This is what democracy looks like in Kansas: The courage to protest
On an April afternoon in a small Midwest town, I stood on the side of a busy street with around 500 of my neighbors and community members to protest the current administration and to defend democracy.
I'm not going to lie. I was afraid. Even knowing we would be peacefully protesting in a public space where we are allowed by law to congregate and express our opinions, it felt dangerous. The reality of today is that people are being snatched off the streets and judges are being arrested. Plus, I live in a small blue dot in the middle of a large swath of red.
I deleted screen shots of funny memes and current facts from my phone. I wrote a phone number in sharpie on my upper arm in case I needed to contact someone with my one phone call. I researched Articles 90 and 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and printed out small messages to explain to any police or military presence that they will only be charged with disobeying any lawful orders and providing the GI Rights Hotline number in case of need. I disabled the location on my phone and logged out of all my social media. I made sure facial recognition and thumbprint were both turned off and couldn't be used to open my phone against my will. I removed my dangly earrings and necklace. I took a deep breath and I walked out the door.
When I got to the city park, I found our allowed protest area neatly marked off with ribbon and volunteers writing signs on posterboard for those of us who forgot to bring a sign. I chose a sign that said 'Freedom From Fear' and found a spot between the curb and sidewalk with my neighbors.
For the next two hours we held our signs high and waived at passing cars as they honked and cheered. It felt so empowering to be out in the world and with community members who feel the need to protect our democracy just like I do. I saw a professor I recognized from the nearby university. I saw knitting and crafting friends. I met new people. We were university students and working families and retirees and young parents with babies and toddlers.
Someone handed me an American flag to waive along with my 'Freedom From Fear' sign. A veteran in a chair nearby along the line had a sign that read, 'Hands off our democracy!' Several versions of 'No Kings' or 'America does not have a king!' showed up in the signs. So did 'Resist Fascism,' 'Hands off my books,' and, 'No one voted for Elon Musk.' I chanted 'Flush the orange turd!' along with the grade-school young ladies every time they walked up and down the line on the sidewalk with a parent and a homemade sign.
Every time someone chanted, 'Show me what democracy looks like!' I shouted back, 'This is what democracy looks like!' as loud as I could along with hundreds of neighbors and community members. Standing along that line I realized I am not alone. A whole lot of other people fear for our democracy and do not like the actions taken in our names. We are afraid and we are also willing to stand up for our democracy despite that fear. And I started to believe that most of us feel that way. None of us are in this alone.
Hundreds of cars drove by to cheer us on and honk. One drove by flipping us off. Another drove by shouting but no one could tell if they were shouting with us or against us. One large truck gunned the engine and spewed a black cloud along the street. But the rest? Hundreds and hundreds of people agreed with us. And the smiles of relief as they drove by were worth the fear. I was relieved too.
I recently heard U.S. Rep. Sarah McBride, D-Delaware, say that no one needs to be a hero as long as we all have a little courage, that seeing someone be courageous helps others have courage too. That day we had enough courage to walk out the door. I have faith that next time it will be easier. And next time? Next time I hope you'll join us.
Tamara Moots lives and works in Manhattan. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vox
6 minutes ago
- Vox
How conservatives help their young thinkers — and why liberals don't
is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he covers ideology and challenges to democracy, both at home and abroad. His book on democracy,, was published 0n July 16. You can purchase it here. Attendees look on during Turning Point USA's Culture War event at the Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, on October 29, 2019. Megan Jelinger/AFP via Getty Images Last week, two young liberals asked for help finding a job in the ideas industry. And I didn't have a great answer. It made sense that they were asking: We were at a conference for liberals, dedicated to building a version of the doctrine that works in the 21st century. They were interested in studying ideas professionally, and I was there to moderate a panel about political philosophy. Yet I found myself struggling to give good advice. Sure, they could try for an internship at a liberal publication or think tank, but those are fiercely competitive and don't pay much. They could apply for a PhD program, but teaching jobs were scarce even before President Donald Trump took a hammer to American academia. What's really missing are programs of a specific kind — ones that help college students and recent grads engage with Big Ideas and connect with Important People. If my young acquaintances were right-wing, I might have told them to apply for National Review's Buckley and Rhodes journalism fellowships — multiyear paid opportunities to write for a national audience straight out of college. For a lesser commitment, they could have tried for the Claremont Institute's Publius Fellowship — a three-week program where you receive $1,500, a $700 travel stipend, free housing, paid meals, and an opportunity to study with some of the most influential (and radical) figures of the Trump era. On the Right The ideas and trends driving the conservative movement, from senior correspondent Zack Beauchamp. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Those are two examples of numerous well-funded programs explicitly designed to usher as many bright young people into the institutional conservative world as possible. If you're an ambitious young college grad, and anywhere on the spectrum from libertarian to hardcore Trumpist, you've got tons of options to get into the ideas game. My young acquaintances really wanted a liberal version of such a thing. But as far as I can tell, it doesn't seem to exist. Where there should be a talent pipeline from universities to liberal public intellectualism, there is a giant sucking sound instead. And, increasingly, it's giving the right a leg up in winning the future. The right's winning formula for training youth It is true, as conservatives have long alleged, that America's intellectual institutions are pretty left-leaning places. They often overstate the case — professors are more likely to be Elizabeth Warren Dems than 'globalize the intifada' socialist revolutionaries — but data confirms that liberals outnumber conservatives in academia and the media by pretty significant margins. This is, of course, not at all new. One of the founding texts of the postwar conservative movement, William F. Buckley's God and Man at Yale, is all about how academia is full of socialists who are chipping away at the eternal truths of capitalism and Christianity. Buckley founded National Review as an antidote to what he saw as the liberal tilt of the mainstream American press. The legacy of Buckley-style thinking is the rise of a conservative ideas industry. A young person nowadays could attend college at right-wing Hillsdale, build their law school life around membership in the Federalist Society, and then get a job writing right-wing papers for the Heritage Foundation — all while getting their news from Fox News and Mark Levin's radio show. As part of these pipeline programs, older right-wingers get to know young up-and-comers as people, and thus develop a personal stake in their success. At the same time, the right also invested in the kinds of 'pipeline' programs our young liberals are desperate for. These aren't designed to replace traditional education or media institutions, but rather to identify young people interested in ideas and expose them to the right-wing alternatives. These work, in large part, by being intellectually exciting. It's not just that you get to go on all-expenses-paid trips with nice meals; it's that you are put in an environment where you're reading and debating classic works of political thought and literature with other people who share those interests. If you're the kind of nerd who wants to debate the finer points of Locke and Hamilton during undergrad summers, you're the kind of nerd who might one day be someone who matters in US politics — and the right's fellowships are there to help make sure you're mattering on their side. The people these young people are meeting are important and famous (well, DC famous). In a 2021 episode of the Know Your Enemy podcast, Nate Hochman — a radical young conservative writer who later staffed both Gov. Ron DeSantis and Sen. Eric Schmitt — talks at length about 'the masterful things the conservative movement institutionally has done in terms of mentorship.' Hochman, who was raised in a liberal household and moved to the right in college, describes how the movement's fellowship programs brought him in direct and meaningful contact with conservatism's leading lights. 'All of a sudden, you're at dinner with people you've looked up to for years, staying up until 1 am drinking wine with them and asking them questions and getting to talk to them. And they're taking you seriously,' Hochman says. As part of these pipeline programs, older right-wingers get to know young up-and-comers as people, and thus develop a personal stake in their success. When you stay up late drinking with someone, talking about shared ideas, you come to care about them in a way you don't if they sent you a cold email. When they come looking for help getting a job writing about conservative ideas, you'll work that much harder to place them in one. And the right has built its institutions to ensure that such positions are available. Right-wing publications and think tanks are much more open to debating big-picture questions — say, what kind of a nation is America? — than their left-wing peers (more on that in a second). Claremont, for example, was founded by students of conservative political philosopher Harry Jaffa, and it shows in the kind of work they put out (even when it strikes me as substantively ridiculous). Liberals are suffering from success There is no parallel culture in American liberalism — a function, in part, of liberalism's longtime intellectual dominance. There wasn't much of a need for liberal donors to create programs to cultivate liberal thought, as people interested could simply go get a PhD or an entry-level reporting job. However, these institutions were not avowedly liberal in character. They styled themselves as politically neutral, focused more on quality research and reporting, than as contributing to a particular ideological cause. This means that while liberals in such fields were in left-leaning environments, many were trained to see themselves primarily as professionals working a craft. So while there are plenty of internships available to young liberals, they're mostly focused on professional training (or coffee-fetching) rather than staying up late swapping ideas with big names. More broadly, the liberal professional approach also produced a kind of intellectual siloing. If you were a young liberal interested in political philosophy, odds are that you end up going to a PhD program and pursuing a career in academia. If you're interested in policy, odds are that you ended up studying a set of applied skills (like law or economics) that prepared you for very specific policy discussions in your area of expertise. But the conservative intellectual model bridges the philosophy-policy gap. It trains young people in the big-picture ideas, like conservative visions of political morality and religion, and teaches them to connect those things to everyday policy discussions. You aren't learning about abstract ideas or concrete policy, but rather learning a comprehensive worldview that treats policy issues as downstream of specific values. You are, in short, learning an ideology. Liberalism has plenty of brilliant theorists who work at a largely abstract level, and policy wonks who work on the most applied issues. But in the middle area of ideology, one bridging the gap between principle and policy, they've basically ceded the field to conservatism. The pipeline problem for young people is a symptom of the movement's blind spot: liberals, as a collective, don't care to cultivate a youth ideological cadre. This might not have been a problem in the past — and maybe even a benefit. Ideological thinking tends to produce rigidity, an unwillingness to adjust one's policy thinking based on new evidence. The right's longtime insistence that tax cuts can reduce deficits, or addiction to proposing military solutions to foreign policy problems, are two examples of curdled ideology. But we're at a moment where liberalism is in a particular kind of crisis: under threat from new ideologies that challenge not specific liberal policy ideas, but the basic premises of a liberal political system. Liberals need a new and compelling vision: one that explains why our ideas are not merely a defense of an unpopular status quo, but a broader politics that can be used to address cardinal problems of the 21st century. At this moment, liberals lack the personnel to articulate such a vision — while the right's radical thinkers, at places like Claremont, seize the field.
San Francisco Chronicle
7 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Recall of Supervisor Joel Engardio is a warning shot to other S.F. politicians
Regarding 'Endorsement: No on Joel Engardio recall. Yes on charter reform' (Editorials, Aug. 16): The editorial board disagrees with over 10,000 District 4 voters who signed the recall petition: San Francisco Supervisor Joel Engardio's offenses warrant an immediate vote rather than waiting until the 2026 election to remove him from office. The disconnect is not surprising: For months, the thrust of the Chronicle's news reporting and opinion writers has been that the reason for the recall is that Engardio championed Proposition K to turn the Great Highway into a park. He did not notify District 4 voters about plans to introduce Prop K. Months before submitting Prop K, he met with groups supporting the highway closure, but gave no opportunity to those opposed to lobby or argue through public meetings or other venues. He submitted Prop K at the last minute, so that no competing proposition could be placed on the ballot. He promised traffic issues would be addressed before the Great Highway was closed. Many District 4 voters disagree with the editorial board and view Engardio's 'insufficient outreach' not as a 'political misstep' but as a callous disregard for basic democratic processes. A successful recall sends a warning to politicians: They ignore and disrespect their constituents at their political peril. John Higgins, San Francisco Have hybrid elections Before the city first switched to district elections in 1977, supervisors were concentrated in a few wealthy neighborhoods. The first district elections corrected that, but without a high voter turnout, it resulted in more fringe candidates. Maybe now is the time to retain residency diversity for selecting the top two candidates per district, but make them accountable to all the city voters in a runoff. To me, this is better than adding new at-large supervisors Ann Carberry, Sacramento Trump's claims are baseless Regarding 'Oakland leaders should listen to what Trump's criticism gets right about city' (Letters to the Editor, Aug. 19): While Oakland has problems — like most cities — the headline for the letter in the print edition ('Trump's criticisms are based on reality') is wrong. For one thing, President Donald Trump did not mention and does not pretend to address the issues the letter raises — businesses closing and underfunding of schools — issues that the city government is addressing and that the president's policies are exacerbating. Trump just talks about crime, when the reality is that crime is down in Oakland. So his criticism is not based on reality at all; rather, it is based on his desire to sow fear and to establish what he hopes will be a police state through the deployment of military force in American cities. Trump doesn't care about Oakland; he cares about power. That is reality. Clyde Leland, Berkeley Penalize Sen. Schiff Regarding 'Trump's motivation for accusing Adam Schiff of fraud is clear. But the legal case is not' (Politics, Aug. 15): As the law states, you can have only one primary residence, it has zero exemptions, and the language is quite simple. You can have only one and meeting the requirements is clearly spelled out. Sen. Adam Schiff has zero special status, just like the other 534 members of the House and Senate, nor do the head of any corporation, legal firm, state, local or city government. The story's attempt to present Schiff's side on a clear violation of tax law falls on deaf ears. Schiff should pay all back taxes, penalties and be happy he's not expelled from the Senate. James Sandler, Pleasanton
Gizmodo
7 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk Randomly Drops In on Small Town; Reminds Everyone He is Still Canadian
British Columbia and a tiny fishing village is now atwitter after the world's wealthiest man made a random and unannounced appearance over the weekend. Elon Musk, the controversial and now apparently political CEO of Tesla and X, touched down in Bella Bella—an isolated town nestled in the Great Bear Rainforest—before departing again by helicopter. His visit to the town with approximately 1,500 residents was a surprise. Local resident Seán Carter told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation that the area is no stranger to high-profile visitors. He added that Musk was possibly passing through en route to James Murdoch, son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who is a board member at Tesla, where Musk serves as CEO, and who owns a property off the coast. 'It's not every day the richest man in the world comes through town,' he said. 'That's going to be a tough one to top.' CBC News confirmed that Musk's private jet touched down in Vancouver late Friday night and departed Monday afternoon. Visual evidence viewed by the CBC reportedly aligns with flight data tracked online and show Musk arriving and departing. If you follow the lore of Musk, he was born in South Africa and is a Canadian citizen through his mother, Maye Musk, who was born in Regina, according to official biographies. Musk moved to Saskatchewan and then Vancouver as a teen, and attended college in Canada. In recent months, Musk's visits and Canadian ties have fueled debate. Earlier this year, a petition circulated calling for the government to revoke his citizenship over his role in former President Trump's White House, exactly as Musk was getting heavy handed in tariff talks between the two countries. In Ontario and Western Canada, Musk's tempestuous influence has also complicated political relationships. Quebec, B.C., and other provinces have debated decisions to exclude Tesla from EV rebate programs in response to U.S. tariffs, with Premier David Eby citing 'retaliation' as the reason. In a move that showed at least one of Musk's businesses still matters to Canadian communities, more than half of Canadian rural areas are buying services from Musk's Starlink satellite internet to improve connectivity. Musk has gone back and forth on his own complicated feelings about Canada. In 2023, he posted a photo wearing a 'I Love Canada' T-shirt and declared himself 'half-Canadian.' But in February 2025, in response to the citizenship revocation petition, he tweeted, 'Canada is not a real country' before deleting the message. Carter told the CBC politics aside, Musk's passage through Bella Bella was one for the history books. 'No matter what your opinion of him is, it's something to follow,' he said. The town's residents clearly had mixed feelings about Musk's drop-in. Emily Lowan, a candidate for the B.C. Green Party leadership, posted images of Musk's arrival on social media, writing, 'yet another reason to tax billionaires out of existence.' But in typical Canadian fashion, Carter said that Musk did not get any special treatment at the local airport and then had to walk for a bit. 'It was quite busy,' Carter said. 'The plane landed on one side, the helicopter on the other, and he had to walk a long way. He probably hoped to come in and out quietly, but there are no secrets in this town.'
