Coinbase quarterly profit falls as expenses climb, shares down
Crypto exchange Coinbase reported a drop in first-quarter profit on Thursday as a steep rise in costs more than offset revenue growth in its transaction and subscription units, sending its shares down 3% in extended trading.
Total operating expenses soared 51% to $1.3 billion in the quarter, driven by increased marketing expenses as well as losses on crypto assets held for operations, the company said.
U.S. President Donald Trump's erratic trade policy had triggered volatility across asset classes during the first three months of the year, rattling financial markets and triggering a sell-off in assets perceived as risky, such as crypto.
Crypto Tracker
TOP COIN SETS
DeFi Tracker
12.10%
Buy
Crypto Blue Chip - 5
8.12%
Buy
Web3 Tracker
8.10%
Buy
NFT & Metaverse Tracker
5.80%
Buy
AI Tracker
5.67%
Buy
TOP COINS
(₹)
Ethereum
189,144 (
21.94%
)
Buy
XRP
198 (
9.08%
)
Buy
Bitcoin
8,839,348 (
6.24%
)
Buy
BNB
53,688 (
5.13%
)
Buy
Tether
86 (
1.43%
)
Buy
However, its transaction revenue rose 17.3% to $1.26 billion. Revenue from the subscription and services unit, which houses businesses outside of trading, also jumped 37% to $698.1 million.
Did you Know?
The world of cryptocurrencies is very dynamic. Prices can go up or down in a matter of seconds. Thus, having reliable answers to such questions is crucial for investors.
View
Details
»
Total revenue rose to $2.03 billion from $1.64 billion a year earlier. That still missed analysts' expectations of $2.1 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Live Events
The company earned adjusted net income of $526.6 million, or $1.94 per share, for the three months ended March 31, compared with $679.2 million, or $2.53 per share, a year earlier.
The largest publicly traded cryptocurrency exchange said earlier in the day that it would buy derivatives exchange Deribit in a $2.9 billion deal to expand into the crypto options markets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
31 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trump Accuses China Of Breaking Trade Agreement After Brief Tariff Truce
President Donald Trump has publicly accused China of breaching their recent trade agreement, expressing frustration after attempting to ease tensions between the world's two largest economies. The President's criticism comes as trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing have reached a standstill, requiring direct intervention from both leaders to move forward. Trump's allegations follow his decision last month to impose a massive 145 percent tariff on Chinese imports, which he claims brought China to the brink of economic crisis. The unprecedented tariffs severely restricted China's ability to trade with the United States, leading to factory closures and what Trump described as civil unrest within China. In a detailed post on his Truth Social platform, Trump explained his reasoning for initially offering China relief from the punitive tariffs. He stated that witnessing China's economic distress prompted him to negotiate a quick agreement to prevent what he anticipated would be a catastrophic situation for the Asian nation. The President emphasized that his intervention helped stabilize China's economy and allowed normal business operations to resume. However, Trump now claims that China has completely violated the terms of their agreement, leading to his public declaration of disappointment with being cooperative. The President's frustration reflects his belief that his goodwill gesture was not reciprocated by Chinese compliance with the negotiated terms. The trade dispute had appeared to find temporary resolution earlier this month when both nations agreed to reduce their respective tariffs. The United States lowered its tariff rate from 145 percent to 30 percent on Chinese goods, while China reciprocated by reducing its tariffs on American products from 125 percent to 10 percent. This mutual reduction was established as part of a 90-day trial period designed to defuse escalating trade tensions. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that trade discussions have stalled and require direct engagement between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to achieve progress. Bessent noted that while the temporary agreement helped stabilize financial markets, it failed to address fundamental American concerns regarding China's state-controlled economic structure. The initial agreement emerged from intensive negotiations held in Geneva, Switzerland, marking the first high-level diplomatic talks between the two nations since Trump implemented the steep tariffs on Chinese imports. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had announced the tariff reductions as part of efforts to prevent a full-scale trade war. Legal challenges have also complicated the trade relationship, with a US trade court recently ruling that Trump exceeded his presidential authority when imposing most tariffs under emergency powers legislation. However, a federal appeals court quickly reinstated the tariffs while reviewing the government's appeal, with response deadlines set for early June. The Trump administration has simultaneously expanded its trade focus to include negotiations with other major economic partners, including Japan, India, and the European Union. This broader approach suggests the administration is seeking to diversify America's trade relationships while addressing ongoing disputes with China. The current impasse highlights the complexity of resolving trade disputes between the world's two largest economies, where economic policies intersect with broader geopolitical considerations and domestic political pressures in both nations.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
37 minutes ago
- First Post
3 'wars' to dominate economic bloc's meeting: Israel-Iran, Ukraine and Trump's tariffs
As Canada gears up to host the G7 Summit in Alberta, 3 wars will be on the leaders' agenda: the Russia-Ukraine war, the West Asian Crisis, and the trade war that US President Donald Trump has ensued read more US President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. The Canadian PM earlier in May said his government is talking to the US about joining the Golden Dome missile defence program. AFP Canada is all set to host the G7 Summit , where leaders from some of the most powerful nations will discuss the global crises that have engulfed the world. At the centre of these discussions will be two wars and the brewing conflict, which many fear can turn into a war. High on the agenda will be the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and the war in Gaza. However, the recent turn of events between Israel and Iran would shift the focus to the brewing crisis in West Asia. Israel's decision to strike Iran's nuclear and military facilities and Iran's retaliation would now compel the member nations to discuss the issue instead of discussing the looming Trump tariffs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD At the heart of these issues would be the UK, France, Germany and Italy - along with Canada and Japan's bid to influence US President Donald Trump, with hopes of America taking a more conventional approach instead of a provocative one. Here's a look at the 3 wars G7 leaders will be focusing on 3 wars | 1 Summit ### Russia-Ukraine war Key to the debate will be the ongoing war in Ukraine and Trump's ever-changing stance on Russia. Since most member states in the G7 are allies of Ukraine, they would want to put more pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin to come to the negotiating table. The European allies argued that one way of bringing Russia to the table was by hitting its economy. During the G7 Summit, the Ukrainian allies would focus on calling for the reduction of the price that most of the world pays for Russian oil. They would also like a tough new package of economic sanctions. The main task at hand would be getting Trump's support since the POTUS has been an ardent supporter of his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. On Saturday, Putin and Trump held a phone call in which the Russian leader wished him on his birthday and expressed his intention to sit for peace talks with Ukraine. ### Crisis in West Asia While the G7 leaders were meant to speak on the war in Gaza, the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel would also take centre stage during discussions at the Summit. While French President Emmanuel Macron has expressed criticism towards Israel, UK PM Keir Starmer and Trump have expressed ardent support for Israe l amid clashes with Iran. The Trump administration is also looking at how the ongoing tension in West Asia is hampering its nuclear talks with Iran, which were initiated earlier this year in Oman. Israel's activities in Gaza might also be on the agenda, given that the UN has been frequently raising concerns about the humanitarian crisis on the coastal strip and calls for a ceasefire remain persistent. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD ### Tariff war With Trump in attendance, most of the leaders would also focus on discussing his proposed reciprocal tariffs , which have now been paused. The club of some of the world's richest industrial nations was set up in the 1970s to discuss global economic crises, and now the same members will be discussing the tariffs imposed by one country, which can severely impact the global economy. 'If the question is how we coordinate on China, how we coordinate on technology, how we coordinate on Russia and Ukraine - how can we have this kind of alliance between advanced-economy democracies if we're also creating economic hardship on our countries by something that's coming from another member?' Josh Lipsky, senior director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Centre, told the BBC on the matter. While the UK has already signed a bilateral trade deal with the US, other nations, especially India and Japan, would also be discussing similar suits with the American president.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US-China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved, sources say
The renewed U.S.-China trade truce struck in London left a key area of export restrictions tied to national security untouched, an unresolved conflict that threatens a more comprehensive deal, two people briefed on detailed outcomes of the talks told Reuters. Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialized rare-earth magnets that U.S. military suppliers need for fighter jets and missile systems, the people said. The United States maintains export curbs on China's purchases of advanced artificial intelligence chips out of concern that they also have military applications . At talks in London last week, China's negotiators appeared to link progress in lifting export controls on military-use rare earth magnets with the longstanding U.S. curbs on exports of the most advanced AI chips to China. That marked a new twist in trade talks that began with opioid trafficking, tariff rates and China's trade surplus, but have since shifted to focus on export controls. In addition, U.S. officials also signalled they are looking to extend existing tariffs on China for a further 90 days beyond the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva last month, both sources said, suggesting a more permanent trade deal between the world's two largest economies is unlikely before then. The two people who spoke to Reuters about the London talks requested not to be named because both sides have tightly controlled disclosure. The White House , State Department and Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to requests for comment. China's Foreign and Commerce ministries did not respond to faxed requests for comment. Live Events President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the handshake deal reached in London between American and Chinese negotiators was a "great deal," adding, "we have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too." And U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said there would be no "quid pro quo" on easing curbs on exports of AI chips to China in exchange for access to rare earths. CHINA CHOKEHOLD But China's chokehold on the rare earth magnets needed for weapons systems remains a potential flashpoint. China dominates global production of rare earths and holds a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. A deal reached in Geneva last month to reduce bilateral tariffs from crushing triple-digit levels had faltered over Beijing's restrictions on critical minerals exports that took shape in April. That prompted the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. At the London talks, China promised to fast-track approval of rare-earth export applications from non-military U.S. manufacturers out of the tens of thousands currently pending, one of the sources said. Those licenses will have a six-month term. Beijing also offered to set up a "green channel" for expediting license approvals from trusted U.S. companies. Initial signals were positive, with Chinese rare-earths magnet producer JL MAG Rare-Earth, saying on Wednesday it had obtained export licences that included the United States, while China's Commerce Ministry confirmed it had approved some "compliant applications" for export licences. But China has not budged on specialized rare earths, including samarium, which are needed for military applications and are outside the fast-track agreed in London, the two people said. Automakers and other manufacturers largely need other rare earth magnets, including dysprosium and terbium. BIG ISSUES REMAIN The rushed trade meeting in London followed a call last week between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Trump said U.S. tariffs would be set at 55% for China, while China had agreed to 10% from the United States. Trump initially imposed tariffs on China as punishment for its massive trade surplus to the United States and over what he says is Beijing's failure to stem the flow of the powerful opioid fentanyl into the U.S. Chinese analysts are pessimistic about the likelihood of further breakthroughs before the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva. "Temporary mutual accommodation of some concerns is possible but the fundamental issue of the trade imbalance cannot be resolved within this timeframe, and possibly during Trump's remaining term," said Liu Weidong, a U.S.-China expert at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. An extension of the August deadline could allow the Trump administration more time to establish an alternative legal claim for setting higher tariffs on China under the Section 301 authority of the USTR in case Trump loses the ongoing legal challenge to the tariffs in U.S. court, one of the people with knowledge of the London talks said. The unresolved issues underscore the difficulty the Trump administration faces in pushing its trade agenda with China because of Beijing's control of rare earths and its willingness to use that as leverage with Washington, said Ryan Hass, director of the John L. Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution. "It has taken the Trump team a few punches in the nose to recognise that they will no longer be able to secure another trade agreement with China that disproportionately addresses Trump's priorities," Hass said.
