logo
WA looks to tighten compliance under police accountability law

WA looks to tighten compliance under police accountability law

Yahoo2 days ago

(Getty Images)
Washington state auditors have started investigating whether local police departments are properly reporting officer misconduct.
As part of police accountability measures passed in 2021, the Legislature required law enforcement agencies to report to the state Criminal Justice Training Commission when officers leave the department for any reason, use force that results in death or serious injury, are charged with a crime or are found to commit certain misconduct.
The law also required departments to continue investigations even if an officer resigns before the probe is finished.
This is meant to ensure 'bad-apple' officers who should lose their state certification don't slip through the cracks. Losing those credentials blocks officers from working as police in the state, even if they quit their job to evade formal discipline.
The Criminal Justice Training Commission suspected agencies weren't reporting misconduct as they should have. So it requested the state auditor's office look into compliance.
Officials see the resulting audits as a teaching moment on the new reporting requirements. The objective is to increase public trust and improve transparency.
'This isn't like a gotcha, it's not a punishment,' said Kimberly Bliss, the commission's assistant director focused on certification. 'This is an educational piece for us to make sure that agencies across the board learn what they're supposed to be doing.'
Last month, Bliss and Michael Huynh, from the state auditor's office, led a presentation on the audits at the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs conference in Spokane. Afterward, police officials told Bliss they realized they hadn't reported correctly.
The first two new audits, of the Renton and Des Moines police departments, both showed missteps.
After reviewing department records, auditors found Des Moines didn't report three of four sustained misconduct allegations. That conduct included violations of the state's controversial pursuit law that lawmakers later rolled back, wrongful use of a Taser and improper handling of drug evidence.
Des Moines Police Chief Ted Boe blamed the lack of reporting on the law being unclear. For example, while some parts of the statute are more specific, one provision says officers can be decertified for failing 'to meet the ethical and professional standards required of a peace officer or corrections officer.'
In response, the Criminal Justice Training Commission agreed to develop guidance on what conduct falls under that umbrella.
Des Moines also notified the state training commission of all officers who had left, but four of those notices came well after the 15-day window in the law.
Meanwhile, in Renton, auditors found the department didn't report that two officers were involved in a use of force incident in 2022 until learning of the audit. The chief said this was an oversight.
Renton also was a little late on reporting two officer separations.
For both departments, the auditor's office recommended outlining the reporting process in agency policy.
'One thing we found was that one person would be responsible for notifications, and if they didn't do it, no one knew,' said Huynh, a program manager with the auditor's office.
Police accountability advocates see failing to comply with the law as a symptom of a systemic problem.
'This is not an oversight. It's a pattern. A culture. One where data is withheld, timelines are ignored, and truth is treated like a suggestion,' Nickeia Hunter, whose brother was killed by police, said in an email. 'Until truth is demanded and enforced, we will remain stuck in a cycle where transparency is performative and justice is optional.'
Next up for these new state audits are the Kitsap County Sheriff's Office and the police wing of the state Department of Fish and Wildlife. Auditors will continue looking into a pair of agencies at a time indefinitely.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ICE Won't Rule Out Retaliating Against Immigrants Who Testify in Free Speech Case
ICE Won't Rule Out Retaliating Against Immigrants Who Testify in Free Speech Case

The Intercept

timean hour ago

  • The Intercept

ICE Won't Rule Out Retaliating Against Immigrants Who Testify in Free Speech Case

Support Us © THE INTERCEPT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Plainclothes officers with Immigration and Customs Enforcement wait in a hallway outside of a courtroom at New York-Federal Plaza Immigration Court inside the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building in New York City on June 6, 2025. Photo: Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images In March, a group of scholars filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to block the government from detaining and deporting students and professors for speaking out about Palestine. Now, as the case heads to trial in Massachusetts federal court in July, those professors and students worry they may be targeted by immigration officials for speaking out in the courtroom on the witness stand. But the Trump administration is refusing to reassure them they won't be subject to retaliation. As attorneys for the scholars prepared to file a motion to protect their witnesses — many of whom are in the country under green cards or visas — from being detained or deported for testifying during trial, government attorneys refused to agree to such safeguards, according to recent legal filings in the case. In their refusal, government attorneys said that their clients, which include the Department of Homeland Security as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 'did not want to be bound by an agreement preventing them from taking action against individuals whose identities they did not know yet,' the filings said. When the scholars' attorneys clarified that the motion would only protect witnesses from being targeted for participating in the case, attorneys for DHS and ICE doubled down in their opposition to the protection and challenged them to instead have the judge decide whether to grant the order. 'Defendants' counsel reiterated that the agencies were 'not comfortable' with such a proposal,' the scholars' attorneys said in the filing, 'and advised us to 'go ahead and ask the judge to rule on it.'' Read our complete coverage The original complaint — lodged by the American Association of University Professors; its chapters at Harvard, Rutgers, and New York University; and the Middle East Studies Association — was filed days after immigration agents abducted Columbia University graduate and Palestinian organizer Mahmoud Khalil, a legal permanent resident who had recently obtained a green card. Among its defendants is Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has led the hunt for pro-Palestinian activists, including a campaign to scour social media for potential targets. The suit called such policies 'unconstitutional' and argues that the repression has 'created a climate of repression and fear on university campuses.' Since President Donald Trump's return to the White House in January, the administration has weaponized the United States' robust deportation apparatus to crack down on pro-Palestinian students and professors. The Trump administration has also punished universities for failing to address alleged antisemitism on campuses in its push to silence pro-Palestinian speech. The administration has canceled the visas of thousands of students and has cut federal funding from universities. Aside from Khalil, immigration agents have also abducted other students and scholars including Georgetown University scholar Badar Khan Suri, Tufts University graduate student Rümeysa Öztürk, and fellow Columbia student protest leader Mohsen Mahdawi. While Suri, Öztürk, and Mahdawi have since been released, Khalil remains detained in a private immigration jail in Louisiana. The March complaint and supporting legal filings highlight more than a dozen students and professors, most of whom are green-card holders, who said Khalil's disappearance and the Trump administration's policy of targeting pro-Palestinian protesters has prevented them from attending actions, posting on social media, and continuing their research and writing on Israel and Palestine. One scholar said they had their scholarship on the topic removed from online and had turned down speaking opportunities 'due to fears that they will be targeted for deportation based on that writing and advocacy.' The motion filed on Wednesday by free-speech attorneys requests a protective order from the court, preventing possible government retaliation. In addition to the threats of deportation, many told attorneys they worried testifying would impact their future applications to become naturalized citizens. 'Noncitizen witnesses contacted by counsel have expressed concern that, if they testify at trial or are otherwise identified in connection with this case, Defendants will retaliate against them by arresting, detaining, or deporting them, denying them reentry into the United States, revoking their visas, adjusting their legal permanent resident status, or denying their pending or future naturalization applications,' the motion read. Aside from cases involving pro-Palestine protesters, ICE agents have shown in recent months they are primed for such courthouse arrests. Some agents have camped outside of courthouses across the U.S. to immediately detain people after judges dismiss their immigration cases, often denying their right to appeal their cases. Others have been detained and jailed in courthouse holding rooms after routine ICE check-ins and asylum hearings. The government is expected to file a response to the motion on Monday, after which the judge in the case, William Young, will rule on whether or not to grant the order protecting witnesses. Join The Conversation

Elon Musk deletes tweet claiming Trump was ‘in the Epstein files' in first sign of de-escalation in very public spat
Elon Musk deletes tweet claiming Trump was ‘in the Epstein files' in first sign of de-escalation in very public spat

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Elon Musk deletes tweet claiming Trump was ‘in the Epstein files' in first sign of de-escalation in very public spat

WASHINGTON — Elon Musk has taken down his tweet claiming President Trump was implicated in the still-unreleased '[Jeffrey] Epstein files' in a first sign of de-escalation since the titanic blow-up between the powerful men this week. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk, 53, had posted Thursday on X to his more than 220 million followers after a multi-day tirade against the president's spending bill working its way through Congress. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein is the real reason they have not been made public,' he alleged. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' Advertisement In February, the DOJ released more than 100 pages of Epstein's phone contacts and flight logs related to sex trafficking charges against the financier, once a friend of powerful politicians like former President Bill Clinton, businessmen such as Bill Gates and Trump himself. Epstein's former lawyer came out on Thursday to dispel any rumors that the president was implicated. 6 Jeffrey Epstein's former lawyer came out on Thursday to dispel any rumors that the president was implicated. Getty Images Advertisement 'I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died,' attorney David Schoen posted on X. 'He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!' White House aides have noted the president's association with Epstein will likely resurface in a fuller release of files but don't believe any alleged wrongdoing by Trump will be revealed. 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday. 'The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again.' 6 '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk alleged. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' REUTERS Advertisement On Friday, Trump speculated that the world's richest man had 'lost his mind' as evidenced by the tweeting spree. Epstein and the future president were photographed and videotaped together attending parties in the 1990s, and Trump told New York magazine in 2002 that his acquaintance was a 'terrific guy' who 'likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' That was six years before Epstein pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution and soliciting sex from a minor, for which he was sentenced to 18 months in prison in a cushy plea deal cut with Florida authorities. 6 White House aides have noted the president's association with Epstein will likely resurface in a fuller release of files but don't believe any alleged wrongdoing by Trump will be revealed. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Trump had reportedly banned his former associate from Mar-a-Lago in 2007 over an incident with a club member's teen daughter. On the 2024 campaign trail, he also said he'd have 'no problem' releasing more official files related to Epstein if elected — including the deceased pedophile's so-called 'client list.' 'I don't think — I mean, I'm not involved,' Trump said in September 2024. 'I never went to his island, fortunately, but a lot of people did.' 6 Epstein and the future president were photographed and videotaped together attending parties in the 1990s. Getty Images A source familiar with the spat between the tech billionaire and the president noted: 'If Elon truly thought the President was more deeply involved with Epstein, why did he hangout with him for 6 months and say he 'loves him as much as a straight man can love a straight man?'' The DOJ files do not contain any new revelations as Trump was already known to have flown on Epstein's private jet at least seven times between October 1993 and May 1994. Those flight logs — contained in what's been referred to as the 'little black book' — became public during the trial of the trial of Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell in 2021. 6 On Friday, Trump speculated that the world's richest man had 'lost his mind' as evidenced by the tweeting spree. Molly Riley/White House / SWNS Advertisement Another version of the book is currently being auctioned off and contains at least five entries 'highlighted in yellow,' one of which is Trump and all of which 'are well-recognized financial and industrial figures,' according to the online webpage of Alexander Historical Auctions. Internet sleuths have speculated that some of Epstein's high-powered clients may have also taken trips down to the financier's private island Little St. James in the Caribbean, where young women and underage girls were allegedly abused. Epstein exploited more than 250 underage girls at his homes in New York, Florida and other locations, according to the Justice Department, before his arrest on federal sex trafficking charges in July 2019. 6 Once among the closest allies to Trump, Musk left behind his cost-cutting efforts at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) just before reaching the 130-day deadline for his position as a special government employee. Getty Images Advertisement Prison guards later found him dead, with bedsheets around his neck, in a New York City federal detention center on Aug. 10, 2019. Investigators later ruled the death a suicide. Once among the closest allies to Trump, Musk left behind his cost-cutting efforts at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) just before reaching the 130-day deadline for his position as a special government employee. Musk had indicated a desire to speak with the president Friday after the kerfuffle, but a White House spokesperson later confirmed no phone call between the onetime allies was planned.

Jim Beam column:New voting machines overdue
Jim Beam column:New voting machines overdue

American Press

time6 hours ago

  • American Press

Jim Beam column:New voting machines overdue

Louisiana legislators have come up with a new system for buying new voting machines that some watchdogs are worried about.(Image courtesy of Louisiana has always had an election system that ranks among the most trustworthy in the country. However, the national conspiracy about the 2020 election being stolen from President Donald Trump resulted in the Legislature creating what is called 'an overly burdensome system for buying voting machines.' The Louisiana Illuminator in 2024 said the 2021 law created the Voting System Commission within the Louisiana Department of State. It is charged with analyzing any available voting systems and recommending a specific type to the secretary of state. Legislators also created a separate Voting System Proposal Evaluation Committee to independently review vendors that submitted bids before making a final recommendation. Joel Watson, a spokesperson for Secretary of State Nancy Landry, said the multiple layers of bureaucratic red tape would mean it would take five rather than three years to purchase new voting machines. And time is important because the Illuminator said the state's current machines are 35 years old and have become difficult and costly to repair. The Illuminator said an effort was made in 2024 to shorten the selection process but it failed 'under pressure from a small group of Donald Trump supporters who came to the state Capitol several times during the 2021 legislative session and bogged down committee hearings with far-fetched election conspiracy theories involving the 2020 presidential election…' Many of the baseless arguments were about Dominion Voting Systems, a voting machine vendor that many Trump supporters falsely accused of rigging the election. Dominion in 2023 won a nearly $800 million defamation lawsuit against Fox News, which spread some of the conspiracy theories. Now another effort appears to be under way to purchase those machines. The Advocate reported Thursday that House Bill 577 by Rep. Daryl Deshotel, R-Marksville, which has passed both the House and Senate, authorizes the elections department to purchase a new voting system using a bidding process called 'invitation to negotiate.' An 'invitation to negotiate' (ITN) is a type of solicitation used in procurement, where the buyer invites potential suppliers to submit proposals and then negotiates with the most promising ones to achieve the best possible outcome. It's a competitive process where factors beyond price, like experience, project plans, and design features, can be considered. The newspaper said the Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana says the new process could lead to less transparency. It is a substitute for the open bidding process, which has delayed purchase of new machines because of lawsuits filed by unsuccessful bidders. Watson said Gov. Jeff Landry hopes to have a new voting system finalized by the end of 2025 and begin a 'phased-in implementation' of the new system in 2026. Under the new system, the state invites vendors to submit competitive sealed responses as a starting point for negotiations. It is then empowered to select which vendors it wants to continue negotiations with. Louisiana currently uses voting machines from Dominion and it will be interesting to see whether Dominion is asked for a response. The state's current machines don't include a paper trail, making it impossible to double-check election results. Absentee and mail-in ballots are on paper and can be checked, but over 90% of Louisiana voters cast their ballots in person. Landry defends the new selection process, saying negotiation is a public bid process. 'It's just more flexible …. It allows you to exchange more information than (a request for proposals) does.' Melinda Deslatte, the research director for PAR, said, 'We just want to make sure that there will be something available for the public to see at the end of this process to understand why the secretary of state's office chose the vendor that it chose.' Deslatte added, 'We're not entirely certain yet if that information will be publicly available. But we're hopeful because the secretary of state's office has indicated that they expect this to be a transparent process.' The PAR concerns are legitimate because the Landry administration has been active in trying to close public records. Landry and other top officials in his administration most of the time also refuse to respond to news media questions. We hope things will be different and that this new voting machine purchasing process will be open widely to the general public. Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at 337-515-8871 or Reply Forward Add reaction

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store