
Pace of Ukraine talks depends on Kyiv, Washington, says Kremlin
The pace of talks to resolve the war in Ukraine depends on Kyiv's position, the effectiveness of US mediation, and the situation on the ground, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in remarks televised on Sunday.
Five months into US President Donald Trump's term, there is no clear end to the war Russia launched in February 2022 against its smaller neighbor, despite his 2024 campaign vow to end it in one day.
Trump, who has pushed both sides towards ceasefire talks since his January inauguration, said on Friday he thinks 'something will happen' about a settlement of the war.
'A lot depends, naturally, on the position of the Kyiv regime,' Peskov told Belarus 1 TV, the main state television channel in Russia's neighbor.
'It depends on how effectively Washington's mediating efforts continue,' he said, adding that the situation on the ground was another factor that could not be ignored.
Peskov did not elaborate on what Moscow expects from Washington or Kyiv. Moscow has been demanding that Ukraine cede more land and abandon Western military support, conditions Kyiv calls unacceptable.
While no date has been set for the next round of talks, Peskov said Russia hoped dates would become clear 'in the near future.'
After a gap of more than three years, Russia and Ukraine held face-to-face talks in Istanbul on May 16 and June 2 that led to a series of prisoner exchanges and the return of their dead soldiers.
They have made no progress towards a ceasefire, however. Their blueprints for a peace deal shared at the June 2 talks were 'absolutely contradictory memorandums', Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday.
Russia, which already controls about a fifth of Ukraine, continues to advance gradually, gaining ground in recent weeks in Ukraine's southeastern regions of Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk, and ramping up air attacks nationwide.
Turkey, which hosted the previous round of talks, is ready to host them again, it said on Friday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asharq Al-Awsat
42 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Israel Strikes Pound Gaza, Killing 60, ahead of US Talks on Ceasefire
Israeli strikes killed at least 60 people across Gaza on Monday in some of the heaviest attacks in weeks as Israeli officials were due in Washington for a new ceasefire push by US President Donald Trump. A day after Trump called to "Make the deal in Gaza, get the hostages back", Israel's strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer, a confidant of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's, was travelling to Washington for talks on Iran and Gaza, according to an Israeli official and a source familiar with the matter. Dermer was expected to begin meetings with Trump administration officials on Tuesday, the source in Washington said. But on the ground in the Palestinian enclave, there was no sign of fighting letting up. The Israeli military issued evacuation orders on Monday to residents in large districts in the northern Gaza Strip, forcing a new wave of displacement. "Explosions never stopped; they bombed schools and homes. It felt like earthquakes," said Salah, 60, a father of five children, from Gaza City. "In the news we hear a ceasefire is near, on the ground we see death and we hear explosions." Israeli tanks pushed into the eastern areas of Zeitoun suburb in Gaza City and shelled several areas in the north, while aircraft bombed at least four schools after ordering hundreds of families sheltering inside to leave, residents said. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military, which says Palestinian militants embed among civilians. The Hamas groups deny this. The heavy bombardment followed new evacuation orders to vast areas in the north, where Israeli forces had operated before and left behind wide-scale destruction. The military ordered people there to head south, saying that it planned to fight Hamas operating in northern Gaza, including in the heart of Gaza City. NEXT STEPS In Israel, Netanyahu's security cabinet was expected to convene to discuss the next steps in Gaza. On Friday, Israel's military chief said the present ground operation was close to having achieved its goals, and on Sunday, Netanyahu said new opportunities had opened up for recovering the hostages, 20 of whom are believed to still be alive. Palestinian and Egyptian sources with knowledge of the latest ceasefire efforts said that mediators Qatar and Egypt have stepped up their contacts with the two warring sides, but that no date has been set yet for a new round of truce talks. A Hamas official said that progress depends on Israel changing its position and agreeing to end the war and withdraw from Gaza. Israel says it can end the war only when Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. The war began when Hamas fighters stormed in to Israel on October 7 2023, killed 1,200 people, most of them civilians, and took 251 hostages back to Gaza in a surprise attack that led to Israel's single deadliest day. Israel's subsequent military assault has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to the Gaza health ministry, has displaced almost the entire 2.3 million population and plunged the enclave into a humanitarian crisis. More than 80% of the territory is now an Israeli-militarized zone or under displacement orders, according to the United Nations.


Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
World needs to rediscover the optimism of UN's founding
The world was last week on the brink of something akin to a mini-catastrophe or a major war, which could have easily slipped into a nuclear confrontation. Amid the missiles and dust, everyone seemed stunned into inaction, despite the repeated mantras of the need for calm and restraint and to let diplomacy take its course. It was evident that all international powers lacked the desire, interest or even basic human empathy to work for peace in an optimistic way. All this coincided with the 80th anniversary of the signing of the UN Charter — a collaborative dream that became reality from the ashes of the Second World War. However, we all agree that there was little to celebrate. In an increasingly contentious and fragmented world, people, nations and global actors need to dig deep to revive collaboration and multilateralism. Above all, they need to find the optimism and moral resolve to work together and build common ground as nation states, either within or outside the UN, as they have done for the past 80 years. When the UN was born in San Francisco on June 26, 1945, the overriding goal of the 50 participants who signed the charter was stated in its preamble: 'to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.' US President Harry Truman explained that the 'job will tax the moral strength and fiber of us all,' pointing out that the UN Charter would be useless without the leadership required to uphold it. Many have long ago condemned the UN to the margins and dismissed it as irrelevant. They say it is like an international group of employees that long ago stopped being productive; instead, they are simply concerned about their own fat salaries, pensions and short-term benefits. But this is unfair to the organization, as well as the spirit of those who lost their lives working to promote its ethos or those who have been saved and given another chance in an increasingly cruel and uncertain world. In an increasingly contentious and fragmented world, people, nations and global actors need to dig deep to revive collaboration Abdulrahman Al-Rashed Yes, its clout has been diminished, but that is due to many reasons, including the veto-wielding members of its Security Council's own involvement in wars. The UN, like other nonprofit organizations around the world, is also struggling with major funding cuts, particularly since the return of President Donald Trump to the White House. It has been trying to reform itself for years, but it has failed and is now shedding jobs due to scarce funding. What is at stake and should keep every caring human being awake at night is the fact that the UN and its multilateralism is under siege. Its most powerful body, the UNSC, has been blocked from taking action to end the major wars in Ukraine and Gaza. And that is maybe why it watched from the sidelines as the latest conflict between Israel, Iran and the US flared. In today's world, adversities continue to multiply not just due to conflicts, with tens of millions of people caught up in the fighting. There is also inequality, global warming, migration and poverty, which continue to feed the system of discontent. Meanwhile, rich donors dwindle in number and aid and development budgets are axed so that governments can spend more on security, defense and wars. The UN marked its 80th anniversary with an exhibition about the San Francisco meeting of 1945. It included a rare centerpiece: the original UN Charter — ironically on loan from the US National Archives in Washington. But due to the events of the week elsewhere, hardly anyone took any notice. Since its establishment, the UN's membership has nearly quadrupled to 193. The UN system has also expanded enormously from its origins, which focused on peace and security, economic and social issues, justice and trusteeships for colonies. Today, its numerous funds, agencies and entities work on improving the lives of children and refugees, in addition to 71 peacekeeping operations and other efforts aimed at protecting people's human rights. What should keep every caring human being awake at night is the fact that the UN and its multilateralism is under siege Abdulrahman Al-Rashed It is easy to sweep the UN aside, especially amid the current superpower discord and confrontations on nearly every topic. However, it is impossible to find another forum or institution where any nation can talk directly at or against any other. At least they talk and do not rely on bombs or some dry, algorithm-fueled cryptic message to attempt conflict resolution. We ought to celebrate the UN and support it, throughout the endless talk and even the peculiar and sometimes boring details, as long as the common good and conflict resolution are of paramount importance. And it is worth underlining the words of its second secretary-general, Dag Hammarskjold, who once said that 'the United Nations was not created in order to bring us to heaven, but in order to save us from hell.' The organization was clearly born from a consensus to save the world from authoritarianism. It is not surprising, therefore, to see it so marginalized by some of its most powerful members, who shrug off what they see as the constraints of the rule of law. The adversities of today call simply for the global moral resolve, optimism and strength to face them. In every crisis, like every business deal, things only advance when people find common interests anchored in fairness and justice. Above all, they must build trust and find the optimism that drives all sides toward better results. The UN has been that forum. Certainty is currently in short supply and might is increasingly making right. This is what 80 years of the UN has tried to help humanity and nations avoid. We ought to find that optimism once more, along with Truman's moral strength, to steer us toward more peace and fewer conflicts.

Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump's administration finds Harvard violated students' civil rights, WSJ reports
US President Donald Trump's administration informed Harvard University that its investigation found the university violated federal civil-rights law over its treatment of Jewish and Israeli students, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. 'Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government,' the report quoted a letter sent to Harvard President Alan Garber on Monday and viewed by the Journal. Reuters could not immediately confirm the report. Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard- and other top-level universities across the US-because in his view they have been captured by leftist 'woke' thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The administration warned Harvard that failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources, the Wall Street Journal reported.