Huddersfield family jailed over abuse have convictions quashed
Members of a family who were jailed for allowing a vulnerable adult to suffer physical harm have had their convictions overturned at the Court of Appeal.Asgar Sheikh and his parents Khalid and Shabnam were jailed in February 2024 after they were convicted following a trial at Leeds Crown Court. Asgar's sister Shagufa was given a suspended sentence.The victim, Asgar's wife Ambreen, survives in a persistent vegetative state, the trial heard.However, an appeal hearing concluded the case against the defendants was "riddled with evidential difficulties".
Barristers representing the four at the Court of Appeal hearing on 4 December argued the trial judge, Mrs Justice Lambert, "misconstrued" the relevant section of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act which the defendants were convicted under.This, they argued, "led her into error" in rejecting the defence barristers' argument there was no case to answer.It could also have led her to "fail to direct the jury appropriately as to its application to the facts", they added.
'Question of intent'
The argument related to the administration of the anti-diabetes drug glimepiride to Ambreen which caused a catastrophic brain injury, and whether the family members should have foreseen it and acted to prevent it.The trial heard Ambreen had earlier suffered a severe burn to her lower back, but the prosecution could not prove who in the household had caused the injury.One of the factors required to prove someone is guilty of causing or allowing the death or serious injury of a vulnerable adult or child is that the unlawful act causing their death or serious injury occurred in circumstances that the defendant foresaw, or ought to have foreseen.The trial heard expert medical evidence that glimepiride was "very, very rarely" known to be used as a "weapon" to deliberately harm someone.However, the Court of Appeal judges said there was "nothing in the ruling which indicates that [Mrs Justice] Lambert had regard to [this] evidence".The judges reviewing the case said Mrs Justice Lambert should have "specifically addressed the question of intent in the administration of a noxious substance" in relation to the glimepiride.The Court of Appeal said there was not enough evidence for the jury to have reasonably concluded there was malicious intent in administering the drug, or that the earlier injury to Ambreen indicated its use had been intended to achieve the same aim of "humiliating" her.The Court of Appeal hearing concluded that the argument of "no case to answer" put forward by the defence at the original trial "should have succeeded".
During the trial, jurors were told the victim only survived by being fed through a tube and would eventually die as a consequence of what happened to her.After the jury returned guilty verdicts Asgar, then 31, Khalid, then 55, and Shabnam, then 52, were jailed for seven years and nine months. They have now been released from prison, the Ministry of Justice confirmed.Shagufa, then 29, was given an 18-month sentence, suspended for two years.Asgar, Khalid, Shabnam and Shagufa did not appeal against their convictions for perverting the course of justice in relation to their delay in seeking medical assistance and concealing the circumstances of Ambreen's lapse into unconsciousness.Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North or tell us a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Habibur Masum trial: Mum killed in 'ferocious' attack in Bradford
A mother was stabbed to death in a "cold blooded, calculated, premeditated murder" as she pushed her baby in a pram, a court has Akter, 27, from Oldham, died after she suffered multiple stab wounds to her body and face outside a shop on Westgate in Bradford city centre in April 2024. The baby was Akter's husband, Habibur Masum, 26, of Leamington Avenue, Burnley, has pleaded guilty to her manslaughter and to possession of a bladed article, but has denied a charge of the opening day of Mr Masum's trial, a jury at Bradford Crown Court saw CCTV footage showing what the prosecution described as "a ferocious and ultimately deadly attack". Prosecuting, Mr Stephen Wood KC said that having stabbed Ms Akter, Mr Masum moved away from the scene and "left her for dead without a second thought for her or, indeed, the baby". 'Controlling behaviour' The court heard that Ms Akter was taken to Bradford Royal Infirmary, but died a short time later from a combination of a stab wound to the neck and blood prosecution said the pair were married for about 18 months, but at the time of her death, Ms Akter had been housed in a refuge to escape her husband's "violence, jealousy and controlling behaviour".Mr Wood said she had told a social worker she believed her husband would kill told the court that in November 2023, Mr Masum became jealous over a "completely innocuous" message Ms Akter had received from a male colleague, grabbing her face, slapping her and pulling her hair."He told Kulsuma, 'I am going to murder you, and the police will be taking me'," Mr Wood next day, after coming home from work, Mr Masum went into their bedroom and held a knife to her throat, for which he was later arrested, jurors the time of the fatal stabbing, Mr Masum was subject to court bail conditions to keep away from his wife following charges of assault by beating and making a threat to kill. The jury heard that Mr Masum had sent Ms Akter a snapchat video of Bradford Interchange eight days before the fatal attack, with a message saying he had "come to her town".Mr Wood said Mr Masum later sent another photograph, depicting the refuge where she was staying, with the words, "I know that you are living in this place."Arrangements were being made to rehouse Ms Akter, but she was killed on 6 April, two days before she was due to move, the jury was Wood said Mr Masum was arrested in a car park near Stoke Mandeville Hospital in Buckinghamshire three days after Ms Akter's death, following police told the court he anticipated the thrust of Mr Masum's defence would be to suggest he was "suffering from an abnormality of mind, or that he lost control of himself in some way".Mr Wood said Mr Masum "cannot bring himself to admit what he has done".Mr Masum has denied a charge of murder, assault by beating, making a threat to kill and trial continues. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Controlling husband killed wife after tracking her to women's refuge'
A 'controlling' husband stabbed his wife to death after tracking her to a hostel where she was staying to escape him, a court has been told. Habibur Masum, 26, launched a 'ferocious' knife attack on Kulsuma Akter, 27, while she pushed their baby in a pram, after confronting her on a street in Bradford, West Yorkshire. A court heard Ms Akter had come to Bradford to be housed in a refuge 'to escape [Masum's] violence, jealousy and controlling behaviour'. Jurors at Bradford Crown Court heard that Masum had previously threatened to kill Ms Akter and, at the time of the attack on April 6 last year, was subject to court bail conditions ordering him to keep away from her. Opening the case on Monday, Steven Wood KC, prosecuting, said Masum tracked Ms Akter to Bradford and, in the days leading up to the attack, tried to trick her into leaving the hostel by pretending to be from a GP's surgery and offering her fake appointments. The court heard that Ms Akter was walking with a friend on April 6 while pushing her seven-month-old son in a pram and was confronted by the defendant, who walked with her into a shop. Mr Wood said she was shocked Masum was there as she believed he was in Spain. The court was shown CCTV footage of Masum walking with Ms Akter until he stopped her, spinning her and the pram around before pulling a knife from his jacket. Mr Wood said: 'He grabs Kulsuma and pushes her into a wall, stabbing her to the body. You will see that Kulsuma then goes to the ground only for the defendant to launch a ferocious and deadly attack. 'When the defendant had finished stabbing her, as a final act of sheer gratuitous violence, he kicks Kulsuma before moving away, but not before ensuring that he disposed of the knife.' The court heard Ms Akter suffered multiple stab wounds to her body and face including a wound to the neck which partly cut her windpipe and severed her left jugular vein. Mr Wood told jurors: 'The [prosecution] say this was cold-blooded, calculated, pre-meditated murder. 'Why would the defendant take a knife with him to meet his estranged wife unless he planned to use it?' 'Threats to kill her' The court heard that by November 2023, Ms Akter and the defendant had been married for about 18 months. Mr Wood said: 'Generally, the relationship had been good, but there were already warning signs. 'There were previous incidents of his making threats to kill her and in July 2023, she was staying with family members because of his controlling behaviour.' Jurors heard that, on Nov 23, Masum became jealous over a 'completely innocuous' message she had received from a male colleague, grabbing her face, slapping her and pulling her hair. 'In what you may think was a chilling prediction of what he was to do in April of the following year, he told Kulsuma, 'I am going to murder you, and the police will be taking me',' Mr Wood said. The next day, after coming home from work, he went into their bedroom carrying a knife and said: 'Tell me what your relationship is with him, or I will kill you,' jurors heard. 'Afraid that he would cut her throat' Mr Wood said that Masum put the knife to Ms Akter's throat and 'she was so genuinely afraid that he would cut her throat, that she thought that the only way to stop him was to keep the baby on her lap'. A female family member who was concerned for Ms Akter's safety called the police, and Masum was arrested that night, jurors heard. In his interview at Ashton police station he denied using any violence towards his wife and 'just asked who the guy was'. He also told officers he had no mental health conditions. The court heard Masum was charged with two offences of assault by beating and one offence of making a threat to kill. Jurors heard Ms Akter told a social worker from Oldham Council she 'believed that one day her husband would kill her', asking if her son could stay with her sister-in-law and brother 'when this day comes'. She was moved to accommodation in Bradford in January 2024. Mr Wood said in March, Ms Akter told her social worker Masum had contacted her on Snapchat, threatening that if she did not go back to him by April 1 he would kill her brothers. 'Nobody will love you like I do' The court heard the refuge contacted the police and, the next day, Masum sent Ms Akter a Snapchat video of the Bradford Interchange railway station with a message saying he had 'come to her town'. He later sent her a photo of the refuge with a message saying: 'I know that you are living in this place. I knew from the first day you moved here. 'If I had any wish to kill you, I could have from the first day. You do not know what you have lost but one day you will understand. Nobody will love you like I do.' The court heard Ms Akter's social worker arranged for her to be rehoused and she was due to move on April 8, but in the meantime she heard from one of Masum's relatives that he was in Spain, and 'felt safe to leave the refuge' on the day she was killed. Masum denies murdering Ms Akter but has pleaded guilty to manslaughter and possession of a knife. He also denies two charges of assault, one count of making threats to kill and one charge of stalking.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Domestic violence can affect victims' brain health for life, study suggests
Women who are victims of domestic violence are at a higher risk of traumatic brain injury and mental health conditions for many years after the abuse has ended, a study has found. Almost one in three women around the world experience domestic violence, and researchers say the impact on mental health – such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) – can last for decades. The study, by the University of Glasgow and published in the journal BMJ Mental Health, explored the mental health consequences associated with domestic violence and traumatic brain injury. The paper – Intimate partner violence, traumatic brain injury and long-term mental health outcomes in mid-life: The Drake IPV study – looked at data from 632 participants aged between 40 and 59. Fourteen per cent reported having a history of domestic violence with physical abuse. Compared with unexposed participants, those with a history of intimate partner violence-physical abuse (IPV-PA) were associated with a higher exposure of traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and a higher lifetime and ongoing diagnoses of depression, anxiety, sleep disorders andPTSD. The analysis also found that even after an average of 27 years since exposure to IPV-PA, the risk of mental health disorders remained just as high. The study concluded: 'Among those reporting exposure to IPV-PA, the majority reported a history of repetitive blows to the head and mild TBI. A history of TBI, in turn, was associated with evidence of adverse mental health outcomes. 'These observations offer initial insights into the potential lifelong brain health consequences of intimate partner violence with physical abuse. 'Given the global prevalence of intimate partner violence, particularly among women, these findings highlight a pressing need for further research in this field, as well as for targeted interventions to raise awareness among policymakers and medical professionals about the potential impact of intimate partner violence with physical abuse on health outcomes across the lifespan.' The work was funded by the Drake Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Medical Research Council, NHS Research Scotland, the Alzheimer's Society, and the Alzheimer's Association. Prof Willie Stewart said: 'Given its prevalence, these findings highlight domestic violence as a public health issue with potential for long-lasting impacts on brain health. Our work also reinforces the need for more research in this previously neglected area.' Dr Graciela Muniz-Terrera, a co-author of the report, said: 'This study highlights the importance of including questions about domestic violence in population research to advance our knowledge about its long-term effects.' In the UK, call the national domestic abuse helpline on 0808 2000 247, or visit Women's Aid. In Australia, the national family violence counselling service is on 1800 737 732. In the US, the domestic violence hotline is 1-800-799-SAFE (7233). Other international helplines may be found via
