Luzerne County study commission plans more power for election board
Currently, the county manager handles these duties but must consult with the board.
The potential change would be similar to the structure of the county controller's or district attorney's offices, with the election board-selected director overseeing staff and reporting to the board instead of to the county manager or council.
The commission is drafting a revised charter that will come before voters for possible adoption in November.
Commission members will not formally vote on the election board recommendations until proposed wording is presented at an upcoming meeting.
The movement to mandate more board power was largely in response to a legal overview Thursday from commission solicitor Joseph J. Khan, of Curtin & Heefner LLP.
Khan said home rule counties have discretion over how election boards are structured but must comply with the Pennsylvania Election Code, or Title 25, in setting forth the duties of the board.
The county's current charter was clear about the selection of election board members but did not spell out the board's duties, creating the potential for conflicting interpretations and future legal challenges, Khan told the commission.
Khan said Title 25 is clear that election boards have employee appointment authority and other responsibilities.
This very issue arose soon after the charter's January 2012 implementation when the county's election director was terminated by the manager, Khan said.
He was referring to Leonard Piazza, who oversaw the election bureau from April 2004 until his termination in April 2012.
Among other issues, Piazza's litigation argued then-county Manager Robert Lawton did not have authority to terminate him because that power is held by the election board. There was no final court decision because a council majority approved a $56,000 settlement in March 2018 to end Piazza's litigation.
Under the current charter, county council appoints four of the five citizens — two Democrats and two Republicans. Those four council-appointed members then select someone of any affiliation, or no affiliation, to fill the fifth seat and also serve as chair.
Prior to home rule, the county's three elected commissioners served as the election board, with the court appointing substitutes during periods when sitting commissioners appeared on the ballot.
During Thursday's two-hour discussion on the matter, commission member Stephen J. Urban said he has long argued that the election board was not exercising its lawful powers, which he said include the authority to select the county's voting system.
Commission members discussed different scenarios of adding council members and/or the county manager to the board as voting or non-voting members, but the majority consensus appeared to be for keeping five citizens.
Regarding the fifth election board seat filled by election board members, commission Chairman Ted Ritsick said he does not believe that person should be required to fill the chairmanship seat. Ritsick said he believes more citizens would apply for the fifth seat if they did not have to serve in the leadership post. He advocated for allowing board members to select anyone to serve as chair during annual reorganization meetings.
Several others voiced support for Ritsick's suggested change.
Commission members Mark Shaffer, Vice Chairman Vito Malacari and Treasurer Cindy Malkemes strongly opposed the addition of council members or the county manager to the election board as voting or non-voting members.
Reach Jennifer Learn-Andes at 570-991-6388 or on Twitter @TLJenLearnAndes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Greg Abbott Blasted by Major Texas Newspaper—'Corruption'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Dallas Morning News editorial board called out Texas Governor Greg Abbott for what it defined as a "power grab" and "corruption of the political process" over his support for the state legislature's push for GOP-backed redistricting maps and his actions against Democrats who fled the state to prevent quorum in the House. Newsweek has reached out to Abbott's press team for comment via email on Friday. Why It Matters Texas Democrats have raised serious concerns over plans for redistricting in the Lone Star State that would create five new Republican-leaning seats in time for the 2026 midterms. Under Texas' Constitution, the 150-member House cannot conduct business or pass legislation without a quorum of at least two-thirds of its members present. Democrats hold 62 seats in the Republican‑controlled chamber, and at least 51 left the state, Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus, previously said. What To Know Abbott has called out the dozens of Democratic state lawmakers who fled the state earlier this week to prevent the House from reaching quorum and voting on the redistricting map. In an August 3 statement, Abbott referred to the members as "derelict" and threatened to remove them from the Legislature altogether if they didn't return by 3 p.m. the following day. Enough Democrats have not yet returned, with seats in the state's House of Representative empty again on Friday, the third time this week that legislators have not reached quorum. There were 95 members present on Friday, five shy of quorum, according to the Associated Press. Days after Abbott's statement, The Dallas Morning News editorial board, which represents a district that would see changes in the proposed map, wrote: "The governor's power grab is a corruption of the political process." The GOP-led redistricting is expected to add at least five Republican seats in the 2026 midterms. The Republican Party holds a slim majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, making every seat vital for President Donald Trump to maintain control of the chamber. The editorial board continued, writing, "Abbott has threatened to remove lawmakers from their seats, based on a single opinion from a Texas attorney generally with the credibility of a $3 bill," adding that "such a move would disenfranchise millions of Texas voters and directly assault democracy." The opinion article went on to note the changes the proposal would make: "Fort Worth, which has a majority nonwhite population, would lose its only nonwhite representative in Congress. One diverse Dallas County district, now represented by Democrat Julie Johnson, would be redrawn to favor Republicans." The Houston Chronicle, Texas' largest newspaper also called out the governor in an opinion piece earlier this week, writing: "The governor has followed his orders from Washington and put a Republican power grab before communities devastated by Central Texas floods." It continued: "With a stroke of his pen, Abbott could have moved hundreds of millions of dollars by executive fiat. He could have called a session with the sole objective of addressing the still-unfolding crisis in the Hill Country. But the lives of Texans come second to the desires of President Trump and his loyalists." Texas Governor Greg Abbott speaks during a roundtable discussion in Kerrville, Texas, during a tour to observe flood damage on July 11. Texas Governor Greg Abbott speaks during a roundtable discussion in Kerrville, Texas, during a tour to observe flood damage on July 11. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin What People Are Saying Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a Friday press release: "The rogue Democrat legislators who fled the state have abandoned their duties, leaving their seats vacant. These cowards deliberately sabotaged the constitutional process and violated the oath they swore to uphold. Their out-of-state rebellion cannot go unchecked, and the business of Texas must go on. I have asked the Texas Supreme Court to declare what has been clear from the beginning: that the runaway members have officially vacated their offices in the Texas House." Senator John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, said in Thursday statement: "I am proud to announce that Director Kash Patel has approved my request for the FBI to assist state and local law enforcement in locating runaway Texas House Democrats. I thank President Trump and Director Patel for supporting and swiftly acting on my call for the federal government to hold these supposed lawmakers accountable for fleeing Texas. We cannot allow these rogue legislators to avoid their constitutional responsibilities." Democratic state Representative Claudia Ordaz said in an X post Friday: "It is with a troubled heart that I write this, literally from a hospital waiting room. From the very beginning, I have made it clear: I will not be in the chamber due to a personal health matter. Yet today, DPS officers showed up to a member of my family's house looking for me. On top of that, I am now being falsely accused of being in the chamber to make quorum." Texas Governor Greg Abbott said in an X post on Friday: "We have an agenda to pass priorities critical to Texans, and we will get it done. I'll call special session after special session—no matter how long it takes—until the job is finished." Democratic state Representative Ramon Romero Jr. said in a CNN interview Friday: "We're going to continue to fight. And as Congressman Al Green said, we will continue to march on, just as those in the past have done, we will as well." What Happens Next? The Texas House is scheduled to meet again on Monday, with the hopes that enough Democrats will return. The redistricted map at the center of the dispute is for next year's midterm elections, which will serve as a bellwether for the Trump administration and the Republican Party.
USA Today
4 minutes ago
- USA Today
Why Trump's firing of labor data chief won't threaten integrity of jobs figures. Probably
President Donald Trump's abrupt dismissal of the U.S. Commissioner of Labor Statistics after a disappointing employment report has raised concerns about the future accuracy and integrity of the nation's vital jobs numbers. Some economists and former government officials are responding to the mounting worries with a simple message: Chill out. These experts cite three reasons Trump administration officials are not likely to manipulate the statistics for political reasons: There's too much data underlying the most publicized jobs figures; broadly comparable numbers are published in other reports; and there are disincentives for chicanery. 'I think it would be pretty hard to revise any statistics' based on politics 'or try to fudge the numbers somehow,' said Sara Estep, an economist at the left-leaning Center for American progress. Still, Estep and other experts say the trustworthiness of the data is being called into question – a development that itself could have a negative impact on the economy and markets – and outright attempts to massage the numbers aren't out of the realm of possibility. 'The concern is that this could mark the start of a slippery slope toward greater White House influence over economic statistics, which in a worst-case scenario might involve censoring, reengineering, or suspending official releases like payrolls or CPI (inflation) to serve the Trump administration's agenda,' Capital Economics wrote in a note to clients. A White House spokesperson didn't immediately return an email message seeking comment. But on "Meet the Press" on Aug. 3, Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told moderator Kristin Welker that Trump simply wants to make the jobs report more transparent. "If there are big changes and big revisions – we expect more big revisions for the jobs data in September, for example – then we want to know why. We want people to explain it to us," Hassett said. What was the jobs report for July? On Aug. 1, Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, after the agency reported a disappointing 73,000 job gains in July and, more significantly, revised down payroll additions for May and June by a historically massive 258,000 positions. Economists said the large revisions can be explained by small business' unusually low response rates to BLS' initial surveys as they grapple with cost increases from Trump's double-digit tariffs on imports and the effects of the duties on business confidence and hiring. But on Truth Social, Trump said without providing evidence that 'today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' noting McEntarfer was appointed by former Democratic President Joe Biden. After firing McEntarfer, he appointed William Wiatrowskias interim BLS head and said he would name a permanent replacement within days. William Beach, McEntarfer's predecessor as BLS chief and a Trump appointee, said it's 'impossible' for a BLS commissioner to manipulate the jobs data. He added that person doesn't see the report until the numbers are loaded and readied for distribution the Wednesday before its release the first Friday of the month. Keith Hall, who was appointed BLS commissioner by former President George W. Bush and served from 2008 to 2011, told USA TODAY that too many career, nonpartisan civil servants have a hand in drafting the report for the data to be distorted. About 40 people, both Republicans and Democrats, see the final jobs number shortly before publication, Beach previously said. Is Trump trying to control independent federal agencies? Yet, economists worry Trump could test that presumption. His removal of McEntarfer marks his latest challenge to federal agencies whose independence is critical for a smoothly functioning economy. For months, Trump has tried to badger Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell into lowering interest rates and has threatened to fire him, though experts say Powell can't be removed without cause. Economists say the jobs report is considered the global gold standard for accurate and unbiased economic data, providing the best broad snapshot of the U.S. economy in close-to-real time and helping guide the actions of investors, corporations, governments and consumers. Trump's removal of McEntarfer 'presents risks to the conduct of monetary policy, to financial stability, and to the economic outlook,' JPMorgan Chase economist Michael Feroli wrote in a note to clients. He added 'the risk of politicizing the data collection process should not be overlooked.' Here's why some experts say they're not worried about the reliability of the jobs numbers: Other federal jobs measures If a BLS commissioner or other key employees finagled the jobs numbers, 'discrepancies would quickly emerge in other metrics like jobless claims, which are reported at the state level and [are] less prone to federal influence,' Capital Economics said in its research note. Initial unemployment insurance applications provide a reliable gauge of layoffs. And the jobs report represents the net total of all layoffs, hiring, quits, retirements and job switches across the economy. Private jobs reports Even if the administration 'brought all major statistical agencies under tight control, economists and investors could still infer the true state of the economy from private sources,' Capital Economics said. Those include the ADP employment report and job postings from Indeed, the leading job search site. 'Any tampering with official data would likely be exposed sooner or later and would be politically damaging once uncovered,' Capital Economics said. Markets are watching – and reacting If evidence emerged that the administration was fiddling with the jobs data, investors likely would demand a higher return for holding assets as such as U.S. Treasuries, pushing up interest rates, Capital Economics said. Trump has fervently advocated for lower rates. The research firm added that 'the administration has some inclination to avoid upsetting markets – especially when it leads to higher bond yields and increased debt-servicing costs.' Trump tends to push the envelope but not rip it up Trump has shown a propensity to push the boundaries in his efforts to achieve his goals 'without clearly crossing' the line, Capital Economics said. For example, he has stopped short of firing the Fed's Powell. 'This fits a broader pattern of the administration applying maximum pressure to get its way on issues from deportations to federal layoffs, without openly defying the courts,' Capital Economics wrote. Lots of people compile the jobs report The jobs report is like a massive puzzle put together by hundreds of employees and the pieces need to fit. If the final numbers were fudged, employees who worked on inputs to those numbers would realize that and speak up, Hall said. 'All of the data, detail and all of the industry statistics need to add up,' he said. The underlying jobs data BLS is famously transparent and provides the underlying data behind all its jobs numbers, Estep said. For example, the unemployment rate is based on a survey of 60,000 households, and the agency has their individual responses, she said. At the same time, here's why some experts are still worried: Private jobs data relies on federal numbers Although ADP and other private firms provide jobs data, they're typically 'benchmarked to the federal data, as private sector data are very rarely nationally representative,' Feroli said. ADP, for instance, relies on the federal jobs report from two months earlier to estimate last month's numbers. The risk of political meddling In the Meet the Press interview, Hassett told Welker, "The president wants his own people there [at BLS] so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable.' Said Estep: 'I would keep an eye out' for the potential replacement of some longterm public servants with political appointees at BLS and other agencies. 'Are they somehow installing more plans for the politicization of these statistical agencies?' Estep asked. The data may be accurate, but is it trustworthy? Even if it's unlikely the data will be manipulated, 'it may be less trusted,' Estep said, noting that could affect markets and the behavior of companies and consumers. "The trust component, that's really scary." In an opinion piece posted on David Madland, senior fellow at the Center for American progress, wrote: 'Government data analysts will do their best to produce credible reports, and much of what they publish will be accurate, but these workers will be increasingly subject to political pressures, or outright meddling. 'Reputational damage has already been done - and the decline in trust carries real consequences.'
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Paxton sues O'Rourke in Texas redistricting battle
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) has sued former Rep. Beto O'Rourke (D-Texas) and his political group, Powered by People, for unlawful fundraising activity after Democratic state House members fled the state to stall a GOP redistricting plan. 'Democrat runaways are likely accepting Beto Bribes to underwrite their jet-setting sideshow in far-flung places and misleadingly raising political funds to pay for personal expenses,' Paxton said in a release. 'This out-of-state, cowardly cabal is abandoning their constitutional duties. I will not allow failed political has-beens to buy off Texas elected officials. I'll see you in court, Beto.' The lawsuit comes after Paxton launched an investigation into whether Powered by People was breaking laws by allegedly 'bankrolling' out-of-state travel for Democrats who broke quorum. The Democratic state legislators left Texas in a last-ditch bid to deprive the state House of the numbers it needs to move forward with redistricting, a plan backed by President Trump that could net the GOP five additional congressional seats. The maneuver is set to be expensive, as the participating Democrats each rack up $500-a-day fines — on top of the lodging, food and other costs of living away from their homes in the Lone Star State. The Texas Tribune reported this week that Powered by People has been one of the top funders covering costs for the quorum breakers, including air travel and logistical support, though it's not the only group helping out. Paxton now alleges that O'Rourke and his group 'intentionally misled donors' to fund the expenses, 'despite advertising it as political fundraising,' according to a release. The attorney general has also requested a temporary restraining order and an injunction preventing them from raising or distributing money 'for the purpose of funding the runaway Democrat House members.' Shortly after Paxton announced his lawsuit, O'Rourke announced that he had sued Paxton in state court. 'We just sued Ken Paxton in state court. Taking the fight directly to him,' O'Rourke posted on X. Exact details on the nature of the lawsuit were not immediately available.
