SNP ‘should rewrite school guidelines on single-sex lavatories'
Judge Lady Ross KC issued a court order on Thursday making clear that state schools north of the border must provide single-sex lavatories for pupils, following a case brought by parents against Scottish Borders Council (SBC).
Rosie Walker, the parents' solicitor, told The Telegraph the SNP Government would now be 'well advised' to rewrite 2021 guidance that claimed there was 'no law in Scotland' that only biological males could use boys' lavatories and vice-versa.
The document also encouraged the provision of 'gender-neutral facilities' and argued that 'where possible' trans pupils should use 'the facilities they feel most comfortable with'.
Ms Walker said she suspected there would be schools across the country that were breaking regulations passed in 1967, which said that separate facilities, including urinals for boys, must be provided.
Although this has yet to be tested in court, she said that schools would also likely be breaking the law if they provided gender-neutral facilities in addition to separate toilets for boys and girls.
This is because the 1967 regulations state that half of a school's toilets must be provided exclusively for the use of each of the two genders, she said.
Her warning came after her clients, Sean Stratford and Leigh Hurley, took legal action against SBC over the new Earlston Primary School only providing gender-neutral facilities.
Their concerns were dismissed by headteacher Kevin Wilson and the council, which claimed it did not have to consult with parents about lavatory policy.
The council this week conceded the case and Lady Ross announced her intention to issue a declarator - a court order - in a hearing on Wednesday morning.
The order, published on Thursday, said that state schools had to 'provide separate sanitary accommodation for boys and girls' in line with Regulation 15 of the School Premises (General Requirements and Standards) (Scotland) Regulations 1967.
It followed last week's Supreme Court ruling that trans women are not women, after a long-running legal battle between feminist group For Women Scotland (FWS) and the Scottish Government.
Ms Wilson, who also worked on the Supreme Court case, said: 'A lot of local authorities have been relying on the Scottish Government guidance issued in 2021.
'That guidance requires being updated in line with the Cass Review (of gender identity services for children) and the FWS case.'
Trina Budge, a director of FWS, said: 'At this point there is so much wrong with the Scottish Government's trans guidance for schools that it should be binned and started again from scratch.
'It is clearly unlawful regarding toilets, but also on changing rooms, sports and overnight accommodation on trips. Disgracefully, it was never updated after the Cass review and still promotes, against best medical advice, social transition for children confused about gender and suggests children who do not use preferred pronouns should be punished.'
Asked about the case after First Minister's Questions at Holyrood, John Swinney said: 'Obviously, there's detail in the decision of the Court of Session yesterday that the government will consider.
'It's obviously an action that involves Scottish Borders Council. It's not an action that involves the government, but it's important that all regulatory issues are properly followed by all public bodies, and the government will look at the judgement and come to its conclusions on that.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish ministers on gender policy
A GENDER-CRITICAL group is taking action against the Scottish Government over policies it says are 'inconsistent' with the Supreme Court ruling on gender. For Women Scotland's legal battle with Scottish ministers on the definition of a woman ended in the UK's highest court, which ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. However, the group said that it now has 'little choice' but to take further legal action as some policies regarding transgender pupils in schools and transgender people in custody remain in place – which the group said is 'in clear breach of the law'. The schools guidance for single-sex toilets says it is important that young people 'where possible, are able to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with'. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon has shown 'complete lack of human decency,' says Alex Salmond's niece The prison guidance allows for a transgender woman to be admitted into the women's estate if the person does not meet the violence against women and girls criteria, and there is no other basis to suppose that she poses an unacceptable risk of harm to those housed in the women's estate. For Women Scotland has now applied to the Court of Session seeking to quash the policies, which it says are 'inconsistent with the UK Supreme Court judgment of April 16 2025'. It has raised an ordinary action for reduction (quashing) of the policies relating to schools and prisons, with the news first reported by the Sunday Times Scotland. In a statement, the group said: 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action, and both policies remain stubbornly in place, to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls, leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action. 'The Scottish ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then, we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court. 'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole. 'We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.' READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests', activists say A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.' For Women Scotland previously brought a series of challenges over the definition of 'woman' in Scottish legislation mandating 50% female representation on public boards. Originally, this had included transgender women who self-identify or had a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC), before the Scottish Government amended the guidance. FWS repeatedly lost their case in the Scottish courts, before taking the case to the Supreme Court.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scottish Government in new court battle over trans prison and school rules
Scottish ministers are being dragged back to court over claims they are ignoring a Supreme Court ruling that sex in law means biology, not gender identity. For Women Scotland is suing the Scottish Government, accusing them of defying April's landmark judgement. The gender-critical campaign group has lodged a summons at the Court of Session, served on the Scottish Ministers, the Lord Advocate and the Advocate General for Scotland on Friday. They have 21 days to respond — a deadline that will coincide with a planned demonstration outside the Scottish Parliament. READ MORE For Women Scotland threaten SNP with fresh legal action Scottish Government to review 'unlawful' trans policy EHRC issues new warning to Scottish Government over sex definition ruling For Women Scotland said they had 'little choice' but to go back to court. They first warned they were considering legal action back in June. In April, the UK's highest court ruled unanimously that a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) does not alter a person's sex for the purposes of the Equality Act. The judgment clarified that the terms 'man' and 'woman' in the legislation refer to biological sex, not acquired gender. While First Minister John Swinney welcomed the 'clarity' provided by the ruling, the Scottish Government has said it is awaiting further guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) before issuing advice to public bodies. The watchdog is expected to publish an updated statutory Code of Practice — effectively an instruction manual on applying the Equality Act — later this year. However, the EHRC has repeatedly said ministers do not need to wait before acting on the ruling. In April the court ruled that sex in law meant biological sex Speaking to The Herald in July, Dr Lesley Sawers, Deputy Chair and Scotland Commissioner at the EHRC, said ministers had 'a responsibility to ensure their adherence to the Public Sector Equality Duty' — the legal requirement for public authorities in Scotland to consider protected characteristics, including biological sex, when carrying out their functions. She warned: 'The current climate of uncertainty and widespread misinformation serves nobody.' 'The law, as set out in the Supreme Court's clear judgment, has been in effect since it was handed down on April 16. 'Service providers and public bodies should in any event be following the law while they wait for our statutory guidance, as it will not cover every eventuality. 'We have urged relevant bodies to seek their own legal advice where necessary, to inform decisions about what changes they need to make now to their existing policies and practices.' Some bodies, including the Scottish Parliament and Police Scotland, have already updated their policies in response to the ruling. READ MORE Museums Scotland warn venues may close over toilet guidance For Woman Scotland intervene in Sandie Peggie tribunal 10 most jaw-dropping moments in Sandie Peggie tribunal In a statement, For Women Scotland said they were focusing on two specific policies: Supporting Transgender Pupils In Schools: Guidance for Scottish Schools, and the Scottish Prison Service's Policy for the Management of Transgender People in Custody. The schools guidance allows pupils 'to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with', and states that 'if PE classes are organised by sex, a transgender young person should be allowed to take part within the group which matches their gender identity'. In April, following separate legal action, a Scottish judge ruled that schools must provide single-sex toilets, but ministers have yet to withdraw the guidance, first issued in 2021. Meanwhile, the prison guidance allows prisoners to be accommodated in the estate that matches their acquired gender — both at admission and at any later stage. It also permits a male prisoner with a history of violence against women or girls to be housed in the female estate, or — if deemed too high a risk to be placed there — to nonetheless take part in women-only activities and programmes. According to the latest Scottish Prison Service (SPS) figures, of the 8,190 prisoners currently in custody, 16 identify as transgender. The SPS does not disclose where they are being held. Among them is Paris Green, formerly known as Peter Laing, who was convicted of murder and torture in 2013. The SPS allows trans prisoners on the estate of their acquired gender (Image: PA) The new legal action is not a judicial review but an 'ordinary' action for the 'reduction' — or quashing — of the government policies. If successful, the court would rule the policies unlawful and effectively annul them. For Women Scotland said: 'We campaigned against the introduction of the prison guidance in February 2024, and in May 2025 the Cabinet Secretary for Justice confirmed her continued refusal to withdraw the policy in response to a letter from MurrayBlackburnMackenzie. 'The Cabinet Secretary for Education stated the government 'will not withdraw' the schools guidance, as did the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice at a meeting in May 2025. 'We have since asked Scottish Government officials, including the Permanent Secretary, to withdraw both policies, and numerous questions have been raised in Parliament, most recently by Annabelle Ewing and Pam Gosal, challenging the continuing operation of the policies following the UK Supreme Court judgment. 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action, and both policies remain stubbornly in place — to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls — leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action. 'The Scottish Ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then, we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court. 'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole. We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.' The Scottish Government has already spent around £216,000 of public money fighting the first case and at least £157,816 on the second. The total bill to the taxpayer is now expected to exceed £600,000. Dr Michael Foran, the incoming Associate Professor of Law at Oxford University, said: 'The rule of law is undermined when judicial decisions are ignored by governments seeking to create ambiguity where there is none. If the clear decision of the Supreme Court doesn't prompt the Scottish Government to act, losing a third case brought by For Women Scotland might.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.'
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish ministers on gender
A campaign group which won a legal victory on the definition of gender is taking action against the Scottish Government over policies it says are 'inconsistent' with the ruling. For Women Scotland's legal battle with Scottish ministers on the definition of a woman ended in the UK Supreme Court, which ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. However, the group said that it now has 'little choice' but to take further legal action as some policies regarding transgender pupils in schools and transgender people in custody remain in place – which the group said is 'in clear breach of the law'. The schools guidance for single-sex toilets says it is important that young people 'where possible, are able to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with'. The prison guidance allows for a transgender woman to be admitted into the women's estate if the person does not meet the violence against women and girls criteria, and there is no other basis to suppose that she poses an unacceptable risk of harm to those housed in the women's estate. For Women Scotland has now applied to the Court of Session seeking to quash the policies, which it says are 'inconsistent with the UK Supreme Court judgment of April 16 2025'. It has raised an ordinary action for reduction (quashing) of the policies relating to schools and prisons. In a statement, the group said: 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action and both policies remain stubbornly in place, to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls, leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action. 'The Scottish ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court. 'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole. 'We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.' For Women Scotland previously brought a series of challenges over the definition of 'woman' in Scottish legislation mandating 50% female representation on public boards. The last step of these ended in the Supreme Court ruling, which the campaign group's supporters hailed as a 'watershed for women'.
