In Ukraine peace talks, Donbas question remains crucial and unresolved
However, the previous statements by the American president regarding potential territorial concessions are well known. According to multiple sources cited in US media, Trump came out of his meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, August 15, saying the Russian president would agree to ending the war on the condition that he obtain the entire eastern region of Donbas, comprised of the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts, including zones of each still controlled by Kyiv.
Trump has made no secret of his view that such a withdrawal would be an unavoidable concession to secure a peace deal. "President Zelensky of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," he wrote on his Truth Social network on Sunday night.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
BHP and Rio Tinto bosses lobby at White House for copper mine
US President Donald Trump welcomed Rio Tinto CEO Jakob Stausholm and incoming CEO Simon Trott, as well as BHP CEO Mike Henry, to the Oval Office on Tuesday to discuss the developments around a vast copper mine project called Resolution Copper. This came a day after the opponents succeeded in temporarily blocking the project. The president called opponents of a huge copper mine in Arizona 'radical left activists' in a social media post after the meeting. The project — a joint venture owned by international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — is set to be one of the biggest copper mines in North America. President Trump has emphasised the need for more copper production in the US, as the versatile metal is important for the country's mineral security. Copper is key to the energy transition and has many uses, remaining an essential component of electrical circuits, as well as defence and technology products. The two international mining giants teamed up to develop Resolution Copper after the deposit was discovered two decades ago. However, Native American tribes and environmentalists have been fighting fiercely ever since, citing religious, cultural and environmental concerns. After a series of court cases and environmental studies, the companies were set to take over the federal forest land in Arizona on Tuesday when a US appeals court temporarily blocked the transfer, delaying the mining. The US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary injunction late on Monday in response to last-minute appeals by a Native American tribe and environmentalists. The land includes Oak Flat — an area used for centuries for religious ceremonies, prayer and gathering of medicinal plants by the San Carlos Apache people and other Native American tribes. The tribe celebrated the pause. President Donald Trump, however, called the opponents 'Anti-American, and representing other copper competitive countries,' in his post on Truth Social. He also stated that delaying the project would affect thousands of jobs. A press release from Resolution Copper stated that the companies view this as 'merely a temporary pause". The statement added: 'We are confident the court will ultimately affirm the district court's well-reasoned orders explaining in detail why the congressionally directed land exchange satisfies all applicable legal requirements.' Mike Henry, CEO of BHP, said in a social media post that the project 'will create thousands of high-value local jobs in Arizona and billions in economic activity across America'. An earlier estimate from Resolution Copper stated that the mine would generate $1 billion (€860 million) a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of jobs. A brief history of opposing Resolution Copper The fight over Oak Flat has spanned two decades, with the latest legal wrangling centred on a required environmental review that was released by the US Forest Service earlier this summer and an appraisal of the land to be mined by Resolution Copper about 60 miles (96 kilometres) east of Phoenix. Before the land exchange can happen, the plaintiffs argued that the federal government must prepare a comprehensive review that covers "every aspect of the planned mine and all related infrastructure". They said the government failed to consider the potential for a dam breach, pipeline failure and if there was an emergency plan for a tailings storage area. As for the appraisal, they said it did not account for the value of the copper deposits that are at least 5,000 feet (1,500 metres) below the surface. The appeals court plans to hear arguments on the merits of the case later this year, but no date has been announced yet. "This injunction comes in a desperate time of asking for miracles, all over the country and all over the world," Wendsler Nosie Sr. of the group Apache Stronghold said in a statement shared on social media. Resolution Copper has said the project underwent an extensive review by the US Forest Service that has included consultation with tribes that have ancestral ties to the land. "The collaborative process has directly led to major changes to the mining plan to preserve and reduce potential impacts on tribal, social, environmental and cultural interests," the company stated. The Forest Service has argued in court filings that it has no discretion because the land exchange was mandated by Congress when language was included in a must-pass national defence spending bill that was signed into law in 2014 by then-President Barack Obama. There have been unsuccessful legislative attempts in the years since to withdraw the Oak Flat area from mining activity.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
US government pushes for 10% Intel stake amid US-China chip war
The US government could become the largest shareholder in Intel, one of the most important US technology companies, marking the first time Washington has sought ownership in a Silicon Valley icon. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday confirmed the US government is vying for a 10% stake in Intel, part of an unusual deal that would deepen the Trump administration's financial ties with the major chipmaker. The move comes weeks after US President Donald Trump called for Intel's CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign due to what he claimed was a conflict of interest. This allegation was linked to Tan's previous role as a venture capitalist in China. Although rare, it is not unprecedented for the US government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the recession in 2008, when the government injected nearly $50 billion (€42.94bn) into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker when it was on the verge of bankruptcy. At the time, even that bailout was seen as controversial despite GM's hardships because it was perceived as blurring the lines between state control and US free market principles. Unlike many European companies, US ones have insisted on a complete separation between government and private ownership of enterprises. The government ended up with a roughly $10bn (€8.6bn) loss after it sold its stock in GM. A misreading of the CHIPS act? Intel historically led the world in semiconductor production, tied in particular to PC production and Microsoft. When the iPhone launched in 2007, Intel-dominated PC chips nonetheless failed to win a foothold in smartphones and tablets. ARM-based chips, which are used by Apple and Samsung, became the mobile standard, leaving Intel stuck in the declining PC market. Intel has also lagged in the AI race, with their traditional central processing units not being well-suited for AI workloads. On the other hand, competitors like Nvidia have surged ahead. The CHIPS and Science Act, often referred to as just the CHIPS Act, was a bill passed in August 2022 by former US President Joe Biden in order to boost the local US semiconductor industry. COVID-19 supply chain disruptions and US–China tech tensions highlighted how dependent the US had become on foreign-made chips, not just for consumer electronics, but also defence, cars, AI and infrastructure. In November 2024, the US Department of Commerce finalised an agreement to grant Intel up to $7.86bn (€6.75bn) in direct funding through the CHIPS Act to support their semiconductor manufacturing and advanced packaging operations across Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio and Oregon. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the program, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the CHIPS program. The company has received about $2.2bn (€1.89bn) of the $7.8bn (€6.75bn) pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve US taxpayers if it is turned into Intel stock, which he said would be in the form of non-voting shares so the government wouldn't be able to use the stake to sway how the company is managed. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC as he explained why Trump is pushing for the deal. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.' The notion of the US government holding a huge stake in Intel would have seemed inconceivable back in the company's heyday when its processors were powering a personal computer boom that began in the mid-1970s. But Intel's ongoing struggles also means the US government is taking on a risky investment. US government as biggest shareholder The US government's negotiations to become a major Intel shareholder are coming on the heels of a $2 billion (€1.7bn) investment Japanese technology giant SoftBank Group, disclosed late on Monday. SoftBank is accumulating its 2% stake in Intel at $23 (€19.70) per share — a slight discount from the stock's price when its investment was announced. Intel's shares surged nearly 7% to close at $25.31 (€21.74) on the news of SoftBank's big bet on Intel, coupled with Trump's plans for the company. SoftBank invests in an array of companies that it sees as holding long-term potential. It has been stepping up investments in the United States since Trump returned to the White House. In February, its chairman Masayoshi Son joined Trump, Sam Altman of OpenAI and Larry Ellison of Oracle in announcing a major investment of up to $500bn (€429.38bn) in a project to develop specific artificial intelligence infrastructure for OpenAI called Stargate. 'Semiconductors are the foundation of every industry," Son said in a statement. 'This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role.' Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the US, which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world since he returned to the White House earlier this year for his second term in office. 'We want Intel to be successful in America,' Lutnick said during his CNBC interview. Intel is valued at about $110bn (€94.4bn), meaning a 10% government stake would equate to roughly $11bn (€9.44bn) at current prices. Other major shareholders include Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street. A 10% US government stake would almost certainly vault Washington ahead of Vanguard as Intel's largest single shareholder, unless structured as non-voting shares outside the normal count.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Russia says discussing Ukraine security guarantees without Moscow 'road to nowhere'
NATO military chiefs were set Wednesday to discuss the details of eventual security guarantees for Ukraine amid efforts to broker an end to Russia's offensive. But Lavrov warned that "seriously discussing security guarantees without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere. "We cannot agree that it is now suggested to solve collective security issues without the Russian Federation," he told reporters. President Vladimir Putin ordered Russian troops into Ukraine on February 24, 2022 and the ensuing conflict has killed tens of thousands of people and forced millions to flee their homes. US President Donald Trump, who spoke Monday with his Russian counterpart, said Putin had agreed to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and accept some Western security guarantees for Ukraine. Lavrov said in their phone call Putin had only told Trump he would "think about raising the level of" talks on Ukraine. Lavrov said any summit between Putin and Zelensky "must be prepared in the most meticulous way" so the meeting does not lead to a "deterioration" of the situation around the conflict. Lavrov also accused European leaders -- some of whom also visited the White House on Monday -- of making "clumsy attempts" to change the US president's position on Ukraine. "We have only seen aggressive escalation of the situation and rather clumsy attempts to change the position of the US president," he said, referring to Monday's meeting. "We did not hear any constructive ideas from the Europeans there," Lavrov added. Lavrov also said the West's "confrontational position, a position to continue the war, does not find understanding in the current US administration, which... seeks to help eliminate the root causes of the conflict". Post-war security is a key concern for Ukraine after more than three years of Russian offensive. Moscow has long said it will not tolerate Kyiv joining NATO and has been hostile to the idea of Western troops being deployed to the war-torn country.
