Doctors mount vaccine safety review to rival feds'
Why it matters: The unusual online gathering of the newly formed Vaccine Integrity Project was intended to provide an evidence base for doctors and public health officials as they update recommendations for kids, pregnant women and immunocompromised people.
The agenda resembled those of a vaccine advisory board to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that's come under scrutiny since Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. purged its 17 members and replaced them with a handpicked roster that includes some known vaccine skeptics.
What they're saying:"Over the last few months, we've seen policy changes by federal officials based on evidence that has been shown as flawed, analytically fraught, or flat-out wrong," said Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota and a leader of the initiative.
"It's vital that providers and the public continue to have vaccine information they can rely on," he said during the meeting.
HHS didn't respond to a request for comment.
What they did: The group of 24 doctors and researchers from across the countryexamined scientific studies published since mid-2024 for COVID and RSV vaccines, and mid-2023 for flu.
The group reviewed more than 14,000 peer-reviewed scientific articles and extracted data from 590 studies, including 50 controlled trials, Osterholm said.
The effort is being funded by Alumbra, a foundation established by philanthropist and Walmart heiress Christy Walton.
The panel found that recent research shows flu, COVID and RSV vaccines remain safe and effective for kids, pregnant women and immunocompromised people.
Data continued to show a possible increased risk of preterm birth associated with Pfizer's RSV vaccine.
Osterholm said there is no scientific evidence to justify Kennedy's recent decision to no longer recommend COVID vaccines for healthy pregnant women or children.
Zoom out: The American Academy of Pediatrics on Tuesday separately released its immunization guidelines for flu, RSV and COVID-19 ahead of the fall respiratory virus season.
For the first time, the group's guidelines diverge from the federal government's. The pediatricians recommend COVID vaccines for all kids between six and 23 months old, and for kids over 2 years old at risk for severe disease.
The Trump administration earlier this year said it would require new randomized clinical trials for COVID boosters before authorizing them for healthy individuals.
The American College for Obstetricians and Gynecologists earlier said it would release its own guidelines for respiratory virus vaccines during pregnancy in coordination with the Vaccine Integrity Project.
Reality check: Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices vaccine recommendations that get approved by the CDC must be covered by health insurers. That's not the case for vaccine recommendations from medical associations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr. attacks pediatric group after vaccine recommendations
Hours after the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) broke with Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr and recommended COVID-19 vaccines for all young children, he blasted the association as beholden to corporate interests. The AAP on Tuesday recommended all infants and children 6 months through 23 months get vaccinated against COVID-19 to help protect against serious illness. Kennedy responded in a post on social platform X, calling the group's recommendations 'corporate friendly' because AAP receives donations to its Friends of Children Fund from vaccine companies like Pfizer and Moderna, among others. The philanthropic fund backs projects supporting child health and equity. The health secretary said the organization should disclose 'its corporate entanglements … so that Americans may ask whether the AAP's recommendations reflect public health interest, or are, perhaps, just a pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions of AAP's Big Pharma benefactors.' Susan Kressly, AAP's president, in a statement said the group would welcome an opportunity to sit down with Kennedy to review the recommendations. 'This attack on the integrity of pediatricians is unfortunate, but it does not change the facts,' Kressly said. 'We are transparent about our funders, follow rigorous conflict-of-interest disclosures and maintain safeguards to ensure the integrity and independence of our guidance.' The AAP and HHS have been at odds for months, and tensions reached a head when Kennedy dismissed all the members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replaced them with his own handpicked representatives, including some outright vaccine skeptics. The AAP chose not to participate in the reconstituted panel's first meeting in June, calling it 'illegitimate.' Kennedy later excluded the fund along with other top medical organizations from working with the panel to research and help influence vaccination recommendations. Kennedy has long criticized the so-called medical establishment for conspiring to make Americans sick. His first ' Make America Healthy Again ' report accused doctors of being overly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry to overprescribe certain medications that don't treat the root causes of disease.
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kennedy's latest attack on vaccine science is as dangerous as it is cynical
While headlines have focused on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to cancel half a billion dollars in research funding for life-saving mRNA vaccines, another Kennedy attack on science has gone largely unnoticed — and it may have even greater consequences for public health. In recent weeks, Kennedy has amplified a campaign to undermine trust in older vaccines that use aluminum adjuvants, long relied on to protect children from deadly diseases. Why does this matter? Because Kennedy, now secretary of Health and Human Services, isn't just repeating discredited talking points — he's actively trying to intimidate scientists and strong-arm the global research community into rewriting decades of established vaccine safety science. The latest flashpoint is a Danish study, published in July in the Annals of Internal Medicine, that looked at more than 1.2 million children and found no link between aluminum-containing vaccines and conditions like autism or any of 50 chronic diseases. This should have been reassuring news for parents and public health officials everywhere. Instead, Kennedy and the anti-vaccine organization he once founded and led, Children's Health Defense, immediately pounced on the study. In a lengthy online rebuttal, Kennedy called the research 'deeply flawed,' demanded the journal retract the study, and even pressured Denmark to break its own privacy laws to release underlying patient data. He went so far as to threaten that the U.S. might cut scientific ties with countries that don't adopt his version of ' gold standard science.' This is not a normal scientific debate. It's an unprecedented attempt by a U.S. Cabinet official to bully both scientists and allied nations into submission — echoing the worst kinds of political interference in science. It's important to step back and see Kennedy's tactics for what they are. For years, he has relied on a small network of like-minded activists and researchers who have pushed the myth that vaccines cause autism or other neurological disorders. Many of their studies were bankrolled by anti-vaccine donors, including the Children's Medical Safety Research Institute and other groups linked to longtime vaccine opponents. For example, Kennedy's key scientific adviser, James Lyons-Weiler, has published and promoted research that mainstream medical organizations have denounced as junk science. Lyons-Weiler's own journal recently ran a paper Kennedy cited during his Senate confirmation hearings — a paper so flawed that an external review by top public health experts concluded it ' should be forgotten.' Yet Kennedy never challenges the credibility of studies that fit his agenda. Meanwhile, the Danish researchers behind the new aluminum study have no such conflicts of interest. Their work was reviewed and published by one of the world's leading medical journals, and their only 'sin' was to produce a result that contradicts Kennedy's belief that vaccines are to blame for autism. Some of Kennedy's claims are simply misleading. He accuses the Danish team of being secretly influenced by the aluminum industry. He tries to frame the study's funding as suspect, ignoring the fact that the supposed 'pharmaceutical giant' involved does not even make vaccines. Most troubling of all, Kennedy's crusade isn't just about aluminum. It's part of a larger pattern of using his government position to sow doubt about all vaccines, at the very moment when public confidence is already dangerously low. If he succeeds, we could see more parents skipping essential childhood immunizations. This could lead to a resurgence of measles, meningitis and other preventable diseases and needless suffering for children and families. We recently wrote about this coordinated campaign, warning that Kennedy's strategy is to undermine trust in every aspect of vaccine safety, from COVID shots to the routine vaccines that have kept generations of kids healthy. The response from scientists around the world has been swift and clear: The evidence is overwhelming that aluminum adjuvants are very safe and effective, and that vaccines do not cause autism. Kennedy's double standards are glaring. He demands the highest level of transparency and rigor from studies that contradict his views, but he champions deeply flawed or even retracted research when it suits him. He accuses his critics of financial conflicts of interest, yet his own movement is supported by organizations and individuals with a direct stake in vaccine-related litigation. The latest twist in this saga: Kennedy has appointed David Geier, a figure with a long, troubling history of promoting dangerous autism 'treatments' and running afoul of medical regulators, to lead a government-backed autism study. This move has drawn sharp criticism from leading autism advocates, who point out that Geier's previous work was discredited and even led to legal sanctions. We urge the media, policymakers and the public not to be distracted by Kennedy's noise. The real stakes are clear: Undermining vaccine science puts lives at risk. We must stand with independent researchers, uphold the integrity of medical evidence and protect the health of our children. Alex Morozov is the CEO and founder of Eviva Partners. Helen Petousis-Harris is a vaccinologist and associate professor at the University of Auckland. Stephan Lewandowsky is a cognitive scientist at the University of Bristol.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
South Lake Tahoe resident tests positive for bubonic plague, first local case since 2020
A South Lake Tahoe resident has tested positive for plague, health officials confirmed Tuesday — the first reported human case in El Dorado County since 2020. The individual is receiving medical care and recovering at home, according to the El Dorado County Department of Public Health. Officials believe the person was likely bitten by an infected flea while camping in the South Lake Tahoe area. 'Plague is naturally present in many parts of California, including higher elevation areas of El Dorado County, said Kyle Fliflet, El Dorado County's acting health director. 'It's important that individuals take precautions for themselves and their pets when outdoors, especially while walking, hiking and or camping in areas where wild rodents are present.' Plague, caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, is most often transmitted by fleas that spread the disease when they bite wild rodents. Domestic cats and dogs can also carry plague-infected fleas into homes, officials said. Symptoms typically appear within two weeks of exposure and include fever, nausea, weakness and swollen lymph nodes. The disease is rare but potentially deadly if left untreated. It can be effectively treated with antibiotics if caught early. Between 2021 and 2024, 41 rodents tested positive for exposure to the bacterium, and four more have tested positive so far this year, according to county health officials. While human cases are uncommon — the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports an average of seven cases annually in the United States, mostly in rural western states — recent incidents underscore the risk.
