logo
DeSantis requested help for elderly condo owners. Here are the proposals.

DeSantis requested help for elderly condo owners. Here are the proposals.

Yahoo08-03-2025

A $2,500 grant to help low-income seniors pay assessments for condominium repairs.
Exemptions from inspections and reserves for buildings under six stories.
Authorizations for condo boards to take out loans to pay reserves.
These are just a few of the ideas that lawmakers have submitted in response to Gov. Ron DeSantis' call to help elderly condo unit owners on fixed incomes keep their homes as maintenance and insurance costs skyrocket.
Business | Florida's condo regulations put seniors in crisis and threaten economy | Opinion
Business | DeSantis promises relief for Florida condo owners by year's end. But how?
Business | Tales from the Florida condo crisis: Homeowners describe hardships after cost hikes
None of the bills are guaranteed to make their way through the Florida Legislature over the next two months. So far, only one — a proposal to restrict state grants for storm hardening to buildings three stories and higher — has been heard by a committee.
After DeSantis made his request in September, some legislative leaders said they were opposed to 'bailing out' condo owners, arguing that they spent years waiving reserve funding instead of anticipating inevitable repairs.
A year after the collapse of the 12-story Champlain Towers South condominium in Surfside that killed 98 people, the Legislature enacted a new law eliminating the option to waive full funding of reserves for budgets approved after Dec. 31, 2024.
It also required all condominium buildings three stories and higher that are at least 30 years old to undergo Milestone Inspections to detect structural problems that need immediate attention, and Structural Integrity Reserve Studies to develop roadmaps for future maintenance and expenses.
Many elderly condo unit owners have reported that monthly maintenance fees, insurance costs and special assessments tied to the new rules have increased by hundreds of dollars, threatening their abilities to remain in their units.
Many of the bills introduced this year seek ways to help those homeowners deal with the rising costs. Nearly all of the bills would force substantial changes to how condominiums are operated in Florida.
The South Florida Sun Sentinel asked several stakeholders to weigh in on the bills' potential impacts.
Dawn Munera, a real estate broker for Pembroke Pines-based Essential Realty Solutions, said she supports the $2,500 grants proposed in a bill filed by Broward County Senate Democrat Rosalind Osgood but says they should not be limited to low-income seniors.
Every senior should get the grant, Munera said. 'While they may have an income that might not meet the 'low-income' threshold, they are on a fixed income with health issues or other life emergencies that could potentially wipe them out,' she said.
Condo unit owners in higher tax brackets also face challenges, such as assessments 'that in some instances well exceed $50,000 per unit,' Munera said. 'They can't sell their multimillion-dollar condos because of these assessments. Buyers don't want to take on units with assessments and sellers can't meet their bottom line if they pay the assessments.'
Owners who decide to rent rather than sell are often stuck with rents 'dropping exponentially,' she said. Those rent payments often can't cover owners' mortgages, condo association fees, taxes, insurance and assessments. 'Some sort of relief should be afforded to them as well,' she said.
But $2,500 wouldn't go far toward paying assessments of $30,000 to $50,000, says David Kim, a community association attorney at the Boca Raton office of Schwartz Sladkus Reich Greenberg Atlas LLP. Still, he said, 'it's something, and any little bit can help owners on fixed incomes.'
The idea 'sounds great' but too many questions linger, said John Cadden, a former real estate banker and investment adviser who is now a managing principal of the Condominium Advisory Group, with offices in Chicago and Atlanta.
Among them: 'Who makes the grant underwriting decision? How much money is going to be appropriated? And what is the potential amount of money that will be needed?' Cadden said. 'It seems like a good political platform, but not something that actually is going to have a large impact in most cases.'
A bill filed by Rep. Vicki Lopez, a Republican from Miami-Dade County, would prohibit state-owned Citizens Property Insurance Corp. from insuring condominiums that have not obtained a milestone inspection report or a reserve study from purchasing policies from state-owned Citizens Property Insurance Corp.
Michael Mayoral is a Coral Gables-based attorney whose firm, Perez Mayoral P.A., represents homeowners in disputes with condo and homeowner associations. He said the bill, which proposes a long list of other changes, would be a 'powerful enforcement mechanism for condo safety' because it also proposes requiring condos to maintain adequate insurance, regardless of what's in a condo's governing documents.
If completing a reserve study becomes a requirement for obtaining coverage from Citizens, it's likely private market carriers will follow suit, he said.
Lopez's bill would also enable governing boards of condos to obtain loans and levy special assessments to make repairs without seeking approval of their full memberships.
Kim said allowing boards to take out loans without unit owners' approval could subject the boards to 'undue burdens or pressures' because they could be held responsible if the loans are not repaid.
Cadden warned that owners could fight back by recalling board members or voting in new members who would refuse to rectify the long-term repair issues.
Mayoral said removal of the requirement to secure approval from unit owners for loans or assessments would eliminate owners' ability to reject 'necessary funding.' But it would also kill 'significant checks and balances,' he said.
'Many associations struggle with contractor pricing and scope decisions, and this could lead to runaway assessments that financially devastate owners, particularly seniors on fixed incomes,' he said.
A separate bill by Sen. Jennifer Bradley, a Republican from north central Florida, would require unit owners' approval before boards could obtain loans to cover reserve requirements.
Bradley's bill also would authorize creation of investment boards consisting of at least two governing condo board members and two unit owners.
The board would adopt rules for invested funds and an 'investment policy statement' that addresses risk, liquidity, authorize investment classes and mixes and limitations on authority relating to investment transactions. Then they must hire an adviser to invest the condominium's reserve money.
The bill would ban anyone related by 'affinity' or blood to any board member, unit owner or reserve study provider from serving as an investment adviser.
Rather than placing such a burden on volunteers, Ken Reid, a condo owner in Boca Raton, said a better idea would be to pool all reserve funds in the state 'into a large fund that will be invested in safe securities, bonds and certificates of deposit, much like a pension fund.'
The money would earn interest or dividends, and each association could tap into the reserves to pay for needed repairs.
Reid said the advantage to his idea is 'the investing decisions are made by qualified professionals, who have a fiduciary responsibility to get a return and not lose money in the markets, not (association) board volunteers.'
The ability to offset costs by generating passive income 'could be a real benefit' for associations, Mayoral said, if the state imposes stricter guardrails such as minimum standards for diversification and limitations on the types of investments that could invite mismanagement by advisers.
Cadden says the idea of allowing condominiums to invest reserve funds makes no sense to him 'because no matter how many guardrails are put in, there is still a risk of losing money on any investment.'
Munera said she supports another Osgood bill that aims to increase from three to six stories the height of condo buildings required to perform structural integrity inspections and fully fund their reserves. Associations controlling buildings under six stories would be able to choose whether to order inspections and fund reserves.
A House version of the bill was filed by Bruce Hadley Antone, a Democrat from Orange County.
Buildings less than six stories high 'don't experience the same structural stresses as high-rise buildings,' she said. All of the inspection and funding requirements will create such an ongoing financial strain to owners of smaller condo buildings, she said, 'they'll never stabilize financially.'
Cadden says the change would not be 'prudent' because 'many properties that are less than six stories have just as much deferred maintenance as taller buildings.'
He added, 'The main point is that allowing any condo association to have the power to arbitrarily set reserves has not been a good practice.'
Mayoral, meanwhile, concurs that many buildings under the limit still house substantial numbers of units and residents.
'Large five-story structures face the same maintenance challenges — erosion, concrete spalling and other structural issues — as taller buildings.'
A proposal by Miami-Dade Republican Sen. Ileana Garcia would create the Condominium and Homeowners' Association Economic Crime, Fraud, and Corruption Investigation Pilot Program to address a beef commonly voiced by condo unit owners — that complaints submitted to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation take too long to investigate and are too often dismissed without appropriate scrutiny.
The bill proposes a long list of reforms and would work in conjunction with creation of an homeowner association ombudsman to serve alongside the existing condo association ombudsman.
Homeowners would submit allegations of wrongdoing to the program, which would investigate them and, if merited, forward them to the ombudsmen.
Governing boards would not be able to require homeowners to pay fines or attorneys fees for violations that are corrected prior to a hearing, and fines could not be aggregated for the purpose of creating a lien against a parcel.
Mayoral said the proposal would be 'a major step forward toward protecting homeowners from some of the worst abuses by HOA boards.'
'Florida has more HOAs and condo associations per capita than any other state, and with that comes endless disputes — many of which start small but quickly turn into serious financial burdens for homeowners.'
Stopping boards from stacking fines to create liens, he said, 'closes a loophole that HOAs have used to push people toward foreclosure.'
The bill 'strengthens the complaint process and creates real oversight … something that's been badly needed for years.'
But regarding proposals to create the pilot program and add an HOA ombudsman, Cadden asks, 'Is there really going to be enough resources to properly make this effective?'
And Kim questions whether creating more options to accuse and investigate board members for alleged crimes will increase the difficulty associations face in recruiting board candidates.
'It's long been termed a thankless position, which at times it is, but will (the proposed pilot program) cause individuals to stay away from director positions? That could pose a problem.'
In addition, these condo-related bills have also been filed prior to the 2025 legislative session:
My Safe Florida Condominium Pilot Project — (Sen. Tom Leek, Rep. Vicki Lopez, Rep. Christine Hunschofsky) — Would restrict participation in My Safe Florida Condominium Pilot Project to condos three stories or higher and require that buildings include at least one residential unit. Would also reduce the necessary percentage of unit owners needed to approve participation in the program from 100% to 75%. The Senate version cleared its first hurdle on March 3, getting a 10-0 vote in the Banking and Insurance Committee.
Homestead exemption increase — (Sen. Blaise Ingoglia) — Proposes adding to the 2016 general election ballot a proposed amendment to the state constitution increasing the exemption for all levies to $75,000.
Flood risk disclosure — (Sen. Jennifer Bradley, Rep. Christine Hunschofsky) — Would require landlords to disclose known flooding risks to prospective tenants at or prior to execution of rental agreements with one year or longer terms. Tenant may terminate the rental agreement if the landlord fails to provide disclosure and a flood causes a substantial loss or damage to the tenant's personal property.
Citizens rate increase cap — (Sen. Ana Maria Rodriguez, Rep. Jim Mooney Jr.) — Would limit annual rate increases for Citizens policies to 10% in counties where the Office of Insurance Regulation determines there is not a reasonable degree of competition. Currently, only Monroe and Miami-Dade counties fall under this definition. Would also add flood insurance exemption to Citizens-insured properties with a Zone X flood risk classification or a structure elevated at least one foot above the flood zone's minimum base flood elevation.
Resilience districts — (Sen. Erin Grall) — Would enable condo associations to establish resilience districts to create ways to fully fund the condo's reserves, make structural changes or other improvements that would otherwise require assessing unit owners. The districts would be able to borrow money and issue bonds, certificates, warrants and notes, charge, collect and enforce fees, and levy taxes and special assessments.
Unit owners' rights to vote in recall elections — (Sen. Kristen Aston Arrington) — Would prohibit suspension of unit owners' voting rights in elections held to recall board members. Would also add additional rules to condo associations, including a requirement that condo associations pay legal bills of unit owners who initiate recall actions if the governing board appeals and loses.
Ron Hurtibise covers business and consumer issues for the South Florida Sun Sentinel. He can be reached by phone at 954-356-4071 or by email at rhurtibise@sunsentinel.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

Hamilton Spectator

time35 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

VIENNA (AP) — Iran's nuclear program remains a top focus for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, particularly as any possible deal between Tehran and the United States over the program would likely rely on the agency long known as the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. This week, Western nations will push for a measure at the IAEA's Board of Governors censuring Iran over its noncompliance with inspectors, pushing the matter before the U.N. Security Council. Barring any deal with Washington, Iran then could face what's known as 'snapback' — the reimposition of all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. All this sets the stage for a renewed confrontation with Iran as the Mideast remains inflamed by Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip . And the IAEA's work in any case will make the Vienna-based agency a key player. Here's more to know about the IAEA, its inspections of Iran and the deals — and dangers — at play. Atoms for peace The IAEA was created in 1957. The idea for it grew out of a 1953 speech given by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the U.N., in which he urged the creation of an agency to monitor the world's nuclear stockpiles to ensure that 'the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life.' Broadly speaking, the agency verifies the reported stockpiles of member nations. Those nations are divided into three categories. The vast majority are nations with so-called 'comprehensive safeguards agreements' with the IAEA, states without nuclear weapons that allow IAE monitoring over all nuclear material and activities. Then there's the 'voluntary offer agreements' with the world's original nuclear weapons states — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. — typically for civilian sites. Finally, the IAEA has 'item-specific agreements' with India, Israel and Pakistan — nuclear-armed countries that haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea, which is also nuclear armed, said it has withdrawn from the treaty, though that's disputed by some experts. The collapse of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord , insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land . Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. IAEA inspections and Iran Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility. The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images. In the years since Trump's 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage . It's also removed cameras . At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates , something the agency disputed. The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn't granted that, it also hasn't entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran's wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West. What happens next Iran and the U.S. have gone through five rounds of negotiations over a possible deal, with talks mediated by the sultanate of Oman . Iran appears poised to reject an American proposal over a deal this week, potentially as soon as Tuesday. Without a deal with the U.S., Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a freefall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Experts fear Tehran in response could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. If a deal is reached — or at least a tentative understanding between the two sides — that likely will take the pressure off for an immediate military strike by the U.S. Gulf Arab states, which opposed Obama's negotiations with Iran in 2015, now welcome the talks under Trump. Any agreement would require the IAEA's inspectors to verify Iran's compliance. But Israel, which has struck at Iranian-backed militants across the region, remains a wildcard on what it could do. Last year, it carried out its first military airstrikes on Iran — and has warned it is willing to take action alone to target Tehran's program, like it has in the past in Iraq in 1981 or Syria in 2007. ___ Associated Press writer Stephanie Liechtenstein contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation . The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

'Loaded weapon': editors decry Hungary bill targeting media
'Loaded weapon': editors decry Hungary bill targeting media

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Loaded weapon': editors decry Hungary bill targeting media

The Hungarian government's decision to delay a vote on a controversial bill which penalises "foreign-funded" media and NGOs does not mean that the danger to freedom of the press is over, top editors warn. The government is still committed to a "campaign to shut down, destroy or discredit certain media outlets, NGOs or people", Peter Uj, editor-in-chief of news site 444, told AFP. Critics say the bill, which they compare to Russia's foreign agent legislation, is the latest attempt by nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban to tighten his control over the central European country of 9.5 million people since his return to power in 2010. Tens of thousands have protested against the bill in Budapest, with another rally to take place on Tuesday. The European Commission has also called on Hungary to withdraw the draft, while representatives of more than 80 media outlets from 22 countries -- including Britain's The Guardian and France's Liberation -- have slammed it. The bill was introduced last month and a vote was scheduled for this week, but the ruling coalition last week put it off, saying that debate would continue in the autumn and that it wanted to review "substantive comments received" from "serious organisations" other than those protesting. - 'Devious' - The legislation would blacklist organisations that "threaten the sovereignty of Hungary by using foreign funding to influence public life". Any kind of support from non-Hungarian citizens, EU funds, or even advertising revenues from companies based abroad constitutes foreign funding, according to commonly accepted legal interpretations. Blacklisted groups would need permission to receive foreign funds. They would also be barred from receiving donations through a Hungarian income tax contribution scheme, an important source of revenue for non-profits. The legal changes could affect any independent Hungarian media outlets, with 444, internet TV Partizan and news site Telex explicitly targeted. Partizan editor-in-chief Marton Gulyas, 39, described the new bill as "devious". "The law would create economic tools to make it impossible for listed organisations to function," he told AFP. The online channel, which was founded in 2018 and has a staff of 70, was the top beneficiary last year of the income tax contribution scheme, receiving more than one million euros ($1.1 million) from over 35,000 supporters. Gulyas rejected the notion that Partizan is "foreign-funded", stressing that the channel had only applied for EU-based grants in the past two years. "Hungary has been a part of the European Union since 2004. There are no borders or customs, yet this money is now being treated as if there could be some kind of criminality involved," he said. - 'Will not back down' - Telex editor-in-chief Tamas Nemet, 44, said that advertising and reader support make up 92 percent of the outlet's revenue. "But the law would now make those unviable" through various legal hurdles and administrative burdens, according to Nemet. One of Hungary's most popular news sources with a staff of around 100, Telex was established in 2021, after Nemet and his colleagues resigned en masse from the country's then-top news site, over alleged political interference. "We can see quite clearly what those in power want, the weapon is loaded and on the table," he said, adding that the "truth cannot be banned". "We will not back down," he said, vowing to "overcome whatever they come up with to hinder our operations". Orban says the law is needed to fight the alleged spread of foreign interference and disinformation. Uj of 444, along with his colleagues from Telex and Partizan, described the bill as "absurd" and "a political weapon designed to keep independent media in constant fear and to take us out". He decried rules "worded in such a way they are impossible to comply with". The 53-year-old Uj and colleagues set up the news site in 2013. It employs about 35 journalists and has broken several stories, including a child abuse pardon scandal, which last year led to the resignation of then-president Katalin Novak, a key Orban ally. AFP partners with its sister site Lakmusz for fact-checking. ros/jza/gv/bc

Why China's auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future
Why China's auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why China's auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

By Norihiko Shirouzu AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) -Chinese electric-vehicle makers led by BYD beat Tesla in the competition to produce affordable electric vehicles. Now, many of those same fierce competitors are pulling into the passing lane in the global race to produce self-driving cars. BYD shook up China's smart-EV industry earlier this year by offering its 'God's Eye' driver-assistance package for free, undercutting the technology Tesla sells for nearly $9,000 in China. 'With God's Eye, Tesla's strategy starts to fall apart,' said Shenzhen-based BYD investor Taylor Ogan, an American who has owned several Teslas and driven BYD cars with God's Eye, which he called more capable than Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' (FSD). It's not just BYD. Other Chinese auto and tech companies are offering affordable EVs with FSD-like technology for a relative pittance. China's Leapmotor and Xpeng, for instance, offer systems capable of highway and urban driving in $20,000 vehicles. A slew of Chinese firms are chasing the same technology, an industry push backed by China's government. BYD's assisted-driving hardware costs are far lower than Tesla's, according to analyses performed for Reuters by companies that dismantle and analyze vehicles for automakers. The comparisons, which have not been previously reported, show that BYD's costs to procure components and build a system with radar and lidar are about the same as Tesla's FSD, which doesn't have such sensors. That undercuts Tesla's unusual technological approach, which aims to save costs by nixing such sensors and relying solely on cameras and artificial intelligence. The rising competition from Chinese smart-EV players is among the chief problems confronting Tesla CEO Elon Musk after his rocky tenure as a Trump administration advisor as he refocuses on his business empire - as Tesla vehicle sales are tanking globally. The stakes are made higher by a moment-of-truth challenge this month in Tesla's home base of Austin, Texas, where it plans to launch a robotaxi trial with 10 or 20 vehicles after a decade of Musk's unfulfilled promises to deliver self-driving Teslas. Tesla did not respond when reached for comment about its Chinese competitors. Previously, Musk has described Chinese car companies as the most competitive in the world. Chinese competition was one factor driving Tesla's strategic pivot away from mass-market EVs last year, when Reuters reported it had killed plans to build an all-new EV expected to cost $25,000. Musk has since staked Tesla's future instead on self-driving robotaxis, the hopes for which now underpin the vast majority of the automaker's stock-market value of roughly $1 trillion. Now Tesla faces the same stiff competition on vehicle autonomy from many of the same Chinese automakers who undercut its affordable-EV plans. Adding to the challenge are tech firms including Chinese smartphone giant Huawei, which supplies autonomous-driving technology to major Chinese automakers. Short of full autonomy, today's driver-assistance systems offer a critical competitive edge in China, the world's largest car market, where Tesla sales are falling amid a protracted price war among scores of homegrown EV brands. Tesla is further handicapped by China's regulations preventing it from using data collected by Tesla cars in China to train the artificial intelligence underpinning FSD. Tesla has been negotiating with Chinese officials, so far without success, to get permission to transfer such data back to the United States for analysis. Tesla's competitors in China do benefit from subsidies and other forms of policy support from Beijing for advanced assisted driving technology. Their advantages also stem from another consequential factor: cut-throat smart-EV competition that has characterized their industry over the past decade. The resulting EV boom created economies of scale and the industry's tendency to forgo some profit margins to expand new technologies' market penetration quickly, leading to lower manufacturing costs. STREETS OF SHENZHEN BYD investor Ogan, of Shenzhen-based Snow Bull Capital, has a front-row seat to China's autonomous-tech battleground. He recently drove several BYD models equipped with God's Eye, he said, and didn't have to take over driving in any of them while traveling the congested streets of Shenzhen, a bustling southern China megalopolis of 18 million people. Another notable smart-EV player in China is Huawei, experts say. Huawei lends its technology and branding to a half dozen automakers including heavyweights Chery, SAIC and Changan, and has lower-profile partnerships with more than a dozen other carmakers, Huawei representatives said. Reuters journalists rode in an Aito M9 — a luxury electric SUV from Seres with Huawei driver-assistance technology — as it navigated Shenzhen roadways in April. With a driver's hands off the wheel, the vehicle exited a highway seamlessly into a congested urban zone, where the M9 proceeded cautiously and slowed to a crawl as a construction worker appeared like he might walk into the roadway. At one point the vehicle turned right and slowly drifted left to avoid two men unloading boxes from a parked truck. The vehicle then parallel parked itself at Huawei's Shenzhen headquarters. Huawei was among several Chinese companies, including automakers Zeekr, Changan and Xpeng, that touted progress towards fully-autonomous cars at April's Shanghai auto show, even as Beijing announced a new marketing crackdown on terms such as 'smart' and 'intelligent' driving in the wake of a deadly crash in a Xiaomi vehicle involving driver-assistance technology. Huawei said it's ready to undergo a new validation regime being developed by Chinese regulators to certify so-called Level 3 driving systems, meaning they are capable enough to allow drivers to look away unless notified by the system to take over. Zeekr, a luxury brand of China auto giant Geely, also plans to soon sell cars with Level 3 systems. Tesla has yet to release such an "unsupervised" version of FSD because its technology needs more training to operate without a driver's hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. Tesla plans to launch self-driving robotaxis in Austin this month. Little is known about its plans. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 fare-collecting driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of the city, which Tesla has not publicly identified. 'GOD'S EYE' ON THE CHEAP Chinese EV makers are moving quickly to develop driver-assistance systems in a market where car-buyers are demanding them at a faster pace than in other regions, analysts say. Their ability to do so at lower costs poses the biggest threat to Tesla's new autonomy-based business model. BYD buyers can get an FSD-comparable version of God's Eye as a standard feature in cars priced at about $30,000. The cheapest FSD-equipped Tesla in China is a Model 3 selling for about $41,500. According to an analysis by A2MAC1, a Paris-based tear-down firm that benchmarks components, the mid-level God's Eye version most comparable to Tesla's FSD runs on an Nvidia computing chip with data collected through 12 cameras, five radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and one lidar sensor, at a cost of $2,105. That compares to $2,360 for Tesla's FSD, which uses cameras without sensors and two AI chips, the firm estimates. Cameras, radar and ultrasonic sensors are 40% cheaper in China than comparable devices in Europe and the United States, A2MAC1 estimates. Lidar sensors cost about 20% less, the firm says. Sensor costs have fallen because China's EV boom created economies of scale, said A2MAC1 engineer Elena Zhelondz. The fierce competition also pushed carmakers and suppliers to accept lower profits on driver-assistance equipment, she said. BYD's 22% gross margin will likely fall as it gives away God's Eye but it will benefit from a vehicle-sales boost, said Chris McNally, head of global automotive and mobility research for advisory firm Evercore. MORE CARS, MORE MILES, BETTER AI Falling behind the Chinese brands on driver-assistance technology would compound Tesla's challenges in China, where it's already losing market share to rivals including BYD, which sells an entry-level EV for less than $10,000. The growing scale of BYD and others could also provide a technological advantage: Racking up more miles on China roads helps train the AI technology needed to perfect automated-driving systems. BYD has a 'clear and ongoing market-share driving advantage' over Tesla in gathering such on-road data to refine God's Eye, Evercore's McNally said, adding that advantage might only increase as offering God's Eye for free helps sell more BYD vehicles. BYD's scale also helps lower costs by providing uncommon leverage over suppliers. In November, a BYD executive in charge of passenger-vehicle operations wrote to suppliers telling them that the automaker sold 4.2 million vehicles last year (more than double the number of Teslas sold) because of 'technical innovation, economies of scale, and a low-cost supply chain.' The executive noted the new year would likely bring more growth, but also fiercer competition. Without specifically mentioning God's Eye, he ended the letter by asking the suppliers for an across-the-board 10% price cut on all parts and systems starting on January 1, calling the new year a final 'knockout round.' Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store