‘Son of Concorde' bosses reveal over 600 routes could see flight times HALVED including 3.5-hour trips from UK to US
MAKERS of a supersonic plane have revealed there are more than 600 global routes where Concorde-style speedy flights could slash flying times by as much as half.
And
Advertisement
2
2
The "Son of Concorde" reached supersonic speeds in January
Credit: Boom Technology
Boom Technology has been testing its XB-1 test jet which managed to fly faster than the speed of sound in January.
One of the hurdles they've overcome from supersonic flying is the sound.
The firm's jet, aptly dubbed the "Son of Concorde", has no audible sonic boom.
A number of orders from the likes of American Airlines, United Airlines, and Japan Airlines have already been made for Boom Technology's passenger jet model, Overture.
Advertisement
Read more about flights
President Trump recently
"While Boom is pleased to see the regulatory pathways to supersonic flight clearing, Boom's business case has never been predicated on regulatory change," a spokesperson for Boom told The Sun.
"There are over 600 global routes that are economically viable for supersonic flight—even without going supersonic over land.
"Now that rules are being updated to allow boomless supersonic flight over land in the US, additional routes will benefit from speedups.
Advertisement
Most read in Tech
Exclusive
Latest
"Boom's supersonic airliner, Overture, will fly transatlantic routes, such as New York to London, at its full cruising speed of Mach 1.7 over water – about twice as fast as today's conventional airliners."
"Boomless Cruise enables Overture to fly at speeds up to Mach 1.3 over land without an audible boom - up to 50% faster than subsonic jets - reducing US coast-to-coast flight times by up to 90 minutes.
I'm a Boom supersonic test pilot - my day job is testing a new generation of Concordes
"International routes with overland segments can also benefit from increased speeds."
The company also revealed that Overture "remains on target" to get certification from relevant bodies including the FAA by the end of the decade so it can carry passengers.
Advertisement
Bosses are aiming to roll out the first
To accomplish that, they expect production of the first aircraft in the "Superfactory" to start next year.
WHY DID CONCORDE FAIL?
CONCORDE was the supersonic passenger jet considered the ultimate luxury in air travel.
Air France and British Airways announced they would be
The plane had its first commercial flight on January 21, 1976, so was retired after 27 years of service and 50,000 flights.
Several reasons led to the decision to retire Concorde.
Air France and British Airways cited low passenger numbers and high maintenance costs.
By the early noughties, the planes were outdated and expensive to run, despite being incredibly advanced when they were first introduced almost three decades previously.
The 9/11 terrorist attack in 2001 majorly impacted passenger numbers, as people opted not to fly.
Passenger numbers also fell after an
The disaster
The plane ran over a small
It was also the only aircraft in the British Airways fleet that required a flight engineer.
Image credit: Alamy
By the end of this year, they expect to produce thrust during fully-operational engine core tests for Overture's bespoke engine, Symphony.
"Boom's current order book accounts for the first five years of production at the Overture Superfactory in North Carolina," the spokesperson added.
Advertisement
"Airlines have been very receptive to Overture and the competitive advantages of supersonic travel.
"In fact, the passenger research we have conducted indicates that 87% of passengers are willing to switch from their preferred airline in order to gain access to supersonic travel."
THE RISE OF SUPERSONIC AND HYPERSONIC
There are several types of hypersonic and supersonic jets. A breakdown of what's been happening in the industry and what's expected in the coming years.
Talon-A
Built by Stratolaunch
Reported speeds of Mach 5
The first test flight conducted in 2024
Built by Nasa and Lockheed Martin
Predicted max speeds of Mach 1.4
The first test flight in 2024 - but subject to delays
Built by Venus Aerospace and Velontra
Predicted max speeds of Mach 6
First test flight in 2025
Built by Hermeus
Predicted max speeds of Mach 2.5
First test flight in 2026
Built by Hermeus
Predicted max speeds of Mach 5
First test flight by 2030
Built by China's hypersonic plane programme
Predicted max speeds of Mach 6
First test flight in 2025
Built by Hypersonix Launch Systems
Predicted max speeds of Mach 7
First test flight in 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Tesla's market share in Ireland diminishes
Sales of Tesla electric vehicles (EVs) in Ireland have fallen in the first five months of this year and its market share has diminished, despite a general surge in EV sales in the market, figures show. It comes amid a wider drop in Tesla sales across as Europe, which is being attributed to the 'Elon effect' or a political backlash against its billionaire owner and erstwhile Trump ally Elon Musk. The CSO's data for January to May show that 1,076 new Teslas were licenced for the first time in Ireland in that period. This compared to 1,080 Teslas licenced in the first five months of 2024. However, while this was a slight drop, it comes as sales of EVs have risen considerably again after nosediving in recent years. The CSO data shows that 9,548 new EVs were licenced in Ireland in the first five months of 2024. In the first five months of 2025, however, 11,877 new EVs were licenced. This is a rise of almost 25%. Meanwhile, while Tesla made up 11.4% of the total number of new EVs licenced for the first time in January to May 2024, its market share has fallen to 9.1% in the same period in 2025. The CSO began monitoring the make and models of new EVs licenced for the first time in July of 2024. It added that, since then, there has been a Tesla model in the top five every month with the exception of January and May this year. Speaking to the Irish Examiner, several car dealers in Ireland said that they are seeing a surge in demand for EVs so far this year and that it was surprising to see one make of EV not follow others in seeing higher sales figures. 'Given what we're seeing in the market, it's not hard to draw a line between this and what he's getting up to in America,' one said, referring to Mr Musk. It comes as other parts of Europe also turn to other brands of EVs according to recent data. In April, sales of Tesla vehicles in 32 European countries tumbled 49% to 7,261 from 14,228 in the same month the previous year, according to figures released by the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association. Elon Musk and US president Donald Trump have had a very public falling out. Picture: Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg At the same time, sales of battery-electric vehicles by all manufacturers rose about 28%. Analysts have suggested the brand may have been damaged by Mr Musk's deep forays into American politics, given his close ties to US president Donald Trump, and further afield such as his support for far-right parties in countries like Germany. In recent weeks, Mr Musk had a very public falling out with Mr Trump that played out on social media before saying last Wednesday that he 'regrets' some of his posts and 'went too far'.
The Irish Sun
14 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
The tiny village an hour from London with its own Shakespeare house and award-winning micro bar
NESTLED away in the countryside of Kent is the village of Headcorn that has its own Shakespeare House and you might even see a big cat. The village is just an hour away from London - but with its quaint charm and Tudor houses it will feel like you're even further from the city. 5 Headcorn is a village in Kent with a high street and Tudor houses Credit: Alamy 5 Around the village are large Tudor-style houses Credit: Alamy Headcorn has even been listed as one of the 100 best commuter towns by Direct trains from London go from The village has a number of Grade II listed buildings and one of the more recognisable is called Shakespeare House which was built in the 16th century. In actual fact, it has nothing to do with Shakespeare, and was originally used for cloth production. Read More on Kent Towns Surprisingly, there's also the opportunity to see big cats like lynx, cheetahs, lions and leopards. Luckily, they'll be in enclosures at For anyone who is curious about the sanctuary, you can even organise a stay there at one of their eight lodges. Nearby is also the Lashenden Air Warfare Museum, which for aviation enthusiasts, has an extensive collection of aircraft relics, mostly from World War Two. Most read in News Travel Headcorn dates back to Neolithic period and very near the local church are the remains of the Headcorn Oak tree. The huge tree was around 500 to a thousand years old when it was severely damaged by a fire in 1989. The up-and-coming English seaside town with cheap booze and huge beaches 5 17 Micro Bar won "Pub/Bar of the Year" in 2025 It continued to grow until 1993 but only the remains of the old oak are left. As for what to do there, the Headcorn Farmers Market has stalls selling food, fruits and vegetables, homemade jams, honey, cakes and pastries too. Local artists selling handcrafted goods also set up shop so you can have a wander around. The market hits the streets on the second Saturday of every month. There's also three pubs, George & Dragon, The White Horse and Tap 17 Micro Bar. Tap 17 micro-bar, located in Headcorn won the "Pub/Bar of the Year" award at the Kent & Medway Food & Drink Awards. earlier this year. One visitor even called it the "best micropub ever" on Tripadvisor. 5 The nearby village of Sissinghurst has a famous castle Credit: Getty Headcorn is just 15-minutes away from the village of It's found in the borough of Tunbridge Wells in Kent and it has been included in the Sissinghurst is best known for its famous gardens and castle that is run by the National Trust The village's tower was never actually a castle, but got that title from the 3,000 French sailors who were imprisoned there during the 1700s. You'll find Headcorn in And another 5 Headcorn has Tudor houses and it's near a famous castle Credit: Alamy
RTÉ News
19 hours ago
- RTÉ News
EU and US sanctions on Russia: Timing is everything ahead of G7 summit
As G7 leaders converge on Kananaskis in the Canadian Rockies this weekend, the prospect of decisively tougher sanctions on Russia will loom large. The Ukraine War is reaching another inflection point: Vladimir Putin has intensified missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities and there are fears a Russian ground offensive is imminent. While President Trump has been publicly frustrated with Mr Putin's relentless attacks on civilian targets, he keeps deferring a tougher response. Over the next 10 days, a key NATO summit in The Hague, and a meeting of EU leaders in Brussels, will further clarify Mr Trump's intentions when it comes to Ukraine and the broader issue of European security. Supporters of Ukraine, therefore, are banking on harsher sanctions to convince Russia to move towards the 30-day ceasefire to which Ukraine has in principle already agreed. There is also a growing consensus that Russia's economy, despite weathering the sanctions better than expected, could be more vulnerable than the regime is claiming. This week the European Commission tabled its 18th sanctions package, aimed at stopping the flow of refined Russian crude oil into Europe, while simultaneously pushing to lower the oil price cap agreed by the G7. In July, the Commission will also propose a complete phase out of Russian fossil fuels, especially LNG. In tandem, two US senators Lindsay Graham (Rep) and Richard Blumenthal (Dem) have been promoting a bill which would, in the words of its authors, put "bone-crushing" pressure on Russia by hitting countries which continue to buy its oil with 500% tariffs. Both gambits face formidable challenges. The cap on the price Russia can sell its seaborne crude oil was set at $60 per barrel by a joint decision of the G7 and EU member states in December 2022. The idea was to ensure that the global south did not suffer from a complete ban (which would also have pushed up prices and therefore the Kremlin's revenues), whereas a cap would keep the oil flowing but with less benefit to Russia. 'Shadow fleet' The price cap was policed through the west's virtual monopoly on maritime insurance. To circumvent the cap, Russia began buying end-of-life vessels, effectively creating a parallel shipping network with dubious insurance - what became known as the "shadow fleet". The EU and G7 then sanctioned individual ships: the US hit 200 vessels, the EU 154 and the UK 177. As a result, ports became increasingly unwilling to let these oil tankers dock while flag states like Panama and Honduras were de-registering them (on Wednesday the EU added an additional 77 shadow fleet vessels to the sanctions list). Experts suggest Russia, which still gets one third of its export revenues from crude oil, is still finding ways to circumvent the price cap. However, the EU believes it has significantly reduced oil revenues. India, Turkey and China - the biggest buyers of Russian oil - have been pressuring Moscow to sell its crude below the price cap, officials say. Now, the EU wants to push the price cap lower. Notwithstanding the spike in prices following Israel's attack against Iran, the traded price of crude this year has fallen to around $65 a barrel, rendering the $60 cap ineffective. This week European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen proposed lowering it to $45. This was deliberately timed ahead of the G7 summit: Europe cannot do this alone. The Commission believes that most G7 partners are on board, but not yet the Trump administration. Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary, is sceptical and reportedly insisted that a reference to a lower price cap be dropped from the final communiqué of last month's G7 finance ministers meeting in Banff, Alberta. While EU officials say the work to convince President Trump will continue, it may be that the six other G7 countries go it alone, given that the UK and EU between them cover most of the elements (ie, identifying the shadow fleet and maritime insurance). Sources admit, however, that the decision-making process within the Trump administration is "difficult to predict". Brussels is also proposing a ban on any EU operator engaging in transactions, either directly or indirectly, via the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines, and also wants to curb the amount of Russian crude making its way into member states through the back door because it has been refined and relabelled elsewhere. Officials admit there are conflicting figures as to how much relabelled Russian crude - mostly refined in India and Turkey - is entering Europe. India and Turkey imported 1.7 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first quarter of 2025, according to LSEG data; EU member states imported more than 350,000 barrels from both countries in the same period. EU officials say the burden of proof would be switched to the exporting countries to show that the refined oil is not originally Russian, but that could be tricky. "The [European] Commission implementing such a ban would be difficult, given that refiners blend different types of crude oil," writes Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy with ING. "Determining the origin of the crude oil becomes challenging." The Kremlin is publicly unperturbed. "Naturally, Russia has not been living under restrictions for just a day," spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said this week. "We have long operated under such conditions, which we continue to regard as unlawful. Russia has gained valuable and substantial experience that allows us to minimize the adverse effects of such measures." The Commission has also proposed cutting off a further 22 Russian banks from the Swift international payments system and converting the partial ban on financial institutions to a full ban. The 18th sanctions package could be agreed by the end of the month, with the usual caveat of potential objections by Hungary and Slovakia. Robert Fico, Slovakia's pro-Russian prime minister, has warned he would not support the package - which requires unanimity - unless the Commission provides a solution to the problems caused by a full phase out of Russia fuel. In reality, it has been the contradictory response by the Trump administration to the Ukraine War that has pushed the EU into launching what could be its toughest sanctions package yet. In Kyiv, on 10 May, the leaders of Ukraine, Britain, France, Germany and Poland had called on Russia - on the assumption they had the backing of the Trump administration - to agree to an immediate 30-day ceasefire or face massive sanctions. Instead, the US President enthusiastically backed a call by Vladimir Putin to start talks in Istanbul the following week (with no commitment to a ceasefire). Mr Putin refused to attend the talks, which were conducted by a low-level Russian delegation, and has since intensified air attacks while continuing to insist on his maximalist war aims. Moscow appears convinced that military gains and the demoralisation of the Ukrainian population are a better bet than ceasefires. "The aim of the [18th sanctions] package is to increase pressure on Russia and to make it agree to negotiate with sincere intentions," says Svitlana Taran, an analyst with the European Policy Centre (EPC). "At the moment Russia is engaging in negotiations, but without any real intention to actually negotiate. Russia still thinks that it can win. Moscow is confident they still have more potential to sustain a war of attrition against Ukraine than Ukraine does." In the absence of tougher action from the White House, US senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal are currently pushing a bill through the Senate which would - if approved by President Trump - allow for tariffs of 500% on countries which are continuing to buy Russian crude oil, gas, uranium and other exports. The bill currently has 82 sponsors on both sides of the aisle with Graham - regarded as a weathervane on Republican sentiment towards Ukraine - and Blumenthal hopeful it can be adopted before the 4 July recess. Supporters of the bill complain that Mr Putin has been stringing the US president along and has no incentive to get to the negotiating table in the absence of tougher measures. 'Making astronomically high tariffs the center of US policy toward Russia's war is misguided' But the Sanctioning Russia Act (SRA2025) is not without its critics. President Trump would have to determine every 90 days that Mr Putin is refusing to negotiate a peace agreement at which point sanctions would be mandatory. These would be on President Putin himself, on Russian oligarchs and on banks and other financial institutions. But the most eye-catching element is the 500% tariffs on countries buying Russian crude oil. Since China is among the biggest purchasers, this would upend the current negotiations between Washington and Beijing on averting a damaging trade war. "Making astronomically high tariffs the center of US policy toward Russia's war is misguided: a threat that will never be carried out lacks real coercive power," argues Stephen Sestanovich of the Council on Foreign Relations. "And a bill that stops all trade with the United States' most important commercial partners is precisely that kind of threat." The authors of the bill insist it is designed precisely to focus minds and to convince Mr Putin that he cannot maintain his war effort for another two or three years. "Russia is in a very perilous state already economically, because 40 percent of its economy is devoted to war production or compensation for soldiers," Senator Blumenthal said during a recent visit to Kyiv. "It's only real source of revenue is oil and gas and other similar energy products, of which 70 percent is sold to India and China together." While Lindsey Graham stresses he has worked closely with the White House in formulating the bill, President Trump has been urging him to water down key aspects and has made his distaste for some of the elements clear. EU officials, while supportive of the need for tougher US pressure on Moscow, are aware of this. "I'm not convinced that the bill will be what gets adopted, even if Trump decides to put sanctions on Putin," says a senior EU source. "These bills in the Senate are notoriously aspirational until the White House gets at them and says: this is what's actually realistic. [Senator] Graham won't do anything without Trump's approval." Russian economy 'clearly heading toward zero growth' Yet, there is a growing body of opinion that this is precisely the time to hit the Russian economy. On paper, Moscow has weathered the sanctions well since 2022. While the economy contracted by 2.1% in 2022, there was economic growth in the following two years as Russia switched to a military economy, deepened trade links with China and India, availed of windfall fossil fuel profits and used its accumulated reserves as a buffer against the sharp decline in exports. This allowed Mr Putin to pour huge resources into military spending. Between 2011 and 2021 the defense budget averaged $53 billion per year. In 2022 it rose to $79 billion and $94 billion in 2023. Last year, defence spending soared to $140 billion, while this year it will eat up 32.2% of the federal budget. Such spending has allowed the Kremlin to mute popular unease about the war by boosting military salaries and social benefits, while buying off business elites. Pouring money into the military industrial complex has generated its own economic growth. However, there are strong indications that this formula is running out of road. Up to a million able-bodied Russians are thought to have left the country either in protest or to avoid being drafted, and while up to half have returned the civilian economy is deemed dangerously starved of labour. That has forced companies to boost salaries so they can compete with military pay, which in turn has fueled inflation. To cut inflation from its current rate of 10.2%, the Russian central bank has raised interest rates to over 20%. In March, President Putin called on his government not to strangle growth in its fight against inflation, while Alexander Shokhin, president of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, warned Russia was "clearly heading…toward zero growth." A report this week by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CISS) concludes that Russia has reached the limit of massive state spending on the military sector, with the side-effects of prolonged sanctions, soaring inflation and interest rates starting to bite. "Russia's current account remains the country's most glaring economic vulnerability," the report says. "A dramatic drop in export revenues, a surge in capital flight, or a further increase in the country's import costs, if timed fortuitously, could push Russia in the direction of a balance of payments crisis." 'Good-cop-bad-cop' tactics The growing frustration in Washington at the Kremlin's unrelenting assault on civilians appears to have prompted a change in heart. While the Biden administration steered clear of tough sanctions against Russia's energy sector until the very end of his tenure, and those countries filling Mr Putin's war coffers by buying its crude oil paid no penalty, there is today a change in mood. It is true that European countries which continue to rely on Russian oil could be caught up in the US tariffs. Lindsey Graham insists there will be exemptions for countries that have supported Ukraine's defence. A much tougher bipartisan response from Congress could provide President Trump with a 'good-cop-bad-cop' tactic to be used on Mr Putin, notwithstanding his tendency to cut the Russian president a very generous amount of slack. Brussels would prefer to act in tandem with Washington. However, observers point to Europe's complete oil embargo on Iran in 2009, and how it pushed the country to negotiate the 2015 nuclear deal, as an argument for going it alone. "Just as the EU oil embargo on Iran helped spur action in Washington a decade and a half ago, major new EU sanctions on Russia could do the same today," writes Edward Fishman, a former Obama administration official in Foreign Affairs. "Instead of waiting around for Mr Trump, Brussels should advance new penalties on Russia's energy sector. Even unilateral EU measures would tighten the screws on Moscow - and could prompt Washington to follow suit."
