
Indus And Sutlej Originate In Tibet. Can China Block Their Flow?
Last Updated:
Technically, China has the capability to stop the water flow of these rivers since they originate in Tibet. But using water as a geopolitical weapon has limitations
China's control over Tibet, where key rivers like the Indus and Sutlej originate, adds a complex dimension to the now-paused Indus Water Treaty between India and Pakistan.
Signed in 1960 to manage shared water resources, the Indus Water Treaty lets India use the eastern rivers (Sutlej, Beas, Ravi) and Pakistan the western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab). After the Pahalgam terror attack, India put the treaty in 'abeyance'. While this move could have severe long-term consequences for Pakistan, concerns now also focus on the potential impact if China decides to obstruct the flow of these rivers originating in Tibet.
The Indus River originates from the Seng Khabab glacier near Mansarovar Lake and Mount Kailash in Tibet, at an altitude of around 5,500 metres. It flows through Tibet into Ladakh, where it meets tributaries like the Zanskar and Shyok, before entering Pakistan and eventually emptying into the Arabian Sea. Spanning approximately 3,180 kilometres, the Indus was the lifeline of the ancient Indus Valley Civilization and remains vital for agriculture and hydroelectric power in both India and Pakistan.
The Sutlej River originates from the Longchen Khabab glacier near Rakshas Tal in Tibet, at an altitude of approximately 4,600 to 5,000 metres. The glacier's meltwater forms the river's initial source. In Tibet, the Sutlej merges with streams like the Spiti River before entering India's Himachal Pradesh near the Shipki La pass. It then flows through the Kinnar Kailash region and continues into Punjab, where it supports the crucial Bhakra Dam hydroelectric and irrigation project. Finally, the Sutlej joins the Indus River in Pakistan. Stretching about 1,450 kilometres, the Sutlej is vital for Punjab's agriculture and India's hydroelectric power generation.
Technically, China has the capability to stop the water flow of these rivers since they originate in Tibet. China has built hydroelectric plants like Senge Tsangpo and Ngari Shiquanhe near the Indus' source, and a barrage at Zada Gorge on the Sutlej. These structures can control water flow, potentially reducing, stopping, or altering it.
China's large dams have the potential to regulate water flow, impacting India and Pakistan, especially during dry and rainy seasons. Additionally, China could divert water for its own use, similar to its South-North Water Transfer Project, though this has not been implemented on the Indus or Sutlej rivers. If China withholds water-flow data—as it did for the Brahmaputra in 2017—it could hinder India's ability to predict floods or droughts, complicating water management and disaster preparedness.
China Has Done It Before
There have been instances where China has used water as a geopolitical tool. In 2016, China halted the flow of the Shiyaku, a Brahmaputra tributary, for a hydroelectric project, sending a geopolitical message to India. After the Galwan Valley conflict in 2020, China blocked the Galwan River, an Indus tributary, causing water shortages in India. In 2004, China created an artificial lake on the Parechu River, a tributary of the Sutlej, raising fears in India of a potential 'water bomb'. However, China shared data promptly, helping to prevent any major damage.
Water: A Geopolitical Weapon
Withholding water can serve as a geopolitical weapon for China in certain situations. According to experts, during border tensions with India—such as at Galwan or Doklam—China could leverage control over river flows.
Given China's close ties with Pakistan, many analysts predict that if India suspends the Indus Water Treaty or reduces water supply to Pakistan, China might retaliate by restricting water from the Indus or Sutlej rivers. Experts have also warned that, with growing water and energy demands, China could divert water from these rivers for its own use.
Limitations Of Water Retention
Using water as a geopolitical weapon has limitations. Only a small percentage of the water in the Indus (10-15%) and Sutlej (20%) originates from Tibet, making it difficult to stop entirely. Building large dams in the earthquake-prone region of Tibet is risky, and stopping water could affect the local ecology and communities.
Stopping water flow can be considered a violation of international water laws, such as the Helsinki Rules, which could lead to global criticism of China. This may escalate tensions with countries like India and Bangladesh, increasing regional instability. Additionally, projects like the Bhakra Dam in Punjab and other hydroelectric and irrigation facilities in Himachal Pradesh could be adversely affected, reducing water availability and power generation. Water shortages in Ladakh could also harm local agriculture and impact military bases in the region.
Existing India-China Water Agreements
India and China currently have hydrological data-sharing agreements for the Sutlej and Brahmaputra rivers, signed between 2002 and 2018. These agreements cover data exchange during the flood season (June–October) and have expired in 2023. However, China has continued to share data for the Sutlej beyond this period. Notably, there is no formal water-sharing treaty between the two nations, giving China greater flexibility and control over the rivers' waters.
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
First Published:
May 19, 2025, 18:08 IST

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Maharashtra has big dams, but we face water imbalance: CM
Nagpur: Maharashtra's deep regional water disparities persist despite hosting some of India's largest irrigation projects, said chief minister Devendra Fadnavis at the Vidarbha Pani Parishad. "Big dams alone can't resolve the issue. The real solution lies in small, sustainable conservation structures," he stated, advocating for localised water planning. He highlighted the success of Jalyukt Shivar under the Baliraja Project, which ensured convergence of departments under district collectors, boosting participation and impact. Fadnavis also backed the Centre's move to suspend the Indus Water Treaty, calling it the "deadliest blow" to Pakistan and a precursor to "Operation Sindoor." He warned that water wars are no longer distant possibilities, urging wise use and conservation amid mounting national and global water stress. "Water has been at the heart of civilisations — from the Saraswati to Sindhu to African rivers," said Fadnavis, adding that in modern times, unchecked use, especially in agriculture, has become a major concern. "Whenever water availability rises, we shift to cash crops and overuse it. We must act wisely in usage and conservation." Speakaing about Jalyukt Shivar, he said, "Unlike earlier fragmented schemes split across 14 departments, this one was coordinated under district collectors. All officials, irrespective of departments, reported directly to the collector. This streamlined planning, execution, and participation." With Rs700 crore raised through public contribution, the scheme benefited over 20,000 villages, notably in Marathwada, improving groundwater levels. A 2018 HC petition led to an expert panel, which verified the scheme's success. In 2020, the Centre's Groundwater Report confirmed Maharashtra as the only state with consecutive annual water level rises. "Even with just 75% rainfall, we faced no scarcity," he said. Among key projects, Fadnavis cited the Wainganga-Nalganga river-linking initiative — a 500km project spanning seven districts in Vidarbha — aimed at redirecting surplus water toward the Godavari basin. Similar efforts include five other river-linking schemes and the Tapi Water Recharge Project, set to shift 35 TMC water to saline-affected areas. Since 2014, the state has completed 90 irrigation projects, including the near-completion Gosikhurd Dam. Post-2017, it has shifted to piped distribution systems, saving 8 TMC of water and boosting efficiency. Fadnavis also praised Israel's water practices, such as micronutrient delivery and precision irrigation, as models being adopted in Maharashtra. He flagged river and nullah pollution, attributing 90% of it to untreated domestic waste. "Industries get blamed, but citizens are major contributors," he said, urging better sewage systems in cities like Nagpur, Pune, and Mumbai. Warning of rising inter-district water conflicts like Nashik vs Marathwada, Fadnavis stressed that solutions, not demands, are the way forward. Earlier, Nagpur University's acting vice-chancellor Madhavi Khode Chaware inaugurated the Wainganga Water Exhibition at Vanamati. Over 150 students, scholars, and activists participated, showcasing posters, research papers, and models focused on water conservation and sustainability. (Inputs by Krisha Panchmatia) * * * * **************** THE WATER STORY * Rs 700 crore raised by villagers under Jalyukt Shivar Yojana 20,000 villages benefited under Jalyukt Shivar 90 irrigation projects completed since 2014 8 TMC water saved through efficient usage methods 3%: Water absorption rate in Maharashtra, (compared to 22% in Uttar Pradesh) 56 TMC water from Konkan redirected to Godavari 35 TMC water under Tapi Water recharge Project 500 km new river being created under Wainganga–Nalganga river linking


India.com
5 hours ago
- India.com
200 km canal, 12 km tunnel...: How India plans to punish Pakistan after suspending Indus water treaty, Modi govt will make....
India suspended the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan after the Pahalgam terror attack. (File) India suspended the Indus Water Treaty after the heinous April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, and now the Indian government has devised a long-term strategy that will make Pakistan yearn for every single drop of water in the coming future. According to reports the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government is committed to make Pakistan pay for the Pahalgam massacre, and plans are in place in to restrict water from the Indus, Sutlej and Beas rivers to the enemy country. How India plans to halt Indus water to Pakistan The Modi government has plans to connect the Indus river with the Ravi-Beas rivers by diverting the water to the Harike Barrage in Punjab through Sutlej river. The mega canal will be around 200 km long, and involves constructing as many as 12 large tunnels. Water running through these these tunnels will flow into the Indira Gandhi Canal, and a few others, including the Ganga Canal in Rajasthan, ultimately flowing into the Yamuna River. As per media reports, quoting sources, the expansion of the plan involves connecting these river streams to the Yamuna, and work is underway to increase the capacity of the Ganga Canal, remove silt and stop leakage along with Sirhind Feeder in Punjab, Rajasthan Feeder in Haryana and Indira Gandhi Canal. The 200 km canal will be built parallel to Harike Barrage, according to reports. Project will benefit multiple states Once the project is completed, several Indian states, including Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh, will be benefitted from the Indus waters, while the excess water will flow into the Ganges and Yamuna rivers. The project is expected to be completed within a span of two-three years, and will also help in reviving the Yamuna River in many places, officials said. Meanwhile, Pakistan has written four letters to India, pleading New Delhi to restore the Indus Water Treaty. However, India has clearly stated the treaty will continue to be abeyance till Pakistan takes visible, concrete action against terrorism.


News18
7 hours ago
- News18
News18 Poll: Indus Waters Treaty Signed By Nehru Surrender Of National Interest, Say 83% People
Last Updated: News18 conducted a public poll to gauge the mood of the nation on India's Operation Sindoor and associated responses to Pakistan's terror tactics Pakistan has written four letters requesting India to reconsider its decision to keep the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in suspension after the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22 that killed 26 tourists. But India has clearly said that, like terror and trade cannot go together, blood and water also can't flow together. The Narendra Modi government has underscored that the treaty will remain in abeyance until Islamabad 'credibly and irrevocably" ends its support for cross-border terrorism. News18 has conducted a public poll to gauge the mood of the nation on India's Operation Sindoor and associated responses to Pakistan's terror tactics. A key question was, 'The BJP says that the Indus Water Treaty signed by Jawaharlal Nehru and Ayub Khan is a surrender of national interest. Do you agree?" To this, 83.38% of the respondents said 'Yes" and only 16.62% chose 'No". The poll was conducted over two days, May 6 and May 7, 2025, using state-of-the-art software. It was held on News18's websites and social media platforms, and also via television channels using QR codes. A total of 14,671 responses were collected. Union minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan recently reignited the debate over the Indus Waters Treaty, criticising Jawaharlal Nehru for allocating 80% of the Indus basin water flow to Pakistan under the 1960 agreement. 'This is a historic decision; the Indus Waters Treaty has been cancelled. This is not an ordinary incident. When the Indus Waters Treaty was signed, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was the Prime Minister; he gave 80% of the water to Pakistan. Not only was water given, along with water, 83 crore rupees were also given, which is currently worth 5 thousand 500 crore rupees. By depriving our own farmers, we are giving water to those who are responsible for breeding terrorists," he added. Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has also criticised Nehru for signing the treaty and referred to it as the 'greatest strategic blunder in India's history". Taking to X, he wrote, 'Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru's signing of the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960 stands as one of the greatest strategic blunders in India's history. Despite India's natural upper riparian advantage, Nehru, under immense pressure from the then-American administration and the World Bank, handed away over 80% of the Indus basin waters to Pakistan—gifting full control over the mighty Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab rivers, while restricting India to the smaller eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej)." India and Pakistan signed the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960, with the World Bank as an additional signatory. The pact sought to divide the water of the Indus river and its tributaries equitably between the two countries. Under the treaty, water from three eastern rivers—Beas, Ravi, and Sutlej—was allocated to India, and that from the three western rivers—Chenab, Indus, and Jhelum—to Pakistan. The treaty also permitted both nations to use the other's rivers for certain purposes, such as small hydroelectric projects that require little or no water storage.