logo
- The Dark Side Of AI In Universities: Are We Celebrating Cheating?

- The Dark Side Of AI In Universities: Are We Celebrating Cheating?

Barnama6 days ago
22/07/2025 03:55 PM
Opinions on topical issues from thought leaders, columnists and editors.
By :
Assoc Prof Dr Azmi Abdul Latiff
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become the shiny new tool in today's classrooms. From helping university students correct English grammar in their assignments to assisting lecturers in creating materials, AI is reshaping education at lightning speed and has become very resourceful, pushing search engines like Google aside.
But lurking beneath the excitement is a worrying trend: the growing over-reliance on AI and the celebration of cheating through it.
Recently, I came across a post on social media where a local university student openly boasted about using AI to complete assignments.
He claimed that he could complete the tasks given even at the eleventh hour, by relying on AI to generate essays and reports, without getting caught by lecturers. Shockingly, this was not whispered in shame but proudly shared, as if it were a clever achievement.
Such a growing overreliance on AI tools when completing assignments raises serious concerns. Universities risk producing graduates who not only lack the professional competence to perform in the real world but may also emerge as individuals with questionable work ethics and underdeveloped personal responsibility.
Are universities, knowingly or unknowingly, breeding a culture where AI cheating is celebrated rather than condemned?
AI: A double-edged sword
There's no denying that AI tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly and Quillbot have transformed how students approach learning and assignments. They offer instant feedback, improve accuracy, and help learners overcome writer's block.
ChatGPT, for instance, is akin to a very resourceful friend who knows everything under the sun and a servant who would prepare anything on the 'master's' request.
Nevertheless, AI tools are meant to support learning, not replace it. When students use AI to generate assignments fully, it defeats the purpose of education. They skip the very processes that education is designed to cultivate – critical thinking, creativity, problem-solving, and self-expression. They may submit polished and remarkable work but walk away with shallow learning.
In English language proficiency classes, for instance, the goal is not just to produce correct sentences in assignments but to 'own' the language, to communicate confidently, and to express one's own ideas. A student who depends entirely on AI tools will struggle to perform in real-life interactions, workplace communications, or even oral exams.
Why is this happening?
Several forces are pushing students down this slippery slope.
First, the pressure to perform is immense. Faced with tight deadlines and high expectations, some students view AI as an easy way out.
Second, peer influence plays a big role. When students see others using AI to get ahead without adverse consequences, they start believing it's normal or even clever.
Third, many students lack awareness of the ethical lines they're crossing. To them, using AI might not feel like cheating because it's not copy-pasting from another student or the internet, it's 'just an app'.
Finally, there's an institutional problem: some universities have not yet set clear policies on AI use, leaving both students and teachers in a grey zone of what is allowed and what is not.
The risks we overlook
When universities fail to address this issue, they risk not only the integrity of assignments but also their entire reputation.
Graduates may leave their universities with AI-polished degrees, but their lack of real-world skills, such as communication and interpersonal skills, will quickly be exposed to the job market.
Employers will notice. Industries will complain. The institution's credibility and the country's higher education system will slowly erode.
Beyond that, overreliance on AI erodes the teacher-student relationship. Instead of seeing lecturers as mentors guiding their learning, students start viewing them as obstacles to outsmarting. The students will celebrate every time they complete their AI-generated assignments without getting caught by the teachers. This undermines the entire spirit of education.
What needs to change?
Universities must act now to reclaim the narrative.
First, set clear AI guidelines: Define what counts as acceptable assistance (e.g., grammar checks) and what crosses the line (e.g., full essay generation).
Second, teach ethical AI use. Integrate discussions about responsible AI practices into the curriculum.
Third, design better assessments. Assessments that require students to do physical oral presentations, handwritten reflective journals, and in-class tests and discussions are much harder to fake with AI.
Next, train lecturers to detect AI-generated work and, more importantly, design learning tasks that promote originality and critical engagement.
Most importantly, we need to rebuild the value of effort and learning among students. Education should not be reduced to chasing grades or tricking systems. It should be about growth, discovery, and building human capacities that no machine can replicate.
Technology should serve, not take control
AI is here to stay, but so are the values of integrity, effort, and human learning. As educators and institutions, we must ensure that technology serves these values, not undermines them.
For students, please stop celebrating the clever use of AI to cheat and start championing the honest, sometimes messy, but ultimately rewarding process of real learning.
-- BERNAMA
Assoc Prof Dr Azmi Abdul Latiff is Dean of the Centre for Language Studies at Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM).
(The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of BERNAMA)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meta clashes with Apple, Google over age check legislation
Meta clashes with Apple, Google over age check legislation

The Star

time7 hours ago

  • The Star

Meta clashes with Apple, Google over age check legislation

The biggest tech companies are warring over who's responsible for children's safety online, with billions of dollars in fines on the line as states rapidly pass conflicting laws requiring companies to verify users' ages. The struggle has pitted Meta Platforms Inc and other app developers against Apple Inc and Alphabet Inc's Google, the world's largest app stores. Lobbyists for both sides are moving from state to state, working to water down or redirect the legislation to minimize their clients' risks. This year alone, at least three states – Utah, Texas and Louisiana – passed legislation requiring tech companies to authenticate users' ages, secure parental consent for anyone under 18 and ensure minors are protected from potentially harmful digital experiences. Now, lobbyists for all three companies are flooding into South Carolina and Ohio, the next possible states to consider such legislation. The debate has taken on new importance after the Supreme Court this summer ruled age verification laws are constitutional in some instances. A tech group on Wednesday petitioned the Supreme Court to block a social media age verification law in Mississippi, teeing up a highly consequential decision in the next few weeks. Child advocates say holding tech companies responsible for verifying the ages of their users is key to creating a safer online experience for minors. Parents and advocates have alleged the social media platforms funnel children into unsafe and toxic online spaces, exposing young people to harmful content about self harm, eating disorders, drug abuse and more. Blame game Meta supporters argue the app stores should be responsible for figuring out whether minors are accessing inappropriate content, comparing the app store to a liquor store that checks patrons' IDs. Apple and Google, meanwhile, argue age verification laws violate children's privacy and argue the individual apps are better-positioned to do age checks. Apple said it's more accurate to describe the app store as a mall and Meta as the liquor store. The three new state laws put the responsibility on app stores, signaling Meta's arguments are gaining traction. The company lobbied in support of the Utah and Louisiana laws putting the onus on Apple and Google for tracking their users' ages. Similar Meta-backed proposals have been introduced in 20 states. Federal legislation proposed by Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah would hold the app stores accountable for verifying users' ages. Still, Meta's track record in its state campaigns is mixed. At least eight states have passed laws since 2024 forcing social media platforms to verify users' ages and protect minors online. Apple and Google have mobilized dozens of lobbyists across those states to argue that Meta is shirking responsibility for protecting children. "We see the legislation being pushed by Meta as an effort to offload their own responsibilities to keep kids safe,' said Google spokesperson Danielle Cohen. "These proposals introduce new risks to the privacy of minors, without actually addressing the harms that are inspiring lawmakers to act.' Meta spokesperson Rachel Holland countered that the company is supporting the approach favored by parents who want to keep their children safe online. "Parents want a one-stop-shop to oversee their teen's online lives and 80% of American parents and bipartisan lawmakers across 20 states and the federal government agree that app stores are best positioned to provide this,' Holland said. As the regulation patchwork continues to take shape, the companies have each taken voluntary steps to protect children online. Meta has implemented new protections to restrict teens from accessing "sensitive' content, like posts related to suicide, self-harm and eating disorders. Apple created "Child Accounts,' which give parents more control over their children's' online activity. At Apple, spokesperson Peter Ajemian said it "soon will release our new age assurance feature that empowers parents to share their child's age range with apps without disclosing sensitive information.' Splintered groups As the lobbying battle over age verification heats up, influential big tech groups are splintering and new ones emerging. Meta last year left Chamber of Progress, a liberal-leaning tech group that counts Apple and Google as members. Since then, the chamber, which is led by a former Google lobbyist and brands itself as the Democratic-aligned voice for the tech industry, has grown more aggressive in its advocacy against all age verification bills. "I understand the temptation within a company to try to redirect policymakers towards the company's rivals, but ultimately most legislators don't want to intervene in a squabble between big tech giants,' said Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich. Meta tried unsuccessfully to convince another major tech trade group, the Computer & Communications Industry Association, to stop working against bills Meta supports, two people familiar with the dynamics said. Meta, a CCIA member, acknowledged it doesn't always agree with the association. Meta is also still a member of NetChoice, which opposes all age verification laws no matter who's responsible. The group currently has 10 active lawsuits on the matter, including battling some of Meta's preferred laws. The disagreements have prompted some of the companies to form entirely new lobbying outfits. Meta in April teamed up with Spotify Technology SA and Match Group Inc to launch a coalition aimed at taking on Apple and Google, including over the issue of age verification. Competing campaigns Meta is also helping to fund the Digital Childhood Alliance, a coalition of conservative groups leading efforts to pass app-store age verification, according to three people familiar with the funding. Neither the Digital Childhood Alliance nor Meta responded directly to questions about whether Meta is funding the group. But Meta said it has collaborated with Digital Childhood Alliance. The group's executive director, Casey Stefanski, said it includes more than 100 organizations and child safety advocates who are pushing for more legislation that puts responsibility on the app stores. Stefanski said the Digital Childhood Alliance has met with Google "several times' to share their concerns about the app store in recent months. The App Association, a group backed by Apple, has been running ads in Texas, Alabama, Louisiana and Ohio arguing that the app store age verification bills are backed by porn websites and companies. The adult entertainment industry's main lobby said it is not pushing for the bills; pornography is mostly banned from app stores. "This one-size fits all approach is built to solve problems social media platforms have with their systems while making our members, small tech companies and app developers, collateral damage,' said App Association spokesperson Jack Fleming. In South Carolina and Ohio, there are competing proposals placing different levels of responsibility on the app stores and developers. That could end with more stringent legislation that makes neither side happy. "When big tech acts as a monolith, that's when things die,' said Joel Thayer, a supporter of the app store age verification bills. "But when they start breaking up that concentration of influence, all the sudden good things start happening because the reality is, these guys are just a hair's breath away from eating each other alive.' – Bloomberg

AI is replacing search engines as a shopping guide, research suggests
AI is replacing search engines as a shopping guide, research suggests

The Star

timea day ago

  • The Star

AI is replacing search engines as a shopping guide, research suggests

Finding products, comparing prices and browsing reviews: Until now, you'd have done most of this in a search engine like Google. But that era appears to be ending thanks to AI, research shows. — Photo: Christin Klose/dpa COPENHAGEN: Three in four people who use AI are turning to the likes of ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot to get advice and recommendations on shopping and travel instead of using the previous online method of search engines like Google, new research shows. AI-supported online shopping is done at least occasionally by 76% of AI users, with 17% doing so most or even all of the time, according to a study conducted by the market research institute Norstat on behalf of Verdane, a leading European investment company. The changes in consumer search behaviour pose a major challenge not only for search engine providers like Google but also for manufacturers and retailers, who must adapt to maintain their visibility in the AI-driven world. AI chatbots have emerged as powerful tools for tracking down specific products, often providing helpful advice in response to complex and specific queries. Of the survey respondents, 3% are dedicated AI enthusiasts who always use AI tools instead of search engines when shopping online, while 14% said they mostly use AI and 35% do so occasionally. A total of 7,282 people from the UK, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland aged between 18 and 60 participated in the survey in June. The highest proportion of AI use is in online travel research, at 33%. This is followed by consumer electronics (22%), DIY and hobby supplies (20%), and software or digital subscriptions (19%). However, AI usage is still relatively low in fashion and clothing (13%), cosmetics (12%), and real estate (7%). Among AI tools, ChatGPT is far ahead of its competitors and 86% of AI users regularly use OpenAI's chatbot. This is followed at a considerable distance by Google's Gemini (26% regular users) and Microsoft's Copilot (20%). The Chinese AI bot DeepSeek, which has been the subject of heated debate among AI experts and data protection advocates, appears to have no significant role among consumers in Europe. – dpa

Layar education group backs Sagah's emphasis on STEM for rural communities
Layar education group backs Sagah's emphasis on STEM for rural communities

Borneo Post

timea day ago

  • Borneo Post

Layar education group backs Sagah's emphasis on STEM for rural communities

Paul also pointed out that SELC 2025 is HRD Corp claimable, making it an accessible professional development opportunity for both educators and employers. KUCHING (July 27): Layar Education Development Committee (LEDC) chairman Paul Langgang has voiced his full support for the call to action from State Minister for Education, Innovation and Talent Development, Dato Sri Roland Sagah Wee Inn, on the importance of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for the rural communities. 'There is no doubt that Sarawak's rural communities must embrace Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in order to be fully prepared for the state's future development,' said Paul. 'Equally important is the ability to address the language of STEM, which is why we have initiated the Sarawak English Literacy Conference (SELC) 2025, scheduled to take place from Sept 17 to 19, 2025, at the Hikmah Exchange Event Centre (HEEC) in Kuching.' Paul also pointed out that SELC 2025 is HRD Corp claimable, making it an accessible professional development opportunity for both educators and employers. He made this remarks during a recent SELC 2025 Steering Committee meeting. The conference is jointly organised by LEDC and Place Borneo Sdn Bhd, with the collaboration of educational partners including Jolly Learning and STEM Learning UK. Sagah had made the call at the STEM Catalysts Raspberry Pi 2025 programme held at SMK Long Lama, Baram, recently, asserting that it was no longer acceptable to say that the 3Rs—reading, writing, and arithmetic—are enough for rural children. 'Our future depends on our ability to master science, technology, and digital knowledge. You too can excel in coding and STEM regardless of your location,' he said. SELC 2025 will convene renowned international education experts to support Sarawak's mission of strengthening English literacy and STEM education in schools. Among the featured speakers is Gilbert Jolly, Managing Director of Jolly Learning, the UK-based publisher behind the globally acclaimed Jolly Phonics programme. He has been instrumental in expanding the reach of phonics-based learning tools in classrooms worldwide and will share insights on their global impact and the future of phonics in literacy education. Also speaking at the event is Sarah Dagnell, a professional development leader with STEM Learning UK. With over a decade of experience in primary science education, Sarah specialises in helping schools and teachers enhance STEM outcomes through curriculum design, training, and evidence-based teaching strategies. SELC 2025 aims to equip educators with innovative teaching strategies, aligned with Sarawak's Post-Covid-19 Development Strategy, to build a future-ready workforce. The conference is expected to draw participants from across Malaysia and the region. It is supported by the Ministry of Education, Innovation and Talent Development (MEITD), the Ministry of Women, Early Childhood and Community Wellbeing Development, the Sarawak State Education Department, Business Events Sarawak (BESarawak), and Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Sarawak Branch, whose contributions reflect a strong and collective commitment to advancing education in Sarawak. Registration is now open, with standard rates set at RM890.92 for Malaysian delegates and USD300 for international participants. Outstation teachers may also apply for a special subsidy extended by MEITD through LEDC and Place Borneo, subject to terms and conditions for eligibility. Eligible participants may also tap into the Geran Tahunan Khas offered by the Ministry of Women, Early Childhood and Community Wellbeing Development. For more information and registration details, visit or contact Mr Emierson at +6082 555 189 or [email protected]. lead Paul Langgang rural communities SELC STEM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store