "just a little bit under what I think is the recommended intake" of protein — a problem that can be easily solved without adding any new pricey supplements or ultra-processed products to your day. His own protein-rich go-to breakfast is cheap, sustaining, and flexible. Greek yogurt has more protein and fewer carbs than regular yogurt Phillips is part of a growing chorus of researchers and nutrition buffs who acknowledge that our current recommended dietary allowances of protein are a little bit low for most people. "A meal where people — I don't say under-consume protein — but that tends to be carbohydrate-heavy is breakfast," he said. For decades, our morning meals have been too often steered by ultraprocessed carbs like cereals, pancake mix, muffins, and toast. "Carbohydrates and fats, they're fuel," he says, but "protein is the structural component of everything." For him, the easiest way to make breakfast a more protein-rich meal is to begin with a bed of yogurt, instead of bread. "My superfood at breakfast is Greek-style yogurt," he said. It's a little higher in protein than regular yogurt, and pairs easily with other healthy, nutrient-rich breakfast staples. "Throw some nuts, throw some seeds, throw some fruit in there — it's probably my go-to breakfast just about every day." If you have a cup of whole, plain Greek yogurt (20g) for breakfast, topped with a quarter cup of mixed nuts (5.5g), a teaspoon of chia seeds (1g), and half a cup of mixed berries (0.5g), that's already about 27 grams of protein. No matter who you are or what your muscle-building goals may be, you're well on your way to meeting your daily requirements that way. How much protein do you really need? A quick and dirty formula Nutrition experts don't quite agree on how much protein is too much, but Phillips says that many people have been overdoing it lately, overreacting to the idea that our recommended guidelines lowball us. "The pendulum becomes 'well we need to get protein because we're not getting enough' but that's not the message," he said. "Actually, a lot of people are getting more than enough." His current recommendation? Consume about 1 gram of protein per kilogram of your body weight each day. If you know your weight in pounds, divide that number by 2.2 to find your rough protein target, in grams. For example, someone who weighs 150 lbs should consume around 68 grams of protein. Older people should strive to get a bit more, maybe around 1.2 grams per kilo of body weight, Phillips said. Lots of influencers and wellness gurus are recommending way more than that. Dr. Peter Attia, a popular longevity physician, recommends more than double what Phillips does, at about 2.2 grams per kilo. We've been through this charade with other macronutrients before. First, carbs were touted as the health foods of the 1980s and 90s, then fat had its heyday in the 2000s. Now, it's protein's turn to be the rockstar macronutrient. Don't get caught up in this hype cycle. Researchers generally agree that anything more than 1.6 grams of protein per kilogram each day is overkill. "I do think that the benefits of protein probably stop a lot sooner than a lot of people are making out," Phillips said.
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
James Van Der Beek reveals what colorectal cancer taught him about self-love
James Van Der Beek has just woken up from a nap as he hops on a Microsoft Teams call. About nine months after sharing his colorectal cancer diagnosis with the world, the 48-year-old actor's face looks thinner. He isn't shy talking about the toll his illness has taken on him. He admits he doesn't have as much energy as he used to. He has good days and bad days. But, while he wouldn't wish his illness on anyone, the actor adds it's also given him something else, something he didn't expect: a deeper sense of self-love. "Cancer's a wild thing," he says. "It really does force you to look at your own mortality and decide what's important and decide really what you want to live the rest of your life without. And so, one of the big things for me was recognizing how negative my self-talk was." He continues: "When I was getting treatment and away from the beautiful cacophony of six kids and 36 acres and five dogs and a bearded dragon and the beautiful chaos that is my life, in the quiet I realized how negatively I was talking to myself. And so, that started a whole journey of just recognizing how important self-love is and how necessary and how simple it is." James Van Der Beek and how cancer has changed him Van Der Beek first revealed he had colorectal cancer in a November interview with People, sharing he was diagnosed in August 2023. He says his cancer was detected via colonoscopy. Now, he's partnering with Guardant Health to encourage people to get screened for cancer regardless of if they have symptoms or not. Doing so, he says, is often life-saving. It was for him. What health & wellness means for you: Sign up for USA TODAY's Better Yet newsletter "To me, the biggest misunderstanding is that you need to have symptoms to get screened," he says. "I was very healthy, in amazing cardiovascular shape, and had full-blown stage three cancer, and I didn't know it." The actor says cancer has forced him to take a good, hard look at his life. It's made him rethink what matters and let go of what doesn't. It's also made him reexamine who he really is, versus what he's come to identify himself as. "I was forced to look at myself and say, 'Well, what am I, if I'm just a too skinny guy alone in a room with cancer?' And the conclusion that I came to, after some meditation, was I'm still worthy of love. I'm still worthy of God's love, but I'm still worthy of self-love, just for existing," he says. "My conclusion is that I do believe we're here to experience love − to connect to and to give and to receive love. But, in order to receive love, I think you have to have it for yourself first." Why he wants to work now more than ever Van Der Beek has refused to let cancer stop him from acting. In fact, he says, it's actually fueled him to act − and do other things he loves − even more. Van Der Beek recently appeared in Amazon's "Overcompensating" and is set to also appear in the upcoming "Legally Blonde" spin-off series "Elle." Before cancer, Van Der Beek says, he was on the verge of taking a step back from acting. Since his diagnosis, however, he's recommitted himself to it. "For a minute I thought, 'You know what? I don't need acting. I don't need it in the way that I did before,' " he says. "I'm very, very happy just doing this here with my family. And then, when I got cancer, I realized I love to tell stories. Acting is actually a real passion. Writing is a real passion, and I need to feed that. So, I joke that I'm the only guy I know who got cancer and realized I need to work more." More: James Van Der Beek chokes up discussing his wife's support after cancer diagnosis One of the best parts about acting, he says, is that, when the camera's rolling, nothing else matters. You're in the moment, not thinking about anything else − including cancer. As for family life, Van Der Beek says his kids have all processed his illness differently. The actor and his wife Kimberly Brook share six children, whose ages span 3 to 14. When it comes to parenting with an illness, Van Der Beek has made honesty his policy. Being transparent, he says, has "really allowed for some lovely moments of connection" with his kids. James Van Der Beek, Jenna Fischer and the rise of young people getting cancer "We made the choice to just be as honest as we can with them," he says. "They all handle it differently. They all hide it differently. Their concern manifests differently in each of them. But again, telling them what I'm going through, it actually allows them to show up for me in a way that's just been so beautiful. 'Dad, can I get you tea?' 'No, dad, I'll get that for you.' 'How are you feeling today?' They know when I'm having a bad day. I mean, kids, they pick up on everything." Though he's grateful for the new perspective cancer's given him, he obviously wishes we lived in a world where no one had to go through it. That's why he's "shouting from the rooftops: Get screened. Talk to your doctor." "I'm feeling good," he says. "I've learned a lot. But, if I could save people from having to go through this journey, I definitely will. I would still give colorectal cancer zero stars." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: James Van Der Beek gives update on colorectal cancer


USA Today
7 days ago
- USA Today
James Van Der Beek reveals what colorectal cancer taught him about self-love
James Van Der Beek has just woken up from a nap as he hops on a Microsoft Teams call. About nine months after sharing his colorectal cancer diagnosis with the world, the 48-year-old actor's face looks thinner. He isn't shy talking about the toll his illness has taken on him. He admits he doesn't have as much energy as he used to. He has good days and bad days. But, while he wouldn't wish his illness on anyone, the actor adds it's also given him something else, something he didn't expect: a deeper sense of self-love. "Cancer's a wild thing," he says. "It really does force you to look at your own mortality and decide what's important and decide really what you want to live the rest of your life without. And so, one of the big things for me was recognizing how negative my self-talk was." He continues: "When I was getting treatment and away from the beautiful cacophony of six kids and 36 acres and five dogs and a bearded dragon and the beautiful chaos that is my life, in the quiet I realized how negatively I was talking to myself. And so, that started a whole journey of just recognizing how important self-love is and how necessary and how simple it is." James Van Der Beek and how cancer has changed him Van Der Beek first revealed he had colorectal cancer in a November interview with People, sharing he was diagnosed in August 2023. He says his cancer was detected via colonoscopy. Now, he's partnering with Guardant Health to encourage people to get screened for cancer regardless of if they have symptoms or not. Doing so, he says, is often life-saving. It was for him. What health & wellness means for you: Sign up for USA TODAY's Better Yet newsletter "To me, the biggest misunderstanding is that you need to have symptoms to get screened," he says. "I was very healthy, in amazing cardiovascular shape, and had full-blown stage three cancer, and I didn't know it." The actor says cancer has forced him to take a good, hard look at his life. It's made him rethink what matters and let go of what doesn't. It's also made him reexamine who he really is, versus what he's come to identify himself as. "I was forced to look at myself and say, 'Well, what am I, if I'm just a too skinny guy alone in a room with cancer?' And the conclusion that I came to, after some meditation, was I'm still worthy of love. I'm still worthy of God's love, but I'm still worthy of self-love, just for existing," he says. "My conclusion is that I do believe we're here to experience love − to connect to and to give and to receive love. But, in order to receive love, I think you have to have it for yourself first." Why he wants to work now more than ever Van Der Beek has refused to let cancer stop him from acting. In fact, he says, it's actually fueled him to act − and do other things he loves − even more. Van Der Beek recently appeared in Amazon's "Overcompensating" and is set to also appear in the upcoming "Legally Blonde" spin-off series "Elle." Before cancer, Van Der Beek says, he was on the verge of taking a step back from acting. Since his diagnosis, however, he's recommitted himself to it. "For a minute I thought, 'You know what? I don't need acting. I don't need it in the way that I did before,' " he says. "I'm very, very happy just doing this here with my family. And then, when I got cancer, I realized I love to tell stories. Acting is actually a real passion. Writing is a real passion, and I need to feed that. So, I joke that I'm the only guy I know who got cancer and realized I need to work more." More: James Van Der Beek chokes up discussing his wife's support after cancer diagnosis One of the best parts about acting, he says, is that, when the camera's rolling, nothing else matters. You're in the moment, not thinking about anything else − including cancer. As for family life, Van Der Beek says his kids have all processed his illness differently. The actor and his wife Kimberly Brook share six children, whose ages span 3 to 14. When it comes to parenting with an illness, Van Der Beek has made honesty his policy. Being transparent, he says, has "really allowed for some lovely moments of connection" with his kids. James Van Der Beek, Jenna Fischer and the rise of young people getting cancer "We made the choice to just be as honest as we can with them," he says. "They all handle it differently. They all hide it differently. Their concern manifests differently in each of them. But again, telling them what I'm going through, it actually allows them to show up for me in a way that's just been so beautiful. 'Dad, can I get you tea?' 'No, dad, I'll get that for you.' 'How are you feeling today?' They know when I'm having a bad day. I mean, kids, they pick up on everything." Though he's grateful for the new perspective cancer's given him, he obviously wishes we lived in a world where no one had to go through it. That's why he's "shouting from the rooftops: Get screened. Talk to your doctor." "I'm feeling good," he says. "I've learned a lot. But, if I could save people from having to go through this journey, I definitely will. I would still give colorectal cancer zero stars."