Woman (54) with terminal cervical cancer settles case over smear tests
High Court
action against the HSE and a US laboratory over the alleged misinterpretation of smear tests.
The action related to five smear tests taken between 2011 and 2018.
Her senior counsel, Patrick Treacy, instructed by Cian O'Carroll solicitors, told the court on Wednesday that the case had been resolved after mediation this week.
The settlement against the HSE and the US laboratory Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, with an address in New Jersey, is without an admission of liability.
READ MORE
In the proceedings it was claimed that as a result of alleged delay, the woman lost the opportunity of cure, her life expectancy has been severely impaired and her enjoyment of life has been catastrophically damaged.
It was claimed her cancer had been allegedly allowed to develop and spread unidentified, unmonitored and untreated until she was ultimately diagnosed following her attendance at a hospital emergency department in late 2024.
It was claimed that the woman had a smear test under the
CervicalCheck
screening programme in February 2011 and the report showed a lesion, and a procedure was arranged with a follow smear arranged for six months later.
She had another smear test in December 2011 which came back as negative, and also in June 2012, which was also negative.
At the end of December 2013, it was claimed the woman had another smear test and cells of uncertain significance were detected, and a referral was made to a colposcopy clinic.
A further smear test in October 2014 came back as negative, and the woman also had a smear test in August 2018, which was returned as negative.
She became unwell on holiday last year and on her return home she was referred for review, where an MRI scan showed a cervical tumour, and she began chemotherapy.
It was claimed that had any of the five smear tests been correctly reported, there would have been a different approach to her care and she would have been advised to undergo a hysterectomy.
It was contended that on the balance of probabilities, her high grade pre-cancer would have been cured and it would not have developed into advanced cancer lesion requiring intensive palliative chemotherapy.
All of the claims were denied.
Noting the settlement, Mr Justice Paul Coffey said he was delighted to hear the case had been resolved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Assessments of children who may have had unnecessary hip surgeries pushed back to next year
Children who may have been subjected to unnecessary hip dysplasia surgery must wait until next year before they are assessed by a team of external experts for a second medical opinion. In May, the HSE published an independent audit on hip surgery thresholds for children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. It examined 147 cases across three hospitals : Temple Street , the National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh and Crumlin Hospital . In Temple Street, 60 per cent of surgeries audited did not meet the clinical threshold for surgical intervention, while this was the case for 79 per cent in the Cappagh hospital. Following the report, the HSE announced it was commissioning an independent expert review panel that will work to review patient files to determine the appropriateness of the original decision to operate. READ MORE The HSE said then that the review panel would be set up within six months. However, a spokeswoman for the executive has now said it will be January before the review of individual cases begins. The health service issued an international call for experts, with applications accepted up until last Friday. 'Expressions of interest have been received from a wide range of regions including Ireland, the UK , the USA , Canada , Asia and other parts of Europe,' the spokeswoman said. 'These submissions will be subject to a shortlisting and recruitment process prior to the formal announcement of the panel, which is expected to convene in September.' She said an international expert has been identified and agreed to chair the external panel, and terms are being negotiated. The organisation is designing a 'robust scientific and methodological framework' for the review, which is expected to be agreed between September and December this year. 'It is expected that the review of individual cases will commence in January. This timeline reflects the complexity of the work involved and the need to ensure a rigorous and comprehensive approach,' it added. The HSE, Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and patient advocates held a meeting on the external review panel last Thursday. In a statement following the meeting, Hip Dysplasia Advocacy Group, a newly-established representative organisation, said there must be 'full transparency' between the HSE and the families regarding these reviews. It said 'everyone is left completely in the dark'. 'We strongly suggested they set up a webpage to inform families of updates in a timely manner and we hope to see this implemented swiftly,' the statement said. The advocacy group described the engagement with CHI at the meeting as positive, adding that the paediatric healthcare provider anticipates all follow-up appointments for affected children will be completed by the end of the year.
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Why do my potatoes look warty – and are they safe to eat?
Why is the skin of my home-grown potatoes covered in patches of what almost looks like a rough, warty growth, and are they still safe to eat? Andrew Cullinane, Co Galway It sounds as if your potatoes have a disease known as common scab. The good news is that while it sounds horrible and looks unsightly, it doesn't affect the flavour or edibility of the tubers themselves. Symptoms of common scab, which is naturally present in many soils as a microorganism known as Streptomyces scabium, are exacerbated by the developing baby potatoes being exposed to periods of sustained dry weather like those experienced in Ireland this spring and summer. It's also more likely to affect potatoes grown in a limy soil, or a soil to which lime has recently been applied. The rough, scabby growth on the skin of your potatoes is actually the plant's way of limiting damage to the flesh of the tubers. There is no treatment for this disease, which can also be inadvertently introduced into a garden or allotment by way of infected seed potatoes. For this reason, it's always recommended to source the latter from reliable suppliers as certified free from disease. It's also a good idea to keep young plants sufficiently watered during any prolonged dry spells. Crop rotation will help too, by preventing a build-up of the disease in the soil. READ MORE It's worth noting that some varieties, typically those with thinner skins, are more vulnerable to common scab than others. Examples of varieties with good resistance to the disease include 'Connect' (maincrop); 'Cammeo' (maincrop) and 'Charlotte' (early). Importantly, all these varieties also have good resistance to blight, a far more destructive disease that can wipe out an entire crop in a bad year. [ Is it too late to save my blighted potato plants? Opens in new window ] If your potatoes are a maincrop variety that you're planning on storing to use over the coming months, then take extra care to give them a cool, dark, dry spot to reduce the possibility of the scabbed areas of the tubers becoming infected by soft rot, which could then spread to the rest of the potatoes and destroy them. For the same reason, make sure to examine the stored tubers regularly to check for any early signs of rot, discarding any that you find (but not in the compost heap). Finally, for obvious reasons, also avoid reusing any of them as seed potatoes next spring. An interesting footnote to the above is that the microorganism that causes common scab in potatoes belongs to the same Streptomyces genus that's also played a vital role in the production of the majority of antibiotics. Just a few years ago, a new soil-dwelling species of Streptomyces was discovered by scientists in west Fermanagh, which promises significant potential as a new generation of antibiotic. How amazing is that?
Irish Independent
11 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Anti-sunscreen ‘lies' sweeping social media are dangerous, dermatologist warns
Influencers on platforms such as TikTok are claiming in posts that chemicals in sunscreen are dangerous. Some viral clips have gone so far as to claim 'the sun does not cause skin cancer'. Reality TV star Sam Faiers from The Only Way Is Essex was criticised when she recently posted that none of her family used sunscreen as she believed it was 'full of toxic ingredients'. Professor Anne Marie Tobin, the HSE's national clinical lead for dermatology, said there is 'absolutely no truth' to the claims and warned that misinformation is particularly dangerous for the Irish population. She said 75pc of Irish people have skin that is at risk of burning on exposure to the sun, 'and never tan or tan only after a long time, so they're at particular risk of skin cancer'. It makes no sense to me. It's anti-science, anti-evidence — it's just untrue The consultant dermatologist at Tallaght University Hospital said there is no evidence to suggest the chemicals in sunscreen are harmful. 'It makes no sense to me. It's anti-science, anti-evidence — it's just untrue. By not using sunscreen, people are increasing their risk of cancer. Apart from the risk of skin cancer, exposure to the sun really damages your collagen, that's incredibly ageing.' Prof Tobin said sunscreen has decades of scientific backing, and added: 'It originated in Western Australia, where they have a very high skin cancer rate. There's good evidence to show that it works. Skin cancer is entirely preventable. Unlike certain cancers, like colon cancer, you can completely avoid it.' She said the rates continue to be 'very high' in Ireland, despite the availability of sunscreen for several decades. One blistering sunburn in childhood or adolescence more than doubles your chances of developing melanoma in later life,' she added.
