logo
New York May Soon Follow the Havana Model

New York May Soon Follow the Havana Model

Regarding Mary O'Grady's 'The Lure of Comrade Mamdani' (Americas, July 7): There is a solution to the problem of Zohran Mamdani potentially becoming mayor of New York. Cuba is already set up as the dream government for Mr. Mamdani. The framework for socialism is in place and working as expected. He will have his shared housing, bathrooms, laundry and government-run grocery stores.
Mr. Mamdani can tell everyone how to live there. Well-heeled voters who got him elected can easily afford to relocate to Cuba and live life in their socialist dream, and desperate Cubans yearning for freedom can move to New York. A win for everybody.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOGE Has Continued to Waste Billions While Saving Almost Nothing: Reports
DOGE Has Continued to Waste Billions While Saving Almost Nothing: Reports

Gizmodo

time23 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

DOGE Has Continued to Waste Billions While Saving Almost Nothing: Reports

The Trump Administration's Department of Government Efficiency has been a project largely defined by ever-diminishing expectations. At the outset of DOGE's journey, its chief operator, Elon Musk, famously claimed, in a bout of wild optimism, that he hoped to cut 'at least' $2 trillion out of the federal budget. Not long after the election, Musk reduced his ambitions to $1 trillion. Throughout the first few months of Trump's second term, DOGE claimed to be saving Americans billions, but analyses repeatedly showed the organization was wildly inflating its savings and often making rudimentary math mistakes. In May, the billionaire claimed that DOGE had saved Americans $160 billion, but admitted that his org was 'not as effective' as he'd hoped. At the time, the New York Times reported that DOGE had only publicly accounted for $58 billion of the savings Musk alleged and that even those purported savings had been 'significantly inflated, by including outright errors and guesses about the future.' Now, yet another fact-checking effort aimed at Musk's initiative has resulted in greatly reduced facts and figures. An analysis by Politico claims that, of some $52.8 billion that DOGE purports to have saved Americans by cancelling various government contracts, only a fraction appears to have been realized. The report states that, of the savings bragged about on DOGE's 'Wall of Receipts' website, only '$32.7 billion in actual claimed contract savings' could be verified. On top of that, the news outlet found that 'DOGE's savings over that period were closer to $1.4 billion.' Politico further notes that none of those savings will lower the federal deficit unless Congress steps in. Instead, the money went back to the respective agencies to which it had been allotted. In other words, DOGE basically did nothing. The apparent blunder was achieved through a poor grasp of timetables, the report claims: DOGE's savings calculations are based on faulty math. The group uses the maximum spending possible under each contract as its baseline — meaning all money an agency could spend in future fiscal years. That amount can far exceed what the government has actually committed to pay out. Counting this 'ceiling value' gives a false picture of savings for taxpayers. 'That's the equivalent of basically taking out a credit card with a $20,000 credit limit, canceling it and then saying, 'I've just saved $20,000,'' said Jessica Tillipman, associate dean for government procurement law studies at George Washington University Law School. 'Anything that's been said publicly about [DOGE's] savings is meaningless.' Also relevant is another recent report that claims DOGE spent substantially more money attempting to downsize government than it saved by destroying public programs. Authored by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the analysis claims that DOGE blew through some $21.7 billion in taxpayer money as it attempted to downsize the federal workforce. Between January and July, DOGE spent some $14.8 billion through its Deferred Resignation Program, which paid public employees 'not to work for up to eight months.' DOGE allegedly spent another $6 billion on '100,000 employees who have been involuntarily separated from federal service or who remain on prolonged periods of administrative leave pending separation, many of whom were paid to not do their jobs for weeks or months.' The organization spent hundreds of millions more on various inefficient and wasteful policies. The Senate committee notes that the amount that DOGE spent in this fashion is more than double the amount that DOGE has definitively culled from the government ($9 billion, via cuts to NPR, PBS, and foreign aid) through the rescission package voted for by Republicans this summer. Meanwhile, as DOGE has continued on with its questionable antics, its own staff have continued to suck taxpayer money out of the government. In March, NPR reported that $40 million in public funds had been apportioned for DOGE's activities, but much about the cost of the initiative remains unclear. That same month, Wired noted that some DOGE staffers were making six-figure government salaries for their slash-and-burn work. The money often appeared to be coming from the very agencies that DOGE was butchering, the outlet noted. If both the recent studies are accurate, they reveal the very ironic contours of DOGE and its activities—an organization that claims to be rooting out governmental waste and fraud, but whose operations appear wasteful and whose public statements are frequently, according to many journalistic analyses, fraudulent. At this point, it's unclear what the heck DOGE is even doing. The organization isn't dead, but with the loss of its Supreme Leader (Musk), its mandate has become increasingly unclear, and its activities are now shrouded in mystery. Like a computer virus, the organization continues to worm its way through the bureaucracy's guts, servicing nebulous projects, like the creation of a national citizenship database that has alarmed privacy activists. Some of DOGE's former members continue to prove useful to the administration in other ways. Last week, the 19-year-old former DOGE-ling known as 'Big Balls' (real name Edward Coristine) managed to get punched in the face by a group of juveniles while out for a stroll in the nation's capital, according to Washington D.C. police. The spectacle of Coristine's bloodied visage was shared widely on Musk's X platform and other social media sites, and the incident has since served as a justification for Trump's authoritarian-style federalization of local police forces in D.C. The episode shows that, while DOGE has been an utter trainwreck from a governance and policy standpoint, it continues to serve certain functions deemed critical to the success of the current regime: namely, those of the public relations (i.e., propaganda) department.

Reverse non-dom crackdown to get Britain building, Reeves urged
Reverse non-dom crackdown to get Britain building, Reeves urged

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Reverse non-dom crackdown to get Britain building, Reeves urged

Rachel Reeves has been urged to scrap her controversial non-dom tax crackdown to lure foreign billionaires back to invest in Britain's much-needed building projects. Leo Quinn, the chief executive of construction giant Balfour Beatty, said the Chancellor's abolition of the non-dom regime had driven away crucial investment from the nation's infrastructure. Mr Quinn said: 'London's the best city on the planet and what we should be doing is attracting all these billionaires and wealthy families here ... because what they bring with them and the investments they make is phenomenal. 'I'm hoping that one [minister] will see the light and say, 'Maybe we've gone a little bit too far in what we've done around non-doms ... and we'll look to mitigate some of those rules.'' The Chancellor scrapped the non-dom status in April, a move widely blamed for chasing some of Britain's wealthiest people out of the country. High-profile exits that followed the tax changes include Richard Gnodde, a Goldman Sachs banker, Aston Villa co-owner Nassef Sawiris and John Fredriksen, a Norwegian shipping magnate. Mr Quinn, 68, said Britain was missing out on opportunities to attract wealthy businesspeople to invest in projects where they could 'take a long view' of the possible profits. 'The Government could do more to increase investment here, and there's huge opportunities to bring investment into the infrastructure market,' said Mr Quinn, who is stepping down after a decade at the company. His comments come as figures show foreign investment into Britain plummeted to a record low last year, despite ministers' efforts to drum up cash from overseas. The number of inbound foreign direct investment projects dropped by 12pc to 1,375, its lowest point since records began in 2008, according to data from the Department for Business and Trade. In a trading update, Balfour Beatty said the Government's efforts to speed up infrastructure developments had buoyed half-year profits, which rose 18pc to £132m. The company's projects include the £833m Net Zero Teesside carbon capture project and the Sizewell C nuclear plant, for which Balfour Beatty will deliver a third of the main civil engineering works. A Treasury spokesman said it was attracting 'record investment to our shores' and providing investors with 'direction and clarity on our priorities for major projects'. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Charlie Kirk, Trump Jr. warn of 'really hard times' ahead as Mamdani energizes progressive base
Charlie Kirk, Trump Jr. warn of 'really hard times' ahead as Mamdani energizes progressive base

Fox News

time2 hours ago

  • Fox News

Charlie Kirk, Trump Jr. warn of 'really hard times' ahead as Mamdani energizes progressive base

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk and President Donald Trump's sons are sounding the alarm on New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's candidacy as the progressive socialist candidate climbs in the polls. "This is a Bolshevik type of group, and I say that with intentionality because they're radical," Kirk said of Mamdani's inner circle Wednesday on "Fox & Friends," drawing comparison to the revolutionary group that took over Russia in 1917 and overthrew the existing government. "This is not part of the Democrat establishment," he added. "They want to go even further than what Zohran Mamdani has talked about." A New York Times report from Tuesday homed in on the Democratic nominee's inner circle, a team built around progressive ideals like free buses and rent freezes. Many of the ideas have been crafted with help from young advisors who share Mamdani's Democratic Socialists of America roots. Kirk said the team's makeup signals that the Democratic Party's progressive base is ready to "roar" after nearly a decade of being sidelined by the establishment. At the same time, polling suggests Mamdani is likely to crush the competition, comprised of Republican Curtis Sliwa as well as incumbent Mayor Eric Adams and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who are both running as independents. In a Siena College poll released Tuesday, Mamdani held a 19-point lead over Cuomo (44% and 25%, respectively), followed by Sliwa (12%) and Adams (7%). Donald Trump, Jr. and Eric Trump also weighed in on Mamdani, Wednesday, reacting to his anti-Trump tour through the boroughs. "This is a city, these are the markets, this is the New York Stock Exchange, this is the Nasdaq," said Eric Trump. "This is the epitome of capitalism around the world, and the guy's coming out and actively saying that he wants to shut down capitalism. It's the antithesis of what New York City is." Donald Trump, Jr. warned that Mamdani's economic proposals — particularly higher taxes on top earners — would drive wealth and jobs out of the city, taking much of the tax base with them. "You lose 10,000, 15,000 of those ultra-high net-worth individuals, this city is in serious trouble, and no amount of free stuff being promised is going to actually help it…" he warned. "If he wins, he's going to be great for the rest of the country in the future. Because New York City is going to go through some really hard times, and people are going to stop playing with this ridiculous experiment of communism and socialism that has not worked anywhere else in the world." Fox News Digital reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment but did not receive a reply in time for publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store