logo
AI Could Be Harnessed to Cut More Emissions Than It Creates

AI Could Be Harnessed to Cut More Emissions Than It Creates

CLIMATEWIRE | Artificial intelligence could cut global climate pollution by up to 5.4 billion metric tons a year over the next decade if it's harnessed in ways that would improve transportation, energy and food production.
Those reductions would outweigh even the expected increase in global energy consumption and emissions that would be created by running power-hungry data centers associated with AI, according to research by the Grantham Research Institute that was published in the journal npj Climate Action.
'The key will be to channel practical AI applications towards key impact areas to accelerate the market adoption rate and efficiency of low-carbon solutions,' the study said, noting that governments will have a vital role to play.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
'Governments must regulate AI to minimise their environmental footprint,' the study said, pointing to the need for energy efficient AI models and the use of renewable energy to power data centers.
It also says governments should invest in AI infrastructure and education in developing countries, 'ensuring that the benefits of AI are shared equitably.'
The use of AI has boomed in recent years and President Donald Trump has made its expansion a priority as he seeks to outcompete China on advanced technologies. But its voracious use of energy has raised concerns about its climate impact, particularly as Trump and other officials argue that winning the race for AI is a reason to expand fossil fuels.
The International Energy Agency projects that by 2030 data centers will consume twice as much electricity as they do today. Growing energy demands are already challenging the U.S. grid, and oil companies are using AI to find new areas to drill. BloombergNEF has said fossil fuels will provide most of the new power for data centers over the next decade, imperiling efforts to cut carbon pollution.
There are ways to mitigate the damage, the Grantham study said.
It outlines five areas where AI can be harnessed to reduce emissions, including consumer behavior, energy management and technology innovation.
For example, AI can help integrate renewables into the grid by better forecasting supply and demand fluctuations and help the grid distribute energy more accurately, reducing concerns about intermittency. That can increase the uptake of solar and wind and lower the use of polluting backup power sources, the report said.
'Power grids are at the heart of the entire economy, so improving their efficiency reduces emissions across multiple sectors,' Roberta Pierfederici, a policy fellow at the Grantham Research Institute and author of the study, said in an email.
AI can also identify new types of protein to replace meat and dairy in human diets — industries that are heavy emitters. And it can improve transportation by lowering the cost of electric vehicles through battery improvements or encouraging people to switch to shared transport.
Those actions combined could reduce emissions by 3.2 billion to 5.4 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent annually by 2035 compared to their current trajectory, the study said. That's more than the entire European Union. By comparison, the U.S. released 6.2 billion metric tons of climate pollution in 2023.
Those cuts are not in line with what's needed to keep global temperatures from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius since the beginning of the industrial age. But they could keep a check on warming by more than offsetting the emissions released by using AI. The study estimated that energy emissions tied to data centers and AI will reach 0.4 billion to 1.6 billion metric tons of CO2 equivalent over the next decade.
The study does have its limitations, given how quickly the field of AI is changing. The authors acknowledged that they might have underestimated AI's potential to reduce emissions, because they only looked at how AI is applied currently to three sectors. On the other hand, the study didn't consider how energy efficiency gains from AI could lead to increased consumption elsewhere that could drive emissions up.
Pierfederici said while the rise in emissions from data centers is a valid concern, she believes the study makes a strong case for using AI to help tackle rising temperatures.
'That said, governments need to play an active role in guiding how AI is applied and governed, to make sure the downsides are managed effectively and the full potential of AI for climate action is realized,' she added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense
NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense

USA Today

time27 minutes ago

  • USA Today

NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense

While Trump got what he wanted at the brief NATO summit, his allies will be relieved he committed to the fundamental principle of collective defense. THE HAGUE, June 25 (Reuters) - NATO leaders on June 25 backed the big increase in defense spending that President Donald Trump had demanded, and restated their commitment to defend each other from attack. While Trump got what he wanted at the brief summit, tailor-made for him, his NATO allies will be relieved that he committed to the fundamental principle of collective defense after less clear-cut language on June 24. In a five-point statement, NATO endorsed a higher defence spending goal of 5% of GDP by 2035 - a response not only to Trump but also to Europeans' fears that Russia poses a growing threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. More: Israel-Iran ceasefire seems to hold as Trump lands in Europe for NATO summit The 32 allies' brief communique added: "We reaffirm our ironclad commitment to collective defense as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty – that an attack on one is an attack on all." Asked to clarify his own stance on Article 5, Trump said: "I stand with it. That's why I'm here. If I didn't stand with it, I wouldn't be here." Macron brings up trade war at NATO summit Trump had long demanded in no uncertain terms that for other countries step up their spending on defense to reduce NATO's heavy reliance on the U.S. Despite an appearance of general agreement, French President Emmanuel Macron raised the issue of the steep import tariffs threatened by Trump, and the damage they may do to transatlantic trade, as a barrier to increased defense spending. More: Can Trump pull off peace plans, trade deals at the G7? What to know about the summit "You cannot come to us as allies and ask that we spend more, tell us we will spend more at NATO - and do a trade war. It's an aberration," he told reporters. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who hosted the summit in his home city of The Hague, said NATO would emerge as a 'stronger, fairer and more lethal' alliance. He had earlier acknowledged that it was not easy for European countries and Canada to find the extra money, but said it was vital to do so. "There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that, given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative," the former Dutch prime minister told reporters in his home city of The Hague. The new spending target - to be achieved over the next 10 years - is a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal of 2% of GDP, although it will be measured differently. Countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5% on broader defence-related measures such as cyber security, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle heavy military vehicles. All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal and can meet its commitments by spending much less. More: Trump says US strike impaired Iran's nukes. What does Pentagon say? Live updates Rutte disputes that but accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly. Spain said on June 25 that it did not expect its stance to have any repercussions. Trump meets Zelenskyy after summit Rutte kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge to try to avert any friction with Trump. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had to settle for attending the pre-summit June 24 dinner rather than the main meeting on June 25, although he met Trump separately after the conference ended. The Kremlin on June 24 accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarization and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defense spending.

Why gasoline prices aren't tumbling along with sinking oil
Why gasoline prices aren't tumbling along with sinking oil

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why gasoline prices aren't tumbling along with sinking oil

Oil futures tumbled again Tuesday on hopes that the shaky ceasefire between Israel and Iran would reduce if not eliminate the risk any significant disruption to global energy markets. Gasoline futures fell, too. So when will you notice prices falling at the pump? It may be a while. Because gas prices didn't shoot significantly higher over the past two weeks after Israel and Iran began their recent hostilities, you probably won't notice any big savings anytime soon. The national average gasoline price stood at $3.12 on June 10 according to AAA, just before oil and gasoline prices started their climb on rising concerns about a conflict in the days before the fighting started between Israel and Iran. The so-called New York harbor prices for gasoline futures closed at a wholesale price of only $2.09. A barrel of Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil closed at $66.60 that day. Both wholesale gasoline and oil futures stared rising steadily June 11 and continued to climb through the early hours of trading this past Sunday night, after the US bombing of nuclear sites in Iran raised fears of a broader conflict. Brent Crude futures briefly topped $80 a barrel late Sunday. But throughout the day Monday as those fears of a wider conflict retreated and hopes for a cease fire increased, the price of oil started falling sharply. Oil Monday closed down 7% at $70.65 a barrel, while a so-called New York harbor prices for gasoline futures fell about 5% to a wholesale price of $2.22 a gallon. And the wholesale prices fell another 5% in midday trading Tuesday to a $2.09 price, essentially matching the price before the recent run-up. The AAA average retail price for a gallon of regular gasoline stood Monday at $3.22, based on a survey of gas stations conducted on Sunday, and it remains there in Tuesday's reading. But that means there was only a 3% rise in pump prices from June 10 to today's level, so there's not a lot of room for prices to fall to go back to pre-conflict levels. Tom Kloza, an independent oil and gasoline price expert, said he could see prices starting to decline a little bit in the coming days as stations take deliveries of cheaper wholesale gas. The seasonal pick-up in summer driving will stop prices from falling significantly in the coming weeks, he believes. But he does think that a glut of oil on global markets and strong US refining capacity could send prices down sharply through the rest of this year once the peak July demand wanes. 'It looks like we're well supplied, and that's bearish for prices,' he said. The strong supply has little to do with President Donald Trump's 'drill, baby, drill' call to increase production. Overall US production is roughly unchanged from this time last year and it's not likely to increase significantly at the current prices, Kloza said, especially with 50% tariffs on imported steel raising the cost of the pipes used in oil exploration. The price of oil futures did not spike as high as during some past global incidents, such as Russia's attack on Ukraine and the imposition of sanctions on Russia by western nations that followed. In that case Brent prices soared 44% from early January 2022 through early March of that year. But Kloza said there isn't as much speculative money in oil futures markets as there used to driving up prices in reaction to external events. 'That money is much more likely to go into crypto and to go into big tech today,' he said. 'There's only so much money to go around.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Mushy Wording Lets NATO Commit to Trump's Military Spending Demand
Mushy Wording Lets NATO Commit to Trump's Military Spending Demand

New York Times

time28 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Mushy Wording Lets NATO Commit to Trump's Military Spending Demand

NATO leaders agreed on Wednesday to a goal of spending 5 percent of their gross domestic product on defense. But that doesn't mean each member nation will actually spend that much. The difference lies in a bit of mushy diplomatic language that lets the NATO secretary general, Mark Rutte, claim that he delivered on a spending demand issued by President Trump. The brief and unanimously approved communiqué that NATO issued after leaders wrapped up their annual summit says that 'allies' — not 'all allies' — had agreed to the 5 percent figure. Mr. Trump floated that target, up from the current 2 percent, early this year in a push to have Europe and Canada spend more on their militaries instead of relying on the United States for security. At the time, few believed it was realistic, given that nine of NATO's 32 member countries still had not reached the 2 percent spending pledge that was set in 2014. Several were balking at the 5 percent commitment as recently as Wednesday, emboldened by an assertion last weekend by Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez of Spain that 'we're not going to do it.' Mr. Sanchez said Spain would spend 2.1 percent of its G.D.P. on defense, 'no more, no less,' because that was all his country needed to meet military capability targets set by NATO. Spain currently spends about 1.28 percent of G.D.P. on defense, according to the most recent official figures available. The language compromise, struck between Mr. Sanchez and Mr. Rutte last weekend, let both sides claim victory. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store