
Why is Trump rewriting US economic history? Anyone?
President Donald Trump wants Americans to see history his way, historians be damned.
On the one hand, Trump is actively trying to forbid any reevaluation of American racial history, on campuses and in museums, to spare the country any 'national shame' for its stained past.
On the other hand, he is actively rewriting economic history to convince Americans that everything they've been taught is wrong and that his jarring new tariff policy won't be the largest tax hike in American history, as some economists and fellow Republicans argue.
The accepted version of history, which you might, or might not, recall from Ben Stein's history teacher in 'Ferris Bueller's Day Off,' is that Congress raised tariffs with the Smoot-Hawley tariff act in 1930 in an effort to 'alleviate the effects of the Great Depression.'
'Did it work?' Stein asked the class. 'Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work and the United States, sank deeper into the Great Depression.'
Trump took the opposite view Wednesday, telling Americans that if only Congress had stuck to tariffs, the Great Depression 'would have been a much different story.'
That Trump should need to goose up the facts to re-educate the population maybe shouldn't be surprising from the leader of a movement built on a backward-looking promise to make the country 'great again.'
'We have a 20th century president in a 21st century economy who wants to take us back to the 19th century,' wrote Douglas Irwin, a Dartmouth economics professor, on X.
Irwin is the author of multiple books, including 'Clashing over Commerce: A History of US Trade Policy.' We talked last year, when he gave me a crash course in US tariff history that bore almost no resemblance to what Trump told Americans on Wednesday.
Here's a look at how Trump described history, with some added context.
'From 1789 to 1913, we were a tariff-backed nation, and the United States was proportionately the wealthiest it has ever been.'
Trump
Trump didn't say what he meant by 'proportionately the wealthiest,' but by any standard definition of the word wealth, he's not on solid ground.
By the numbers, the US today is an extremely wealth country, as former Sen. Pat Toomey, a Republican, explained on Fox Business as he trashed Trump's tariff plan.
'For all this discussion about how badly we've been abused and ripped off and how terrible it's been, well, we're the world's biggest economy with four percent of the world's population,' Toomey said. 'We have 25 percent of the world's economic output. We are the biggest agricultural exporter in the world. We – our manufacturing, domestic manufacturing is at an all-time high. We're doing it with fewer workers, mostly because automation has allowed us to do it much more productively.'
Americans are wealthy in terms of a standard of living. Most people today have indoor toilets, air conditioning, access to modern grocery stores, vaccines and carry a super computer around in their pocket. Back then, pretty much nobody had any of those things.
There was no Medicare of Social Security, so older people were left to fend for themselves at a level modern Americans would not understand.
'In the 1880s, they established a commission to decide what they were going to do with the vast sums of money they were collecting. We were collecting so much money so fast, we didn't know what to do with it. Isn't that a nice problem to have?'
Trump
It's not clear what commission Trump is referring to. A tariff commission in 1883 under President Chester A. Arthur recommended lowering tariffs, but was ignored by Congress. The Constitution puts Congress in charge of tariffs, but lawmakers have, over the years, handed much of this authority to the president.
Surpluses of the 1880s probably had more to do with the government being much smaller. Things like Medicare and Social Security, the biggest drain on US tax dollars today, did not exist and the US military, the largest recipient of discretionary funding, was a fraction of what it is today.
Trump has also lionized President William McKinley, who before he was president pushed for the McKinley Tariff, by which Congress raised tariffs in the 1890s. Voters perceived the tariff as benefiting the wealthy and Republicans subsequently lost the House in one of the biggest power swings in US history.
The Stanford professor emeritus Richard White told me in a Q&A about the Gilded Age that there are structural differences between the country in the 19th Century and the country today that make these comparisons extremely difficult to make.
'One of the things McKinley was trying to do, and the Republicans were trying to do, was to raise the tariff in order to reduce the federal deficit by making the tariffs so high, it would take down tax revenue because they really were worried about the deflation that was coming with the Gold Standard,' White said.
'Now we're in a very different situation, because now we have great deficits and the idea that the tariff is going to bring in revenue is really not something that's going to happen,' White added.
In the 1880s, the US was rapidly industrializing and many other countries, which are industrializing today, were not yet on that path.
'Then in 1913, for reasons unknown to mankind, they established the income tax so that citizens, rather than foreign countries, would start paying the money necessary to run our government.'
Trump
The reasons for the income tax are pretty simple. Congress tried to establish an income tax earlier in a bill where it tried to lower tariffs, according to the National Archives. But the Supreme Court struck the income tax down. Earlier in US history, an income tax had been temporarily enacted to pay for the Civil War. Enacting a Constitutional Amendment requires the assent of three quarters of states, so this was the will of the majority at the time.
Trump frequently says foreign countries pay tariffs. It's not true. US importers pay them, but really US consumers and businesses end up footing the bill.
'Then in 1929, it all came to a very abrupt end with the Great Depression, and it would have never happened if they had stayed with the tariff policy. It would have been a much different story.'
Trump
He must be referring here to the aforementioned Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, passed not long after the 1929 stock market crash, according to the National Archives, which notes that historians debate what role the Smoot-Hawley tariff, or already in-place tariffs played in causing or deepening the Great Depression.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
7 top crypto ETFs: The best funds for investing in Bitcoin, Ethereum and more
Bitcoin has hit a number of all-time highs in 2025, and the Trump administration is prioritizing rules that open up the crypto world to more investment, including creating the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. So it's no surprise that traders have been actively pushing up crypto prices on the positive shift in sentiment. But how do investors without crypto accounts — or those who are wary of dodgy cryptocurrency exchanges — get a piece of the cryptocurrency market? Simple. Crypto ETFs give anyone with a traditional brokerage account the ability to get exposure to the most popular cryptocurrencies — and more ETFs are on the way to the market. If you're looking to trade crypto through ETFs, it's vital to know exactly what's under the hood of the ETF, and that may not always be obvious by the fund's name. Broadly, traders have several types of crypto funds, depending on what they own. Direct ownership of cryptocurrencies: These ETFs — called spot ETFs — own cryptocurrencies, meaning their shares represent real stakes in the cryptocurrency. These funds closely track the price moves of their cryptocurrency. These funds tend to have relatively low management expenses (i.e. low expense ratios). Indirect exposure to cryptocurrencies: These ETFs use financial derivatives such as futures contracts, to mimic the cryptocurrency's performance. These funds may move in the direction of the cryptocurrency but often don't closely track the crypto's moves. These funds tend to have higher fees, because of the costs of trading. Some funds may try to double the performance of Bitcoin using derivatives, though at greater risk and cost. Options strategies with cryptocurrencies: Some newer funds may own spot ETFs and use options to generate income from the highly volatile asset, and then pay out that income as dividends to shareholders. These funds also have higher fees. Direct ownership of crypto- or blockchain-related stocks: Some crypto ETFs may invest in stocks of companies that profit on blockchain or other crypto-related companies. This ETF will track the fund's stocks and not really the performance of a cryptocurrency. These funds may have lower expense ratios, but you'll need to check each fund's fees. While ETFs owning Bitcoin, the most popular cryptocurrency, had existed for a few years before 2024, that year saw a big development as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved trading in spot Bitcoin ETFs in January and then spot Ethereum ETFs later on. These spot ETFs allow investors to earn virtually the same return as the underlying crypto coin, since they own the cryptocurrency directly. So they're a great pick if you want to invest in these top crypto assets without having to open an account at a crypto exchange and deal with the headaches of handling the coins yourself. The fund company safeguards the crypto, and since ETFs are listed on the exchange, you can work with any of the best online brokers to buy them. For now, only Bitcoin and Ethereum are approved for spot ETFs, but that could change soon, as the crypto-friendly administration of President Donald Trump eases regulations on the sector. Already, dozens of applications for other crypto ETFs have been submitted, and funds for two of the most popular cryptocurrencies — Solana and Avalanche — are among the applicants. So investors may soon have a low-cost way to wager on the prices of many more cryptocurrencies. Below are some top cryptocurrency funds, including what the funds own, how much they charge (as a percentage of your investment) and how they may perform. The funds all feature low expense ratios. ETF (ticker) What it owns Expense ratio How it may perform iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) Bitcoin 0.25% Tracks the returns of Bitcoin closely. Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) Bitcoin 0.19% Tracks the returns of Bitcoin closely. Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) Bitcoin 0.25% Tracks the returns of Bitcoin closely. Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) Ethereum 0.20% Tracks the returns of Ethereum closely. Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) Ethereum 0.19% Tracks the returns of Ethereum closely. iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) Ethereum 0.25% Tracks the returns of Ethereum closely. VanEck Digital Transformation ETF(DAPP) Blockchain-related stocks 0.51% Tracks a set of blockchain stocks such as crypto exchanges. The expense ratios for the Bitcoin and Ethereum funds are low, particularly given the relatively high costs of trading cryptocurrency directly, even at some of the best crypto apps and exchanges. A $10,000 investment in the iShares Bitcoin Trust, the largest spot Bitcoin fund by assets, costs $25 per year, and you pay a proportional share of that each day you own the fund. As you can see in the table, the first three funds are all spot Bitcoin ETFs, so they own the crypto directly and the fund performs almost exactly like the cryptocurrency itself. Similarly, the Ethereum funds here are all spot funds, so they closely track the price of Ethereum. So they're a good substitute for trading these cryptocurrencies on your own through an exchange. Here are more of the best Bitcoin ETFs and best Ethereum ETFs. The final fund invests in blockchain and related crypto and infrastructure companies such as crypto exchange Coinbase and Strategy, a company that invests in Bitcoin directly through an elaborate process that could significantly magnify the returns, albeit at much greater risk. Returns at this crypto fund will reflect the weighted average performance of the fund's stocks, and it won't track any cryptocurrency directly, though it may rise and fall with the crypto market. Traders looking to buy a crypto ETF should know exactly what the fund owns so they can get the type of exposure and investment that they actually want. Each fund must report exactly how it's investing its money, so a quick search for the fund will tell you its specific strategy and what kinds of assets it owns — actual cryptocurrency, spot ETFs, futures contracts or stocks. Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
Three Days of Protest in L.A.
An extraordinary weekend of protest ignited in Los Angeles after federal immigration authorities conducted a series of immigration raids across the region Friday. Over the next two days, the protests were limited in size and occurred only in a few pockets of the area. But in some of the clashes with demonstrators, law enforcement officers responded with crowd-control munitions, tear gas and flash-bang grenades. President Trump activated the California National Guard without the assent of Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday, an unusual move the governor described as 'intentionally designed to inflame the situation.' By Sunday, several hundred troops had been dispatched to the city as protesters gathered outside a detention center in downtown Los Angeles, though most troops appeared not to engage with protesters. City and state leaders condemned the deployment, including Mayor Karen Bass, who called it 'a chaotic escalation.' But Ms. Bass also urged protesters to follow the law and said not all demonstrators had been entirely peaceful. Some defaced self-driving Waymo cars and a group ventured onto the 101 freeway, bringing traffic to a halt. Outside of downtown, life went on as normal in most parts of the city. But Mr. Trump painted a darker picture, saying the city had been 'invaded and occupied' and any efforts to impede federal immigration officials would be seen as a 'form of rebellion.' Sunday, June 8 Waymo self driving cars were vandalized and set on fire as protests intensified. Officers from the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the city police department all worked to contain the unrest. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's First Words at Kennedy Center Dinner Were a Diss
President Donald Trump kicked off a Monday dinner for the Kennedy Center board with a dig at their own organization. 'What a group of good friends,' Trump said of Kennedy Center's leadership as he took the podium at the White House event. 'We're gonna bring this place back. It's not so good. I thought it was gonna be beautiful.' The president appeared to be recounting his visit to the legendary arts hub in March, when he lamented that it was in 'tremendous disrepair' and went on a litany of everything he wanted to see changed, from the decor to the seats. The Kennedy Center has been one of many tense battlegrounds in Trump's bid to remake the federal government in his image. In February, he fired the institution's board members to name himself chair and install high-profile MAGA figures such as Laura Ingraham and Richard Grenell. 'The Kennedy Center was in dire shape,' Trump told the new board on Monday. 'It's been neglected very badly, and it needs an infusion of different things, including probably funds. But I think we're going to do very well when we get some money from Congress to fix it, because it's so important.' The president accused Kennedy Center's previous leadership of wasting millions of dollars on 'rampant political propaganda, DEI, and inappropriate shows.' 'Who thinks of these ideas?' he asked, drawing laughter from the crowd. 'It's different. We're bringing our country back so fast.' Trump, a longtime Broadway fan, earlier identified his favorites, including Cats and The Phantom of the Opera, as examples of 'non-woke' shows that he wanted to promote. The Kennedy Center's new lineup, unveiled Monday, includes The Outsiders, Spamalot, Back to the Future, and Moulin Rouge. Chicago and Mrs. Doubtfire, shows that feature characters usually played by a man crossdressing as a woman, will also be coming to the arts institution, despite Trump's earlier comments criticizing the Kennedy Center for having 'featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth.' Trump touted that the Kennedy Center has so far balanced its budget, 'eliminated DEI initiatives in all cases, brought back family-friendly programming that will attract large audiences once again, and launched a plan to renovate the building and reclaim the grandeur as a landmark really a Washington landmark—which it always was.'