logo

STARS air ambulance founder Greg Powell dies at 77

CBC02-05-2025

Current STARS president says countless people alive today due to Powell's vision
STARS air ambulance announced on Thursday night that its founder and former CEO, Greg Powell, died earlier this week.
Powell, 77, died on Wednesday at Foothills Hospice in Okotoks, with his family by his side.
Current Shock Trauma Air Rescue Service (STARS) president and CEO John Froh said in a release that Powell recognized too many patients were dying because they couldn't receive the care they needed quickly enough, and was motivated to improve the delivery model.
"Countless people are alive today because of his ground-breaking vision and enduring tenacity and for that we are honoured to carry on his mission," Froh said.
Powell grew up in Edmonton and studied medicine at the University of British Columbia, according to a profile of his career published for his induction into the Alberta Order of Excellence in 2021.
During his second year of studies, he used a medical elective to join the Flying Doctor Service in Darwin, Australia.
While on the way to Australia, he visited a mobile army surgical hospital (MASH) unit in Saigon during the Vietnam War, where he watched helicopter rescues in action.
Watching war casualties survive traumatic injuries thanks to the rapid intervention inspired him to create a helicopter emergency medical service closer to home, the profile says.
After graduating from UBC, Powell attended Canada's then-only emergency medicine training program at McGill University and worked as the director of emergency medicine at Calgary's Foothill hospital.
Powell co-founded STARS in 1985. The charity survived early financial struggles and expanded beyond Calgary in 1991, opening an Edmonton base.
The emergency medical service is celebrating its 40th year of operation this year. It has flown more than 60,000 missions across Western Canada, from bases across the prairies in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba.
For his work launching STARS, Powell was appointed to the Order of Canada in 2006. Powell also received the Alberta Centennial Medal in 2005, and the Queen Elizabeth II's Diamond Jubilee Medal in 2012.
Powell also served as chair of emergency medical services for the 1988 Calgary Winter Olympics and as medical director for internationally protected persons at the 2002 G8 Summit in Kananaskis.
He was later inducted into the Canadian Aviation Hall of Fame in 2018, and the Foothills Medical Centre helipad was named after him in 2015.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two injured, including RCMP officer, after collision near Punnichy, Sask.
Two injured, including RCMP officer, after collision near Punnichy, Sask.

CTV News

time4 days ago

  • CTV News

Two injured, including RCMP officer, after collision near Punnichy, Sask.

Saskatchewan RCMP are continuing to investigate after a police vehicle collided with a truck on Highway 15 near Punnichy on Wednesday. On June 4 around 11:10 a.m., a two-vehicle collision was reported near the rodeo grounds on Muskowekwan First Nation. Officers responded along with local paramedics and STARS Air Ambulance. Police determined that a marked RCMP vehicle and a truck had collided. The officer was taken to hospital by STARS for injuries described as 'serious but non-life-threatening.' There were no passengers in the RCMP vehicle at the time of the crash. The driver and sole occupant of the truck was taken to hospital non-life-threatening injuries, RCMP said. Highway 15 was temporarily closed due to the incident. Punnichy RCMP continue to investigate with the help of a collision reconstructionist. Muskowekwan First Nation is located approximately 150 kilometres north of Regina.

Is the U.S. still a ‘safe' country for refugees?
Is the U.S. still a ‘safe' country for refugees?

Globe and Mail

time4 days ago

  • Globe and Mail

Is the U.S. still a ‘safe' country for refugees?

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, tens of thousands of American citizens sought, and gained, refuge in Canada. They weren't technically refugees – most applied for landed immigrant status – but what they were seeking was, in effect, a safe place to avoid the draft during the Vietnam War. The official policy of Canada's 'Department of Manpower and Immigration' was not to ask about applicants' military status; these were mostly young, educated, middle-upper-class men, after all – making them precisely the type of 'desirable' immigrant seen to offer benefits to Canada. There hasn't been anything close to that major influx of American 'refugees' to Canada since then, of course, but individuals from the U.S. never stopped trying. There was a small wave when George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq sent U.S. Army deserters such as Jeremy Hinzman fleeing to Canada. Since 2013, there have been 3,142 claims filed by asylum-seekers alleging persecution in the U.S., according to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, including 102 filed in the first three months of 2025 alone (by comparison, 118 were filed in all of 2022). There was a significant spike in applications after Donald Trump was inaugurated for the first time, both from American asylum-seekers alleging persecution in the U.S. (869 in 2017) and from foreign nationals seeking refugee protection in Canada by way of the U.S. We can likely expect the same jump in applications now. Canada is now trying to make the process a little bit harder. This week, the Liberals tabled an omnibus bill that, among many other things, would render ineligible for asylum those who have been in Canada for more than a year (which addresses the spike in applications from international students who filed refugee claims after the government changed student visa rules in 2024), and would prohibit those who entered Canada via an irregular border crossing to file for refugee protection after 14 days. These are necessary changes that may help to bring Canada's current four-year-backlog for refugee hearings down to manageable levels. But some people will still try. Ottawa's proposed immigration reforms will restrict asylum seekers access to hearings Opinion: The tightening of Canada's asylum laws was an inevitability There are two types of would-be U.S. refugees. The first are American citizens like the draft dodgers of the 1960s and 1970s, the war resisters of the early aughts, and the anti-Trumpists of 2017 onward. Earlier this week, The Globe and Mail reported the story of Hannah Kreager, a trans woman from Arizona, who is seeking asylum in Canada because of alleged gender-identity-based persecution in the U.S; in March, CBC News reported that a family from Illinois had made a similar claim. These individuals cite Mr. Trump's edict on the U.S. government's official recognition of only two genders, among others, as evidence of the harms they face, but they will likely have a tough time proving their persecution rises to the level of 'serious harm,' particularly when there are regions of the United States that are far more inclusive to trans individuals than others. The other type of refugees from the U.S. are foreign nationals seeking asylum in Canada. They might have a much better shot at staying in the country if they challenge the legitimacy of the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA). The Supreme Court of Canada already heard a case challenging the STCA on constitutional grounds in 2023, and it essentially declared that the process of sending refugees back to the U.S., which is based on the requirement that they apply for asylum in the first safe country they arrive in, does not breach the right to life, liberty and security of the person under section 7 of the Charter. The SCC wrote that any violations because of deportation would have to be a 'foreseeable consequence of Canada's actions' and that even though returnees face a risk of detention, there are 'mechanisms that create opportunities for release and provide for review by administrative decision makers and courts.' 'In my view,' Justice Nicholas Kasirer said, writing for the court, 'the record does not support the conclusion that the American detention regime is fundamentally unfair.' But now, those without legal status in the U.S. are being picked up off the streets, thrown into detention centres and, in many cases, deported to third countries without a hearing. The Trump administration is doing that in defiance of court orders, as in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, and resisting even the U.S. Supreme Court, which said that the government must "facilitate" the return of those deported in error. This matters for Canada because of the principle of non-refoulement under international law, which holds that refugees should not forcibly be returned to countries where they are likely to face cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. It used to be hard to argue that migrants sent back under the STCA would face that, but the case seems much easier to make now. Canada should prepare for another challenge to the STCA – and possibly, a different result.

A book prescription for mental health?
A book prescription for mental health?

CBC

time4 days ago

  • CBC

A book prescription for mental health?

On the surface, it may seem that bibliotherapy is another personal wellness trend. The practice promotes books and literature as touchstones, to aid mental health and healing. While it's true that anyone can offer book recommendations, there is evidence in the scientific literature to support its clinical use by mental health practitioners. "It's recommended in the Canadian guidelines for treatment of depression and anxiety," said Victoria-based psychiatrist Martina Scholtens. Bibliotherapy is one of the mental health approaches that she makes use of in her private practice, for certain patients. She might prescribe poetry or a memoir, a novel or workbook. "I want the prescription to be evidence-based and tailored to the recipient of the book and their very particular circumstances," she said. Dr. Scholtens, who is a clinical assistant professor of medicine at the University of British Columbia, put together a list of recommended titles, based on evidence. "I wanted to make book prescriptions more accessible to patients and their caregivers by reviewing, organizing, and disseminating recommended reading lists." She first published the extensively-researched list as an academic paper in 2024, but has now created a website for it, divided by diagnosis, at Bibliotherapy as an art Bibliotherapy can range from a science-based approach, to one that is primarily literary. Brooklyn journalist Cody Delistraty sought out an arts-based bibliotherapist when researching ways to address the prolonged grief he felt after the death of his mother. Then in his early 20s, Delistraty undertook a number of experiments and therapies. "I love to read, I love to write. So [bibliotherapy] made sense for me to dive into," said the author of The Grief Cure: Looking for the End of Loss. After an "odd, not-your-usual therapy session" and an intensive reading questionnaire, English bibliotherapist Ella Berthoud furnished him with an annotated and personalized list of international fiction. He particularly resonated with Sum, a collection of surreal and witty short stories by neuroscientist David Eagleman. "Grief can feel so sacred and so scary," said Delistraty. "To realize that it's just part of the wildness and the absurdity of life had the peculiar effect of helping me to really see the world through a new lens." Literary caregiving A Hundred Years of Bibliotherapy: Healing Through Books, is a new essay collection edited by three researchers from the UK's Open University. It takes a historical survey of the practice. "The term bibliotherapy was coined by an American Unitarian minister called Samuel McChord Crothers in 1916," said 20th-century literature professor Sara Haslam. "The First World War is certainly a key inflection point." America's institutionally-backed Library War Service set up military camp libraries at the start of the First World War. At U.S. military hospitals, books were prescribed and dispensed to wounded soldiers by uniformed librarians. The British version of bibliotherapy was somewhat less prescriptive and medicalized. Sara Haslam calls it "literary caregiving." In places like the female-run Endell Street Military Hospital, "it wasn't about medicalizing books as part of soldiers' recovery. It was about freeing wounded and sick soldiers to identify the kind of reading that they wanted to do." Haslam discovered archival proof that a substantial UK war library was amassed by 1917, spearheaded by one woman. Donations poured in from the public after May Gaskell's emotional call-out asking for meaningful books for soldiers. "I see these books as invested with caregiving from the donating public. They gave things that were precious, that they loved. So it went a long way to meeting the need that was being expressed by those who were fighting." Reading in a digital era A hundred years later, it seems that bibliotherapy has been experiencing a renaissance. Two more new books about bibliotherapy are being published this spring: one by bibliotherapist Bijal Shah, and another from social worker Emely Rumble. Edmund King, a co-editor of A Hundred Years of Bibliotherapy, is a historian of reading. He has a theory for the resurgence. "I think the reason that we're so obsessed now with the idea that books can heal, or are good for us, is because we also fear the end of reading." Despite the rise of BookTok, the books community populated by users of TikTok, King worries about the decline of time young people spend with books. "The literary culture that we value so much might be coming to an end." Yet throughout the history of reading, he says, it has been imbued with "this great power to change people's minds, change the way we see the world, transfer thoughts from one mind to another, preserve ideas, transmit ideas to different times and different contexts." For Sara Haslam, books remain powerful. In her view, opening a book is always surprising, and inherently conducive to mental health. "It's a moment when you are in the present. You have slowed down," she said. "I think it's fair to say that there is a wide readership of all ages who still recognize that that moment in engagement with a book is irreplaceable. "And long may that continue." *Written and produced by Lisa Godfrey. Guests in this episode: Martina Scholtens is a psychiatrist in Victoria, and a clinical assistant professor at UBC Faculty of Medicine. She is the author of Your Heart Is the Size of Your Fist: A Doctor Reflects on Ten Years at a Refugee Clinic.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store