logo
China unveils zero-tariff deal for Africa, capitalizing on Trump chaos

China unveils zero-tariff deal for Africa, capitalizing on Trump chaos

China has announced plans to eliminate all tariffs on imports from nearly every African country, bolstering its role as an attractive ally to countries suffering from the chaotic tariff policies of U.S. President Donald Trump.
African countries were hit with some of the most severe penalties – including tariffs as high as 50 per cent – when Mr. Trump announced his trade plan in April. The increases were later rolled back to 10 per cent temporarily, but the threat of higher tariffs is still looming as Washington reviews its policies.
Beijing, capitalizing on the Trump-related turmoil, is positioning itself as a friendly alternative to the United States. It announced Wednesday that it will introduce a zero-tariff policy for all imports from the 53 African countries with which it has diplomatic relations. The only exception is the tiny kingdom of Eswatini (formerly Swaziland), which has relations with Taiwan.
In a joint declaration after a high-level meeting in the Chinese city of Changsha this week, Chinese and African leaders announced plans to sign the zero-tariff deal as part of a new economic agreement. Without mentioning Mr. Trump by name, they complained of 'protectionism and economic bullying' and pledged to resist the pressure for unilateral trade concessions.
'China highly commends African countries' commitment to the basic principles of sovereignty, equality and justice, and to upholding a common position in the face of external pressure,' the joint statement said. 'We resolutely oppose any party reaching a deal of compromise at the expense of the interests of other countries.'
U.S., China reach trade truce after two days of talks, Trump says
The zero-tariff pledge is a significant expansion of China's earlier trade policy, announced last year, which eliminated tariffs on imports from 33 countries worldwide that are classified as least-developed. The earlier policy also ended tariffs on 98 per cent of products imported by China from 21 African countries.
The new policy will replace this with the complete elimination of all tariffs on African countries, except Eswatini. Africa's least-developed countries, which already have full access to China without tariffs, will receive additional Chinese assistance to boost their exports, according to Beijing.
The announcement was well timed. African countries have been increasingly hurt by Mr. Trump's decisions in recent months, and their efforts to strike deals with Washington have been largely futile, prompting many of them to seek ways to diversify their trade away from the U.S. China has already been Africa's top trading partner for the past 15 years, making it a logical choice for closer links now.
Mr. Trump has alienated many Africans not only with his tariff policies, but also with other controversial decisions that disproportionately hurt the continent: travel bans, migration restrictions, foreign-aid cuts and a recently announced tax on overseas remittances, a key source of income in Africa. He has also engaged in verbal battles with a key African country, South Africa, falsely accusing it of 'genocide' against its white minority.
Mr. Trump's tariffs have effectively killed an important U.S. trade program, the African Growth and Opportunity Act, which has created tens of thousands of jobs in 32 African countries over the past 25 years by granting duty-free access to the U.S. market for specified goods. The trade deal expires in September and is seen as unlikely to be extended.
Trump ambushes South African President with false claims of white genocide during White House visit
While the U.S. has been damaging its relations with African countries on multiple fronts, China has been assiduously cultivating those same countries with trade, investment and financing deals.
'The China-Africa relationship has been at its best in history,' Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian told a press conference last week.
China's zero-tariff plan drew praise from African officials who attended the meeting in Changsha this week. Kenya's top diplomat, Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi, said the new Chinese tariff plan is creating 'strong momentum' for Africa.
'China continues to stand out as a steadfast partner and a powerful voice for the Global South, including the African continent,' Mr. Mudavadi said in a social-media post Wednesday.
South Africa's Minister of International Relations, Ronald Lamola, said the trade discussions were 'very fruitful' at the Changsha meetings. 'This is a big opening up for us, particularly on market diversification,' he said in comments posted online by his department.
With a report from James Griffiths in Hong Kong

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration pulls US out of agreement to help restore salmon in the Columbia River
Trump administration pulls US out of agreement to help restore salmon in the Columbia River

Toronto Star

time35 minutes ago

  • Toronto Star

Trump administration pulls US out of agreement to help restore salmon in the Columbia River

SEATTLE (AP) — President Donald Trump on Thursday pulled the U.S. out of an agreement with Washington, Oregon and four American Indian tribes to work together to restore salmon populations and boost tribal clean energy development in the Pacific Northwest, deriding the plan as 'radical environmentalism' that could have resulted in the breaching of four controversial dams on the Snake River. The deal, known as the Resilient Columbia Basin Agreement, was reached in late 2023 and heralded by the Biden administration, tribes and conservationists as historic. It allowed for a pause in decades of litigation over the harm the federal government's operation of dams in the Northwest has done to the fish.

Trump illegally deployed National Guard, must return control to California: Judge
Trump illegally deployed National Guard, must return control to California: Judge

Toronto Sun

time40 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

Trump illegally deployed National Guard, must return control to California: Judge

Published Jun 12, 2025 • 3 minute read A man stands in front of a row of California National Guard members and waves a combination U.S. and Mexican flag during ongoing protests in response to federal immigration operations outside the Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles, on June 12, 2025. A judge has ordered Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard to the state, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles over Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections was "illegal." Photo by ROBYN BECK / AFP via Getty Images SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday directing President Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to California. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The order, which takes effect at noon Friday, said the deployment of the Guard was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The White House had no immediate comment on the ruling, but the federal government immediately filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit court. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said Trump overstepped his bounds in ordering the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown. It was not immediately clear how that would change the situation on the ground. California Gov. Gavin Newsom sued to block the Guard's deployment against his wishes. California later filed an emergency motion asking the judge to block the Guard from assisting with immigration raids. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More He argued that the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and wanted the court to block the troops from helping protect immigration agents during the raids, saying that involving the Guard would only escalate tensions and promote civil unrest. The Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response Wednesday. In a broad ruling, the judge determined Trump had not properly called the Guard up in the first place. Maj.-Gen. Scott Sherman, speaking in an interview with The Associated Press and one other media outlet, said that as of Wednesday about 500 of the Guard troops have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations. Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Sherman is commander of Task Force 51, which is overseeing the Guard troops and Marines sent to Los Angeles. Typically the authority to call up the National Guard lies with governors, but there are limited circumstances under which the president can deploy those troops. Trump federalized members of the California National Guard under an authority known as Title 10. RECOMMENDED VIDEO The lawsuit argued that Title 10 requires, among other things, that the president go through governors when issuing orders to the National Guard. Brett Shumate, an attorney for the federal government, said Trump complied with the statute by informing the general in charge of the troops of his decision and would have the authority to call in the Guard even if he had not. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In a brief filed ahead of the Thursday hearing, the Justice Department said Trump's orders were not subject to judicial review. 'Courts did not interfere when President Eisenhower deployed the military to protect school desegregation. Courts did not interfere when President Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail in the midst of a postal strike. And courts should not interfere here either,' the department said. 'Our position is this is not subject to judicial review,' Shumate told the judge. Breyer, who at one point waved a copy of the constitution, said he disagreed. 'We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is of course limited in that authority. That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' he said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Trump called up the Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle. Federal immigration agents have been arresting people at Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, sparking fear in immigrant communities, after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown. Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles, and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand the raids stop and the troops leave. World Toronto & GTA Editorial Cartoons Toronto Blue Jays Toronto & GTA

Trump administration pulls US out of agreement to help restore salmon in the Columbia River
Trump administration pulls US out of agreement to help restore salmon in the Columbia River

Winnipeg Free Press

time42 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Trump administration pulls US out of agreement to help restore salmon in the Columbia River

SEATTLE (AP) — President Donald Trump on Thursday pulled the U.S. out of an agreement with Washington, Oregon and four American Indian tribes to work together to restore salmon populations and boost tribal clean energy development in the Pacific Northwest, deriding the plan as 'radical environmentalism' that could have resulted in the breaching of four controversial dams on the Snake River. The deal, known as the Resilient Columbia Basin Agreement, was reached in late 2023 and heralded by the Biden administration, tribes and conservationists as historic. It allowed for a pause in decades of litigation over the harm the federal government's operation of dams in the Northwest has done to the fish. Under it, the federal government said it planned to spend more than $1 billion over a decade to help recover depleted salmon runs. The government also said that it would build enough new clean energy projects in the Pacific Northwest to replace the hydropower generated by the Lower Snake River dams — the Ice Harbor, Little Goose, Lower Monumental and Lower Granite — should Congress ever agree to remove them. In a statement, the White House said former President Joe Biden's decision to sign the agreement 'placed concerns about climate change above the Nation's interests in reliable energy sources.' Conservations groups, Democratic members of Congress and the Northwest tribes criticized Trump's action. 'Donald Trump doesn't know the first thing about the Northwest and our way of life — so of course, he is abruptly and unilaterally upending a historic agreement that finally put us on a path to salmon recovery, while preserving stable dam operations for growers and producers, public utilities, river users, ports and others throughout the Northwest,' Democratic U.S. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington said in a written statement. 'This decision is grievously wrong and couldn't be more shortsighted.' Basin was once world's greatest salmon-producing river system The Columbia River Basin, an area roughly the size of Texas, was once the world's greatest salmon-producing river system, with at least 16 stocks of salmon and steelhead. Today, four are extinct and seven are listed under the Endangered Species Act. Another iconic but endangered Northwest species, a population of killer whales, also depend on the salmon. The construction of the first dams on the main Columbia River, including the Grand Coulee and Bonneville dams in the 1930s, provided jobs during the Great Depression, as well as hydropower and navigation. The dams made the town of Lewiston, Idaho, the most inland seaport on the West Coast, and many farmers in the region rely on barges to ship their crops. But the dams are also main culprit behind the salmon's decline, and fisheries scientists have concluded that breaching the dams in eastern Washington on the Snake River, the largest tributary of the Columbia, would be the best hope for recovering them, providing the fish with access to hundreds of miles of pristine habitat and spawning grounds in Idaho. The tribes, which reserved the right to fish in their usual and accustomed grounds when they ceded vast amounts of land in their 19th century treaties with the U.S., warned as far back as the late 1930s that the salmon runs could disappear, with the fish no longer able to access spawning grounds upstream. 'This agreement was designed to foster collaborative and informed resource management and energy development in the Pacific Northwest, including significant tribal energy initiatives,' Yakama Tribal Council Chairman Gerald Lewis said in a written statement. 'The Administration's decision to terminate these commitments echoes the federal government's historic pattern of broken promises to tribes, and is contrary to President Trump's stated commitment to domestic energy development.' Republicans in region opposed agreement Northwestern Republicans in Congress had largely opposed the agreement, warning that it would hurt the region's economy, though in 2021 Republican Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho proposed removing the earthen berms on either side of the four Lower Snake River dams to let the river flow freely, and to spend $33 billion to replace the benefits of the dams. 'Today's action by President Trump reverses the efforts by the Biden administration and extreme environmental activists to remove the dams, which would have threatened the reliability of our power grid, raised energy prices, and decimated our ability to export grain to foreign markets,' Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington, said in a news release. Tribes, environmentalists vow to fight for salmon The tribes and the environmental law firm Earthjustice, which represents conservation, clean energy and fishing groups in litigation against the federal government, said they would continue working to rebuild salmon stocks. 'Unfortunately, this short-sighted decision to renege on this important agreement is just the latest in a series of anti-government and anti-science actions coming from the Trump administration,' Earthjustice Senior Attorney Amanda Goodin said. 'This administration may be giving up on our salmon, but we will keep fighting to prevent extinction and realize win-win solutions for the region.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store