Xiaomi founder's bold EV bet paying off where Apple's failed
Xiaomi succeeding where Apple failed has burnished Mr Lei Jun's reputation, made his company one of the most valuable in China.
Hong Kong – Lei Jun, founder and chairman of Xiaomi, the only tech company to have successfully diversified into carmaking, couldn't resist.
Speaking at a triumphant launch event in Beijing in June for Xiaomi's second electric vehicle, a long-anticipated SUV, Mr Lei pointedly mentioned Apple, which spent a decade and US$10 billion (S$12.7 billion) trying to make a car before giving up in 2024.
'Since Apple stopped developing its car, we've given special care to Apple users,' he said, noting that owners of the US giant's iPhones would be able to seamlessly sync their devices to Xiaomi's vehicles.
The not-so-subtle dig was followed by a flex: Xiaomi then said it had received more than 289,000 orders for its new sport utility vehicle within an hour of its announcement, more than its first EV, a sedan launched in March 2024.
Xiaomi succeeding where Apple failed has burnished Mr Lei's reputation, made his company one of the most valuable in China and shaken up both the tech and automobile industries.
The collapse of Apple's moonshot car programme has only underscored the effectiveness of Xiaomi's grounded approach, which took inspiration from proven designs from Tesla and Porsche Automobil Holding while staying true to the affordable ethos that's made it a cult brand for Gen Z consumers.
Crucially, it also launched into the most fertile EV ecosystem in the world – China. With state subsidies, existing charging infrastructure and a ready made supply chain, Xiaomi had a structural tailwind Apple lacked.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
World Trump says US nears trade deals as tariff effective date delayed
Singapore MPs should not ask questions to 'clock numbers'; focus should be improving S'poreans' lives: Seah Kian Peng
Singapore Sequencing and standards: Indranee on role of Leader of the House
Singapore NUS College draws 10,000 applications for 400 places, showing strong liberal arts interest
Singapore Life After... blazing biomedical research trail in S'pore: Renowned scientist breaks new ground at 59
Business Beyond the 9 to 5: Why side hustles are becoming a way of life for more full-time workers
Singapore Smart sensors used in study to detect cognitive decline in seniors who live alone
Life Star Awards 2025: 11 looks that shocked and charmed on the red carpet
Xiaomi declined to comment for this story.
Mr Lei and Xiaomi's 'charisma, brand recognition and ecosystem cannot be underestimated,' Yale Zhang, the managing director of Shanghai-based consultancy Automotive Foresight, said. 'It's a big influence on young consumers who have filled their homes with Xiaomi products. When it comes time to buy an EV, they naturally think of Xiaomi.'
Recruitment tactics
Xiaomi's public narrative is that Mr Lei and his team learned by visiting multiple Chinese automakers, including Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and Great Wall Motor, and talked to more than 200 industry experts in some 80 meetings.
The reality is also that he used Xiaomi's reputation as an innovative consumer behemoth to get close to China's large carmakers and pick off their top talent. Geely and its billionaire founder Li Shufu welcomed Mr Lei to the automaker's research institute in Ningbo in the months leading up to Xiaomi's announcement that it would enter the car business to discuss topics, including potential collaboration.
It's Geely lore that Mr Lei added the WeChat contacts of many staff at the institute, including then-director Hu Zhengnan. Mr Hu later joined Shunwei Capital Partners, the investment firm co-founded by Mr Lei.
Mr Hu, known for his love of the German luxury marque Porsche, was one of the team members credited as being instrumental to developing Xiaomi's EV business, Mr Lei said at the SU7 launch in 2024. He added that Mr Hu left his previous employer after his contract ended.
Other executives who joined Xiaomi came from companies including BAIC Motor, BMW, SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile – the General Motors joint venture with SAIC Motor and Wuling Motors Holdings – and auto supplier Magna Steyr.
Besides assembling top Chinese automaking talent, Mr Lei made a prescient bet on investing in a self-controlled supply chain – insulating Xiaomi's operation from manufacturing vagaries. This came from painful lessons learned in Xiaomi's early smartphone-producing days, when external suppliers would cut off components unpredictably.
With the 10 billion yuan (S$1.8 billion) it committed to the first phase of its EV venture, Xiaomi also built its own factory, rather than going down the contract manufacturing route that some Chinese makers, including Nio and Xpeng, did when they started out.
'Among tech companies that now build electric vehicles, those who previously had hardware products seem to be more successful than those who only had software products or information services,' said Paul Gong, UBS Group's head of China autos research.
Copycat allegations
Despite its early success, there are many who argue Xiaomi's one hit car is copied from elsewhere – and that a sole successful vehicle does not a successful auto producer make. Mr Lei's aggressive approach has also raised hackles in China's car industry.
Yu Jingmin, vice president of SAIC's passenger car division, reportedly described Xiaomi's approach as 'shameless' in a critique of the SU7 resembling Porsche. The SU7 has been colloquially dubbed 'Porsche Mi' by netizens.
Xiaomi's design team, led by former BMW designer Li Tianyuan, has defended the SU7's aesthetics, emphasizing that the choices were driven by aerodynamic efficiency and performance benchmarks.
In late March, there was another setback after a fatal accident involving the SU7. The car had its advanced driver assistance technology turned on before the crash, which afterward led to authorities reining in the promotion and deployment of the technology.
The usually vocal Mr Lei kept a low profile on social media for more than a month post the March accident. He returned to more active engagement in May with a missive that said this period of time was the most difficult in his career.
Fortunately for Xiaomi, its consumer base is sticky. Known as 'Mi Fans,' the loyal customers have played a pivotal role in the company's rise. Xiaomi cultivated this fandom early on by prioritising user feedback and the grassroots allegiance has helped it build strong brand equity, especially in China. The SU7 has remained a top selling model even after the accident in March.
Small scale
The EVs are also showing financial promise. Xiaomi posted record revenue for first quarter this year, driven by car and smartphone sales. Its EV division is expected to turn profitable in the second half of 2025, Mr Lei said in an investor meeting in June.
But even if the popularity of Xiaomi's EVs can spring beyond the company's devoted base, production is still on a much more boutique scale. China's top car brand, BYD, sold around 4.3 million EVs and hybrids last year, many overseas, while Tesla moved about 1.78 million vehicles globally. Toyota Motor, the world's No. 1 automaker, sold some 10.8 million vehicles and boasts a lineup of approximately 70 different models.
Mr Lei doesn't seem to be prioritizing the mass market of below US$20,000 yet, which drives significant volume and is where BYD dominates, Automotive Foresight's Zhang said.
Without a lineup in that segment, Xiaomi cars will remain niche purchases for middle to higher-income consumers and Xiaomi may face the same risks as Tesla, which is seeing its sales slump exacerbated by a narrow consumer base and limited models.
Nonetheless, Mr Lei seems buoyed by Xiaomi's early wins and is now looking at global expansion. Xiaomi will consider selling cars outside China from 2027, he said last week.
Success or otherwise, the European Union, the US and Turkey have all slapped tariffs on Chinese EVs, but Xiaomi wants to set up a R&D centre in Munich and may test sales starting in European markets such as Germany, Spain and France when the time is right, Chinese media 36Kr reported in April.
'Xiaomi is a latecomer to the auto industry,' Mr Lei admitted on Weibo in June. But, he said, in a market driven by technology and innovation and the rising global influence of China's EV culture, 'there are always opportunities for latecomers.' BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
40 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Chips won the Cold War; rare earths may win the next
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The US is doing too little to close the energy-transition technological gap. A mine for heavy rare earth metals, the minerals crucial for everything from electric cars to drones, robots and missiles, on the outskirts of Longnan, China. In retrospect, the symbolism of the moment was foreboding. On May 15, 2019, President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning US firms from doing business with Chinese telecommunications companies, including Huawei Technologies. Five days after that first broadside in a brewing trade-and-technology war, Chinese President Xi Jinping was photographed touring a factory producing rare earth magnets. Such devices, his visit seemed to imply, could be a geopolitical weapon for China quite as potent as advanced semiconductors are for the US.
Straits Times
41 minutes ago
- Straits Times
From glass and steel to rare earth metals, new materials have changed society throughout history
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Innovation in materials science has driven technological change and, as a result, shaped global economies, politics and the environment. The rare earth metals case illustrates how a single category of materials can shape trade policy, industrial planning and even diplomatic alliances. Many modern devices – from cellphones and computers to electric vehicles and wind turbines – rely on strong magnets made from a type of minerals called rare earths. As the systems and infrastructure used in daily life have turned digital and the United States has moved towards renewable energy, accessing these minerals has become critical – and the markets for these elements have grown rapidly. Modern society now uses rare earth magnets in everything from national defence, where magnet-based systems are integral to missile guidance and aircraft, to the clean energy transition, which depends on wind turbines and electric vehicles. The rapid growth of the rare earth metal trade and its effects on society isn't the only case study of its kind. Throughout history, materials have quietly shaped the trajectory of human civilization. They form the tools people use, the buildings they inhabit, the devices that mediate their relationships and the systems that structure economies. Newly discovered materials can set off ripple effects that shape industries, shift geopolitical balances and transform people's daily habits. Materials science is the study of the atomic structure, properties, processing and performance of materials. In many ways, materials science is a discipline of immense social consequence. As a materials scientist, I'm interested in what can happen when new materials become available. Glass, steel and rare earth magnets are all examples of how innovation in materials science has driven technological change and, as a result, shaped global economies, politics and the environment. Glass lenses and the scientific revolution In the early 13th century, after the sacking of Constantinople, some excellent Byzantine glassmakers left their homes to settle in Venice – at the time a powerful economic and political centre. The local nobility welcomed the glassmakers' beautiful wares. However, to prevent the glass furnaces from causing fires, the nobles exiled the glassmakers – under penalty of death – to the island of Murano. Murano became a centre for glass craftsmanship. In the 15th century, the glassmaker Angelo Barovier experimented with adding the ash from burned plants, which contained a chemical substance called potash, to the glass. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Eligible S'poreans to get up to $850 in GSTV cash, up to $450 in MediSave top-ups in August Singapore Four golf courses to close by 2035, leaving Singapore with 12 courses Singapore Singapore's second mufti Sheikh Syed Isa Semait dies at age 87 Singapore Fewer marriages in Singapore in 2024; greater marital stability for recent unions Singapore Competition watchdog gives SIA, Malaysia Airlines conditional approval to continue cooperation Singapore About 20 delivery riders meet Pritam Singh to discuss platform worker issues Business OCBC sets loan target of $5b and covers more territories in boost for serial entrepreneurs Singapore Reform Party to leave opposition group People's Alliance for Reform; two parties remain The potash reduced the melting temperature and made liquid glass more fluid. It also eliminated bubbles in the glass and improved optical clarity. This transparent glass was later used in magnifying lenses and spectacles. Johannes Gutenberg's printing press, completed in 1455, made reading more accessible to people across Europe. With it came a need for reading glasses, which grew popular among scholars, merchants and clergy – enough that spectacle-making became an established profession. By the early 17th century, glass lenses evolved into compound optical devices. Galileo Galilei pointed a telescope toward celestial bodies, while Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered microbial life with a microscope. Lens-based instruments have been transformative. Telescopes have redefined long-standing cosmological views. Microscopes have opened entirely new fields in biology and medicine. These changes marked the dawn of empirical science, where observation and measurement drove the creation of knowledge. Today, the James Webb Space Telescope and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory continue those early telescopes' legacies of knowledge creation. Steel and empires In the late 18th and 19th centuries, the Industrial Revolution created demand for stronger, more reliable materials for machines, railroads, ships and infrastructure. The material that emerged was steel, which is strong, durable and cheap. Steel is a mixture of mostly iron, with small amounts of carbon and other elements added. Countries with large-scale steel manufacturing once had outsized economic and political power and influence over geopolitical decisions. For example, the British Parliament intended to prevent the colonies from exporting finished steel with the Iron Act of 1750. They wanted the colonies' raw iron as supply for their steel industry in England. Benjamin Huntsman invented a smelting process using 3-foot tall ceramic vessels, called crucibles, in 18th-century Sheffield. Huntsman's crucible process produced higher-quality steel for tools and weapons. One hundred years later, Henry Bessemer developed the oxygen-blowing steelmaking process, which drastically increased production speed and lowered costs. In the United States, figures such as Andrew Carnegie created a vast industry based on Bessemer's process. The widespread availability of steel transformed how societies built, travelled and defended themselves. Skyscrapers and transit systems made of steel allowed cities to grow, steel-built battleships and tanks empowered militaries, and cars containing steel became staples in consumer life. Control over steel resources and infrastructure made steel a foundation of national power. China's 21st-century rise to steel dominance is a continuation of this pattern. From 1995 to 2015, China's contribution to the world steel production increased from about 10 per cent to more than 50 per cent. The White House responded in 2018 with massive tariffs on Chinese steel. Rare earth metals and global trade Early in the 21st century, the advance of digital technologies and the transition to an economy based on renewable energies created a demand for rare earth elements. Rare earth elements are 17 chemically very similar elements, including neodymium, dysprosium, samarium and others. They occur in nature in bundles and are the ingredients that make magnets super strong and useful. They are necessary for highly efficient electric motors, wind turbines and electronic devices. Because of their chemical similarity, separating and purifying rare earth elements i nvolves complex and expensive processes. China controls the majority of global rare earth processing capacity. Political tensions between countries, especially around trade tariffs and strategic competition, can risk shortages or disruptions in the supply chain. The rare earth metals case illustrates how a single category of materials can shape trade policy, industrial planning and even diplomatic alliances. Technological transformation begins with societal pressure. New materials create opportunities for scientific and engineering breakthroughs. Once a material proves useful, it quickly becomes woven into the fabric of daily life and broader systems. With each innovation, the material world subtly reorganizes the social world — redefining what is possible, desirable and normal. Understanding how societies respond to new innovations in materials science can help today's engineers and scientists solve crises in sustainability and security. Every technical decision is, in some ways, a cultural one, and every material has a story that extends far beyond its molecular structure. Peter Mullner is Distinguished Professor in Materials Science and Engineering, Boise State University. This article was first published in The Conversation .
Straits Times
43 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Not easy to buy online tickets for football matches
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The Football Association of Singapore is using Ticketek, a company based in Sydney, Australia, for selling tickets to football events in Singapore. I am 68 and am finding it very difficult to secure tickets, as the process seems rather complicated. The password field, even when filled with the required 12 characters, does not always let me proceed. I also find electronic payments a security risk. Surely a company which has counters in Singapore should be chosen as the ticketing partner, as that would give us a choice to buy physical tickets. It doesn't help that Ticketek's helpline is an Australian number. One suggestion is to sell the tickets at the venues for three days after the match dates are announced, so that fans like me can go physically to buy them. It looks like I cannot even go support Singapore's boys' and girls' squads in the Lion City Cup 2025, or watch the national team when they face India and Bangladesh in the coming months. As retired seniors, we feel locked out from attending football events in our golden years. Please think of us. Prakasam Alexander Maria Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Eligible S'poreans to get up to $850 in GSTV cash, up to $450 in MediSave top-ups in August Singapore Four golf courses to close by 2035, leaving Singapore with 12 courses Singapore Singapore's second mufti Sheikh Syed Isa Semait dies at age 87 Singapore Fewer marriages in Singapore in 2024; greater marital stability for recent unions Singapore Competition watchdog gives SIA, Malaysia Airlines conditional approval to continue cooperation Singapore About 20 delivery riders meet Pritam Singh to discuss platform worker issues Business OCBC sets loan target of $5b and covers more territories in boost for serial entrepreneurs Singapore Reform Party to leave opposition group People's Alliance for Reform; two parties remain
