HC directs Industries Department to pay ₹20 lakh to petitioners for wilful disobedience of court orders
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed the Industries Department to pay a sum of ₹20 lakh to petitioners and another ₹5 lakh to the Chief Justice Relief Fund for the wilful disobedience of court orders to grant permission for sand quarrying operations in Tiruchi district.
The court was hearing a contempt petition filed in 2015 by Babu of Tiruchi, the original petitioner. The other petitioners B. Shanthi, B. Balaji, B. Vishnuvaradan, B. Umamaheswari and D. Bhavani, his family members, were added as petitioners following the demise of Babu.
The contempt petition was filed for non compliance of the order wherein Tiruchi Collector was directed to grant permission for quarrying sand in favour of the petitioner on the basis of the pathway permission from the Forest Department with conditions stipulated by the Supreme Court.
The petitioner was granted licence to quarry sand covering an extent of 10 hectares in Srinivasanallur village at Thottiyam taluk in Tiruchi district for three years from December 2001 to December 2004. Subsequently, the State government issued a G.O. in 2003 introducing Rule 38-A to the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959, thereby taking over the operation of sand quarries by the government. The court upheld the validity of the G.O. subject to certain directions in favour of the petitioner.
Aggrieved by the same, the State government preferred a Civil Appeal before the Supreme Court which upheld the validity of Rule 38-A, while permitting the lessees who were in existence as October 2, 2003, to continue quarrying operations and also directed refund of the unutilised lease amounts. A review petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court order Tiruchi Collector permitted the petitioner to carry on quarrying operations for six months. However, the petitioner was unable to commence the quarrying operations as the Forest Department deferred passing an order granting permission to use the pathway for transportation. Consequently, the permission period for quarrying operations expired.
The petitioner sought extension of the quarrying period, which was rejected on the ground that the original permission period had already lapsed. The rejection order was challenged. In 2010, the court directed the petitioner to approach the Forest Department for permission to use the pathway and to approach Tiruchi Collector for extension of the quarry lease.
The petitioner submitted an application to the Forest Department and the Department granted permission to use the pathway. Subsequently, the petitioner approached Tiruchi Collector for extension of the lease period. However, the same was disregarded. by Tiruchi Collector. A contempt petition was filed before the court.
Justice K. Kumaresh Babu said the court was of the view that there has been a violation of the orders of the court. Such violation is a wilful disobedience only to deny the benefits of the order of the court to the petitioner. There was a collective bureaucratic effort in seeing to defend the violation of the orders of the court by taking protection under the umbrella of subsequent events.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
T.N. government enhances Kuruvai coverage in Cauvery delta to over 5 lakh acres
With the comfortable storage of the Mettur dam and the forecast of a favourable Southwest Monsoon in the catchment areas of the Cauvery in Karnataka and Kerala, the Tamil Nadu government has set an enhanced target of over 5 lakh acres in the delta for the ongoing Kuruvai cultivation season. Last year, the achievement was around 3.88 lakh acres, which was about 1.7 lakh acres short of what was covered during 2023-24. Among the reasons for the reduced coverage in 2024-25 was the delay in the commencement of water release for irrigation from Mettur. As against the scheduled date of June 12, the release began on July 28. Since the current situation is better, the government has decided to open the dam on June 12. Cauvery realisation: Pattern of flows since 2018-19* Year Quantum realised Overall excess or shortfall 2018-19 405.43 228.176 2019-20 275.401 98.151 2020-21 211.315 34.065 2021-22 281.058 103.808 2022-23 667.483 490.233 2023-24 81.418 -95.832 2024-25 305.6289 128.3789 *The Supreme Court, in February 2018, fixed the annual quantum of water — 177.25 thousand million cubic feet (tmcft) — to be realised by Tamil Nadu at Biligundulu on the Karnataka-Tamil Nadu border, as per the monthly schedule. On Friday morning, the water level of Mettur stood at 113.41 ft against its full level of 120 ft. The storage was 83.349 thousand million cubic feet (tmcft) against the total capacity of 93.47 tmcft. On the corresponding day last year, the water level and storage were 44.88 ft and 14.739 tmcft, respectively. 'This time, the achievement in Kuruvai coverage can be as high as 5.6 lakh acres,' said an agricultural expert. Going by the average of the immediately preceding five years (2020-21 to 2024-25), the new normal coverage has been set at 4.77 lakh acres as against the traditional coverage of 3.24 lakh acres. The government has also decided to continue with a special Kuruvai package with an allocation of ₹58 crore for farmers in the delta. The scheme contains the provision of subsidies for mechanised paddy transplantation, certified quality seeds, bio-fertilizers, and micronutrient mixtures. Cauvery water realisation during 2024-25 (in tmcft) Month Realised Excess or shortfall June 2.2519 -6.9381 July 96.5429 65.3029 August 78.3974 32.4474 September 27.615 -9.145 October 39.7128 19.4928 November 19.8243 6.0443 December 18.4808 11.1308 January 3.538 0.778 February 2.0406 -0.4594 March 3.0639 0.5639 April 4.3305 1.8305 May 9.8308 7.3308 Total 305.6289 128.3789 Cauvery panel to meet Meanwhile, the Cauvery Water Regulation Committee (CWRC) will hold its deliberations on June 10. As of now, the State's concern is to ensure that Karnataka complies with the monthly schedule of water release, as decided by the Supreme Court in the February 2018 judgment and by the Cauvery Water Management Authority in June and subsequent months. The just-concluded water year (June 2024-May 2025) saw the State experiencing yet another year of excess realisation. Since the Supreme Court's 2018 verdict, the State received less than its due of 177.25 tmcft only once (2023-24).
United News of India
10 hours ago
- United News of India
US SC gives Trump admin's DOGE dept full authorisation to access social security data
Washington, June 7 (UNI) The US Supreme Court on Friday authorised officials from the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to access Social Security Administration data, giving it complete access to all sensitive private data of American citizens. The Supreme Court issued the authorisation after allowing an emergency petition filed by the administration of President Donald Trump to ask for a lifting of an injunction issued by a district judge in Maryland, who stated that privacy must be safeguarded, reports said. 'Under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,' the court said in a three-paragraph order. The order didn't, however, give the reasoning behind its ruling, which has become a very controversial issue. The order was also challenged by the court's three liberals — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — all of whom dissented. In an opinion joined by Sotomayor, Jackson said the court was 'creating grave privacy risks for millions of Americans.' In the SSA case, US Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the Supreme Court that 'the government cannot eliminate waste and fraud if district courts bar the very agency personnel with expertise and the designated mission of curtailing such waste and fraud from performing their jobs.' The DOGE department, which was created by the Trump administration and was until recently headed by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, before his resignation following his spat with the POTUS, while not an official government department, was designed specifically to monitor data fraud and misinformation. The disputed data includes Social Security numbers, addresses, birth and marriage certificates, tax and earnings records, employment history, and bank and credit card information. The lawsuit challenging DOGE's actions alleged that allowing broader access to personal information would violate a federal law called the Privacy Act, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander had ruled that DOGE had no legitimate need to access the specific data in question, according to Xinhua. The 4th circuit court of appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, declined to block Judge Hollander's decision, prompting the Trump administration to file an emergency request with the Supreme Court. In a separate order issued Friday in another case involving DOGE, the Supreme Court granted an additional request filed by the Trump administration, allowing it to shield DOGE from Freedom of Information Act requests for the time being. UNI ANV PRS
Hans India
10 hours ago
- Hans India
South Korean court orders Mitsubishi to compensate 107-year-old
Seoul: South Korean appeals court has ruled in favour of a 107-year-old South Korean victim of Japan's wartime forced labour in a damages suit filed against Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd., sources said on Saturday. The civil appeals division of the Seoul Central District Court overturned a lower court's ruling handed down in 2022 that rejected Kim Han-soo's suit seeking compensation from the Japanese company on the grounds that the case's statute of limitations had expired. In May, the appeals court ordered Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to pay 100 million won ($73,400) in compensation to Kim in a ruling that came about 80 years after he was conscripted into Japan's wartime forced labour. Despite the court's ruling, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries is not likely to pay the compensation. Kim said he was forced to work in a shipyard run by the Japanese firm in 1944 during Japan's 1910-45 colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula. In previous damages suits related to forced labor, courts largely ruled that the statute of limitations expired in May 2015, three years after the Supreme Court acknowledged the legal right to claim damages by Korean victims of Japan's forced labour for the first time, Yonhap news agency reported. South Korean civil law stipulates that the legal right to claim damages expires three years after the victim discovers the harm and identifies the offender. But the appeals court ruled in favour of Kim, judging that the statute of limitations related to forced labour-related damages suits should be calculated based on a separate 2018 ruling by the Supreme Court, effectively pushing back the expiration of the statute of limitation. Kim's damages suit against Mitsubishi was filed in 2019. In 2018, the Supreme Court ordered Japanese firms to compensate Korean victims of Tokyo's forced labour in a landmark ruling. But Japan has claimed all such reparation issues were settled under a 1965 treaty to normalise bilateral relations.
