How Nest turned a $24,000 idea into a global movement supporting women artisans
In 2005, Rebecca van Bergen was a graduate student in social work at Washington University when she won $24,000 in a school innovation contest. That seed money sparked the creation of Nest Inc., a nonprofit that empowers women artisans globally by providing training, funding, and market access.
From its modest beginnings, Nest has grown into a force in the artisan economy. It now supports creators in 125 countries and 47 U.S. states, helping women transition from informal craft work to sustainable business ownership. Nest's network includes around 3,000 handcraft businesses and has reached more than 345,000 entrepreneurs — mainly women — with grants and coaching on skills like pricing and financial management.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
Is There a Difference Between Architects, Designers and Decorators?
When Noz Nozawa first opened her San Francisco interiors firm in 2014, she faced an existential crisis: Was she a designer or was she a decorator? 'I was brand-new to this universe,' she said. 'I was a career switcher, so I held the term 'designer' with such esteem that I did not think that I could call myself that.' On her business cards, Ms. Nozawa split the difference and referred to herself as an 'interior decorator.' As for her business name, she left the term 'design' out altogether. 'My first business name was Noz as a Service, because I was literally so insecure about even putting the word 'design' in my name,' she said. Now, more than a decade later, she's embraced the word in all of its variations. With her firm Noz Design, Ms. Nozawa doesn't only design interiors, but also lighting and jewelry. 'I think of design as an umbrella that includes, necessarily, architecture and decorating,' she said. For homeowners looking to spruce up their spaces, however, the jargon surrounding design professions can be as befuddling as the difference between toile and twill. Do you hire an architect to renovate your bathroom? A decorator to design your kitchen? Or someone else entirely? Allow us to explain. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump is counting on economic growth to offset his tax cuts. But his big, beautiful bill likely wouldn't deliver, experts say
President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans are promising that their sweeping tax and spending cuts package will usher in an era of historic economic growth. 'This is going to be jet fuel,' House Speaker Mike Johnson said on NBC's 'Meet the Press' earlier this month. 'The reason we call it the Big, Beautiful Bill is because it is a tremendous pro-growth package entwined in this legislation that is going to make everybody's incomes go up.' But a multitude of economic experts across the ideological spectrum doubt that's going to happen. In fact, many argue that the Trump agenda megabill that narrowly passed the House last month would provide even less economic oomph than his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act – and the jury is still out on how much economic growth that earlier tax cut package spurred. While independent estimates vary somewhat, most find that the House-passed package would only give a small nudge to economic growth and fail to offset its trillions of dollars of tax cuts. The reason: The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' wouldn't provide substantial long-term corporate tax relief, which drives economic expansion. The Senate version, a portion of which was released Monday, would make several business tax provisions permanent, which would increase the bill's economic growth potential but also its cost. But the two chambers would still need to hammer out their differences on these and other provisions. And growth estimates for the Senate bill have yet to be released. The megabill's main focus is to extend the roughly $4 trillion in TCJA individual tax cuts that are set to expire at the end of this year. The House-passed package would also expand some of the measures, such as a four-year enhancement to the child tax credit, and aims to fulfill several of Trump's campaign promises, including temporarily eliminating taxes on tips, overtime and auto loan interest. On the corporate tax side, the package would restore a tax break from the 2017 package that allowed businesses to fully write off the cost of equipment in the first year it was purchased. The incentive has been phasing out since 2023. Also, the legislation would once again allow businesses to write off the cost of research and development in the year it was incurred. The TCJA required that companies deduct those expenses over five years, starting in 2022. The two provisions would expire after 2029. The bill would also allow companies to immediately deduct the cost of constructing or making improvements to certain types of buildings, including manufacturing plants, through 2028. These corporate tax breaks would prompt businesses to invest and expand in the next few years, but the incentives are temporary and won't prompt long-term economic growth, said Will McBride, the Tax Foundation's chief economist. What's missing is the massive business tax break – the permanent reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 20% – contained in the TCJA, which some experts argue drove the economic growth in that package. According to the right-leaning Tax Foundation, the tax provisions in the House-approved bill would boost the economy 0.8% over about three decades – compared to its estimate of 1.7% for the 2017 bill. Increased revenue from economic growth would offset about 22% of the current bill's tax cuts. Still, the package would increase the federal budget deficit by $1.7 trillion over 10 years, even taking its roughly $1.5 trillion in spending cuts into account. 'We look at the bill and kind of shrug our shoulders and say, 'You could have done better on growth',' said Daniel Bunn, the foundation's president. Similarly, the Penn Wharton Budget Model forecasts that the overall House bill would give a 0.4% boost to the economy by 2034, but the deficit would grow by $3.2 trillion over that period. Penn Wharton estimates that the deficit impact would increase when taking the economic effects into account because some lower-income households would reduce their hours worked to requalify for Medicaid coverage and some higher-income people would work less because of their gains from the bill's tax breaks. The Trump administration argues that these independent analyses are wrong. 'So called 'experts' panning The One, Big, Beautiful Bill, without a smidge of self-awareness, should remember that they made these same exact gloomy predictions about President Trump's tax cuts during his first term,' Kush Desai, a White House spokesman, said in a statement to CNN, adding that the TCJA 'helped usher in historic job, wage, investment, and economic growth.' The Congressional Budget Office has yet to release its analysis that takes the House package's economic impact into account. A separate CBO analysis forecasts the bill would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion over a decade, not accounting for economic growth. One way to boost the economic growth potential of the package would be to make the business tax breaks permanent, some experts say. The Senate Finance Committee version of the bill calls for making several of the provisions permanent. For instance, the temporary corporate tax breaks for equipment and for research and development would cost $60 billion over a decade, but making them permanent would increase the price tag to $507 billion, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimate, which was calculated prior to the Senate Finance Committee proposals were released. Penn Wharton forecasts that making permanent the temporary business tax provisions and other time-limited measures in the House bill would increase the deficit after taking the economic impact into account. Higher levels of federal debt can reduce incentives for private investment, which typically spurs more economic growth. Providing subsidies for new commitments is a much more efficient way to encourage growth than cutting the corporate rate since companies only get the benefit if they invest, said William Gale, co-director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. 'Making the investment provisions permanent would be a pro-growth move relative to almost anything else in the bill,' Gale said, though the increase in deficit and other measures in the legislation could negatively affect private investment.
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Fed's ‘Wait and See' Approach Is Intact as New Risks Cloud Economic Outlook
Through all the twists and turns of President Trump's tariffs, a widespread immigration crackdown and the scuffles surrounding the Republican tax and spending bill, the Federal Reserve has stayed steady in its stance that it can go slow in taking action on interest rates. That message holds as officials gather on Tuesday for a two-day meeting, at which they are set to extend a pause in rate cuts that has been in place since January. It is also likely to endure throughout the summer, giving the Fed at least a couple more months before it must make a difficult decision about when and by how much to lower borrowing costs. 'As long as the labor market continues to look solid but inflation continues to mainly move sideways, it's going to be a 'wait-and-see' situation,' said Jon Faust, a fellow at the Center for Financial Economics at Johns Hopkins University and a former senior adviser to Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair. When the central bank sets monetary policy, it has two goals in mind: keep inflation at 2 percent and ensure that the labor market is healthy. Currently, both aims are in sync. Inflation has stayed remarkably stable in recent months. The latest Consumer Price Index report, released last week, showed price pressures remain well contained. Employers are hiring less than they once did and fewer workers are entering the labor force, but layoffs have yet to rise in a meaningful enough way to lift the unemployment rate. The economy has all the makings of a soft landing, a rare feat in which the central bank tames inflation without pushing the economy into a recession. But such an outcome is not guaranteed. Mr. Trump's policies have stoked fears that inflation will eventually re-accelerate, growth will slow and the labor market will weaken, forcing officials to make a tough decision about which of their goals to prioritize. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
