logo
Munir's missile talk in US exposes Pakistan's rogue mindset

Munir's missile talk in US exposes Pakistan's rogue mindset

Hans India5 hours ago
India has slammed Pakistan Army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir's recent anti-India remarks made in the US. Speaking at an event in Tampa on Sunday, Munir had threatened to destroy any Indian infrastructure that could impact water flow to Pakistan.
"We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, we will destroy it with ten missiles," he said while also issuing a nuclear warning.
Munir's statements are not just in bad taste, but also show his desperation to remain relevant back in Pakistan. Munir has only gone on to prove that he is the de facto head of a rogue state that has nuclear weapons.
After every terror attack on Indian soil that is carried out by Pakistan, New Delhi has threatened a strong response. India has refrained from war, and Pakistan believed that it was because it had nuclear weapons.
However, Operation Sindoor called Pakistan's nuclear bluff, and India did manage to decisively take down several strategic targets within Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
What is to be noted here is that Munir made the threat in the US. This statement comes at a time when US-Pakistan ties have improved. Further, the Trump administration has also partnered with Pakistan on an energy deal.
However, the statements by Munir are not off the cuff. He has chosen the US to make this statement as part of his strategic messaging. Moreover, his confidence comes from the fact that this is his second visit to the US. On June 18, he was invited to the White House for lunch by President Donald Trump. This is something that is reserved for heads of state.
It may be recalled that a few months back, Munir had said that Kashmir was Pakistan's 'jugular vein'. He also went on to state that Hindus and Muslims were different. At that time, too, he had made the statement in front of the Pakistan diaspora. The only difference is that the earlier statement was made in Pakistan, and this time it is in the US.
Munir's comments could also be seen in the context of India calling Pakistan's nuclear bluff during Operation Sindoor. The statement could be aimed at deterring India from carrying out further military action in Pakistan.
Security analyst Nitin A Gokhale posted on X, 'Mullah Munir's rant from American soil is not surprising. From Ayub to Zia and from Musharraf to Munir, each one thought the yanks were their true friends, only to find, sooner or later, being placed in the 'use and throw' category. But the main reason for his nuclear sabre-rattling is India calling Pakistan's nuclear bluff in Operation Sindoor.'
The timing of the threat also comes at a time when India's relations with the US are strained. Trump has repeatedly claimed responsibility for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. He also went on to impose a 50 per cent tariff on Indian imports and criticised India's trade policies and continued purchase of Russian oil.
This is a high-stakes move by Munir as he knows he has the backing of the Trump administration. While Munir may be basking in the glory of renewed ties with the US, the fact is that he is very unpopular at home.
Despite all the rhetoric, the Pakistanis are aware that during Operation Sindoor, India gave Pakistan a bloody nose. Hence, Munir may have gone into damage control mode.
Further, he is facing a lot of criticism back home for his handling of the Imran Khan issue.
If Munir thinks he has made a very calculated move, he is mistaken. No responsible nation which has nuclear capabilities issues such threats. At the end of it, Munir has proven to the world that Pakistan is nothing but a dangerous and unstable nation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'We'll see what happens': Trump dodges question on extending August 12 China tariff deadline
'We'll see what happens': Trump dodges question on extending August 12 China tariff deadline

First Post

time6 minutes ago

  • First Post

'We'll see what happens': Trump dodges question on extending August 12 China tariff deadline

US President Donald Trump on Monday dodged a question about whether he would extend the August 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods, saying 'we'll see what happens' read more US President Donald Trump on Monday dodged a question about whether he would extend the August 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods, saying 'we'll see what happens,' while praising China for its cooperation in ongoing trade talks with the US. 'We've been dealing very nicely with China. As you have probably heard, they have tremendous tariffs that they're paying to the United States of America,' Reuters quoted Trump as saying at a news conference at the White House. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'They've been dealing quite nicely,' he said, adding that he had a good relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping. A tariff truce between the US and China is set to expire on August 12, though the Trump administration has signaled the deadline could be extended. More from World PM Modi to visit China: Why the trip matters amid Trump's steep tariffs on India Without an extension, US tariffs on Chinese goods are expected to surge to 145%, while Chinese tariffs on American products could reach 125%. The two countries agreed to a 90-day pause in their trade dispute during talks in Geneva this May, allowing time for further negotiations. A follow-up meeting in Stockholm in late July ended without any announcement on extending the truce. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington is making progress and expressed optimism about reaching a deal with Beijing. With the clock ticking, Trump on Sunday night called on China to quadruple its purchases of American soybeans and noted that doing so would help reduce America's trade deficit with China. 'China is worried about its shortage of soybeans,' Trump wrote on Truth Social in a message directed to Xi Jinping, China's leader. 'Our great farmers produce the most robust soybeans,' he added. With inputs from agencies

US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage
US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage

News18

time6 minutes ago

  • News18

US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage

Curated By : Last Updated: August 12, 2025, 00:39 IST It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case (Pexels/Representative Image) The US Supreme Court legalised same-sex marriage in 2015 following its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. Now, nearly a decade after that historic decision, the nation's highest court is being urged to revisit the ruling. Kim Davis, a former county clerk from Kentucky, has submitted a petition asking the Court to consider granting her protection from personal liability under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, reported ABC . Davis made national headlines in 2015 when she was jailed for six days after refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, citing her religious beliefs. At the time, she was the only official authorised under Kentucky law to issue marriage licenses in Rowan County. When she denied a marriage certificate to David Ermold and David Moore, a lower court ordered her to pay $100,000 in damages for infringing on their constitutional rights. Recommended Stories In her recent appeal to the Supreme Court, Davis is contesting the $100,000 jury verdict and is also seeking $260,000 in emotional damages and attorneys' fees. Her claims had previously been dismissed by lower courts. A federal appeals court panel earlier this year ruled against her, stating that the former clerk 'cannot raise the First Amendment as a defence because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect." It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case. The justices are expected to consider if they will take the matter during a private conference at the end of September. Should the Court agree to hear the case, oral arguments would likely take place in the spring of 2026, with a final decision anticipated by the end of June. 'I'm hoping that we'll obviously get justice in this case for Kim Davis but that the religious accommodation that she obtained for all clerks," said Matt Staver, Davis' legal representative, in a statement to Scripps News . View All "Dragging Out War" Zelensky Eyes "Stronger Global Pressure" on Russia Ahead of Trump-Putin Meet Donald Trump Will Try To Get Back Territory For Ukraine In "Feel-out Meeting" With Putin In Alaska North Korea Slams US-South Korea Drills; Lukashenko Admits Kim's Troops Took Part in Ukraine War |4K Air India Crash Victims' Families Demand Immediate Release Of Flight Recorders, Hire Us based Lawyer "Road To Misery" IRGC Slams Trump-Backed Zangezur corridor, Iran to Hold Meet with Armenia | 4K View all Meanwhile, William Powell, attorney for David Ermold and David Moore, expressed confidence in the current legal outcome. In a statement to ABC , he noted, 'Not a single judge on the US Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis' rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that her arguments do not merit further attention." In her petition, Davis further argues that the Court should treat the issue of same-sex marriage similarly to how it addressed abortion in its 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade. This is the first time that someone has challenged the same-sex marriage ruling after it was announced in 2015. News world US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage Read More

Why is Trump not imposing extra tariffs on China just like India for importing Russian oil? Is he scared? VP Vance admits...
Why is Trump not imposing extra tariffs on China just like India for importing Russian oil? Is he scared? VP Vance admits...

India.com

time6 minutes ago

  • India.com

Why is Trump not imposing extra tariffs on China just like India for importing Russian oil? Is he scared? VP Vance admits...

New Delhi: US President Donald Trump imposed 25 percent tariff on India for buying Russian oil. On being asked why he isn't imposing same tariff on China for buying Russian oil, there is no straight answer. Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance has admitted that imposing tariffs on China is a very difficult decision. JD Vance has said that after imposing a huge tariff hike on Russian oil imports from India, US President Donald Trump is now considering similar measures against China. But he stressed that deciding to impose tariffs against China would be much more difficult and politically sensitive. Why did Trump not impose tariff on China for importing Russian oil? It is clear from the statement of Vice President JD Vance that Donald Trump is afraid of China's retaliation. In fact, when Trump imposed tariffs on China for the first time, China immediately retaliated and reduced the supply of those rare minerals to America, which are most needed by America's defense industry. The current situation is that American defense companies are struggling to make weapons, and many companies have been forced to extend the delivery date of weapons by two to three months. What did VP Vance say on the issue? That is why JD Vance has admitted that 'the relations between the two countries also affect many other issues.' That is, America is looking after its own interests and is avoiding imposing tariffs on China due to fear. Speaking on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, Vice President JD Vance said, 'imposing tariffs on China is being considered, but no decision has been taken yet.' Vance said, 'The President (Donald Trump) has said that he is thinking about it, but he has not taken any concrete decision. The China issue is a little more complicated because our relationship affects many other things that have nothing to do with the Russian situation.' How much oil did China purchase from Russia in July? China's imports of Russian crude oil crossed $ 10 billion in July, the highest monthly level since March. However, the figures so far in 2025 are 7.7% lower than in 2024. Vance said that the President is 'reviewing his options' and 'a decision will be taken at the right time.' At the same time, senior advisor Peter Navarro warned that such tariffs 'can also harm America.' This statement of JD Vance comes after the recent 25 percent additional tariff imposed by the US against India. Due to which the total tariff rate on Indian goods has increased to 50%. This additional duty will come into effect from August 27.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store