logo
Leaving Cert Maths Paper 2 contained 'some curveballs' for higher level

Leaving Cert Maths Paper 2 contained 'some curveballs' for higher level

BreakingNews.ie09-06-2025
The Higher Level Maths Paper 2 "contained some curveballs" according to Studyclix subject expert Stephen Begley, Head of Maths at Dundalk Grammar School, Co Louth.
He called it 'A very fair and decent Higher Level Maths Paper 2 – though it did have some curve balls to get students thinking.
Advertisement
"Whilst Higher Level will always contain some challenge, the questions did not mix topics, and provided good guidance and direction to students on how to start their answers.
'The opening parts to most questions were accessible and students will have gained good marks on these, while latter parts would have certainly stretched student's ability to problem solve. Those looking to get by in the exam and those also looking for a top grade will certainly be content overall with this paper.
'There was a decent array of questions available in Section A, each focusing on only one topic. Question 1 on Coordinate Geometry of the Line was a lovely opener. Question 2 on The Circle was very fair, with some easy marks available in part (a). Question 3 on Probability was a walk in the park for any Higher Level student.
'Looking a little out of place in the paper given the usually higher complexity of question, Question 4 on Statistics looked at the easier side of Statistics, which may have even been overlooked by students in their revision, though hopefully they remembered their Junior Cycle Statistics to get through a very undemanding question.
Advertisement
'Question 5 on Geometry saw a routine congruence proof followed by a question on enlargements that would have been puzzle like for students to figure out. Many may have avoided this.
"Closing the short questions was a lovely Trigonometry question on Trigonometric Equations and a Cosine Rule question, though I imagine the heavily predicted Trig Function question threw many due to its unusual appearance within a modulus function which would have caused some trouble.
'Section B tasked students with answering any three of the four long questions across the usual topics of Area and Volume, Coordinate Geometry, Trigonometry, Probability, and Statistics. Students would have been delighted to see a Tree Diagram in Question 9 on Probability, which had a lovely part (a) and (b), but certainly got trickier with some abstract combinations in parts (c) and (d).
"The closing question on Statistics took a different format from the usual text heavy and comprehension style question and presented the fan favourites Empirical Rule, Z Scores, Confidence Interval, Hypothesis Test and P-Value, hitting all the main aspects of Statistics.
Advertisement
'Those who prepared for a typical Paper 2 would have been content with this paper which enabled students to showcase their knowledge of the usual core topics in a range of questions. Whilst not without challenging parts of course, the examiner was generous with their questioning style which contained clear instruction and even provided formulas or methods at times.
'As a tale of two halves, the two Maths papers were well balanced in terms of difficulty, with neither being dominated by challenge. All in all, it's been a pretty good, fair, and accessible set of exams for Leaving Cert Higher Level Maths students in 2025.'
Leaving Cert Maths Paper 2 (Ordinary)
Commenting on the paper, Studyclix subject expert Stephen Begley said: 'The Ordinary Level paper presented a very typical and manageable set of questions spanning the usual suspects of Trigonometry, Coordinate Geometry, Statistics, Probability and Area and Volume.
Lifestyle
Junior Cert science exam 'accessible and reasonabl...
Read More
'The short questions in Section A were each focused on a single topic of Statistics, Trigonometry, The Circle, The Line, Geometry and Statistics, while the long questions in Section B focused on Probability, Statistics, Constructions & Enlargements, Trigonometry, and some parts of Area and Volume.
Advertisement
'While the paper was particularly Statistics heavy, those who prepared this regularly featured topic would have been well rewarded with all elements of the area being examined across multiple question.
"Particularly, the Empirical Rule in Q6, Tree Diagram in Question 7, Pie Chart in Question 8 and decent Trigonometry question in Question 10 would have given students plenty of marks to boost their confidence in the exam.
'Whilst the tail end of questions were not without their stings, the opening parts provided good space for students to gather marks. Overall, students could play to their strengths topic wise in this rather fair and approachable Paper 2.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meet the Afghan girls building robots at home after the Taliban stopped their education
Meet the Afghan girls building robots at home after the Taliban stopped their education

The Independent

time2 days ago

  • The Independent

Meet the Afghan girls building robots at home after the Taliban stopped their education

In the sweltering heat of Kabul, a group of young women, who have been barred from higher education for the past three years, gather in one of their homes to work on a new project. Calling themselves 'Voices of Hope,' the group's members are former computer science students who refuse to abandon their pursuit of knowledge, despite the Taliban's sweeping ban on female education. They are using the internet and artificial intelligence to reconnect with the subject they once studied at university. In a country where even a walk in the park is off-limits for them, they have created their own community of learners behind closed doors. Their education was interrupted in December 2022, when a Taliban ban forced them to abandon their studies. The young women were all in their second semester of computer science studies at a private Afghan university. Initially, they clung to the hope that public outrage and international pressure might prompt the regime to reverse its decision. Instead, the Taliban, who had seized power in 2021, issued even harsher decrees, further tightening restrictions on women and making their lives even more difficult. Asrar Parsa, the 25-year-old leader of Voices of Hope, told Independent Persian that the university ban caused a wave of despair. But she and 20 of her classmates decided to keep going, turning to online educational resources to continue studying at home. Since then, the team has taken on several projects in their desire to learn, grow and keep their dreams alive. Among their achievements are building two robots from scratch. They cost about 30,000 Afghanis (roughly $430 or £330) to build, paid for by the group members themselves. Under Taliban rule, women are not allowed to go outside without a male guardian. The team has one male member: Asrar's 28-year-old brother, Navid Parsa, a computer science graduate who is their link to the outside world. He runs errands for the group and brings in supplies from the city. The group started off with 20 members. But over time, 14 dropped out due to economic hardship and a growing sense of hopelessness. Asrar explains: 'Our goal was to keep the light of hope alive in our hearts, to stay motivated, and to learn about AI. But most of the team became disheartened and gave up.' However, some chose to stay. 19-year-old Hadiya Ahmadi, says she suffered from depression and anxiety after universities shut down. But working on small projects and learning how to use AI with the support of the group helped her feel better. Over the past two years, the team has used what they learned in their first year of university and supplemented it with online tutorials. They've built two robots and several other devices. One robot can recognise 20 different objects, including humans, and is controlled remotely. The team tested its movement on a kitchen table. It's powered via radio frequency and bluetooth and can be operated through four different apps. Asrar says if developed further, it could be used in search and rescue operations after earthquakes or explosions. The team is also working on building a drone. If successful, they hope it could be used for tasks like collecting rubbish, delivering emergency medicine, or transporting small items across Kabul. For Asrar, Hadiya, and the rest of the group, tinkering with wires and batteries and listening to online lessons is about more than just robotics or AI. In a time when, under Taliban laws, even a woman's voice and face are deemed awrah (something to be hidden), these sessions are a way to cope with the mental and emotional toll of their isolation. Asrar says these gatherings are a way to escape 'the pain and grief brought about by their current situation'. The meetings offer hope, she explains:'When we're together, it feels like not everything is lost. We still have the power to learn and grow.' Hadiya adds that meeting the group two to three times a week has had a positive impact on her mental well-being. They study AI, build robots, and talk about their hopes for the future. She says she feels better now than she did when her university first closed down: 'Seeing the results of our work makes us happy. It makes us feel that our education isn't over yet and we can still try to reach our goals.' They draw inspiration from another Afghan robotics team, known as 'The Afghan Dreamers', which was founded in 2017 and gained widespread attention both at home and abroad. Focused on technology, engineering, and robotics, the team became a symbol of talent and hope in the face of social and political restrictions. After the Taliban returned to power and banned education and employment for women and girls, team members left the country and now continue their work in exile. For Voices of Hope, the Afghan Dreamers serve as an inspiration. But unlike them, Asrar's team has not yet received any support from external organisations. Despite all the obstacles, they hope to one day showcase their work in international exhibitions, and find opportunities to keep chasing their dreams. The Taliban have strictly enforced their ban on education for girls over the age of 12, claiming that they are adhering to 'Sharia law'. These decrees, especially those denying women access to education and jobs, have drawn widespread international condemnation. But Taliban leader Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada has dismissed international pressure as 'pointless.' Over the past four years, Mullah Hibatullah has repeatedly emphasised the importance of 'education within the framework of Sharia and Islamic principles'. However, not once has he addressed the topic of education or employment for women and girls in Afghanistan.

Girls expected to outperform boys again at GCSE
Girls expected to outperform boys again at GCSE

Telegraph

time3 days ago

  • Telegraph

Girls expected to outperform boys again at GCSE

Boys will be outperformed once again in next week's GCSE results, despite them triumphing over girls at A-level, expert analysis has suggested. Prof Alan Smithers, an academic at the University of Buckingham who forecasts exam results every year, said the chronic underachievement of boys at GCSE should be treated as a ' matter of national concern '. He said girls' dominance in last year's GCSE results was likely to continue this summer, meaning around 24.7 per cent will receive top grades this year compared to 19.1 per cent of boys. Pupils in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will receive their GCSE results on Thursday, a week after A-level results were handed out. Boys exceeded girls in this year's A-levels for only the third time on modern record, reversing a stable trend of female pupils securing the lion's share of top grades in recent years. But that turnaround is unlikely to be repeated for GCSEs, according to Prof Smithers, who has called for an official inquiry into the under-performance of boys. Girls were ahead in 42 out of 47 subjects in last year's GCSEs, with boys leading in just five – maths, statistics, economics and 'other sciences'. Prof Smithers said: 'The chronic under-performance of boys in education should be treated as a major issue. It appears that we are not developing the talents of half the population as fully as we could. This can only lead to a decline in the nation's economic competitiveness and ultimately loss of its standing in the world.' The Centre for Social Justice, a social mobility think tank, has repeatedly warned that a generation of 'lost boys' is falling behind in education, particularly those from white working-class backgrounds. 'Written off' Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, said last week that the demographic risked being 'written off' by society, with the Government planning a series of measures to tackle the issue. Plans include publishing more data on how white pupils are performing, as well as harnessing artificial intelligence to identify schools falling short. Prof Smithers said he called last year for ministers to investigate the poor performance of boys at GCSE but was met with a 'complacent view' from some critics that 'since men usually came out on top anyway, what's to worry about?'. He added: 'Our policy-makers seem to be content for the hard evidence of the exam results to be over-ridden by fashionable narratives.' 'Ineluctable force of nature' The academic expects this year's overall GCSE results to be broadly similar to those seen last year, when more than a fifth – or 21.8 per cent – of all entries were awarded the top grades. This remained higher than the year before the pandemic in 2019, when 20.8 per cent of GCSE entries scored a grade 7 or above – equivalent to an A in the former marking system – despite efforts to curb grade inflation. Prof Smithers warned that grade inflation appeared to be becoming baked into the system after top A-level results leapt to a record in a non-pandemic year on Thursday. 'These grades, of course, are not determined by some ineluctable force of nature, but by human decisions,' he said. Education experts have called for the Government to crack down on creeping grade inflation to stop formal exam results losing their value. 'Soul-destroying' Prof Smithers also called for an urgent rethink of 'soul-destroying' compulsory re-sits for those who fail their English and maths GCSEs, since figures show those who retake them are likely to be doomed to fail them again and again. Around a third of pupils fail their English and maths GCSEs each year, and those who choose to stay on for sixth form are required to retake them until they either pass or turn 18. Just over a fifth of pupils who resat their English GCSE passed last year, while 17.4 per cent did the same in maths. 'This puts a big question mark over the efficacy of the re-sit requirement. Although well-intended, it looks to be utterly demoralising to pupils who find difficulty with these GCSEs, whose purpose is different from ensuring the basic grasp of words and numbers that is necessary to cope with life as it is lived,' said Prof Smithers. Ministers are understood to be considering abolishing mandatory resits for the two subjects as part of Labour's review of the national curriculum. They have faced calls to replace it with a driving license-style certificate showing pupils are competent in the basic skills in English and maths.

Most popular A-level subject with 112,138 entries revealed
Most popular A-level subject with 112,138 entries revealed

The Independent

time4 days ago

  • The Independent

Most popular A-level subject with 112,138 entries revealed

In 2025, more young people than ever have opened their A-level results to find out how they did in their maths exam. Once again, maths has been the most popular A-level subject, with 112,138 entries in 2025. This is up by more than 4% compared with 2024. Entries in further maths, an A-level that expands on the maths curriculum, have also risen – an increase of 7% since 2024, with over 19,000 entries this year. As a professional mathematician, this is pleasing news. Some of these students will be happily receiving confirmation of their place to study maths at university. The joy I experienced when I discovered in my maths degree that many of the subjects I studied at school – chemistry, biology, physics and even music – are woven together by a mathematical fabric, is something I've never forgotten. I'm excited by the idea that many young people are about to experience this for themselves. But I am concerned that fewer students will have the same opportunities in the future, as more maths departments are forced to downsize or close, and as we become more reliant on artificial intelligence. There are a number of differences between studying maths at university compared with school. While this can be daunting at first, all of these differences underscore just how richly layered, deeply interconnected and vastly applicable maths is. At university, not only do you learn beautiful formulas and powerful algorithms, but also grapple with why these formulas are true and dissect exactly what these algorithms are doing. This is the idea of the 'proof', which is not explored much at school and is something that can initially take students by surprise. But proving why formulas are true and why algorithms work is an important and necessary step in being able discover new and exciting applications of the maths you're studying. A maths degree can lead to careers in finance, data science, AI, cybersecurity, quantum computing, ecology and climate modelling. But more importantly, maths is a beautifully creative subject, one that allows people to be immensely expressive in their scientific and artistic ideas. A recent and stunning example of this is Hannah Cairo, who at just 17 disproved a 40-year old conjecture. If there is a message I wish I knew when I started studying university mathematics it is this: maths is not just something to learn, but something to create. I'm continually amazed at how my students find new ways to solve problems that I first encountered over 20 years ago. Accessibility of maths degrees But the question of going on to study maths at university is no longer just a matter of A-level grades. The recent and growing phenomenon of maths deserts – areas of the country where maths degrees are not offered – is making maths degrees less accessible, particularly for students outside of big cities. Forthcoming research from The Campaign for Mathematical Sciences (CAMS), of which I am a supporter, shows that research-intensive, higher-tariff universities – the ones that require higher grades to get in – took 66% of UK maths undergraduates in 2024, up from 56% in 2006. This puts smaller departments in lower-tariff universities in danger of closure as enrolments drop. The CAMS research forecasts that an additional nine maths departments will have fewer than 50 enrolments in their degrees by 2035. This cycle will further concentrate maths degrees in high-tariff institutions, reinforcing stereotypes such as that only exceptionally gifted people should go on to study maths at university. This could also have severe consequences for teacher recruitment. The CAMS research also found that 25% of maths graduates from lower-tariff universities go into jobs in education, compared to 8% from higher tariff universities. Maths in the age of AI The growing capability and sophistication of AI is also putting pressure on maths departments. With OpenAI's claim that their recently released GPT-5 is like having 'a team of PhD-level experts in your pocket', the temptation to overly rely on AI poses further risks to the existence and quality of future maths degrees. But the process of turning knowledge into wisdom and theory into application comes from the act of doing: doing calculations and forming logical and rigorous arguments. That is the key constituent of thinking clearly and creatively. It ensures students have ownership of their skills, capacities, and the work that they produce. A data scientist will still require an in-depth working knowledge of the mathematical, algorithmic and statistical theory underpinning data science if they are going to be effective. The same for financial analysts, engineers and computer scientists. The distinguished mathematician and computer scientist Leslie Lamport said that 'coding is to programming what typing is to writing'. Just as you need to have some idea of what you are writing before you type it, you need to have some idea of the (mathematical) algorithm you are creating before you code it. It is worth remembering that the early pioneers in AI – John McCarthy, Marvin Minsky, Claude Shannon, Alan Turing – all had degrees in mathematics. So we have every reason to expect that future breakthroughs in AI will come from people with mathematics degrees working creatively in interdisciplinary teams. This is another great feature of maths: its versatility. It's a subject that doesn't just train you for a job but enables you to enjoy a rich and fulfilling career – one that can comprise many different jobs, in many different fields, over the course of a lifetime.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store