Oil prices settle lower as US sanctions ease fears of escalation in Iran
Oil prices settled down on Friday as the U.S. imposed new Iran-related sanctions, marking a diplomatic approach that fed hopes of a negotiated agreement, a day after President Donald Trump said he might take two weeks to decide U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict.
ADVERTISEMENT Brent crude futures settled down $1.84, or 2.33%, to $77.01 a barrel.
U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude for July - which did not settle on Thursday as it was a U.S. holiday and expires on Friday - was down 21 cents, or 0.28%, at $74.93.
The more liquid August contract settled at $73.84. Brent rose 3.6% on the week, while front-month U.S. crude futures increased 2.7%. The Trump administration issued fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on two entities based in Hong Kong, and counter-terrorism-related sanctions, according to a notice posted to the U.S. Treasury Department website. The sanctions target at least 20 entities, five individuals and three vessels, according to Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control.
ADVERTISEMENT "Those sanctions are cutting both ways. They may be part of a broader negotiation approach towards Iran. The fact they are undertaking this is a signal they are trying to resolve this outside of conflict," said John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital in New York. Oil prices jumped almost 3% on Thursday after Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran, while Iran - OPEC's third-largest producer - fired missiles and drones at Israel. Neither side showed any sign of backing down in the week-old war. Brent prices retreated after the White House said Trump would decide whether the United States would get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict in the next two weeks. "Although a major escalation is yet to occur, risks to supply from the region remain high, still hinging upon the potential for U.S. involvement," said Russell Shor, senior market analyst at Tradu.com. Israel's UN ambassador said Israel seeks genuine efforts on Iran's nuclear capabilities from Friday's meeting between European and Iranian ministers, not just another round of talks.
ADVERTISEMENT "However, while Israel and Iran carry on pounding away at each other, there can always be an unintended action that escalates the conflict and touches upon oil infrastructure," PVM analyst John Evans said. Iran in the past has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for Middle East oil exports.
ADVERTISEMENT Oil exports so far have not been disrupted and there is no shortage of supply, said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS. "The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions," he said.
ADVERTISEMENT An escalation of the conflict in such a way that Israel attacks export infrastructure or Iran disrupts shipping through the strait could lead to oil at $100 a barrel being a reality, said Panmure Liberum analyst Ashley Kelty.
Elsewhere, the EU has abandoned its proposal to lower the price cap on Russian oil to $45, Bloomberg reported. U.S. energy firms this week cut the number of oil and natural gas rigs operating for an eighth week in a row for the first time since September 2023, energy services firm Baker Hughes said in its closely followed report.
The oil and gas rig count, an early indicator of future output, fell by one to 554 in the week to June 20, the lowest since November 2021.
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Maybe I'll change my mind about firing him': Trump revives threat to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell; calls him ‘total and complete moron'
Donald Trump revives threat to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell (Picture credit: AP) US President Donald Trump on Friday again floated the possibility of firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, reigniting a long-standing feud over interest rates he claims should be much lower. In a scathing post on Truth Social, Trump called Powell a 'numbskull' and a 'total and complete moron,' blaming him for refusing to reduce rates despite what Trump called 'virtually no inflation' in the economy. 'I don't know why the Board doesn't override this Total and Complete Moron! Maybe, just maybe, I'll have to change my mind about firing him?' Trump wrote. 'But regardless, his Term ends shortly,' Trump added. Powell's current term ends in May 2026. Trump's renewed criticism came just days after the Federal Reserve decided to hold interest rates steady at 4.25%–4.50%. Powell, backed by all six board members and five regional bank presidents, cited the need for patience as inflation trends slowly downward. Trump, however, insists rates should be slashed to between 1% and 2%, claiming such a move could save the country up to $1 trillion annually. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Has Toyota Done It Again? The New RAV4 Is Finally Here (Take A Peek) FrequentSearches | Search Ads Learn More Undo 'I've tried it all different ways. I've been nice, I've been neutral, and I've been nasty, and nice and neutral didn't work!' Trump added. As per The Hill, Powell has previously stated that a sitting US president cannot lawfully remove a Fed chair except for cause, such as misconduct. A recent Supreme Court ruling also reinforced the Fed's unique structure as a quasi-independent entity, limiting Trump's ability to dismiss Powell directly. Trump's renewed focus on the Fed comes at a time when Fed Governor Christopher Waller, considered a top contender for Powell's successor, suggested that rate cuts could be on the table by July, citing cooling inflation and signs of a weakening labour market. Nonetheless, Waller joined the unanimous decision to keep rates on hold this week. Adding to the speculation, Trump is reportedly preparing to announce a nominee to replace Powell, potentially well before the end of his term. Market analysts have warned that such an early move could create instability by introducing a 'shadow chair' dynamic, where the sitting chair and the president's nominee pull policy in conflicting directions. Names circulating as potential replacements include Fed Governor Waller, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, former Trump nominee Judy Shelton, and White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett. However, any new Fed chair must be confirmed by the US Senate, a process that could take months. Market strategists caution that the perception of a politically influenced appointment could erode confidence in the Fed's independence. 'Any Wall Street manager would tell you that Fed independence is the golden rule of markets,' said Callie Cox of Ritholtz Wealth Management. Despite the firestorm, Powell remains firm. In a previous statement, he said he would not step down if asked and reiterated that Fed decisions are grounded in economic data, not political pressure. Meanwhile, Trump's intensifying rhetoric and tariff plans continue to inject uncertainty into the central bank's outlook for the second half of 2025. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
India Today
13 minutes ago
- India Today
'Zero dignity': Pak faces brickbats within and outside over Trump Nobel proposal
Pakistan's move to nominate US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize seems to be a bolt from the blue, not only for geopolitical experts, but for Pakistanis and the country's leaders the government of Trump's support to the "genocidal war" in Gaza and Israel's bombing of Iran, several Pakistani activists and authors took to social media to slam Pakistan. advertisementThe brickbats on X followed shortly after Pakistan formally announced it had proposed Trump's name for the Nobel Prize, crediting his "decisive diplomatic intervention" during the hostilities between India and Pakistan. This despite India making it clear on several occassions that the ceasefire was directly negotiated between the two nations upon Pakistan's insistence at the height of Operation Sindoor.'INGRATIATION CAN'T SERVE AS POLICY'Pakistani journalist and author Zahid Hussain said it was pathetic that the government recommended the Nobel for a person who backed the "genocidal war in Gaza" and was planning to invade Iran."Trump has called Israel's attack on Iran 'excellent'. And the Pakistani government has recommended him for the Nobel Peace prize... So pathetic on the part of the Pakistan government. A man who has backed genocidal war in Gaza and planning to invade Iran," Hussain Lodhi, who previously served as Pakistan's ambassador at the United Nations, said "ingratiation" cannot serve as policy and called the government's move unfortunate."It is unfortunate that the govt is recommending Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. A man who has backed Israel's genocidal war in Gaza... This move does not reflect the views of the people of Pakistan," Lodhi announcement came days after Trump hosted Pakistani army chief, Field Marshal, Asim Munir at the White House spokesperson Anna Kelly previously said that Trump invited Munir for lunch after the army chief promised to nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize for preventing a nuclear war between India and SENATOR CALL OUT PAKISTANSeveral Pakistani activists also called out the government, slamming the "puppet regime" for having "zero dignity"."The genocide in Gaza is still happening because Trump wants it. Another war in the Middle East is brewing because Trump called for it. And yet, Pakistan's puppet regime, eager to please the empire, recommends him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Zero dignity," Rida Rashid activist, Noor-e-Maryam Kanwer, said Pakistan has once again proved that it would "remain a rentier state".Perhaps the strongest criticism came from Senator Allama Raja Nasir, who called Pakistan's move a "deeply misguided and ethically hollow decision".advertisement"Such a nomination undermines the very principles of peace and justice the award purports to uphold. Moreover, this gesture matters little, as the Nobel Peace Prize has long served as a Western tool to honour its own and advance its geopolitical agenda," he EXPERTS WEIGH INGlobal foreign policy experts also weighed in, with national security expert Derek J Grossman saying, "Whatever dignity Pakistan had left, and there wasn't much, is now gone".Mehlaqa Samdani, director of the Community Alliance for Peace and Justice, called it an open display of "cringe-worthy pandering"."This is embarrassing beyond belief. Pakistan's government recommending Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize reeks of servility and a colonised mindset," she NOBEL PRIZE PUSH FOR TRUMPBut, why has Pakistan suddenly warmed up to Trump despite slamming Israeli aggression in Gaza on several forums, knowing fully well that it had US backing?Officially, Pakistan cited Trump's "robust diplomatic engagement" with both Islamabad and New Delhi in helping stop the hostilities last month. The statement called Trump's intervention proof of his role as a "genuine peacemaker".The timing of Pakistan's recommending Trump for a Nobel Prize is also worth noting. It comes as Trump, on several occasions, offered to resolve the Kashmir will work with you both to see if, after a thousand years, a solution can be arrived at, concerning Kashmir," Trump had said earlier this as well as Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as recently as this week, have told the US President that Delhi would never accept third-party mediation with Pakistan on the Kashmir has long maintained Kashmir as an integral part of its territory and said any future talks with Pakistan would be on the Pakistan-occupied its strategic Nobel Prize push, Pakistan seems to be seeking US support for its position on Watch
NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
Tulsi Gabbard's Clarification On Iran After Trump's 2nd Rebuke In A Week
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Saturday said the US believes that Iran could have a nuclear weapon built "within weeks to months", hours after she was snubbed by President Donald Trump for providing "wrong" information, signalling a possible rift that has spilled out into the open. In a post on X, the spy chief said her earlier remarks that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon was taken "out of context", and agreed with the President that Tehran cannot attempt to build on its purported ambition. "The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division. America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree," she posted on the micro-blogging site. The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division. America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the… — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) June 20, 2025 In March, Ms Gabbard testified to Congress that the US intelligence community believes that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon. "The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon," she said. On Friday, President Trump said Ms Gabbard was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence to prove that Iran is building a nuclear weapon. " She is wrong," he told reporters. It was for the second time in a week that Mr Trump has undermined Mr Gabbard for her assessment on the matter. " I don't care what she says," he said on Monday, when asked about the spy chief's remarks on the matter. The developments come at a time when the White House is weighing its involvement in the current Iran-Israel conflict. The US President's statement aligned him more closely with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described a nuclear-armed Iran as an imminent threat, than with his own top intelligence adviser. Administration officials, however, downplayed the inconsistency between Mr Trump and Ms Gabbard, saying that enriching uranium can put Iran on track to having a nuclear weapon. A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters that the assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed. They said the spy services also judged that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice.
