Paul Vallas: We must not allow a repeat of 2020 George Floyd protests in Chicago
Events in Los Angeles have justifiably raised concerns about demonstrations spreading across the country, and Chicago must be prepared for the possibility of violent protests opposed to Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions. To avoid repeating the mistakes of 2020, the city, county and state governments must take proactive steps to ensure the safety of residents and law enforcement.
The city cannot afford a repeat of the George Floyd civil unrest of 2020. The lack of preparedness was well documented in the Chicago Office of Inspector General's February 2021 report. The OIG found that despite advance warning of large-scale protests following the Minneapolis police murder of Floyd, the Chicago Police Department was underequipped and unprepared to respond to the scale of the protests and unrest.
Much of downtown, as well as many commercial strips and other areas of Chicago, haven't fully recovered from the participants who turned destructive in late May through early June 2020, or the second wave of unrest in August, which erupted after police shot a man in Englewood. The first wave of unrest cost downtown businesses over $66 million, with 2,100 buildings damaged and looted and 71 set on fire. Downtown cannot survive another such episode.
There is additional cause for concern in Chicago due to the incendiary language used by some state and local political leaders. Mayor Brandon Johnson's racially divisive rhetoric has become a political calling card. Johnson's condemnation of recent ICE operations and his calls for protest amount to a political call to arms.
Not to be outdone, Gov. JB Pritzker in February compared President Donald Trump's administration and its supporters to the Nazi regime and in an April speech in New Hampshire called for 'mass protests,' saying 'it's time to fight everywhere, and all at once.' Such language appeals to the worst instincts of the radicals among the Democrats.
City, county and state governments should take the following steps to ensure the safety of residents and law enforcement.
Most importantly, Johnson must support police Superintendent Larry Snelling's request for the authority to call a snap curfew in emergencies and direct city agencies to confiscate vehicles and other personal property from those who engage in disruptive behavior.
Editorial: MAGA morphs into Make America Cruel AgainIn the longer term, the City Council would do well to reconsider enacting a city nuisance ordinance that would punish anyone rioting, looting, obstructing the public way, disrupting traffic, physically assaulting a police officer or even publicly calling for such behavior. Police would have the power to ticket, impound vehicles, confiscate personal property, revoke licenses and levy heavy fines. The city could also sue in cases of serious property or economic damage.
It is true that there are always groups willing to take advantage of legitimate protests to incite violence and individuals ready to use the opportunity to loot and steal. This was clearly evident during the Floyd protests. The state and city should approach preparations for the worst with the same urgency they gave to protecting the Democratic National Convention — deploying extra officers, enforcing the law more strictly, issuing tickets and fines, and confiscating vehicles.
This is about ensuring that the city and state are always prepared for the worst, so that no individual or group can exploit citizens' constitutional right to dissent. The state and city are well equipped to protect these rights and to keep any situation from escalating to the point in which even the governor would consider deploying the National Guard — something I, as a 13-year member, would strongly advise against.
City and state leaders need to prepare now to address any crisis without resorting to the National Guard and to send a clear message that violating people's rights will have consequences. The ICE crackdown on people living in the country illegally will be just one of many issues that may lead to protests in the coming years. City and state leaders must be prepared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth won't commit to following court rulings on troops in LA
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth refused to commit to following federal court or Supreme Court rulings regarding the Pentagon's extraordinary deployment of National Guard members and Marines into Los Angeles. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pressed Hegseth on the question, which he repeatedly dodged. 'What I will tell you is my job right now is to ensure the troops that we have in Los Angeles are capable of supporting law enforcement,' Hegseth told Khanna. After another effort, Hegseth said the U.S. should not have 'local judges determining foreign policy or national security policy for the country.' Khanna pointed to signals from others in the Trump administration, specifically Vice President Vance, that it could ignore court orders it disagrees with. 'If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal,' Vance said in February on the social media platform X. 'If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that's also illegal.' 'Judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power,' he added. Hegseth's reference to limits on the judiciary's power over foreign policy harkens to the administration's legal argument against returning Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Salvadoran prison. Abrego Garcia was returned to the U.S. on June 6 and now faces charges over alleged smuggling crimes. California quickly sued the Trump administration over the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops — and mobilization of hundreds of Marines. A federal judge declined to issue an immediate order removing the troops from Los Angeles, pending further consideration of the case. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) has also engaged in a war of words with Trump and Hegseth throughout the week, warning their overreach in California will spread to other cities and states — particularly those run by Democrats. Hegseth, who is testifying in Congress for the third straight day, has sparred with Democrats over the deployments. He has said the troops are carrying out a constitutional duty to protect law enforcement agents carrying out Trump's immigration policies. Protests in Los Angeles were spurred by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carrying out workplace raids to arrest illegal immigrants in a heavily Hispanic part of the city. Khanna on Thursday also grilled Hegseth over the U.S. military posture with Israel reportedly threatening an imminent attack on Iran. Khanna repeatedly asked Hegseth whether he could commit to not directly attacking Iran unless the Islamic Republic first fired on the U.S. Hegseth would make no such assurance. He said Trump is 'giving Iran every opportunity, with talks ongoing, but he also fully recognizes the threat that Iran, with a nuclear blow up, would exist,' Hegseth said. 'Will you commit to us not bombing them?' Khanna repeated, noting some prominent MAGA figures have spoken out against the risk of war with Iran. 'It wouldn't be prudent for me to commit or not to commit. My job is to be postured and prepared,' Hegseth said.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats tested immigration messaging in battleground districts. Here's what they found.
A survey of likely voters seeks to offer Democrats a blueprint for how to punch back on an issue that's vexed them in recent elections: immigration. The poll, conducted in key 2026 battleground districts by Democratic-leaning groups Way to Win and Impact Research and shared first with POLITICO, argues that Democrats — with the right messaging — can drive down President Donald Trump's strength on immigration by a net 10 percentage points. The poll does not shy away from Democrats' overall poor standing on the issue. Republicans overall have an 11-percentage-point net negative job rating on immigration (43 percent approve versus 54 percent disapprove), but Democrats have a 58-percentage-point net negative rating on the issue (19 percent approve versus 77 disapprove). Democrats can turn the tide, the message testing found, by playing up Trump's overreach and disregard for the rule of law that they say threatens citizens and noncitizens alike as he carries out his mass deportations. But many Democrats would rather avoid the topic. 'Coming into and out of the 2024 cycle, Democrats were silent — completely — on immigration,' said Tory Gavito, president of Way to Win. 'There was just no response at all. This poll is to show Democrats that when they point out how enforcement has failed, they can attack Trump on one of his most favorable policies.' The survey, conducted in more than 70 key congressional districts, including the 26 'frontline' member list of top House Democratic-held seats the party hopes to defend next cycle, found a weakness for Trump. His initial job rating, which started with 50 percent positive versus 49 percent negative on immigration, dropped to 45 percent positive and 54 percent negative after emphasizing overreach messaging. The survey used specific examples, like the deportation of a person in the country legally 'but deported and sent to a prison in El Salvador because of their autism awareness tattoowas wrongly identified as a gang tattoo' — or a 10-year-old U.S. citizen deported because her parents were undocumented. Researchers say Democrats have plenty ammunition on the issue. They found policies that separate families and impact children among the most salient issues among respondents. A large majority, 74 percent, of respondents who oppose revoking visa and green cards from people without proof of committing a crime. And nearly eight in 10 respondents do not support sending U.S. citizens to foreign prisons. 'Voters view Trump's policies on immigration and his enforcement of immigration differently — there's a gap,' said Molly Murphy, president of Impact Research. 'They are more supportive of what Trump wants to do on immigration … from a policy standpoint, than how he's actually going about it.' Of course, getting voters engaged on the specifics of Trump's immigration policies can be a challenge. Public polling shows voters who haven't heard much about the high-profile cases are more likely to approve of the president. The poll, conducted May 6-11 with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent, does not capture reactions to the widespread protests in Los Angeles. The showdown between California Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Trump administration's deployment of the state's National Guard has also centered on the president's overreach. 'Democrats shouldn't be focused on protesters right now,' Murphy said. "We should be talking about the people he's deporting: people here legally, people here with no criminal records, people who have proof of citizenship and not make this a fight about protesters, because that's what he wants.' Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) said the party needs to " keep those stories in the news.' and plans to hold a briefing on the survey findings for members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus early next week on Capitol Hill. 'Trump wants to highlight the chaos that he is helping stoke in LA," Cesar added. "Democrats should be making sure that more of the focus is on the immigration overreach that has everyday people … deeply upset and deeply troubled.'
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth won't rule out military actions against Greenland, Panama
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday would not rule out the possibility of a future military invasion of Greenland and Panama, suggesting to lawmakers the Pentagon may have plans for such a future strike. Appearing before the House Armed Services Committee, Hegseth asserted the department 'plans for any particular contingency' and said, 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for anything.' Pressed by Republican lawmakers to dismiss the possibility of such a U.S. military attack on Greenland or Panama, Hegseth reiterated that the 'Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies' and that officials 'look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' Democrats on the panel scoffed at those answers. 'I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' said committee ranking member, Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash. 'The message this sends to the rest of the world is one that the U.S. is purely in it for itself, and does not care about alliances.' Space Force commander fired after email DOD says 'undermined' JD Vance The issue of possible U.S. military intervention to take over Greenland, Panama, Canada and other allied territories has been a point of concern for months among critics of President Donald Trump. On social media and in White House comments, Trump has stated multiple times that Denmark should surrender control of Greenland for the good of global security, and that Canada should become the 51st state in the American union. Administration officials have downplayed those comments. Hegseth, in his first appearance before the committee, avoided directly responding to the claims, but said the United States government has significant interest in protecting the areas from Chinese influence or manipulation. Earlier this week, Denmark's Parliament approved legislation to allow new U.S. military bases on Danish soil, broadening an existing previous military agreement between the countries. But Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen in recent months has vowed to oppose any U.S. efforts to take over the Danish territory. The Pentagon, meanwhile, is likely to shift Greenland from U.S. European Command to U.S. Northern Command, the military body responsible for defense of the American homeland, Mexico and Canada. The change itself only involves redrawing the maps of U.S. combatant commands and handing over responsibility for the military forces in Greenland, but it has caused angst among some in Denmark who think the administration is trying to draw the territory closer to America.
