logo
Democrats fret about national fallout after Mamdani stuns in New York City

Democrats fret about national fallout after Mamdani stuns in New York City

Yahoo10 hours ago

NEW YORK (AP) — The stunning success of Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old self-described democratic socialist, in the race for New York City mayor has exposed anew the fiery divisions plaguing the Democratic Party as it struggles to repair its brand nearly half a year into Donald Trump's presidency.
A fresh round of infighting erupted among Democratic officials, donors and political operatives on Wednesday, a day after Mamdani's leading opponent, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, conceded the Democratic primary. Mamdani appears on a glide path to the nomination, though ranked choice vote counting will determine the final outcome next week.
Many progressives cheered the emergence of the young and charismatic Mamdani, whose candidacy caught on with viral campaign videos and a focus on the cost of living. But the party's more pragmatic wing cast the outcome as a serious setback in their quest to broaden Democrats' appeal and move past the more controversial policies that alienated would-be voters in recent elections.
Indeed, Wednesday's debate was about much more than who would lead America's largest city for the next four years.
Giddy Republicans viewed Mamdani's success as a political gift that would help shape elections across New Jersey and Virginia this fall and into next year's midterms. And while such predictions are premature, national conservative media focused on the New York election with fresh zeal, suggesting that Mamdani's emerging profile as a prominent Democratic leader will surely grow.
Trump took aim at Mamdani on social media, calling him 'a 100% Communist Lunatic.'
'We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous," the president wrote. 'Yes, this is a big moment in the History of our Country.'
Some Democrats think so, too.
Lawrence Summers, the Treasury Secretary under former Democratic President Barack Obama, aired dire concerns on social media.
'I am profoundly alarmed about the future of the (Democratic Party) and the country" because of the New York City results, Summers wrote.
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who had endorsed Mamdani, scoffed at such Democratic critics and instead called for them to follow Mamdani's lead.
'In many ways, Mamdani's campaign really shows the direction in which the Democratic Party should be moving. And that is not to worry about what billionaires want, but to worry about what working-class people want," Sanders told The Associated Press.
The Vermont senator warned Republicans against premature celebration.
'People like Mamdani are their worst nightmares," Sanders said of the GOP. 'It's one thing for the Democrats to be strongly against Donald Trump. It is another thing to give working class people something to vote for — a positive agenda."
Assuming Mamdani ultimately is the Democratic nominee, he would move to a November election against embattled Mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent, Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa and maybe even Cuomo again, should he also choose to run as an independent.
A member of the New York state Legislature since 2021, Mamdani won over Democratic primary voters with an optimistic message centered on the cost-of-living backed by a sprawling grassroots campaign that brought out thousands of volunteers across the city's five boroughs. Initial precinct data shows that he did well in the city's wealthier enclaves while Cuomo struggled in all but majority Black and orthodox Jewish neighborhoods, along with the more conservative Staten Island.
Mamdani's rise was aided by Cuomo's baggage. The 67-year-old Democrat was trying to mount a political comeback from a sexual harassment scandal that forced him to resign the governorship in 2021.
Mamdani has had to sidestep a field of landmines of his own making, centered on his policies and political rhetoric.
He called the New York Police Department 'racist, anti-queer and a major threat to public safety' in a 2020 social media post. As a mayoral candidate, he softened his stance and said that the police served a vital role. Still, he pushed for the creation of a new public safety department that would rely more on mental health care services and outreach workers.
On Israel's war in Gaza, he used the term 'genocide' to describe Israel's actions in the conflict. In the primary's closing stretch, Mamdani also defended the phrase ' globalize the intifada,' which he described as 'a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.'
He also faced criticism over his identity as a democratic socialist, a label he refused to back away from.
Mamdani's agenda includes free city bus service, free child care, government-run grocery stores, a rent freeze for people living in rent-regulated apartments and new affordable housing — all paid for by raising taxes on the rich.
Matt Bennett, co-founder of the centrist Democratic group Third Way, warned that Mamdani's policies are a political problem for the Democratic Party.
'The fact that Mamdani is young, charismatic, a great communicator — all of those things are to be emulated,' Bennett said. 'His ideas are bad. ... And his affiliation with the (Democratic Socialists of America) is very dangerous. It's already being weaponized by the Republicans.'
Mamdani's age and ethnic background also earned praise from allies across the country. He would be the youngest New York City mayor in more than a century and its first Muslim and Indian American mayor if elected.
After keeping quiet on Mamdani throughout his primary campaign, three of New York's top Democrats, Gov. Kathy Hochul, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, praised the progressive upstart but stopped short of endorsing him after his victory seemed assured.
The Democratic leaders, largely considered moderates, applauded his focus on affordability and said they had spoken with him, although none explicitly said they would support him in the November general election.
Mamdani's Democratic critics feared that he would make their task this fall and in next year's midterm elections, which will decide the balance of power in Congress, even more difficult.
The group, Republicans Against Trumpism, a key Democratic ally in the 2024 election, predicted that Republicans would make Mamdani 'the face of the Democratic Party, hurting moderates in swing districts and Democrats' chances of taking back the House.'
In a Wednesday radio interview with WNYC, Mamdani acknowledged that his contest had become part of the national debate.
'It has been tempting I think for some to claim as if the party has gone too left,' he said. 'When in fact what has occurred for far too long is the abandonment of the same working-class voters who then abandoned this party."
___
Associated Press writers Matt Brown and Joey Cappelletti in Washington and Jill Colvin in New York contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court has 6 cases to decide, including birthright citizenship
Supreme Court has 6 cases to decide, including birthright citizenship

Associated Press

time19 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Supreme Court has 6 cases to decide, including birthright citizenship

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is in the final days of a term that has lately been dominated by the Trump administration's emergency appeals of lower court orders seeking to slow President Donald Trump's efforts to remake the federal government. But the justices also have six cases to resolve that were argued between January and mid-May. One of the argued cases was an emergency appeal, the administration's bid to be allowed to enforce Trump's executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally. The remaining opinions will be delivered Friday, Chief Justice John Roberts said. On Thursday, a divided court allowed states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood amid a wider Republican-backed push to defund the country's biggest abortion provider. Here are some of the biggest remaining cases: Trump's birthright citizenship order has been blocked by lower courts The court rarely hears arguments over emergency appeals, but it took up the administration's plea to narrow orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the U.S. The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. At arguments last month, the court seemed intent on keeping a block on the citizenship restrictions while still looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders. It was not clear what such a decision might look like, but a majority of the court expressed concerns about what would happen if the administration were allowed, even temporarily, to deny citizenship to children born to parents who are in the country illegally. Democratic-led states, immigrants and rights groups who sued over Trump's executive order argued that it would upset the settled understanding of birthright citizenship that has existed for more than 125 years. The court seems likely to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. The school district introduced the storybooks in 2022, with such titles as 'Prince and Knight' and 'Uncle Bobby's Wedding.' The case is one of several religious rights cases at the court this term. The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries. A three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana is making its second trip to the Supreme Court Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are weighing whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act. Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. A three-judge court found that the state relied too heavily on race in drawing the district, rejecting Louisiana's arguments that politics predominated, specifically the preservation of the seats of influential members of Congress, including Speaker Mike Johnson. The Supreme Court ordered the challenged map to be used last year while the case went on. Lawmakers only drew that map after civil rights advocates won a court ruling that a map with one Black majority district likely violated the landmark voting rights law. The justices are weighing a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking. The justices appeared open to upholding the law, though they also could return it to a lower court for additional work. Some justices worried the lower court hadn't applied a strict enough legal standard in determining whether the Texas law and others like that could run afoul of the First Amendment.

Trump judge picks advance
Trump judge picks advance

Politico

time23 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump judge picks advance

Senate Republicans are facing major new issues with their domestic policy megabill after the chamber's parliamentarian advised senators that several provisions they are counting on to reap hundreds of billions of dollars in budget savings won't be able to pass along party lines. Those include major pieces of Medicaid policy, including a politically explosive plan to hold down Medicaid costs by cracking down on a state provider tax — a provision that is expected to have a nine-figure impact on the bill. Republicans now will have to try to rewrite major sections of their Finance bill or potentially leave out key policies. The decisions were detailed in a Thursday morning memo from Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee. Other provisions now at risk include several GOP proposals to exclude undocumented residents from Medicaid, including by withholding federal funds from states that make them eligible for benefits. The rulings come at a critical time for Senate Majority Leader John Thune and other GOP leaders, who are already facing a revolt inside their conference from members wary of the practical and political impacts of the Medicaid changes. Some GOP members have proposed reverting to a less drastic House plan, which would merely freeze the existing provider taxes, though it's unclear if that provision could also pass muster under Senate rules. Even though the ruling is a setback for Republicans — and to their timeline for taking an initial vote on Friday — they were aware based on private conversations with parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough that parts of their initial plan were at risk of running aground of the chamber's rules. Republicans view the hurdle right now as 'technical' and are optimistic they will be able to get modified language into the bill. The revised language will still have to be blessed by the parliamentarian as complying with the chamber's rules. 'We knew that it was going to be an interesting conversation and we didn't know for sure how she was going to come down on it. But there are things that we can do, there are other ways of getting to that same outcome,' Thune said on Thursday morning, adding that Republicans might not ultimately get 'everything that we want' on the provider tax but will hopefully be able to salvage 'most of the reforms.' Some House Republicans are calling for Senate leadership to overrule the parliamentarian, an unprecedented step. 'The Senate Parliamentarian is not elected. She is not accountable to the American people,' Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) posted on X. 'Yet she holds veto power over legislation supported by millions of voters.' Senate GOP leadership has repeatedly shot down that idea and Thune reiterated on Thursday morning that they wouldn't overrule the parliamentarian. Democrats took a victory lap after the ruling, noting the rulings blew a $250 billion hole in the megabill's savings. 'Democrats fought and won, striking healthcare cuts from this bill that would hurt Americans walking on an economic tightrope,' said Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) in a statement. The parliamentarian also ruled early Thursday against a Republican proposal to prohibit plans from not getting certain Obamacare payments if they cover abortion. There are 12 states that currently require such coverage and insurers have worried they don't have enough time to implement the payment change before the start of open enrollment. There remain some outstanding policies, such as Republicans' effort to defund Planned Parenthood and removal of a nursing home staffing rule. Republicans still aren't closing the door to taking a first vote on Friday. One person granted anonymity to discuss the schedule insisted that the parliamentarian's decision is 'not as fatal as Dems are portraying it to be' and that 'Friday still not off the table.

New UNH poll reveals how New Hampshire residents feel about Big Beautiful Bill
New UNH poll reveals how New Hampshire residents feel about Big Beautiful Bill

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New UNH poll reveals how New Hampshire residents feel about Big Beautiful Bill

New Hampshire residents do not want Congress to pass President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending legislation, known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' reveals a new poll from the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. The bill, which includes major changes to taxes and social safety net programs that have the potential to affect millions of Americans, is currently being negotiated on in the Senate. Trump has requested a July 4 deadline for passage. But it's facing blowback around the country, as less than 30% of voters support the bill in three recent national polls by Pew, Quinnipiac and the Washington Post-Ipsos. This trend is seen in New Hampshire, too, where only 33% of residents want Congress to pass the bill. A majority (56%) want Congress to block it, including 90% of Democrats and 72% of Independents. In comparison, 64% of Republicans want the bill to be passed. The poll was based on the results of 1,320 surveys completed online from June 19 to June 23, 2025. The margin of error is 2.7%. Out of the provisions in the bill surveyed, New Hampshire residents only supported one: to remove taxes on tips and overtime. The poll found 60% of Granite Staters support this provision, which would allow tipped employees like waiters and hairstylists, as well as workers who are paid overtime, to claim a new tax deduction through 2028. But New Hampshire residents largely disapprove of the other provisions in the House-passed bill, including work requirements for Medicaid, making the 2017 tax cuts permanent, removing electric vehicle and solar energy tax credits and banning state regulation of artificial intelligence for 10 years. The AI provision is the least popular, with just 24% in support. However, when divided by party, Republicans in New Hampshire are supportive of work requirements for Medicaid, permanent 2017 tax cuts and removing EV and solar energy tax credits. Granite Staters are also worried about the $2.8 trillion increase that the U.S. Congressional Budget Office estimated the bill is expected to have on the federal budget deficit over the next 10 years. In total, 85% of New Hampshire residents said they are concerned about the deficit, including 86% of Democrats, 82% of Independents and 87% of Republicans. Per the poll, 55% of New Hampshire residents disapprove of Trump's handling of his job as president while 45% approve, giving him a net approval rating of -10. This is unchanged from his approval in May. Of those who approve of Trump's performance, 28% cite handling of immigration, 16% say they think he's kept his campaign promises, and 11% say his handling of the economy. Of those who disapprove, 19% say they believe Trump is undermining democracy, 11% because they think he has poor character, and 10% say his handling of the economy. Overall, 56% of Granite Staters disapprove of Trump's handling of the economy, while 44% approve. His net approval on this issue (-12) is down from May (-9), and much lower than February (-2). Trump's approval on immigration has also slightly decreased following ICE protests in Los Angeles. 54% of Granite Staters disapprove of his handling of immigration, according to the poll, up from 51% in April. Nearly all Democrats disapprove while nearly all Republicans approve. The poll reveals that 53% of Granite Staters have an unfavorable opinion of Elon Musk, up from 44% in April. Despite Musk's feud with Trump in early June, 64% of Republicans have a favorable opinion of Musk, virtually unchanged since April (62%). However, his unfavorability has increased greatly among Democrats and Independents. 49% of New Hampshire residents also believe that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency has had a negative effect on the federal government, versus 40% who think it has had a positive effect. This article originally appeared on Portsmouth Herald: New poll: How do NH residents feel about Trump's Big Beautiful Bill?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store