
Secukinumab in Early PsA Starts Fast vs Standard of Care
More patients with recently diagnosed psoriatic arthritis (PsA) saw clinical improvement by 3 months in a treat-to-target strategy with secukinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-17, compared with those on standard-of-care treatment, but this difference was not seen at later 3-month intervals out to 1 year.
METHODOLOGY:
In a randomized, open-label, manufacturer-sponsored, multicenter trial, 120 patients (mean age, 49; 41% women) diagnosed with PsA within the prior 3 months were randomized to a treat-to-target approach of early treatment with secukinumab or standard of care in which treatment escalated according to predetermined steps if patients failed to respond.
At the start, in the secukinumab arm, 60 patients received 300 mg monthly secukinumab, a single injection of 80 mg triamcinolone, and 15 mg/wk methotrexate plus 10 mg/wk folic acid. In the standard-of-care arm, 60 patients received 80 mg triamcinolone (single injection), methotrexate starting at 15 mg/wk and increasing to 25 mg/wk by 6 weeks, and 10 mg/wk folic acid.
In the standard-of-care arm, treatment was escalated by adding sulfasalazine 1000 mg twice daily if needed, then switching if needed to a first or second TNF inhibitor with methotrexate.
In the secukinumab arm, patients with poor response were escalated to a TNF inhibitor with 25 mg methotrexate per week, followed by a second TNF inhibitor plus methotrexate if needed.
Outcomes were measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and the primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving 50% or greater improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR50) at 6 months.
TAKEAWAY:
At 6 months, both trial arms had similar ACR50 rates (around 41% in the secukinumab arm vs 37% in the standard-of-care arm).
However, first-line secukinumab was associated with significantly more patients achieving ACR50 at 3 months (about 42% vs 22%; P < .05).
Secondary endpoints of the percentage of patients meeting criteria for Minimal Disease Activity, 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index, and resolution of enthesitis and dactylitis generally followed the same pattern of quicker responses in the secukinumab arm, followed by numerically greater but not statistically significant differences in the secukinumab vs standard-of-care arms at later timepoints.
IN PRACTICE:
'Early response is very important to patients. They don't necessarily care whether they are eventually going to catch up. They want to know they'll feel much better at 3 months,' commented Dafna Gladman, MD, senior scientist at the Toronto Western Research Institute and professor in the Institute of Medical Science at the University of Toronto, both in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. She was not a part of the study.
SOURCE:
Gonul Hazal Koc, MD, of Erasmus MC in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, led the research and presented the 12-month results in a poster at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2025 Annual Meeting and Trainee Symposium in Bogotá, Colombia.
LIMITATIONS:
The study was not blinded, and a treat-to-target approach, while recommended by several guidelines, does not necessarily represent routine clinical practice in PsA.
DISCLOSURES:
Koc and her colleagues' research was supported by an unrestricted grant to her institution by Novartis, the manufacturer of secukinumab, which also supplied the study drug.Koc reported having no financial relationships outside the grant to her institution. Gladman has received research support and/or consultant fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Novartis, Galapagos, UCB, Gilead, Janssen, Roche, and Pfizer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
TransMedics Group, Inc. (TMDX): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on TransMedics Group, Inc. on Global Equity Briefing's Substack by Ray Myers. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on TMDX. TransMedics Group, Inc.'s share was trading at $118.97 as of July 31st. TMDX's trailing and forward P/E were 59.75 and 62.11 respectively according to Yahoo Finance. A surgeon in a modern operating theatre performing a transplant surgery with medical technology. TransMedics is revolutionizing the organ transplant ecosystem through its Organ Care System, a technology designed to keep organs warm, oxygenated, and viable far longer than traditional cold storage. By tackling key bottlenecks—organ degradation, low utilization rates, and logistical constraints—Organ Care System significantly extends transplant windows and boosts usage rates. Clinical trial data highlights its transformative potential: expanded criteria lungs and hearts saw utilization jump to 87% and 81%, respectively, while DCD heart use rose from 0% to 89%. TMDX monetizes this impact through a razor-and-blade model—selling Organ Care System consoles and high-margin, single-use consumables—while providing end-to-end services through its National Organ Care System Program, a SaaS-like Organs as a Service platform. With 21 private jets, 17 procurement hubs, and trained staff, TMDX handles organ retrieval, transport, and maintenance, positioning itself as a logistics powerhouse in the transplant chain. The opportunity is vast: U.S. underutilization alone represents a $400M+ annual consumables revenue potential, and TMDX currently serves just 3% of the $39B global market expected by 2034. Future growth catalysts include a kidney Organ Care System by 2029, entry into international markets via a $200M facility in Italy, and scaling the National Organ Care System Program globally. Financially, the company achieved profitability in 2024, posting $441M in revenue and positive operating cash flow, though free cash flow remains negative due to capex-heavy expansion. Trading at a P/E of 91, investor returns hinge on continued execution, EU rollout, and successful kidney platform launch. If goals are met, the stock could double by 2030, but slower expansion or margin compression may limit upside. Previously, we covered a on TransMedics Group, Inc. by Oliver | MMMT Wealth in May 2025, which highlighted warm perfusion technology, strong execution, and real-time flight data as revenue indicators. The company's stock appreciated ~24% since Q1 outperformance played out. Ray Myers shares a similar view but emphasizes the SaaS-like NOP model and global expansion potential. TransMedics Group, Inc. is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 23 hedge fund portfolios held TMDX at the end of the first quarter which was 29 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of TMDX as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
BofA Securities Affirms ‘Buy' Rating on Taysha Gene Therapies (TSHA) on TSHA-102 Prospects
Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSHA) is . On July 11, BofA Securities initiated coverage of the stock with a 'Buy' rating and an $8 price target. The positive stance comes as the research firm remains buoyed by the company's Taysha gene therapy TSHA-102 under development for Rett Syndrome. Copyright: dolgachov / 123RF Stock Photo The research firm believes TSHA-102 has the potential to become the first approved disease-modifying treatment for the severe neurodevelopmental disease. Clinical trials have already demonstrated that the therapy has the potential to help patients regain or achieve developmental milestones. Taysha Gene Therapies has already reached an alignment with the US Food and Drug Administration on a pivotal trial design for TSHA-102. The company plans to initiate a trial in the third quarter of 2023. BofA Securities views the candidate treatment as a commercially attractive opportunity. Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSHA) is a clinical-stage biotech company focused on developing and bringing to market gene therapies for serious monogenic disorders affecting the central nervous system. It seeks to address unmet medical needs by developing transformative medicines for these diseases. Its approach centers on using adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapies. While we acknowledge the potential of TSHA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and 11 Defensive Stocks Billionaires are Buying amid US Trade Tariff Uncertainty. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio


Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
These Two Simple Interventions May Cut CRC Recurrence Risk
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Hello. I'm Dr David Johnson, professor of medicine and chief of gastroenterology at Eastern Virginia Medical School and Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. New guidelines have lowered the age to begin screening for colon cancer to 45 years old. Although this change is positive, we're still seeing advanced cancer in younger patients who haven't been screened in time. Once diagnosed, these patients undergo surgery and chemotherapy and often return to us asking, 'What can I do now to help myself?' Two recent studies highlight interventions that are simple, affordable, and actionable today: exercise and aspirin. Let's take a closer look at the results. Exercise's Risk Reduction Potential The idea that exercise reduces cancer recurrence and mortality is supported by observational data. The mechanistic effects behind this have been ascribed to metabolic growth factors, inflammatory changes, immune function changes, and perhaps even positive impact on sleep. A study just published in The New England Journal of Medicine examined structured exercise after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. The phase 3 randomized CHALLENGE trial, mostly conducted at Canadian and Australian centers, recruited patients with resected stage II or III colon cancer (9.8% and 90.2%, respectively) who had completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with recurrences within a year of diagnosis were excluded, as they were more likely to have highly aggressive, biologically active disease. Patients were randomized to receive healthcare education materials alone or in conjunction with a structured exercise program over a 3-year follow-up period. The exercise intervention, delivered in person or virtually, focused on increasing recreational aerobic activity over baseline by at least 10 metabolic equivalent task (MET). An increment of 10 MET hours per week is not too vigorous. It is essentially the equivalent of adding about 45-60 minutes of brisk walking or 25-30 minutes of jogging 3-4 times a week. Patients were asked to increase MET over the first 6 months and then maintain or further increase the amount over the next 2.5 years. They were permitted to structure their own exercise program by choosing the type, frequency, intensity, and duration of aerobic exercise. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, with secondary endpoints assessing overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and other outcomes. Although designed to detect differences at 3 years, follow-up was also performed out to 5 and 8 years. At a median follow-up of 7.9 years, exercise reduced the relative risk of disease recurrence, new primary cancer, or death by 28% ( P =.02). This benefit persisted — and even strengthened — over time, with disease-free survival increasing by 6.4 and 7.1 percentage points at 5 and 8 years, respectively. Musculoskeletal adverse events were slightly higher in the exercise group compared with the health education group (18.5% vs 11.5%, respectively), but only 10% were directly attributed to the exercise. There are considerations when interpreting these results. First, there was an attrition over time for compliance and training. It would be interesting to see whether that impacted the results. Second, it's unclear whether patient pedigree or a genomic pathway may predispose to a benefit here for the exercise group. But overall, this phase 3 trial provides class 1 evidence supporting exercise as a low-cost, high-impact intervention to reduce cancer recurrence. Adjuvant Aspirin in Colon Cancer Subset That's a perfect segue into another recent study looking at the effects of adjuvant aspirin on the prevention of recurrence. The ALASCCA trial— conducted across centers in Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Norway — assessed patients with stage I-III rectal cancer or stage II-III colon cancer. It focused on a subset of patients with an oncogenic abnormality called PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha). PIK3CA occurs in approximately a third of colon cancers and is associated with significant chemotherapy resistance and a higher rate of disease progression. Of the included patients, 1103 (37%) had alterations in the PIK3CA pathway. Researchers randomized patients to receive either 160 mg of aspirin or placebo daily for 3 years, starting within 3 months of surgery. Among patients with PIK3CA mutations, aspirin dramatically reduced the risk for time to recurrence by nearly 50% at 3 years ( P =.044). Adverse events associated with aspirin were minimal, including one case each of gastrointestinal bleeding, hematoma, and allergic reaction. There is no evidence that higher aspirin doses provide greater prevention of colorectal cancer recurrence. The 160 mg use in the current study is fairly normal, roughly equivalent to two low-dose (81 mg) aspirin tablets. Now, it's worth noting that the use of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease was initially recommended by the US Preventive Task Services Force in 2016. This recommendation was then recanted in 2022, when the same group reported limited net benefit to this approach. Two Proactive Actions These studies highlight two interventions — exercise and aspirin — that are low cost, accessible, and appeal to patients eager to help prevent their cancer from recurring. Exercise is broadly beneficial and can be recommended immediately. For aspirin, patients should work with their oncologist to determine their PIK3CA mutation status, as this subgroup appears to benefit the most. These findings offer patients meaningful, proactive interventions they can apply to support their recovery and reduce the risk of recurrence. Hopefully these new findings will help guide your clinical conversations. I'm Dr David Johnson. Thanks for listening.