logo
U.K. to cut foreign workers, the ‘backbone' of British nursing homes

U.K. to cut foreign workers, the ‘backbone' of British nursing homes

Washington Post12 hours ago

LONDON — The 23-year-old Nigerian man handed the 78-year-old British woman her noon pill and, on a sunny June day, sat down for a little chat amid the family photos lining her wall.
'Will you miss me if I leave?' Jeremiah Akindotun asked with a smile.
'Oh, I think it's too sad Jerry,' said Suad Lawy, sitting back in her chair. 'You get so attached. What's going to happen to our carers?'
Akindotun is a health assistant at Hammerson House, a 116-room nursing home in north London where 58 percent of the clinical staff come from 49 different countries. Across the United Kingdom, foreign workers commonly provide intimate care to elderly Brits, with nearly a third of care staff coming from overseas.
But maybe not for long. The British government, struggling to address immigration tensions, announced last month that it was ending the special overseas recruitment program that has been a pipeline for care workers in recent years.
Officials said the move was necessary to make the care system less dependent on foreign labor and to root out fraud and exploitation in the fast-track care worker visa program, which was initiated five years ago to ease a staffing crisis in the care industry, one of Britain's biggest employment sectors.
The plan funneled more than 220,000 workers into facilities around the country, according to a government-sponsored database, but it also faced problems. Most workers landed with legitimate companies, but thousands were scammed in their home countries by fake employment brokers. Others arrived only to be overworked and underpaid, even sexually exploited, under threats of having their visas canceled.
Reputable nursing home administrators, however, said canceling the program outright is a body blow to their efforts to fill more than 131,000 open positions in a system that is creaking under the weight of an aging population. Nursing home care is provided by private companies in the U.K. but largely financed by cash-strapped local governments.
British citizens show little interest in the jobs, which are considered low pay, low status and demanding, providers say.
'I haven't had a White British applicant in a year,' said Jenny Pattinson, CEO of the nonprofit that runs Hammerson House and another London care home.
Underlying all of this is a debate about immigration that continues to convulse Britain, like most Western nations. A decade after its Brexit vote to leave the European Union, the U.K. is still arguing with itself about how multicultural and globally integrated it wants to be, questions that continue to drive politics.
The Labour government, generally considered immigration-friendly, announced the end of the care worker visa program less than two weeks after being crushed in English regional elections by Reform UK, a right-wing, populist party started by anti-immigration activist and Brexit-champion Nigel Farage. Reform UK defeated hundreds of Labour and Conservative incumbents and took control of 10 local councils.
Critics say Prime Minister Keir Starmer is trying to dent Reform UK's appeal by making his own rightward pivot on immigration. Cutting the care-worker visa was part of a broader package of immigration changes, including doubling the number of years required for visa holders to become permanent residents and raising the English-language requirement for skilled workers.
In announcing the measures, Starmer sparked a backlash within his own party by warning that Britain risked becoming 'an island of strangers,' a phrase in which some found echoes of xenophobic rhetoric. In 1968, Enoch Powell was kicked out of the Tory shadow cabinet after saying in his famous 'rivers of blood' speech that White Britons 'found themselves made strangers in their own country.'
Starmer rejected the comparison in an interview with the Guardian newspaper, saying that 'migrants make a massive contribution to the UK, and I would never denigrate that.'
Immigration has bedeviled both Labour and Conservative prime ministers for years. Both legal immigrants and asylum seekers arriving on small boats surged to a peak of 906,000 by June 2023.
The numbers are falling as restrictions imposed by the then Tory government and the new Labour government kick in, with net migration into the country down to 431,000 in measures released in May. But the issue remains divisive as a record 11,074 people arrived in small boats in the first four months of this year.
Care home operators accused Starmer of going after their workers because they are easier migrants to block than those crossing the English Channel without permission.
'In my humble opinion, this is a knee-jerk reaction to the surge in votes for Reform,' Pattinson said. 'The government is saying 'Right, we've got to do something about immigration. Where is the largest body of workers coming from abroad? It's the care sector.'
There aren't many aspects of British life in which immigration plays a larger, or more emotional, role than in health and social care. Migrants from the British commonwealth, and particularly the postwar 'Windrush' generation of workers recruited from the Caribbean, fill the ranks of beloved National Health Service. Nurses of colors danced and flew through the air as part of a tribute to the NHS in the Opening Ceremonies of the 2012 London Olympics.
Lawy, a former secondary schoolteacher from Hampshire, a county that is 90 percent White, who has formed bonds with her Nigerian, South Asian and Filipino caregivers, said she had little experience with multiculturalism before moving to Hammerson House following a stroke. 'It's really opened my mind,' she said.
'My sister used to say she enjoyed living in a diverse community and I really didn't know what she meant,' Lawry said. 'Now I do.'
Hammerson House is a Jewish care home. But Ayesha Khan, a Muslim physical therapist from Pakistan who arrived through the visa program last year, said she has felt welcome and useful. Managers told her to step away for prayers whenever she needed to and the only comment she has gotten about her hijab was from a questioner making sure she was not wearing it against her will.
'It's not just a home for residents here, it's a home for me,' Khan said.
These ties make the new restrictions even more explosive, experts said, even as they acknowledged that there was a need for some reform of the abuse-prone visa program.
'It's a sacred cow, immigration is the backbone of the U.K. care system,' said Rob McNeil of Oxford University's Migration Observatory. 'There is a snap response, 'Oh my god, how terrible.' But if they don't resolve things at a structural level there will be consistent problems.'
The program started in 2020 under Prime Minister Boris Johnson to address a drain of European workers that followed the Brexit vote. A lack of oversight, critics charge, allowed shady enterprises and outright fraudsters to operate alongside legitimate care providers. In a crackdown last year, government investigators revoked the licenses of 470 sponsoring organizations, leaving 39,000 guest workers stranded without jobs.
'A third of our calls now come from care workers,' said Olivia Vicol, head of Work Rights Centre, a legal advocacy group.
Nursing home operators say the government has itself to blame for letting the bad actors flourish and that the staffing crisis will only get worse as a result of cutting the whole program without beefing up training, incentives and pay for British citizen to take the jobs. That could create even more political backlash for the government.
'This program was poorly designed at the outset and it's kind of obvious lever to pull when net migration numbers go up,' said Robert Ford, political science professor at the University of Manchester. 'But there will be an uproar if there is major crisis in care homes.'
The government said it was immediately suspending new overseas recruitment through the program, but that current visa holders could apply for renewals until 2028. The number of family members workers can bring was cut, and they will now be required to stay 10 years for a sponsoring facility, instead of five, before being free to explore other work.
For Akindotun, the health assistant, the changes put his whole future in doubt. With a master's degree in clinical psychology, he and his wife and toddler daughter arrived in the U.K. two years ago with hope that he could eventually work as a therapist. His training has been invaluable in dealing with Hammerson's elderly, infirm residents, he said.
'I have much to give here,' he said before sitting down with a 91-year-old who asks him to draw pictures for her. 'It's very demoralizing to feel that the government don't want us.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans Like Health Savings Accounts
Republicans Like Health Savings Accounts

Forbes

time33 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Republicans Like Health Savings Accounts

Should the government allow HSAs to cover gym memberships? Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) are a popular and important way many people pay for medical expenses. They are also a great way to save—better, for example, than an IRA or a 401(k) plan. Because of various quirks in the law, HSAs are not available to a large number of people—including people on Medicaid or Medicare and most people who buy their own insurance in the (Obamacare) exchanges. Under the reconciliation bill just passed in the House of Representatives, more people will have access to these accounts and there will be new opportunities to use them. Currently, individuals and their employers can make tax-free deposits to HSAs, provided the individual is also covered by third-party health insurance with a high deductible. Money can accumulate and grow tax-free. After age 65, the money can be withdrawn for non-health expenses without penalty, but it is subject to normal income taxes. As of 2023, there were 37.4 million accounts with $46.4 billion in assets. Industry experts think the House bill will lead to an additional 20 million people with an HSA. Here is a summary of the hits and misses in the Republican bill, as it faces a vote by the Senate. The Good. By far the best feature of the bill is a provision making all bronze and catastrophic insurance plans offered through the (Obamacare) exchanges automatically eligible for an HSA account. This is likely the main reason why the number of HSA accounts is likely to soar. Another provision would allow the use of HSAs to pay monthly fees for direct primary care (DPC). This used to be called 'concierge care' and in the past it was available only to the rich. But the price has come way down. Atlas MD in Wichita, for example, charges $50 a month for a mother and $10 for a child. In return, the family has 24/7 access to a physician's practice that provides all primary care. Often, the family has the doctor's personal phone number. DPC has become increasingly popular, and employers often pay the monthly fee for their employees. Under current law, however, the employer cannot put funds in an HSA account, let the employee choose a DPC doctor and pay that doctor from the account. The House bill will create that opportunity. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the ten-year cost of all of the HSA changes combined is almost $44 billion. Yet the cost of the two best provisions is less than $6 billion. More on that below. The Questionable. The bill allows annual withdrawals of $500 (individuals) or $1,000 (couples) for gym memberships and other physical activities. (No sailing or golfing expenses, however.) The problem is that these are not medical expenses. If we are going to allow gym memberships, why not hundreds of other nonmedical expenses – including sailing and golfing? The CBO says the cost of this provision is $10 billion. The bill also doubles the annual HSA contribution that is allowable for individuals with incomes up to $75,000 and couples who earn up to $150,000. The problem here is that only about one in ten account holders are contributing the maximum allowable right now. At a cost of more than $8 billion this is an expensive change that will only affect a small part of the market. Instead of these questionable measures, the Senate should consider making all Obamacare silver plans (the most popular choice) automatically eligible for an HSA. Missed opportunities. While the House should be congratulated for making many desirable improvements in the HSA law, it unfortunately failed to correct a fundamental flaw: an inflexible across-the-board deductible. Common sense would suggest that different medical expenses need different deductibles. The biggest problem with chronic illness, for example, is noncompliance with a drug regimen. That is why some Medicare Advantage plans make maintenance drugs for chronic patients (such as insulin for diabetics) available for free or at very low cost. In the first Trump administration, an IRS ruling waived the deductible requirement for 14 specific services and medications that serve as treatments for such conditions as diabetes, asthma, heart disease, and depression. This was an executive branch decision to modify existing legislation, however. To make it permanent, Congress needs to codify it. Ideally, Congress should remove the deductible requirement altogether and let the role of deductibles be determined in the marketplace. One way to think about the combination of allowing gym memberships and failing to address the deductible issue is to see that the House risks being accused of creating benefits for the healthy while ignoring the sick. Another missed opportunity was the failure of House Republicans to give 80 million Medicaid enrollees access to what I will call a Roth HSA. Private companies managing Medicaid (or the state itself) should be able to make deposits to an account that would cover, say, all primary care. Enrollees could use the money for health care during an insurance year. Afterward, they could withdraw any unspent funds for any purpose. If there were no taxes or penalties on non-medical withdrawals, health care and non-health care would trade against each other on a level playing field under the tax law. People wouldn't spend a dollar on health care unless they got a dollar's worth of value. An early study by the RAND Corporation suggests that these accounts would reduce Medicaid spending by 30 percent. Aside from payments for the disabled and nursing home care, if Medicaid spending could be reduced by 30 percent, the savings would amount to almost $1 trillion over ten years. This saving would be shared by the beneficiaries and the taxpayers who fund Medicaid.

What's the Life Expectancy for Parkinson's Disease?
What's the Life Expectancy for Parkinson's Disease?

Health Line

time3 hours ago

  • Health Line

What's the Life Expectancy for Parkinson's Disease?

Key takeaways At age 65, patients with Parkinson's disease have a life expectancy reduced by 6.7 years compared to those without the disease, while at age 85, the difference in life expectancy is 1.2 years. Severe clinical milestones that can impact survival include visual hallucinations, recurrent falls, dementia, and placement in a nursing home. Each milestone may double the risk of death during a 10-year period. Males with Parkinson's disease may experience a greater reduction in life expectancy than females, and those diagnosed before age 70 typically see a larger decrease in life expectancy compared to later diagnoses. If you or a loved one has received a diagnosis of Parkinson's, you may be wondering how the disease may progress over time. Parkinson's disease is a slow, progressive disease. This means that symptoms gradually worsen over time. While Parkinson's disease itself isn't fatal, related complications can reduce life expectancy. The individual outlook can vary based on the severity of Parkinson's disease, a person's overall health, and the type of Parkinson's disease they have. Research from 2020 suggests that at 65 years, the life expectancy of patients with Parkinson's was reduced by 6.7 years compared to that of people without Parkinson's disease. At 85, the difference in life expectancy was 1.2 years. Keep reading to learn more about the disease course and outlook with Parkinson's disease and the factors that may inform a doctor's prediction about a person's outlook. Factors that affect the outlook with Parkinson's disease Symptoms and complications can affect the outlook of a person with Parkinson's disease. Symptoms and severity Research from 2022 suggests that the presence of certain severe clinical milestones may predict a person's disease course with Parkinson's disease and increase the risk of death. Each milestone may double the risk of death during a 10-year period. These milestones include: visual hallucinations recurrent falls dementia placement in a nursing home Parkinson's and falls Falls are a common secondary symptom of Parkinson's disease. The risk of falling increases in stages 3 and is greater in stages 4 and 5. In these stages, you may not be able to stand or walk on your own. You'll also be prone to broken bones and concussions, and severe falls can be dangerous. Complications from a serious fall can reduce your life expectancy. Age Age is another factor in the diagnosis and outlook for Parkinson's disease. Most people will receive a diagnosis after 70. As you get older, you may be more prone to falls and more likely to develop certain diseases, even if you don't have Parkinson's disease. These risks can increase if you have Parkinson's. Research from 2020 suggests that people who receive a diagnosis before age 70 usually experience a greater reduction in life expectancy: In people at age 55: a 10.1-year reduction In people at age 65: a 6.7-year reduction In people at age 75: a 3.5-year reduction In people at age 85: a 1.2-year reduction Sex Research suggests that males with Parkinson's may have a greater reduction in life expectancy than females. Access to treatment Life expectancy has increased significantly due to advances in treatment. Medications and physical and occupational therapy are especially helpful in the earliest stages of Parkinson's. These treatments can improve your quality of life. Type of disease The type of parkinsonism can also impact a person's life expectancy, according to 2020 research. People with atypical parkinsonism, including Lewy body dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple system atrophy, have increased mortality compared to people with typical Parkinson's disease and people without Parkinson's disease. Long-term outlook Early detection of Parkinson's disease is key to helping reduce complications that can negatively affect the outlook. If you suspect that you or a loved one may have Parkinson's disease, consult a doctor right away. Parkinson's symptoms and severity by stage Doctors classify Parkinson's disease into stages 1 to 5, with stage 5 being the most advanced. Advanced stages may increase the risk of health complications that can reduce life span. The symptoms of Parkinson's are gradual and are sometimes not noticeable in the early stages of the disease. They may include: tremors loss of balance slowing of movements spontaneous, uncontrollable movements Symptoms in later stages of Parkinson's may include: more frequent falls trouble dressing difficulty eating swallowing severe stiffness in your legs, which makes it impossible to stand or walk hallucinations or delusions cognitive changes (problems with planning, language, attention, or memory) dementia lightheadedness mood disorders loss of sense of smell or taste vision problems sleep disorders sexual problems As Parkinson's progresses to stages 3, 4, and 5, the risk of falling may increase, and motor balance may worsen. Pneumonia, particularly aspiration pneumonia, is the leading cause of death for people with Parkinson's, accounting for 70% of Parkinson's deaths. Aspiration pneumonia happens when you inhale food, stomach acid, or saliva into the lungs. As Parkinson's progresses, swallowing can become more difficult, causing food and liquid to enter the lungs. Treatment may help reduce symptoms. Frequently asked questions Why does it take so long for a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease? There is no definitive medical test that can be performed to diagnose Parkinson's disease. It's essentially a clinical diagnosis, meaning a doctor will make the diagnosis based on several clinical features seen. Symptoms of Parkinson's disease include tremor, slowness of movement, stiffness, and balance problems. However, the presentation and progression of these symptoms vary widely from person to person. The initial presentation is often subtle and may be similar to other conditions. Some people think their symptoms are due to normal aging, which may make them delay seeking medical attention. Another common finding in patients with Parkinson's disease is 'masked facies,' or an expressionless face, which often gets mistaken for depression. If there's concern that someone is developing Parkinson's disease, they should get a clinical exam from a neurologist to get a diagnosis. There is no definitive medical test that can be performed to diagnose Parkinson's disease. It's essentially a clinical diagnosis, meaning a doctor will make the diagnosis based on several clinical features seen. Symptoms of Parkinson's disease include tremor, slowness of movement, stiffness, and balance problems. However, the presentation and progression of these symptoms vary widely from person to person. The initial presentation is often subtle and may be similar to other conditions. Some people think their symptoms are due to normal aging, which may make them delay seeking medical attention. Another common finding in patients with Parkinson's disease is 'masked facies,' or an expressionless face, which often gets mistaken for depression. If there's concern that someone is developing Parkinson's disease, they should get a clinical exam from a neurologist to get a diagnosis. Is Parkinson's disease fatal? While Parkinson's disease is not fatal, it can cause complications that increase the risk of death. People with Parkinson's have a mortality rate 3 times that of people without Parkinson's. While Parkinson's disease is not fatal, it can cause complications that increase the risk of death. People with Parkinson's have a mortality rate 3 times that of people without Parkinson's. Can treatment help prevent Parkinson's disease complications? Parkinson's disease cannot be cured, but medications, supportive treatments, lifestyle changes, and even surgery can help manage your symptoms or delay more severe symptoms, especially if you start treatment early. This may reduce complications. Parkinson's disease cannot be cured, but medications, supportive treatments, lifestyle changes, and even surgery can help manage your symptoms or delay more severe symptoms, especially if you start treatment early. This may reduce complications.

Far-left House candidate rallies around healthcare for illegal immigrants: 'How is it controversial?'
Far-left House candidate rallies around healthcare for illegal immigrants: 'How is it controversial?'

Fox News

time4 hours ago

  • Fox News

Far-left House candidate rallies around healthcare for illegal immigrants: 'How is it controversial?'

Kat Abughazaleh, a 26-year-old Democratic candidate for Illinois' ninth congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives, said "every single person in the world deserves healthcare," even illegal immigrants. "How is it controversial?" Abughazaleh asked a CNN "NewsNight" panel on Thursday night. The young progressive candidate, with a campaign website that reads, "I don't have health insurance, and I'm running for Congress," repeatedly told the panel that every person is entitled to healthcare when asked if that includes illegal immigrants. "I'm such a monster… How is it controversial that I don't want someone to die in the hospital if they can't afford it?" Abughazaleh asked. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act is currently under consideration by a Republican-led White House and Congress. The president has championed the legislation as fulfilling his key campaign promises, including border security, American energy production and tax cuts. House Republicans have celebrated Medicaid reform included in the megabill, which they say eliminates waste, fraud and abuse in the welfare program to deliver for Americans who need coverage most. Removing illegal immigrants from Medicaid is one of the key provisions of that Medicaid reform. Meanwhile, Democrats have railed against possible Medicaid cuts since Trump was elected in November. Every House Democrat voted against the bill, and Democrats are already defining Medicaid cuts as a driving issue ahead of competitive midterm elections in 2026. The bill does not cut Medicaid for the most vulnerable, according to Rep. Erin Houchin, R-Ind., who served on three major committees leading budget markup in the reconciliation process. Houchin told Fox News Digital that targeting waste, fraud and abuse in the Medicaid program cuts benefits to illegal immigrants, those ineligible to receive benefits who are currently receiving benefits, duplicate enrollees in one or more states and those who are able-bodied but are choosing not to work. "Your bill is going to cut coverage for 11 million Americans and it'll still cost more than universal healthcare. Healthcare is a human right, you absolute ghouls," Abughazaleh said in response to a Republican National Committee (RNC) rapid response account calling her comments, "madness." Abughazaleh said she is running for the U.S. House of Representatives because, "Our leaders are out of touch." The young Democrat is challenging Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., who has served decades in congress. Abughazaleh is a former staffer for the progressive watchdog group, Media Matters, and a progressive influencer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store