U.K. Will Recognize Palestinian Statehood in September, Barring Israel-Hamas Cease-Fire
Mr. Starmer's announcement, which came after an emergency meeting of his cabinet, is a sharp shift in his position, reflecting the intense political pressure his government has faced as the British public and lawmakers in his own Labour Party recoil from images of starving children in Gaza.
Mr. Starmer cast recognition as part of a broader European effort to end the ruinous war between Israel and Hamas. He reiterated that Hamas must release its remaining hostages, sign up to a cease-fire and accept that it will have no role in the future governing of Gaza.
But Mr. Starmer's statement was aimed squarely at Israel, dramatizing how swiftly sentiment has changed among Western countries about how to end the war. Britain followed in the steps of France, which announced last week that it would recognize an independent Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
'The situation is simply intolerable,' Mr. Starmer said after the cabinet meeting. 'I am particularly concerned that the very idea of a two-state solution is reducing and feels further away today than it has for many years.'
In addition to a cease-fire, Mr. Starmer said the Israeli government would have to agree not to annex the occupied West Bank and to commit to a peace process that would result in a Palestinian state alongside Israel.
These are demands that Israel is highly unlikely to accept under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing government. Mr. Netanyahu recently said that a Palestinian state could be 'a launchpad to annihilate Israel.'
Britain's decision will deepen Israel's diplomatic isolation after it abandoned a truce with Hamas in March and resumed its military offensive in Gaza. It also carries significant symbolic weight, given Britain's diplomatic stature and history in the Middle East.
Britain played a critical role in the creation of the state of Israel by declaring in 1917 that it supported the establishment of a 'national home for the Jewish people' in what was then Palestine.
Mr. Starmer had been ambivalent about recognizing a Palestinian state, several officials said, in part because he viewed it as a 'performative' gesture that would not change the situation on the ground and could, in fact, complicate efforts to negotiate a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas.
But a chorus of warnings about rising starvation in Gaza, after Israeli restrictions on the delivery of food, changed his calculation. More than 250 lawmakers, including many from Labour, signed a letter to Mr. Starmer and the foreign secretary, David Lammy, urging Britain to recognize a Palestinian state at a U.N. conference this week that is devoted to the two-state solution.
Speaking at the conference on Tuesday, Mr. Lammy evoked Britain's role in the creation of Israel, noting that the Balfour Declaration, the diplomatic statement issued by the British government in 1917, vowed that 'nothing shall be done, nothing that will prejudice the civil and religious rights' of the Palestinian people.
'This has not been upheld,' he said, 'and it is a historical injustice that continues to unfold.'
Mr. Lammy said that Britain was carrying out airdrops of humanitarian aid along with Jordan, evacuating injured children to British hospitals and working for the resumption of the U.N.'s relief assistance.
For Mr. Starmer, a methodical former human rights lawyer, the agonizing scenes in Gaza clearly moved him and changed his calculus.
'We will keep working with all our international partners to end the suffering, get aid flooding into Gaza and deliver a more stable future for the Middle East,' he said. 'Because I know that is what the British people desperately want to see.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Germany will provide 2 more Patriot defense systems to Ukraine, US will backfill stockpiles
Germany announced on Friday that it will provide two additional Patriot air defense systems to Ukraine in the coming days, and several more in the coming months, after the Pentagon agreed to quickly replenish Berlin's stockpiles. The statement, issued by Germany's Ministry of Defense, also said Germany would be paying for the new Patriot systems provided by the US. 'The prerequisite was that the US manufacturer would deliver new Patriot systems as quickly as possible in return so that we could continue to meet our NATO obligations,' German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said in a statement. 'This commitment from the US side has been made.' Germany has provided three Patriots to Ukraine since Russia's 2022 invasion, and had been reluctant to send more until they could ensure that the systems would be replenished by the US. But under a new plan unveiled by President Donald Trump last month, European nations agreed to transfer weapons to Ukraine while purchasing new ones from the US to backfill their stockpiles. The plan, which would see Europe shoulder more of the burden in supplying Ukraine, has been under discussion ever since Trump won last year's election and European officials quickly began deliberating on ways to sustain US weapons shipments to Ukraine under a leader who had vowed to pull back American support, CNN has reported. Col. Martin L. O'Donnell, a spokesperson for NATO's Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, told CNN in a statement that NATO is prepared to coordinate the weapons' 'urgent delivery' to Ukraine. 'NATO is delivering on the initiative President Trump and Secretary General Rutte announced last month to boost support for Ukraine by opening additional assets to Ukraine through investment by Allies in Europe and Canada. Germany has shown its leadership in this regard,' O'Donnell said. 'We look forward to additional voluntary contributions from other European nations. Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe and NATO Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine, and others, stand ready to coordinate them for urgent delivery.' NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte also said in a post on X on Friday that he 'welcomes' Germany's decision. 'This is great news and I welcome Germany's leadership! This will help ensure Ukraine is able to defend its skies, protect its people, and deter Russian aggression,' he wrote.
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
UCLA loses federal research funding in administration's ongoing fight with top universities
Race & ethnicityFacebookTweetLink Follow UCLA is the latest major institution of higher learning to see promised research funding snatched away by the Trump administration, the university's leader said in an open letter to students and faculty Thursday. 'This is not only a loss to the researchers who rely on critical grants,' wrote Chancellor Julio Frenk. 'It is a loss for Americans across the nation whose work, health, and future depend on the groundbreaking work we do.' Grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health are included in the suspensions, Frenk said, but did not provide an amount of how much funding is in peril. The Los Angeles Times reported that roughly $200 million in grants awarded to UCLA are being suspended, citing a partial list of suspended grants provided to them by a source. A spokesperson for the National Science Foundation declined to provide specific figures, saying grant awards are being suspended 'because they are not in alignment with current NSF priorities and/or programmatic goals.' 'We will not fund institutions that promote antisemitism,' said a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the National Institutes of Health. 'We will use every tool we have to ensure institutions follow the law.' The Trump administration has repeatedly cited antisemitism – especially in the context of contentious pro-Gaza protests on campuses – as a reason to deny promised funds to universities, including Harvard and Columbia. Harvard is fighting the funding decisions in court, while Columbia agreed to a settlement with the government that restored its grants. The funding cut comes days after the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division announced it found UCLA in violation of federal law by 'acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students.' While the formal notice to UCLA said the federal government 'now seeks to enter into a voluntary resolution agreement,' Attorney General Pam Bondi sounded less conciliatory. 'DOJ will force UCLA to pay a heavy price for putting Jewish Americans at risk and continue our ongoing investigations into other campuses in the UC system,' Bondi said in a statement. It is not just the Trump administration that has tangled with UCLA over charges of antisemitism. A group of Jewish students filed suit against the university last June, saying the school allowed discrimination against Jews to flourish following Israel's military operation in Gaza in response to the October 7 attacks. The lawsuit said UCLA leaders waited days before responding to a group of pro-Palestinian protesters that refused to allow students to enter campus unless they agreed to 'a statement pledging their allegiance to the activists' views.' UCLA settled the lawsuit earlier this week for $6.45 million, with more than $2 million of the total going to designated 'organizations that combat antisemitism and support the UCLA Jewish community.' UCLA also agreed it is prohibited from 'knowingly allowing or facilitating the exclusion of Jewish students, faculty, and/or staff' from university programs and activities.
Associated Press
a few seconds ago
- Associated Press
El Salvador opens path for Bukele to stay in power indefinitely. Why critics aren't surprised
SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador (AP) — El Salvador's Legislative Assembly pushed through a constitutional reform overnight eliminating presidential term limits, fueling concerns Friday that it paves the way for President Nayib Bukele to indefinitely stay in power. Watchdogs and critics of the self-described 'world's coolest dictator' said they've seen this coming for years, watching Bukele's administration slowly chip away at democratic institutions, attack opponents and consolidate power in the president's hands. Bukele, who regularly posts streams of tongue-in-cheek remarks on social media, remained notably silent Friday. His government didn't respond to multiple requests for comment. 'It's not surprising. But that doesn't mean it's not severe,' said Claudia Ortiz, one of the country's few remaining opposition lawmakers. 'The implication of this is more concentration of power, more risk of abuse of the rights of Salvadorans ... and the complete dismantling of all democratic checks and balances.' Here's what happened overnight in El Salvador On Thursday night, Bukele's New Ideas party and its allies approved changes to El Salvador's constitution, which were jammed through Congress by the party's supermajority. The changes will: The vote passed with 57 in favor and three opposed. Damian Merlo, a U.S. lobbyist and consultant hired by Bukele's administration, defended the changes, noting that many European countries don't have term limits, and said the move only gives Bukele the option of reelection, not an automatic extension of his mandate. 'It's up to the people to decide who the leader will be,' Merlo said. 'It's been made very clear by the electorate they are very happy with the president and his political party — and this move represents the will of the people of El Salvador.' Why watchdogs aren't surprised Ortiz, the opposition congresswoman, called the defense 'absurd,' and said that Merlo was citing countries — Germany and France — with democratic systems of government answering to the countries' parliaments. In El Salvador, power is now entirely concentrated in the hands of Bukele, she said. Bukele, 44, was first elected president in 2019 after founding the New Ideas party, casting aside the country's traditional parties thoroughly discredited by corruption and lack of results. Bukele's highly controlled messaging of beating back the country's gangs and rooting out corruption have gained traction in El Salvador, especially as homicide rates have sharply dropped. But critics say many of the moves he has justified as tackling corruption and violence have actually whittled away at the country's democracy. Over the years, his attacks on opponents and critics have gradually escalated. In recent months, things have come to a head as Bukele has grown emboldened by his new alliance with U.S. President Donald Trump. A number of high profile arrests and a slew of other actions have forced more than 100 members of civil society — lawyers, activists and journalists — to flee their country as political exiles in the span of months. A look back at some of the actions he's taken Intensifying his crackdown in 2025 This year, watchdogs have warned that Bukele has ramped up his crackdown on dissent, emboldened by his new alliance with Trump. What critics saying The recent constitutional reform has fueled a new wave of criticism by civil society in the Central American nation, with leaders saying that Bukele's government has finally done away with one of its last democratic norms. Roxana Cardona, a lawyer and spokeswoman for the Movement of Social Justice and Citizen Control, said 'a democratic state has been transformed into an autocracy.' Cardona was among those to provide legal representation for Venezuelans detained in El Salvador and other Salvadoran youth accused of being gang members. 'Today, democracy has died. A technocracy has been born. Today, we live in a dictatorship,' she said. Others, like human rights lawyer Jayme Magaña, said the idea of alternating power, crucial in a country that still has decades of civil war and dictatorships of the past simmering in its recent memory, has been broken. Magaña said she worried for the future. 'The more changes are made to the system of government, the more we see the state's repression of the Salvadoran population intensifying,' she said. —— Janetsky reported from Mexico City.
