Belarus Long-Term President Alexander Lukashenko Announces He Won't Seek Another Term
This has ended speculation about Lukashenko's bid to extend his three-decade rule. He is the longest serving European head of state, as he gained power in 1994.
Analysts and reports reveal that Lukashenko has ruled on of the most authoritarian regimes in the continent's recent history, with large-scale arrests, executions to maintain his self-proclaimed dictatorial regime.
His 2020 re-election was highly disputed, marked by a large crackdown on pro-democracy activists and protestors.
Recent elections gained the president his seventh term in office in January. Most of the opposition candidates were arrested during the campaign, and he won the election by 86.82% of the vote .
Lukashenko has also been a long-term ally of Vladimir Putin, having supported the Russian front of the war in Ukraine, with troops and land border access.
In his interview to the Times, the Belarus president said that he does not want his replacement to 'break anything right away', and that they should avoid a 'revolutionary breakdown.'
Lukashenko also rejected the long-held belief that he was grooming his son Nikolai to take his place and replace him. 'No, he is not my successor. I knew you would ask that. No, no, no. Ask him yourself, he may be really offended' he said in the conversation in Russia by Belarusian state news.
However, the question lingers as to who will take his place, as most opposition figures remain behind bars with around 1,200 of his largest opponents thrown in prison, charged with extremism and various political offenses.
Speculation aside, Lukashenko's announcement brings not only a monumental shift in Belarus in politics but a renewed hope in Europe for no more dictator-like leadership. Tags: BelaruspoliticsPresident
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
2 hours ago
- Morocco World
‘Correct The Map': AU Denounces Cartographic Imperialism in Global Fight for Africa's Spatial Justice
Marrakech – For centuries, Africa has been systematically erased through the hegemonic Western cartographic gaze, its territorial vastness deliberately diminished on world maps that perpetuate neocolonial hierarchies and Eurocentric epistemological violence. This geographic subjugation – an insidious form of representational colonization – is finally facing a formidable continental resistance. A newfound quest for dismantling the subtle visual reproduction of Western superiority The African Union (AU) has forcefully thrown its diplomatic weight behind the 'Correct The Map' campaign, a radical decolonial intervention challenging the 16th-century Mercator projection that has methodically misrepresented the continent for over four centuries under the false pretense of scientific neutrality and cartographic objectivity. This map – an artifact of European imperial expansion created by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569 – grotesquely hyperinflates regions near the poles like North America and Greenland while severely diminishing Africa and other equatorial territories. The result has been the embedding of these geographical falsifications deep within the global collective consciousness through educational indoctrination, media narratives, and policy frameworks that reproduce Western supremacy. The distortion transcends mere technical manipulation to function as ideological warfare on spatial representation. With its 30.3 million square kilometers, Africa is large enough to fit Greenland fourteen times over. Yet the visually offensive projection masquerading as the world map perniciously suggests that Greenland, despite being of merely 2.16 million square kilometers, is nearly as large as the African continent. This visual erasure reinforces a pernicious narrative of Africa as 'marginal' despite it being the world's second-largest continent with 54 sovereign nations and over one billion people systematically rendered smaller on the world stage. 'It might seem to be just a map, but in reality, it is not,' declared AU Commission Deputy Chairperson Selma Malika Haddadi, articulating how these cartographic misrepresentations have reinforced asymmetrical power relations since the triangular trade era when the Mercator projection facilitated European maritime hegemony, colonial dispossession, and territorial annexation. The 'Correct The Map' campaign is spearheaded by pan-African advocacy collectives Africa No Filter and Speak Up Africa. It demands that institutions immediately dismantle this cartographic apparatus of dominance and adopt the 2018 Equal Earth projection, which accurately represents landmasses' true proportions without the Eurocentric distortions that have privileged Western geopolitical narratives and ontological frameworks. 'The current size of the map of Africa is wrong,' asserted Moky Makura, executive director of Africa No Filter with uncompromising clarity. 'It's the world's longest misinformation and disinformation campaign, and it just simply has to stop.' Africa reclaims spatial dignity through cartographic decolonization This cartographic injustice has been institutionalized in classrooms, media representations, and transnational organizations worldwide, normalizing a vision of Africa as spatially insignificant – a visual rhetoric supporting centuries of resource extraction and political marginalization. Fara Ndiaye, co-founder of Speak Up Africa, stressed the profound psychological and cultural violence this misrepresentation inflicts on African identity formation and self-determination. 'We're actively working on promoting a curriculum where the Equal Earth projection will be the main standard across all African classrooms,' she said. This educational intervention seeks to decolonize geographic knowledge, dismantle internalized spatial hierarchies, and restore cartographic justice to Africa's representation in the global imaginary. The AU's unequivocal endorsement signals a continental rejection of geographic imperialism at the highest diplomatic level. Haddadi strategically positioned this support within broader anti-colonial struggles, explicitly stating it aligns with the AU's mission of 'reclaiming Africa's rightful place on the global stage' amid intensifying demands for comprehensive reparations addressing the historical injustices of colonialism, slavery, and continued economic exploitation through unequal exchange. Despite decades of postcolonial critique, the Mercator projection remains deeply entrenched in educational systems and digital platforms worldwide. Google Maps belatedly adopted a 3D globe view on desktop in 2018, yet continues to default to the distorted Mercator projection on mobile applications used by billions daily, perpetuating this geographic misinformation and cognitive imperialism across generations of users. The campaign is now directly confronting major international bodies like the World Bank and United Nations, demanding they abandon these cartographic tools of subordination. While the World Bank claims to be gradually phasing out Mercator on web maps in favor of Equal Earth or Winkel-Tripel projections, implementation remains insufficient and inconsistent across their platforms and publications. Read also: African Integration: Reality and Wishful Thinking A request has been sent to the UN geospatial body, which a UN spokesperson said must be reviewed and approved by a committee of experts once received. This spatial revolution has garnered crucial solidarity beyond Africa's borders. Dorbrene O'Marde, Vice Chair of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Reparations Commission, has forcefully endorsed Equal Earth as an essential rejection of the Mercator map's embedded 'ideology of power and dominance' that has distorted global spatial consciousness for over four centuries, linking this cartographic struggle to broader movements for historical justice across the Global South. The AU is now pledging to aggressively advocate for the immediate and widespread adoption of the Equal Earth projection among its member states and coordinate strategic collective actions to dismantle this persistent legacy of cartographic colonialism. In doing so, the continental body seeks to challenge not just how the world perceives Africa, but how Africa perceives itself after generations of deliberate geographic diminishment and spatial disenfranchisement at the hands of Western mapmakers. This continental mobilization against cartographic misrepresentation stands as a crucial front in the ongoing struggle against epistemological imperialism and the decolonization of knowledge production systems that continue to center Western perspectives while marginalizing African spatial realities and territorial sovereignty. Tags: African mapAfrican Union (AU)
Morocco World
a day ago
- Morocco World
Trump Warns Putin of ‘Severe Consequences' if Alaska Talks Fail
Casablanca – US President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their high-stakes summit in Anchorage, Alaska, saying Moscow will face 'very severe consequences' if he refuses to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine. The meeting, scheduled for Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, comes amid mounting international pressure to halt Russia's full-scale invasion, now in its third year. Speaking to reporters in Washington on Wednesday, Trump confirmed he had held a 'very good' call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several European leaders, including Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron. Trump insisted the Alaska summit was a 'feel-out' session rather than a substantive negotiation, aimed at testing Putin's readiness for a temporary ceasefire. He also hinted at potential economic pressure, with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warning of further sanctions on Russia's trading partners if talks falter. In Moscow, Russian officials dismissed Europe's behind-the-scenes diplomacy as 'politically insignificant,' but signaled that the meeting would cover the full scope of US-Russia relations, not just Ukraine. Veteran Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is expected to join the talks. Since the start of Russia's invasion in Ukraine February 2022, Zelensky and Putin have not met face-to-face. Trump's latest remarks suggest that could change soon. Read also: The Shockwaves of the Ukraine-Russia War in North Africa Tags: Donald TrumpUS and RussiaVladimir Putin
Morocco World
3 days ago
- Morocco World
What if the Real Winner of a Strait of Hormuz Blockade… Is Washington?
At first glance, it sounds utterly reckless, almost suicidal for global stability: blocking the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of the world's oil supply flows, would deal a devastating blow to the global economy. Iran, under continuous pressure, even after a shaky ceasefire, seems to favor shutting down this vital passage. The Iranian parliament, a vocal mouthpiece of the regime, just voted a few weeks ago in favor of its closure while small but repetitive irruptions of violence occur each week around this bottleneck. In that particular scenario, oil prices would skyrocket, market chaos would ensue and a recession would be all but guaranteed. And yet… if we dig deeper into the geopolitical calculus, we find that in this catastrophic scenario, one side might actually emerge stronger: the United States. This is not a crude oversimplification of global power plays, but rather a cold-eyed reading of 21st-century energy realities and economic interdependencies. Should Iran ever decide, finally, to close the Strait of Hormuz as its ultimate act of defiance, it would not be the Americans who pay the highest price. Far from it. Europe: The Energy Noose Tightens Even More Let's start with Europe. Already weakened by the war in Ukraine and severed from Russian gas supplies, the EuropeanUnion has been in a frantic scramble to diversify its energy sources since 2022. The Middle East, especially Gulf exports, has become a critical safety valve. Close the Strait of Hormuz tomorrow, and all of that unravels. The result? Setbacks on climate ambitions, soaring energy costs, slower growth, and above all, a deeper dependence on, guess who… the United States. Washington would inevitably become Europe's main supplier of liquefied fossil fuels. The Old Continent's structural energy independence would weaken further. China: Energy Vulnerability Under the Spotlight The real geopolitical shockwave would hit Beijing. China depends on the Middle East for more than 40% of its oil imports, a large portion of which transits the Strait of Hormuz. Any disruption there could be catastrophic for China's energy security and internal stability. To date, China has no comparable alternatives. Its efforts to reduce dependence, through the China-Pakistan EnergyCorridor or Russian supplies, remain structurally insufficient. A crisis at Hormuz would painfully expose the limits of its rise, reminding Beijing that its growth still heavily depends on global flows it cannot fully control. And while the Strait of Malacca represents an even more critical vulnerability, a true Achilles' heel for the Chinese economy, that topic deserves its own analysis in due time. Washington watches all this with a blend of suspicion and opportunism. A temporary slowdown in the Chinese economy would, after all, bolster America's position, especially in value chains, financial markets, and advanced technologies. The United States: Energy Resilience and Strategic Windfall So, what about the U.S. in this tumultuous context? Since the shale oil and gas revolution, America has taken a giant leaptoward energy autonomy. Where once Washington heavilyrelied on imports, it now stands as a net exporter of hydrocarbons, especially liquefied natural gas (LNG). This structural shift has sharply reduced its vulnerability to Middle Eastern disruptions, a historically volatile yet crucial region for the global energy market. The U.S. also holds vast strategic petroleum reserves, able to temporarily absorb supply shocks. Its energy infrastructure, from pipelines to liquefaction terminals, is modern and expanding, enabling flexible, secure supply. This resilience gives Washington a unique leverage: in a crisis, it can not only meet domestic needs but also strengthen its role as a key global supplier. Better yet, a global energy crisis would send oil prices soaring, fattening the profits of major American oil companies, and by extension, the federal treasury. This financial windfall would grant Washington considerable political and economic maneuverability. Through what could be called 'energy aid' disguised as strategic support, the U.S. could sell its oil and gas at premium prices, imposing its standards of quality, security, and environmental norms. This dynamic would also reinforce the Atlantic Alliance, as European nations facing supply disruptions would be forced to depend more on American LNG. Washington would thus reclaim ground on the global energy agenda, imposing its standards and cementing alliances in exchange for vital resources. A Risky Bet… But Tempting Of course, it's not without risks for Washington. Uncontrolled price spikes could also cripple the American economy, fuel inflation, and send shockwaves through the stock market. But in the arsenal of geostrategic consequences, gains often outweigh losses. Such is the paradox of today's international system: what appears as an absolute threat to world order can, from another perspective, be transformed into a power lever for those able to anticipate, absorb, and even capitalize on crises. So yes, it sounds crazy. But in real geopolitics, the illusion of madness often masks cold power logic, and Trump has mastered the cynical game of 'Dynamic Disruption'. Tags: Strait of HormuzUS and IranWashington
