
Trump admin detains Vietnamese people who arrived as refugees
The Alabama warehouse worker served 15 years in prison for his involvement in a robbery that led to a shopkeeper's death.
His wife of six years, Amy, 39, said she knew of the crime, which took place when he was 17.
"I didn't hold it against him when I met him," she said. "I think people should be given second chances."
For decades, both Republican and Democratic administrations agreed - at least for immigrants from Vietnam, a country the United States left in disgrace five decades years ago. Although immigrants from other countries were routinely deported after serving time for crimes, the Vietnamese were allowed to stay.
Not anymore.
In his first administration, President Donald Trump sought to end that special treatment. Four months into his second term, he has stepped up efforts to deport as many immigrants as possible, including Vietnamese.
Tricia McLaughlin, an assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, said people like Phan deserve to be deported because of their criminal past.
"Under President Trump and (DHS Secretary Kristi) Noem's leadership, ICE is continuing to protect Americans by detaining and removing criminal aliens," McLaughlin said in an emailed statement.
Protections as refugees
Fifty years after the fall of Saigon, these changes are leaving thousands of Vietnamese refugees like Phan in limbo, said Quyen Mai, executive director of the California-based nonprofit Vietnamese American Organization.
"We feel we got abandoned again," he said.
As of late May, the Trump administration had tried to remove at least one Vietnamese man to South Sudan, along with other migrants. On May 27, observers noted that at least one deportation flight appeared to have landed in Hanoi.
Vietnam historically has not accepted deportations from the United States, except for a period during Trump's first administration. President Joe Biden largely halted such deportations when he came into office.
Neither the Trump administration nor the Vietnamese government responded to questions about any changes to agreements for detaining Vietnamese immigrants or repatriating deportees.
Although it's not clear how many Vietnamese immigrants will be affected, one Atlanta-based immigration attorney already represents more than a dozen now in detention. Through agreements between the nations, around 8,600 Vietnamese immigrants have been shielded from deportation despite prior convictions and removal orders, said Lee Ann Felder-Heim, an immigrant rights staff attorney at the San Francisco-based nonprofit Asian Law Caucus.
After Black April in 1975, the first wave of 125,000 people fleeing Vietnam arrived in the United States. By 2000, nearly a million Vietnamese had settled here, according to the Migration Policy Institute. Most became permanent residents.
"The U.S. government made a commitment to the people admitted as refugees that they would be protected," said Jana Lipman, a professor of history at Tulane University who studies Vietnamese refugee populations.
Phan is among those who arrived as refugees before 1995, when the United States and Vietnam re-established relations 20 years after the end of the war.
A lawsuit settled in 2021 has prevented extended detention for these early immigrants. The Biden administration limited their removal. The Trump administration now seeks to restart deportations.
"This is a huge impediment to the president's deportation program," said Andrew Arthur, resident law and policy fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, a right-leaning think tank.
Vietnam has been among the countries most "recalcitrant" to accept deportees, he added. And Trump's hardline removal policy looks forward rather than back to a a 50-year-old war, he said.
Escape by boat
Phan last saw Vietnam from a boat.
He was born in 1982 to two farmers in Ben Tre, an agricultural province in southern Vietnam's Mekong Delta.
His relatives, including his grandfather, fought for militias aligned with American-backed South Vietnam, according to his aunt's refugee application, which USA TODAY reviewed. They were sent to the new communist government's re-education prison camps and forced to do hard labor. Vietnamese officials seized part of their family's land.
In the war-torn country, his parents made the decision to send a 7-year-old Phan with his aunt, Le Thi Phan, then 25, and her daughter, who was 3. After fleeing by boat, in 1989, they arrived in a Malaysian refugee camp, records showed.
Two years later, American immigration officials accepted Phan and his relatives as refugees.
He distinctly remembers his first sight of America.
"The U.S. lit up like a Christmas tree," he told USA TODAY in a phone interview from a detention center. "It was magical."
They settled in metropolitan Atlanta.
He learned English, developing a Southern twang, and became his family's translator. He took care of two younger cousins.
Bad choices and redemption
Phan dropped out of school in 9th grade and went to live with other Vietnamese boys and men. He said he looked up to the wrong people.
On July 3, 1999, then 17 and short on rent money, he and four others decided to rob a Vietnamese cafe. Detectives described them as customers who formed an "ad-hoc robbing crew."
Several of the others beat the shopkeeper to death trying to get him to give up the money, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported at the time.
Phan was sentenced as an adult and served nearly 15 years in Georgia prison, records show. An immigration judge issued a final removal order in 2002, while he was in prison. He received his GED and technical training certificates while behind bars.
Since his release, in 2015, his family said he's had no run-ins with law enforcement.
Phan said he worked seven days a week at Little Caesar's and in a nail salon until he met Amy on an online dating site. He got a stable job at a warehouse so he could spend more time with her.
Their family, now with a toddler, moved to Alabama last year to be closer to Amy's sister, before she died in February.
Arrest and detention
On April 14, while waiting for his 11-year-old stepson and 3-year-old son to wake up, he heard a knock on the door. At the start of spring break, he thought his stepson's friends had come to start playing early.
Instead, it was ICE agents and U.S. Marshals, who put him in handcuffs. Amy awoke to her husband calling out from the living room, where she saw several agents around her husband in handcuffs.
Phan was confused. His work authorization is valid through September. They brought up his teenage conviction.
"I did something wrong in the past, but nothing wrong now," Phan said.
For two days, his wife couldn't find him. He finally got a minute-long call to tell her he was headed to the LaSalle Detention Center, in Jena, Louisiana, where the Trump administration has sent other detainees, including former Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil.
In a TikTok video with over 940,000 views, Amy begged, "Give me my husband back."
On a worn piece of paper addressed "To Whom It May Concern," his supervisor and nearly a dozen of his coworkers called Phan "an honorable individual, a leader for the company, and a valuable member of the community." They hoped the court took their letter into consideration.
He received documents ordering him to leave the country, but he can't comply with those orders while he's in ICE custody.
Amy, who hasn't been on a plane since she was a baby, now wonders what it might be like to live in Vietnam.
Eduardo Cuevas is based in New York City. Reach him by email at emcuevas1@usatoday.com or on Signal at emcuevas.01.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Insane moment Elon Musk 'SHOVED' Trump's treasury secretary Scott Bessent during screaming match
Elon Musk 's swift departure from his signature Department of Government Efficiency and the White House was escalated by an outburst that turned violent, according to a high-profile insider. Former Chief Strategist Steve Bannon told that Musk's turbulent time in the White House was marred when he physically 'shoved' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent after he was confronted over wild promises to save the administration 'a trillion dollars'. 'Scott Bessent called him out and said, 'You promised us a trillion dollars (in cuts), and now you're at like $100 billion, and nobody can find anything, what are you doing?'' the prominent MAGA figure revealed. 'And that's when Elon got physical. It's a sore subject with him. 'It wasn't an argument, it was a physical confrontation. Elon basically shoved him.' Bannon said the physical altercation came as the two billionaires moved from the Oval Office to outside Chief of Staff Susie Wiles' office, and then outside the National Security Advisor's office. 'Trump 100%' sided with Bessent after the clash, he added. 'I don't think Bessent has any bad blood, but he's got a job to do and he's going to do it.' The revelation of a confrontation between the pair was confirmed by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Friday. 'It's no secret President Trump has put together a team of people who are incredibly passionate about the issues impacting our country', she said in a statement to 'Disagreements are a normal part of any healthy policy process, and ultimately everyone knows they serve at the pleasure of President Trump.' Musk's time in the Trump White House was scheduled to only last five months, but it comes the same week he broke ranks by publicly trashing the administration's 'Big Beautiful' domestic bill. As Musk's time at the White House came to a close, Bessent took to his X platform to publicly thank the Tesla CEO on his way out, saying he did 'very important work' and said he was 'committed to not letting the bureaucracy slow it down' now Musk is gone. The revelations of the Musk Bessant clash follow an explosive New York Times report that alleged Musk was using a cocktail of drugs on the campaig n trail including ketamine, ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms. Bannon added that Musk also lost status in Trump's orbit when it was leaked to the New York Times in March that the billionaire was preparing to receive top-secret military briefings on China, which Trump abruptly stopped. The former chief strategist in Trump's first administration said the mounting issues with DOGE and the China briefings led to Musk losing face in the White House. 'The president backed (Bessent) just like the president didn't allow the briefing on China,' he said. 'People in the administration and the White House realized he didn't have any idea what he's doing. 'They cauterized the damage.' Bannon said the president's decision to block Musk from receiving briefings on China 'made (Musk) realize that Trump was going to back his cabinet.' 'That's the inflection point, you see Elon all changed from that moment.' The fight between Musk and Bessent was initially reported in April, however the extent of the alleged physicality of the clash was not previously known. Bannon said Musk's alleged shortcomings with DOGE were exacerbated when Trump gave his State of the Union address earlier this year, when the president listed through millions of allegedly fraudulent Social Security recipients aged over 100. Despite Musk claiming to have found a scandal, it was later alleged that these were primarily due to an accounting error and no significant money was sent to these recipients. 'Not one penny was ever shown to have been sent to these people,' Bannon said. 'Is anyone trying to talk to Elon now? No.' Musk's departure from the White House comes as the Trump administration is grappling with its 'Big Beautiful Bill' in Congress. The billionaire broke ranks earlier this week as he trashed the bill for its spending increases, which Musk fumed had 'undermined' the work he had done at DOGE. But Bannon blamed the fallout from the bill squarely on Musk's shoulders, saying the White House and Congressional Republicans relied on him to cancel out the spending with his DOGE cuts and he didn't deliver. 'The political class on Capitol hill willingly got behind a pied piper and wasted five months,' he said. 'The people at fault here are Congress,' he continued. 'They wanted to have a fairy godmother come in and wave a magic wand and say, its all fraud, and get them off the hook. 'Particularly (Speaker) Johnson… they didn't invite Musk to Capitol hill because they think he's politically radioactive, and they all lined up and didn't do the work on these bills... There's no cuts.' Bannon insisted that he was a supporter of the DOGE mission and said 'we have to cut out every penny we can', but felt Musk failed to live up to the promise. With the nation's finances set to fall under the spotlight as Congress works to pass the 'Big Beautiful Bill', Bannon said the most pressing crisis will be the impact on the bond markets, and said the fallout could become a 'Liz Truss moment.' 'This is a crisis, unless we get our arms around this we're going to have a Liz Truss moment.' Bannon clarified that he did not mean the crisis could bring Trump down in the way that it did with the former UK Prime Minister, but warned that the looming financial fallout could have the same impact on the markets that her bungled premiership had. 'Where is the fraud? The Pentagon is a cesspool of fraud, where is it? Where are the criminal referrals?' he added.


Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's multi-pronged attack on Harvard explained
May 30 (Reuters) - The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is waging a campaign against Harvard University, the country's oldest and richest school, across multiple fronts, including funding freezes, investigations and threats to the school's tax-exempt status. The president says he's trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the U.S. - because they have been captured by leftist "woke" thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The Trump administration has opened numerous investigations into Harvard. Some are looking at threats against Jewish students and faculty after pro-Palestinian protests broke out following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent Israeli military actions in Gaza. Others are probing if Harvard discriminates based on sex and gender, along with the school's ties to foreign governments and international students. Harvard and other universities say Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech, freedom of academics and the schools' very existence. Here are the main avenues Trump's administration is using to take on Harvard: The Trump administration in April sent a letter to Harvard, opens new tab demanding it make far-reaching changes in how it operates. Harvard's President Alan Garber publicly rejected the demands, saying they amounted to ceding control of the university to the government. Hours after Garber rejected the demands, the Trump administration announced it was freezing more than $2 billion in federal contracts and grants with Harvard, which mostly fund scientific and medical research. A total of some $3 billion in funding has now been frozen by the Trump administration after more blocks were announced. Those were mainly through frozen National Institutes of Health grants along with blocked monies from eight different federal agencies and the Centers for Disease Control. Harvard is fighting the funding cuts in court. Trump in May said he's considering taking previously awarded grant money for scientific and engineering research away from Harvard and giving it to trade schools. The Trump administration in May revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students and said it was forcing current foreign students to transfer to other schools or lose their legal immigration status. Harvard sued over that action, and a judge has temporarily blocked the administration's action. More than a quarter of Harvard's students come from outside the U.S., and they serve as a vital revenue source at the Ivy League school and at hundreds of other colleges across the U.S. In late May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the administration would start "aggressively" revoking visas issued to Chinese students attending Harvard and all U.S. schools. Republican concerns over Chinese students in the U.S. are not new - many have expressed worries China is manipulating Harvard and other universities to gain access to U.S. advanced technology. The action on Chinese students is a direct blow to Harvard's strong links to China, and it has left Chinese students in a legal limbo as they contemplate their academic futures. There are two main ways the Trump administration is using the tax system to attack Harvard. First, they are threatening the university's tax-exempt status, which experts say likely saves the school hundreds of millions of dollars each year. It is unclear, however, if the Internal Revenue Service would rescind that tax exemption, or if it would hold up before courts. Most universities, including Harvard, are exempt from federal income tax because they are deemed to be charitable organizations operated exclusively for public educational purposes. The exemption also allows people to make tax-deductible donations to such organizations, a valuable source of income for colleges with wealthy alumni. The second prong on this front is language in Trump's massive spending bill that is before Congress. It would drastically hike taxes that Harvard and other elite schools pay on the profits their massive endowment investments make. Critics say that would weaken the ability of Harvard and other rich schools to provide generous financial aid packages to poorer students.


Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Harvard graduates reveal how they REALLY feel about Trump's international student crackdown and antisemitism
Harvard University graduates have slammed President Donald Trump 's crackdown on international students, but some admitted there is racial bias and antisemitism on campus. The alumni spoke with Newsmax about the controversies which have engulfed the prestigious college in recent months and placed it at war with the president. Trump has threatened to clampdown on international students amid accusations the institution fostered racial bias through DEI policies and allowed antisemitism to go unchecked. A Jewish student who graduated Thursday was among those who criticized the college's response to protests following the Hamas attack of October 7. 'My personal feeling was that the administration is trying to do things to get us more, feel more comfortable and be more safe in our place,' he told Newsmax. 'Having said that, there were many events that were held during the year that were always concentrating on one side of this hard discussion, and it wasn't the Israeli side'. Other students who reportedly expressed similar views told the outlet they were too afraid of a 'backlash ' to appear on camera, but told Newsmax's Sarah Williamson that there is racial bias and discrimination against Jewish students at Harvard. Other students were less reticent when it came to expressing their outrage over Trump's proposals to block international students from obtaining visas to study at the college. The president was hit with a temporary blow Thursday after a federal judge blocked the State Department from enacting the policy. 'You don't control Harvard. It's not a dictatorship,' one student fumed. 'This is education at its highest form. So this needs to be accessible to everyone.' 'I fully believe that we need to protect our diversity and make sure that international students are welcome and supported here at Harvard,' another added. A third said a ban on international students, 'would be a disservice to education' and 'a disservice to what Harvard offers to the world.' Trump said this week that the school should cut its population of foreign students — a fifth of whom are Chinese — from nearly 30 percent to 15 percent. He also accused university leaders of fostering a breeding ground for antisemitism, making Jewish students feel uncomfortable and unsafe. A large encampment of pro-Palestine students protesting the Israel-Hamas war formed on Harvard Yard during the 2024 spring semester and lasted for three weeks. The students wanted the university to divest from the Israeli government and Israeli businesses, but the administration did not acquiesce. Even before the encampment in April and May of 2024, there were widespread protests at Harvard immediately following the Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. One such protest descended into a confrontation where pro-Palestine demonstrators surrounded a Harvard MBA student and repeatedly shouted 'shame' at him. Claudine Gay, Harvard's president during much of this turmoil, resigned in January 2025 after she refused to condemn students calling for the genocide of Jews when pressed by members of Congress. Gay presided over billions of dollars in lost potential donations from wealthy Jewish families appalled by what took place on campus. And since Trump has retaken the White House, he has inflicted even more financial damage on the ailing college, freezing about $3.2 billion in federal grants and contracts. On top of that, Trump has cut $100 million in remaining contracts with Harvard. Harvard sued the Trump administration for the federal funding freeze and denies accusations of alleged bias against Jewish students. Lawyers for Harvard also argue that the attempted revocation of foreign student visas violates its free speech and due process rights under the US Constitution as well as the Administrative Procedure Act, a law that constrains what federal agencies are allowed to do. Harvard says the Trump administration is retaliating against it because it refused to obey the government's demands to control the school's governance, curriculum and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students. The federal government sent a letter to Harvard President Alan Garber on April 11 claiming that the school has 'failed to live up to both the intellectual and civil rights conditions that justify federal investment.' The letter demanded university leaders adopt merit-based admissions policies, stop admitting students who are 'hostile to American values', enforce viewpoint diversity in all academic departments, and immediately end all DEI programs. Officials explained that they wanted what amounted to progress reports on these goals sent to them so they could ensure that their orders were being followed.