logo
My research team used 18 years of sea wave records to learn how destructive ‘rogue waves' form – here's what we found

My research team used 18 years of sea wave records to learn how destructive ‘rogue waves' form – here's what we found

Yahoo17 hours ago
Rogue waves have captivated the attention of both seafarers and scientists for decades. These are giant, isolated waves that appear suddenly in the open ocean.
These puzzling giants are brief, typically lasting less than a minute before disappearing. They can reach heights of 65 feet (20 meters) or greater and often more than twice the height of surrounding waves. Once a nautical myth, rogue waves have now been observed around the world. Because they're so tall and powerful, they can pose a danger to ships and offshore structures.
To rethink what rogue waves are and what causes them, I gathered an international team of researchers. Our study, published in Nature Scientific Reports, sheds light on these oceanic giants using the most comprehensive dataset of its kind.
By analyzing 18 years of high-frequency laser measurements from the Ekofisk oil platform in the central North Sea, we reached the surprising conclusion that rogue waves aren't just freak occurrences. They arise under the natural laws of the sea. They are not mysterious, but somewhat simple.
27,500 sea states
We analyzed nearly 27,500 half-hour wave records, or sea states, collected between 2003 and 2020 in the central North Sea. These records, taken every 30 minutes, describe how elevated the sea surface was compared to the average sea level. They include major storms, such as the Andrea wave event in 2007.
Under normal conditions, waves arise from wind blowing over the sea surface. It's like when you blow over your cup of coffee and form small ripples on the surface. At sea, with enough time and space, those ripples can turn into large waves.
We focused on understanding what causes waves to suddenly go rogue and rise far above their neighboring waves. One proposed theory is based on modulational instability, a phenomenon described by complex mathematical models. I've revised these models in the past, as my work suggests that this theory doesn't fully explain what causes rogue waves in the open ocean.
When waves are trapped within a narrow channel, the modulational instability theory describes their rippling movement well. However, it starts to fall apart when you look at the real ocean. In open environments such as the North Sea, waves are free to propagate from multiple directions.
To understand the difference, imagine a crowd of spectators leaving a stadium after a football game. If the exit is a long, narrow hallway with tall walls, people are forced to move in a single direction. Those at the back push forward, and some may even climb over others, piling up between the confining walls. This catastrophic pileup would resemble a rogue wave, caused by their confinement.
In contrast, if the stadium's exit opens onto a wide field, spectators can disperse freely in all directions. They don't push on each other, and they avoid pileups.
Similarly, researchers can generate rogue waves in a confined channel in the lab, where they obey modulational instability. But without the confinement of a channel, rogue waves usually won't follow those physics or form the same way in the open sea.
Our team knew we had to study the open sea directly to figure out what was really going on. The real-world data my team examined from the North Sea doesn't line up with modulational instability – it tells a different story.
It's just a bad day at sea
We analyzed the sea state records using statistical techniques to uncover patterns behind these rare events. Our findings show that instead of modulational instability, the extreme waves observed more likely formed through a process called constructive interference.
Constructive interference happens when two or more waves line up and combine into one big wave. This effect is amplified by the natural asymmetry of sea waves – their crests are typically sharper and steeper than their flatter troughs.
Rogue waves form when lots of smaller waves line up and their steeper crests begin to stack, building up into a single, massive wave that briefly rises far above its surroundings. All it takes for a peaceful boat ride to turn into a bad day at sea is a moment when many ordinary waves converge and stack.
These rogue waves rise and fall in less than a minute, following what's called a quasi-deterministic pattern in space and time. This type of pattern is recognizable and repeatable, but with touches of randomness. In an idealized ocean, that randomness would almost vanish, allowing rogue waves to grow to nearly infinite heights. But it would also take an eternity to witness one of these waves, since so many would have to line up perfectly. Like waiting for Fortuna, the goddess of chance, to roll a trillion dice and have nearly all of them land on the same number.
In the real ocean, nature limits how large a rogue wave can grow thanks to wave breaking. As the wave rises in height and energy, it can't hold itself beyond a certain point of no return. The tip of the wave spills over and breaks into foam, or whitecap, releasing the excess energy.
The quasi-deterministic pattern behind rogue waves
Rogue waves aren't limited to the sea. Constructive interference can happen to many types of waves. A general theory called the quasi-determinism of waves, developed by oceanographer Paolo Boccotti, explains how rogue waves form, both in the ocean and in other wave systems.
For example, for turbulent water flowing through a confined channel, a rogue wave manifests in the form of an intense, short-lived spike in vortices – patterns of spinning swirls in the water that momentarily grow larger as they move downstream.
While ocean waves seem unpredictable, Boccotti's theory shows that extreme waves are not completely random. When a really big wave forms, the waves in the sea around it follow a recognizable pattern formed through constructive interference.
We applied Boccotti's theory to identify and characterize these patterns in the measured North Sea wave records.
The giant waves observed in these records carry a kind of signature or fingerprint, in the form of a wave group, which can reveal how the rogue wave came to life. Think of a wave group like a small package of waves moving together. They rise, peak and then fade away through constructive interference. Tracking these wave groups allows researchers to understand the bigger picture of a rogue event as it unfolds.
As one example, a powerful storm hit the North Sea on Nov. 24, 2023. A camera at the Ekofisk platform captured a massive 55 foot (17 meter) rogue wave. I applied the theory of quasi-determinism and an AI model to investigate the origin of this extreme wave. My analysis revealed that the rogue event followed these theories – quasi-determinism and constructive interference – and came from multiple smaller waves repeatedly stacking together.
Recognizing how rogue waves form can help engineers and designers build safer ships and offshore platforms – and better predict risks.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Francesco Fedele, Georgia Institute of Technology
Read more:
What makes the world's biggest surfable waves?
Surfing makes its Olympic debut – and the waves should be world-class thanks to wind, sand and a typhoon or two
What causes a tsunami? An ocean scientist explains the physics of these destructive waves
Francesco Fedele does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Little-Known Gut Nutrient Is Emerging Player in Cancer Fight
Little-Known Gut Nutrient Is Emerging Player in Cancer Fight

Medscape

time2 hours ago

  • Medscape

Little-Known Gut Nutrient Is Emerging Player in Cancer Fight

An under-the-radar micronutrient is having a moment. Queuosine — just call it 'Q' — is a molecule that humans can only get from foods and gut bacteria. It's has been known to microbiologists for decades, who know it plays a role in protein synthesis — as well as cancer growth, brain health, and inflammation. Yet, it hasn't been clear how Q moves from the gut into cells throughout the body. Now the curtain has been pulled back. The authors of a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ( PNAS ) have pinpointed a gene ( SLC35F2 ) that helps transport Q to cells. The researchers say the new finding could help scientists figure out how to use the micronutrient to fight disease. 'It's 70 years ago now that Q was discovered,' said study author Vincent P. Kelly, PhD, Professor of Biochemistry in the School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 'What's exciting about this study is the fact that we never understood how we actually took that molecule from bacteria in our body and transported it into our cells, and this explains how we do it.' Q: A Brief Primer The PNAS study looked at both queuine (q), a modified nucleobase, and its nucleoside Q. A quick refresher: A nucleobase is a nitrogen-containing molecule that is one of the building blocks of DNA and RNA. And a nucleoside is a molecule made of sugar (either ribose or deoxyribose) plus a nitrogenous base (purine or pyrimidine) — also a building block of DNA. All of the cells in the human body are eukaryotes — they have a nucleus — and they rely on the micronutrients Q and q, which lurk in the human gut. They come from gut bacteria or a person's diet (most commonly meat, eggs, dairy, fruits and vegetables, and fermented foods), said Kelly. Prior studies had given hints that cellular uptake of Q and q is mediated by a selective transporter, but Kelly said that this transporter's identity 'remained elusive' until now. 'Almost all eukaryotes take the Q molecule and incorporate it into the transfer RNA (tRNA) in the body,' said Kelly. 'tRNA is critical for making protein. It's essential — essential for everything,' he said, pointing out that the average adult human is composed of about 12 kilograms (26 pounds) of protein. How does Q get into gut bacteria and the food we eat? The Q molecule is more or less everywhere, Kelly said. 'It's in the oceans, it's in the soil. Plants, which are eukaryotic, take it from the soil. And yet, very little is known about it. I'm surprised more people aren't knowledgeable about it,' he said, especially considering public interest over the years in health-oriented micronutrients like vitamins and 'macros' like carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. What They Found, What It Means Collaborating with researchers from Germany, Northern Ireland, the United States, and his own colleagues in Ireland, Kelly said they used a cross-species bioinformatic search and genetic validation — research techniques that enable scientists to analyze vast amounts of genomic data from across different species — to determine that Q and q are 'salvaged' from the gut by SLC35F2 and ferried to different tissues throughout the body. 'There's a whole biology built around this micronutrient,' said Kelly. Cracking the identity of the transporter of Q and q opens up opportunities for important research, Kelly said. It will lead to a deeper understanding of how intracellular levels of both micronutrients are regulated and how their deficiency is associated with diseases. The study findings 'represent an important leap in our understanding of queuosine biology. Queuosine is a unique tRNA modification to its precursor, queuine, which is not synthesized de novo in mammalian cells,' said Sherif Rashad, MD, PhD, Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering and the Graduate School of Medicine at Tohoku University in Sendai, Japan. Rashad said scientists' understanding of how q is imported into cells was 'virtually nonexistent' until now and that the authors of the PNAS study used 'an elegant but grounded approach' to identify the first q importer. The finding 'paves the way for new discoveries in the many fields at the crossroads of queuosine biology,' he said. Zdeněk Paris, PhD, Head of Laboratory, in the Laboratory of RNA Biology of Protists, at the Institute of Parasitology in Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, agreed. 'This study advances the field of queuosine research by identifying the primary transporter and establishing a direct link between the function of SLC35F2, intracellular queuosine levels, and vital cellular processes, which can explain how a deficiency of Q and/or its free base, queuine (q), contributes to various conditions, including neurological disorders and cancer.' Paris said, 'Prior to this study, no specific transporters for the intracellular uptake of Q or q had been identified in any eukaryote.' He said the research is 'high-quality.' He pointed out that the researchers also demonstrated that SLC35F2 is the sole high-affinity plasma membrane transporter for the Q nucleoside and the primary high-affinity transporter for the nucleobase q in human cells. 'Its high expression in the human alimentary canal strongly suggests a critical role in Q/q uptake from the gut during digestion,' he said. 'This reveals how these micronutrients, which are synthesized exclusively by bacteria, are salvaged from the gut microbiome and/or diet and delivered to various body tissues. Based on the obtained data, the authors propose a model in which Q is transported from the gut to the liver by SLC35F2 . There, QNG1 cleaves Q to release the q base, which enters the serum for wider distribution.' The Cancer Connection Paris said that SLC35F2 was characterized as an oncogene in previous research and is known to contribute to the progression of various cancers through its overexpression, including non-small cell lung cancer, papillary thyroid cancer, and bladder cancer. Paris added that SLC35F2 's role in Q and q transport provides a significant mechanistic explanation for its oncogenic activity. 'High SLC35F2 expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor for patient survival in multiple cancers. SLC35F2 overexpression increases cellular Q/q levels, promoting higher Q34 modification of tRNAs. Consequently, Q modification may offer malignant cells a selective advantage through codon-biased translation,' he said. Additionally, the study identified SLC35F2 (or its homologs) as the unique Q/q transporter in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and the human parasite Trypanosoma brucei , Paris said. 'While the physiological importance of Q-tRNA varies by species — for example, loss of Qtp1 does not affect growth in S pombe or T brucei — this comparative analysis strengthens the evidence for SLC35F2 's role in humans and reveals its conserved function in eukaryotes that salvage Q and q.' He said, 'In essence, the study provides the missing link in the queuine salvage pathway, significantly advancing our understanding of how this essential micronutrient is acquired, distributed, and regulated, and its profound impact on health and disease, particularly in the context of cancer.'

Novel Tool May Predict NSAID Hypersensitivity
Novel Tool May Predict NSAID Hypersensitivity

Medscape

time2 hours ago

  • Medscape

Novel Tool May Predict NSAID Hypersensitivity

TOPLINE: A new risk stratification tool known as CA4TCH — which relies solely on clinical history — could help predict which patients with a suspected hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) will have a hypersensitivity confirmed during a drug provocation test. METHODOLOGY: To develop and validate CA4TCH, researchers conducted a retrospective study of 1035 patients who presented with suspected NSAID hypersensitivity at the allergy unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier in Montpellier, France, between February 2001 and December 2020 and underwent drug provocation testing. Using elements of the clinical history — including sex; age at the last reaction; reaction onset ≤ 24 hours; whether the last reaction occurred in the past 5 years; history of anaphylaxis or respiratory symptoms; reactions to two or more drug classes; reaction to aspirin; and comorbid atopy, asthma, sinus disease, or chronic spontaneous urticaria — the team constructed a risk score to predict the presence of a drug hypersensitivity reaction. They then validated the risk score in an independent cohort of 69 participants from the University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France. TAKEAWAY: Overall, 232 (22.4%) participants had at least one positive result during drug provocation testing, whereas 803 (77.6%) did not react to the suspected culprit NSAIDs. The CA4TCH tool had a sensitivity of 78.4%, specificity of 70.4%, and positive and negative predictive values of 43.3% and 91.9%, respectively. Among participants with a negative result, the model successfully delabeled 565 of 803 cases (70.4%). In these cases, past symptoms commonly included angioedema, urticaria, or pruritus. External validation showed comparable predictive performance. IN PRACTICE: 'Given existing variation in testing protocols across clinical centers, the fact that the CA4TCH score is based on clinical history elements alone means it can be used to generate a prediction for any individual upon presentation and could thus constitute a practical tool to be used alongside or as part of existing phenotype classifications,' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: Ileana-Maria Ghiordanescu, MD, PhD, with the Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania, was the corresponding author of the study, which was published online on July 16 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. LIMITATIONS: Fixed drug eruptions were underrepresented in the study, and the researchers did not consider food allergy phenotypes because they lacked information about food sensitization. DISCLOSURES: Some authors reported receiving financial support, including grants, consulting fees, honoraria, or support for attending meetings, from institutions and pharmaceutical companies. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

California has more cattle feedlots than any state, new map shows
California has more cattle feedlots than any state, new map shows

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

California has more cattle feedlots than any state, new map shows

In a first, researchers have identified the nation's roughly 8,700 cattle feeding operations, and the map shows California has more of them than any other state. California also has the most feedlot acreage: over 85,000 acres, or 130 square miles, the majority of it for dairy cows. Tulare County has more than any county in the country — 304 operations. Were it a state, it would would rank No. 8, researchers at the University of Michigan and UC Santa Barbara found. Until now, there has been no national database of animal feeding operations. The federal government doesn't keep one, and states tend to keep what information they have confidential. The researchers say their data will allow local governments and non-governmental organizations to set targeted environmental, health and economic policies for their regions. "It's really awesome research," said Andrew deCoriolis, the director of FarmFoward, an anti-industrial agriculture group. "This is by far the most comprehensive research I've seen, both in the map ... and the quantification of the number of operations." They also mapped the geography of hog raising. The U.S. is the world's second-largest livestock producer (behind China) — and most of the animals are raised in confined feeding operations: 70% of cattle and 98% of hogs. The facilities pack many animals into relatively small areas where they are fed energy-dense diets and raised for milk or meat before they are eventually slaughtered. In California the average dairy operation is 1,300 animals, but they range from a few hundred cows in the north coast, to more than 10,000 in the San Joaquin Valley. For decades, such operations have been associated with degraded air and water quality. There is often little vegetation and animals kick up dirt and dried manure with their hooves when they move. Other research has found the industry workforce is often underinsured and economically disadvantaged. More than 50% of the nation's dairy workers may be undocumented. The lack of precise location data has meant that local governments, academics and nonprofit organizations have struggled to document the effects of these facilities on the environment and community health. So the researchers decided to build a database and map combining existing data sets — national, regional, business and crowd-sourced — that they cross-referenced with Google Earth. Then they scoured satellite imagery for more than two years, eventually pinpointing 15,726 cattle and hog feeding lots and their extent. The collective footprint exceeded 658,500 acres, or 1,000 sq. miles, slightly larger than Rhode Island. The study was published Tuesday in the journal Communications Earth & Environment. Seeing the amount of land dedicated to this use is important "when you're thinking about how this affects communities living nearby, when you start to ask questions about water pollution, the size of the facility, questions about other health impacts," said Joshua Newell, a geographer at the University of Michigan's School for Environment and Sustainability. Once the researchers located the feed lots, they looked at local air quality and economic data, and found the operations are associated with degraded air quality, and the more land devoted to cattle and hog farms in a given census tract, the lower the social and economic well-being of people living nearby. A look at health-insurance coverage rates, for instance, shows they significantly drop in areas near cattle feeding operations. Anja Raudabaugh, CEO of Western United Dairies — the state's largest dairy trade group — took issue with the study, and said the environmental and economic data were incorrect. "The researchers either don't know, or failed to inquire, with the EPA or the local regulating air quality authorities about existing guardrails" on air pollution, she said. She pointed out there are several other causes of or contributors to air pollution in the San Joaquin Valley, including Interstate 5 and Highway 99, as well as "our significant and growing human population and geography that traps pollution in the valley." Newell responded that the analysis compared similar nearby tracts that are not right next to feeding operations — so other pollution sources were accounted for. Last week, a federal court ruled animal feeding operations are exempt from reporting air emissions and dangerous "pollutants" to local and state officials. Raudabaugh also took issue with authors' claims about environmental justice, which she said were widely disputed in other research and analyses. "We've discussed the real struggle of rural healthcare during recent viral outbreaks and how difficult it can be to service our communities," she said, noting research about H5N1 bird flu and the vulnerability of a dairy workers to infection. "But arriving at a single outcome, a production style of agriculture, is like saying L.A. has lots of cars and therefore a high homicide rate." Instead, she said, "it would be nice to focus on increasing rural access to more healthcare where communities need it" instead of villainizing an industry that provides jobs and a "major local tax base." This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store