Trump Offers F-47 Sixth-Gen Fighter To Japan: Reports
A possible sale of the F-47 to Tokyo was raised during a phone call between Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba last week, according to a report from the Japanese daily newspaper Asahi Shimbun. According to this source, the short-notice call was confirmed by Ishiba administration officials and came just before a visit to the United States by Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's top trade negotiator, for talks on Trump's economic tariffs.
Trump and Ishiba are said to have discussed the strengthening of the U.S.-Japanese military alliance, with the U.S. leader asking whether the Japanese prime minister agreed that '47' is a good number. The new Boeing fighter received the Mission Design Series designation F-47, echoing the fact that Trump is the 47th U.S. president.
The Asahi Shimbun also reports that Trump praised the F-22 Raptor and the so-called F-55, a purported development of the F-35 that the U.S. president first mentioned while talking to the press earlier this month. Trump has described the F-55 as a twin-engined F-35, but there has been no confirmation from the manufacturer or the Pentagon that such an aircraft is in the works.
According to Japanese officials, Trump asked whether Ishiba was interested in U.S.-made fighters and promised to get 'the best' for Japan. The same officials noted that the offer of buying U.S. combat jets was not tied to any tariff negotiations.
At this stage, there's no sign that Tokyo is actively looking to add a new type of fighter jet to its inventory, although earlier this year, Ishiba did disclose an interest in buying C-17 Globemaster III transport aircraft from the United States. With Boeing's C-17 production line now shuttered, any such aircraft would have to be transferred from the U.S. Air Force or from an allied operator inventory.
Officially, at least, Japan is still committed to the GCAP program, which aims to field a sixth-generation crewed fighter, which is known in the United Kingdom as Tempest. You can read more about what we know of this aircraft and its planned capabilities here.
However, there are now indications that Japan may be concerned that the Tempest fighter will not be ready for service soon enough for its requirements.
Citing two unnamed defense sources, Reuters reports today that Japan is looking at ways of filling a gap in its fighter fleet pending the likely delayed arrival of GCAP. One of those sources blamed a lack of urgency on the part of Italy and the United Kingdom for the slow pace of the GCAP initiative, while the other noted it was taking too long to align each country's concept of how the aircraft will operate.
A British Ministry of Defense spokesperson told Reuters that: 'The United Kingdom, Italy and Japan are focused on delivering a next-generation combat aircraft for 2035 and we are making strong progress.'
Recently, however, at least one senior British official in the GCAP team has mentioned the goal for Tempest replacing the U.K. Royal Air Force's Typhoon in the 2040s.
The first option for Japan involves buying additional F-35s. Already, Japan is the largest overseas customer for the aircraft. The Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) is in the process of introducing 147 Joint Strike Fighters, in the form of 105 conventional takeoff and landing F-35As and 42 short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) F-35Bs. The STOVL jets will go aboard Japan's two Izumo class helicopter carriers, which have been modified to operate F-35Bs.
Reuters reports that senior officials in Tokyo are now discussing the possibility of buying more F-35s, although the numbers involved are unclear.
Currently, Japan has received 43 F-35As, while six F-35Bs have been delayed. Overall, delays in F-35 deliveries related to the introduction of critical upgrades have impacted the program significantly, and it's unclear how quickly the aircraft could be provided to Japan, even if they were to be ordered imminently.
'We have already paid for many items, and they haven't arrived,' a senior lawmaker from Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party told Reuters about the current F-35 delays. 'It's not right to be told to buy more when previous orders haven't been fulfilled.'
However, if Japan does opt for more F-35s, that could come with a potential economic advantage, serving as a bargaining chip for Tokyo amid tariff talks with Washington.
'Japan's purchase of defense equipment would contribute to the U.S. trade surplus, so in that sense, it could be considered [in trade talks],' Ryosei Akazawa told reporters yesterday.
The second option is to upgrade Japan's existing fourth-generation fighters. These comprise around 85 Mitsubishi F-2s and approximately 200 F-15Js. Already, 68 of the F-15Js have been earmarked for a long-awaited upgrade that will take them to F-15JSI Japanese Super Interceptor standard with the addition of new radar, electronic warfare systems, weapons, and possibly more.
An upgrade to the F-2s would be a new development, but it would help ensure combat air capability until the arrival of the GCAP.
However, were Japan to buy more F-35s, that could threaten the future of its involvement in GCAP altogether, and if the Japanese were to leave the program, it's far from certain whether Italy and the United Kingdom would be able to continue without them. Even with Japanese participation, there are questions about the feasibility of GCAP, not least because of the enormous pressure on the U.K. defense budget with various other big-ticket programs competing for funds.
Provided that Trump's tentative offer of F-47s for Japan is firmed up, that would provide another route for Japan to acquire a sixth-generation fighter, on a similar or potentially more favorable timeline than GCAP.
The F-22 was never offered for export, on account of the sensitive nature of its technologies, as you can read about here. But it seems increasingly likely that the F-47, or a version of it, might be sold. As one of America's closest military allies, Japan would be well-positioned to buy it, should it be offered.
When announcing the F-47 contract award, Trump said that U.S. allies 'are calling constantly' with a view to obtaining an export version of the NGAD fighter. He said that the United States would be selling them to 'certain allies … perhaps toned-down versions. We'd like to tone them down about 10 percent, which probably makes sense, because someday, maybe they're not our allies, right?'
For Japan, or any other potential export customer, the big problem is likely to be the cost, with the baseline F-47's unit cost expected to be at least twice that of an F-35, or in the $180 million to $200 million range, based on publicly available information.
On the other hand, a somewhat downgraded NGAD crewed fighter, which should also be notably cheaper, could be a very interesting option for Japan, as an alternative to GCAP. It would give Japan the chance of operating America's top fighter, something it was never allowed to do with the F-22. It would also allow the JASDF to integrate more seamlessly with its U.S. counterparts, which is even more important than for European allies. Moreover, it could open the door to other export opportunities, notably Australia, which is increasingly cooperating with both the United States and Japan.
For the U.S. Air Force, F-47 foreign sales would increase production numbers and could lower unit costs, as well as making maintenance less expensive.
U.S. officials are already talking about different future iterations of the NGAD combat jet. The former Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics, Andrew Hunter, recently suggested that the baseline F-47 might just be 'Increment 1' of the NGAD crewed combat jet initiative. An export-optimized increment would seem to make a lot of sense.
On the other hand, buying more F-35s or F-47s would come with disadvantages, including reliance on the United States for operational support and sustainment at a time when even close allies are having doubts about the reliability of Washington as a strategic partner.
With Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) having a major stake in GCAP, Japan will have sovereign control of the aircraft once it's delivered, meaning, for example, that it would be able to adapt or upgrade them without U.S. approval. Tokyo would also benefit from MHI's industrial partnership in GCAP, with revenues from every sale.
For years now, Japan has been steadily increasing its military budget as it faces what its 2024 defense white paper described as 'the most severe and complex security environment since the end of World War II.' The three primary threats are identified as China's ambitions toward its southwestern archipelago, as well as Russian and North Korean missile and nuclear programs.
While stepping away from the GCAP effort altogether would have considerable repercussions, far beyond Japan, further delays to that program might well force Tokyo to look at other options for its fighter force.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Next Step: Can a millionaire store clerk retire at 55?
There's low-cost living, and then there's the freegan-living millionaire featured in this edition of The Next Step, Financial Planning's newest series. The series explores one simple question: What's the single most impactful move someone can make toward a stronger retirement? Here's how it works: We invite Americans to share basic details about their savings, income and goals. We anonymize their data and present it to professional financial advisors, asking what one step could make the biggest difference. READ MORE:The Next Step: Is this young lawyer on track to retire?As insurers axe Medicare plans, here's what advisors should knowTrump order opens 401(k)s to private assets: What advisors need to knowBetting on bitcoin is the smart move for financial advisors Each edition features one individual's story and practical advice from advisors. In this installment, we heard from a 42-year-old store clerk in Caldwell, Idaho. Here's how his finances stack up against the average American his age. The saver makes just about $37,000 a year, roughly 47% less than the median full-time worker in his age range. Currently, 60% of his income goes toward retirement savings. After taxes and withholdings, he receives $2,500 in monthly income, more than enough to cover his average monthly expenses of $900. Despite having a lower income than the typical American his age, the saver owns his home and has no debt. That puts him well ahead of the median debt figure for someone in his age bracket. The typical American between 35 and 44 years old reports a median debt figure of just over $140,000. "I purchased a home when I was 23 — when someone like me, making $12 per hour, could purchase a home," the saver said. "And have since paid it off." Along with owning his home, the saver keeps costs down by practicing freeganism, a lifestyle focused on cutting consumption and reducing food waste. Freegans often rely on discarded goods, using practices like dumpster diving, foraging, bartering and sharing. The saver has $1.1 million stowed away for retirement, nearly 25 times more than the median adult in his age range. About 20% of that is in pretax retirement accounts, while the other 80% is evenly split between Roth accounts and nonqualified accounts. Based on his current income and contribution rate, he saves about $1,850 every month toward retirement. His journey to this point wasn't linear. On the path to becoming a millionaire, he faced a handful of significant financial setbacks. He invested in his employer and lost everything when the company restructured, he said. After the housing crisis, he put significant money into mortgage-backed REITs, only to lose most of it. One of his earliest investments, General Motors at age 18, was wiped out when the automaker went bankrupt in 2009. Still, he said he's had some sizable successes as well. He purchased Meta on its IPO day and added Nvidia shares to his portfolio a few years ago. He also bought a few bitcoins at $400. Although he sold half of them in 2019, he has held onto the rest. "I did all this while never making over $20 per hour at my job," he said. "It has been a kind of wild adventure accumulating something for the future." The saver said he wants to retire at 55, with plans to spend slightly less per month than he currently does. Based on his desired retirement age, FP projected how much money he can expect to have at 55, given a $1.1 million starting base and a monthly contribution of $1,850. In the calculation, FP assumes an average inflation-adjusted return of 7%. General savings guidelines suggested by Fidelity Investments recommend having savings equaling one year of your annual salary by age 30, with the goal of having 10 times your annual salary saved by age 67. With current savings far beyond Fidelity's milestones, the saver said he's very confident about his ability to retire. The saver also said he does not have a spouse with whom he shares a retirement strategy, or any children. Based on the information he shared, Financial Planning asked advisors: "What single step could make the biggest difference in this person's retirement readiness?" Here's what they said: Responses have been edited for length and clarity. Bridging the gap for an early retirement John Power, principal of Power PlansThe most important thing he can do is refine his income needs in retirement based on what he wants retirement to look like. Retiring at 55 means he will need private health insurance for 10 years until he is Medicare eligible, and it can be quite expensive. He also needs to craft a withdrawal plan for the next five years to avoid penalties, then the next several years until he chooses when to claim Social Security. Jamie Ebersole, founder of Ebersole FinancialThe significant challenge will be that the individual will have no steady income stream starting at the age of 55, which means there is a significant gap between the time that he will be able to take Social Security payments and when it will be optimal to start drawing down on retirement accounts. So finding a way to fund the years from 55 to 67 or 68 will be critical. This usually is most tax efficient when assets are taken from taxable accounts, so building up those balances in addition to retirement accounts will be important for this interim period. Switching investment gears Carlos Salmon, partner at Wooster Square AdvisorsThe key next step is to move from aggressive growth to a more balanced and risk-aware strategy. He should consider converting pretax funds to a Roth account for better tax efficiency and plan ahead for health care costs before he becomes eligible for Medicare. In short, what got him to this point won't necessarily carry him through the next phase. Figuring out what retirement could look like Michael Espinosa, president of TrueNorth RetireThe single biggest thing this individual can do to prepare for retirement has little to do with money. This person needs to make sure that he has purpose, so that he is retiring to something and not just from something. I could give some specific pointers around optimizing his portfolio, and making sure he is prepared for medical coverage and all that good stuff, but I have seen where good savers have a hard time flipping the switch to spending. This, above all else, needs to get worked out: envisioning how he will spend his time, energy and focus once work is optional. Jamie Ebersole, founder of Ebersole FinancialObviously, he has done a great job of saving up to this point in his life. With what can be seen as a modest amount of income, he has been able to accumulate a very significant pool of assets for retirement. The next big step is to psychologically prepare for what it means to live in retirement. With a target retirement age of 55 and another 13 years to go until he wishes to retire, there's plenty of time to accumulate additional assets and to develop a plan for what retirement may look like. The key to successful retirement will be figuring out what he wants to do and how to budget for that. Psychologically, it can be very difficult to go from working to retirement if there is no plan in place that lays out what retirement would look like. I would suggest that the individual take some time to really think about what he wants to do when he retires and then try it out. He may also consider working part-time in order to stay active and smooth the transition. Lindsey Young, founder of Quiet WealthThe question is: Given the large amounts of savings relative to his lifestyle, what kind of retirement would this person like to have? Maybe he enjoys living a modest life, and in that case an earlier retirement is something to discuss. But it's also possible that he might want to buy a house, move to a larger house, go on trips, support family members or increase his charitable giving. Or maybe this person simply enjoys his work and would want to keep working even if he has enough money to retire today. In this situation, the right financial steps depend greatly on what this person's vision is for the next 10-20 years. That is why the best next step for this person is working with a financial planner to understand how different life paths would likely play out financially. For people who surprisingly find themselves being able to retire sooner rather than later, exploring different life options through a financial lens plays an invaluable role in clarifying a life vision for the coming years, which then can lead to the development of recommended financial actions. Ready to contribute? Financial advisors who are interested in contributing to future editions of The Next Step can submit their names and emails below, and Financial Planning will contact them when there is another opportunity to participate. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Russian reporters whine about conditions at Trump-Putin summit — but Moscow may be to blame
Russian reporters are whining about having to sleep on cots and being served old tuna for breakfast while covering the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska — but their own country may actually be to blame. The Kremlin journalists griped that they've had to rough it on portable beds with no sheets set up at the Alaska Airlines Center sports arena in Anchorage, where they were hardly able to make phone calls. They — gasp — even had to get by without bottled water. Advertisement 4 Russian journalists from the Kremlin press pool, arriving in Alaska, were housed in a stadium converted into a temporary accommodation center, with single bunks separated by curtains. x/DD_Geopolitics 'After being assigned for [Thursday] night to what appeared to be a disaster evacuation zone, Russian journalists were being treated to breakfast of tuna mayo left out overnight, some chips, and an unlimited supply of water (from a drinking fountain),'' wrote an irked Margarita Simonyan, editor in chief of the Russian state-run outlet RT. But critics said Russia is at least partly to blame for what its scribes consider practically Third World conditions. Advertisement 4 Workers set up a sign in front of Air Force One for the arrival of U.S. President Donald Trump at Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. Getty Images The country flew roughly 50 of its own 'reporters' over to supposedly cover the event, and it's lucky so many of them got into the US at all, considering the nation's intelligence services regularly send spies to work as 'journalists,'' a security source told The Post. There wasn't much time to vet them or get enough accommodations for quickly planned summit, the source noted. Many US reporters didn't get hotel rooms in the small capital city of roughly 290,000, either. Advertisement 4 Russia's President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with Magadan region's Governor Sergei Nosov as he visits the far eastern port city of Magadan on the Sea of Okhotsk, Russia. via REUTERS On Friday, footage showed members of the Russian media receiving stepped-up food including breakfast sandwiches, packaged snacks and beverages at the arena, which hosts basketball games on the University of Alaska Anchorage campus. 'Americans finally provide journalists with proper food,' declared the X account Alaska Summit News First. But in some corners, the Russian journos are in no position to complain about the US. Advertisement 4 Russia flew out 50 people to cover the Trump-Putin Alaska summit. Diana Nerozzi / NYPost 'Sanctions mean roaming doesn't really work, so they are stuck on WiFi, and Russia blocked most calls on WhatsApp and telegram the other day,'' wrote Financial Times' Moscow Bureau Chief Max Seddon on X. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Another X user wrote, 'So, better treatment than Ukrainians in the occupied territories. 'You have access to running water, something people in occupied Donetsk don't have.


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump reacts to Hillary Clinton saying she'd nominate him for Nobel Peace Prize if he helps end war in Ukraine
During his Air Force One sitdown with Fox News' Bret Baier, President Trump was asked about former rival Hillary Clinton's promise that she would nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize if he could end Russia's invasion of Ukraine without Kyiv being forced to give up territory. Hillary Clinton said she'd nominate her 2016 presidential rival if he brokered a peace deal. Raging Moderates Podcast Trump is attempting to broker a deal between Putin and Zelensky to end the war in Ukraine. REUTERS Advertisement 'Well, uh, that was … very nice,' the president said after a prolonged pause. 'I may have to start liking her again,' Trump added of the former first lady, secretary of state and two-time defeated presidential candidate.