logo
US Asks Judge to Dismiss Criminal Charge Over Boeing 737 Max Crashes

US Asks Judge to Dismiss Criminal Charge Over Boeing 737 Max Crashes

Bloomberg2 days ago

The US Justice Department asked a federal judge in Texas to dismiss its criminal case against Boeing Co. over two fatal crashes of its 737 Max jets more than six years ago, despite objections of family members of some crash victims.
The move disclosed Thursday in a court filing is part of a proposed settlement prosecutors reached with the planemaker last week. The case had been set to go to trial June 23.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This Ugreen 4-Port USB-C 65W Charger Is Now Almost Free, Amazon Clearing Stock at All-Time Low Price
This Ugreen 4-Port USB-C 65W Charger Is Now Almost Free, Amazon Clearing Stock at All-Time Low Price

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

This Ugreen 4-Port USB-C 65W Charger Is Now Almost Free, Amazon Clearing Stock at All-Time Low Price

Carrying a tangled mess of chargers and cables in your bag can get very annoying, especially when you have multiple devices that are trying to stay charged throughout the day. Whether you are traveling on business or just trying to stay productive at home, you know you need a dependable and flexible charging option. That's where Ugreen comes in – a brand that's established a presence for quality and innovation with charging options. Right now, Amazon is offering the premium Ugreen 65W USB-C/USB-A 4-Port charger at the lowest price ever: At only $29, which is a 30% off the list price of $42, this small but mighty charger is a no-brainer. The deal is so good that Amazon is rapidly clearing out its stock, so you need to make sure you get it before it runs out of stock. See at Amazon Perfect Charger For All Your Devices The Ugreen 65W USB-C (and USB-A) charger is a real asset if you have multiple devices you manage. Whether you are charging a MacBook Pro, iPhone, iPad, Galaxy S25 or even a Steam Deck, this charger will work. With 65W of charging power, you can charge a MacBook Air to 51% in a quick 30 minutes so it's great for a quick charge as you're heading out the door. With three USB-C ports and one USB-A port simultaneously charge four devices, so there is no need for a tangly mess of chargers littering your workspace or travel bag. This Ugreen charger uses GaN (Gallium Nitride) technology instead of traditional silicon: GaN is a smaller, more efficient and safer material than its silicon-based counterparts. Not only does GaN provide faster charging speeds, but it also has built-in overcurrent and overheating protection so your devices stay safe while charging. The foldable plug design also provides a more compact way to store the charger in your bag or pocket. With dimensions of 2.64 x 1.65 x 1.5 inches, that's small enough to fit in your hand but strong enough to withstand every day. If charging needs have you working from home, on a commute or traveling, this charger checks all the boxes as an appropriate charging solution. With folding prongs, you can use it on a desk in your office, in a hotel room, or anywhere else you need to charge devices. Plus, it works with any device that can be charged via USB, so you will never have charging compatibility concerns. Considering its price on Amazon at an all-time low, this is best deal you will find at this time. See at Amazon

Republicans want to add work requirements to Medicaid. Even some recipients with jobs are concerned
Republicans want to add work requirements to Medicaid. Even some recipients with jobs are concerned

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Republicans want to add work requirements to Medicaid. Even some recipients with jobs are concerned

Without Medicaid, Joanna Parker would have a much tougher time holding down a job. The Garner, North Carolina, resident works for a local home goods store up to 20 hours a week, typically. But she also suffers from degenerative disc disease in her spine and relies on Medicaid to cover her doctor's visits, physical therapy and medication that helps her manage the pain so she can get out of bed in the morning. 'If I lose my insurance, I lose my ability to work,' said Parker, 40, who was uninsured for about a decade until North Carolina expanded Medicaid to low-income adults in December 2023. That's why Parker is so worried about the sweeping Republican tax and spending cuts package that's now making its way through Congress. The bill that narrowly passed the House last week would impose the first-ever work requirement on Medicaid enrollees like her. The Senate will put its stamp on the measure, which aims to fulfill President Donald Trump's agenda, in coming weeks. Though she's employed, Parker fears she could be stripped of her health insurance if she's not able to work enough hours every month or gets tripped up in reporting her time on the job to the state – should the work mandate become law. 'I feel it will be so easy to lose your coverage if you do the reporting the wrong way and you can't fix it,' said Parker, who has applied for full-time jobs over the past 18 months but said she hasn't received responses. The House GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' would mandate that many Medicaid expansion enrollees ages 19 to 64 work, volunteer, go to school or participate in a job training program at least 80 hours a month to obtain or maintain coverage. The requirement, which would go into effect by the end of 2026, would not apply to parents, pregnant women, medically frail individuals and those with substance-abuse disorders, among others. The provision would help achieve Republicans' longstanding goal of introducing work requirements into Medicaid. It's part of an unprecedented set of cuts the House GOP would make to the nation's safety net program. Proponents say the mandate would prompt enrollees who could – and should, in supporters' view – work to get jobs and, eventually, move off of Medicaid. Also, they argue, it would preserve the program for the most vulnerable Americans and reduce spending on the low-income adults who gained coverage through the Affordable Care Act's expansion provision, a frequent target of congressional Republicans. 'If you are an able-bodied adult and there's no expectation of you to work or train or volunteer in any way, there's going to be a large number who don't,' said Jonathan Ingram, vice president of policy and research at the Foundation for Government Accountability, which promotes work requirements in government assistance programs. But many Medicaid enrollees and their advocates fear millions of people would lose their coverage under the proposed measure, including many who already work or qualify for an exemption but would get stuck in red tape. An estimated 4.8 million Medicaid recipients would be left uninsured over 10 years because of the work mandate, according to a preliminary Congressional Budget Office analysis, though that figure could grow due to last-minute changes to the House bill that accelerated the start date of the requirement. (The Senate, which will now consider the bill, is expected to also make changes to the legislation – though any adjustments to its Medicaid provisions remain to be seen.) Many adults with Medicaid coverage have jobs, though the estimates vary. Some 38% of adult enrollees had full-time jobs in 2023, most of them for the full year, according to KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group that looked at folks ages 19 to 64 without dependent children who did not receive disability benefits or have Medicare coverage, which insures people with disabilities. Just over 20% worked part time, up to 35 hours a week. Another 31% reported that they did not work because they were caregivers or in school or had an illness or disability, all of which might qualify them for exemptions from the work requirements under the House bill. Only 12% of the enrollees said they were not working because they couldn't find jobs, had retired or reported another reason, according to the KFF analysis, which is based on US Census Bureau data. 'Most people are doing the things that they're expected to do in terms of qualifying activities or things that could qualify them for an exemption,' said Michael Karpman, principal research associate at the Urban Institute. 'But people have a lot of difficulty navigating the process for reporting their exemptions, or if they're not exempt, reporting their work activities.' He pointed to Arkansas, the first state to temporarily implement work requirements during Trump's first term before the effort was halted in federal court. More than 18,000 Medicaid enrollees lost their coverage over several months – even though the state automatically exempted about two-thirds of those subject to the mandate. Many beneficiaries in Arkansas did not understand the work requirements or did not realize it applied to them, a 2019 Urban Institute report found. Participants tend to move frequently so their contact information may have been outdated. Others had difficulty using the online reporting portal, especially if they did not have access to computers and internet service. 'That population has all kinds of challenges with interacting with a system like that,' said Bill Kopsky, executive director of the Arkansas Public Policy Panel, a social and economic justice advocacy group. He noted that many enrollees didn't receive mailed notifications from the state or didn't realize they had to take action. What's more, the mandate was not associated with an increase in employment, though the uninsured rate did rise among low-income residents in the affected age group, said Karpman, who analyzed Census data in a recent report. That finding is in line with a previous study from Harvard University researchers, which was based on telephone surveys. Ingram, however, challenges the assertion that the effort did not spur Medicaid recipients to find work. He noted in a recent report that more than 9,000 enrollees found jobs during the time the work requirement was implemented. Some 99% of them were in the age group subject to the mandate, according to a prior foundation report that cited state data. Katrina Falkner knows what it's like to be stuck in a Medicaid paperwork morass. The Chicago resident, who cares for her elderly father and other family members with disabilities, said she was disenrolled from the program in 2023 after the state Department of Human Services lost the paperwork that she had spent days organizing. The agency told her that it reinstated her, she said. But when she went to the hospital, she found out she was still uninsured. It took several visits to multiple agency offices before the issue was resolved the following year. The department told CNN that such scenarios are 'extremely rare' and it works to 'ensure timely review and enrollment' for all applicants eligible for Medicaid. Falkner, 43, volunteers with several community organizing groups at least 20 hours a week and works every other Saturday as a Head Start ambassador for the Chicago Early Learning program. She also suffers from asthma, anemia, vertigo and other conditions, which can make it hard for her to work or volunteer at times. Being able to meet the reporting requirements concerns her, especially since her electricity and internet access are sometimes cut off. 'If I lost my Medicaid, it would cause me a whole lot of struggles,' she said, noting that the program covers her nebulizer and other health care needs. 'If they don't have the right documents, I won't be able to be in existence because I can't breathe.' Although Dana Bango of Zionville, North Carolina, has dealt with state social service agencies for years, she still 'sweats it every time.' There are many strict deadlines and hoops to jump through, so she has to remain vigilant, she said. The potential work mandate fills her with 'dread' since she's worried that she could fall through the cracks and lose her Medicaid coverage – even though she works 20 hours a week at the North Carolina Christmas Tree Association and delivers for Door Dash 10 hours a week. A cancer survivor who still needs follow up care, Bango is concerned that she may not get the help she could need from state workers to log her hours if the mandate takes effect. 'I've been uninsured before. I don't want to go back there. It's a scary thing,' she said.

I Used MindStudio AI to Help With Research. It Was Remarkably Handy
I Used MindStudio AI to Help With Research. It Was Remarkably Handy

CNET

timean hour ago

  • CNET

I Used MindStudio AI to Help With Research. It Was Remarkably Handy

The most taxing thing about being a journalist, apart from the job insecurity, is all the required reading. Working on a piece means reading through stacks of articles, studies and other reports just to paint a full picture for readers. Even then, you'll invariably miss things that'll immediately be pointed out in the comment section. However, AI can help streamline research and reduce missteps. As an AI reporter, I'm constantly being sent pitches about the latest AI wares from companies the average person hasn't heard of. Most don't seem particularly useful for the average person, but speaking with Dmitry Shapiro, a former product manager at Google and current CEO of MindStudio, and seeing a video he posted on LinkedIn for his Do Your Research AI agent, made me want to give it a try. AI is increasingly becoming the go-to tool for reporters, researchers and students. Its ability to synthesize nearly the entire trove of human knowledge and give a bespoke output to any question saves time that would have otherwise been dedicated to cross-referencing material. At the same time, there's a worry that relying too heavily on AI systems atrophies the human mind, making it less capable of problem-solving and critical thinking. Despite this, people, companies and universities are all in on offloading the arduous task of human analysis to neural networks. In some cases, AI can greatly outperform human output, doing 1 billion years of doctoral research in one year. On the other hand, AI can make grave mistakes, such as telling businesses to break the law. While AI optimists say that the tech will maximize human potential in a fraction of the time, there's worry about the effects of the workforce being supplanted by AI systems and whether society is ready to deal with the potential of mass layoffs. Despite the concerns, AI is here, everyone is using it, and only the most useful tools will survive. In concept, Do Your Research seems like a godsend for reporting. In practice, it's good overall, but it has some issues that need fixing. For example, in researching the changes to Twitter's moderation policies after Elon Musk's takeover, Do Your Research did a great job painting a history of all the changes the Tesla CEO made and how it immediately led to an increase in hate speech on the platform. It also highlighted the externalities to Musk's abrupt firings and moderation changes, including an advertiser revolt and an exodus of customers, backed by actual data. The conclusion also gave a position -- I hadn't asked for one, but it shows that the tool can connect all the facts presented. Per my spot checks, the data that Do Your Research presented was accurate and backed up with correct sources. However, I wish that factoids could be hyperlinked directly to sources, like Wikipedia. If you're a student, you'll want to be careful with copying and pasting directly from Do Your Research. Upon checking with a plagiarism detection site, Do Your Research's text came up as 20% plagiarized. Unsurprisingly, AI detection tools dinged Do Your Research as 46% AI-generated, which is pretty low considering it's 100% AI-generated. An example of MindStudio's Do Your Research AI agent looking into Twitter's content moderation. Screenshot by CNET The thing I like about Do Your Research over ChatGPT and Gemini is the way it breaks down different points into subheads and tacks on a full list of sources at the bottom. While the other chatbots do this too, Do Your Research lists it out like a detailed bibliography. Given that AI systems can get things wrong, easily being able to go back to the actual source immediately is handy. Perplexity has a function called Pages that works similarly to Do Your Research. In my tests, the writing read much more like a human and was at a level I'd deem publishable. The sourcing was also well detailed and correctly documented. Granted, Pages was immediately dinged by plagiarism checking tools as more than 93% plagiarized. It's a criticism Perplexity has received in the past. It also explains why Perplexity reads so much better than other AI-generated content. Do Your Research does need further optimization. A single run of the model can take minutes to compile. In my case, it would fail about 40% of the time. Obviously, these instances are annoying, and it requires more time to rerun the model. After about five successful Do Your Research reports, I ran out of the $5 in token credits allotted to me by MindStudio for my press account. Tokens are essentially the amount of output the AI model can generate before the customer will need to pull out a credit card. Is Do Your Research worth your time and investment? Yes. It's an incredibly handy tool that does a fantastic job of grabbing various bits of information and collecting it all into an article-like package. The output isn't good enough to be publishable, as its text can read as anodyne and lacking in personality. However, it's a strong jumping-off point to help expand your own research and reporting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store