HC refuses to confer mother's caste status to 18-yr-old student as his father belongs to Agri community
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Friday refused to grant an 18-year-old student the Scheduled Category (SC) status of his mother as his estranged father belonged to the Other Backward Class (OBC) category. The bench said the student 'was never discriminated against and did not suffer any disadvantages on account of his mother belonging to a Scheduled Caste community.' (Shutterstock)
In his petition, the teenager stated that his parents married on April 22, 2004, in Pali, Raigad district. Due to a matrimonial discord, they annulled their marriage by a decree of divorce passed by the Alibag court on July 2, 2016. In 2022-23, when the petitioner enrolled in junior college, his mother applied for his caste certificate as she belonged to the Chambhar community. The competent authority issued a certificate on February 7, 2023, declaring the student belonged to the Chambhar community. The petitioner's college forwarded the caste certificate to the caste scrutiny committee in Raigad for validation, as per the prevailing rules. On April 15, 2024, the scrutiny committee invalidated the caste claim and cancelled the caste certificate, prompting the student to approach the high court.
He contended his father belonged to the Hindu Agri community; however, he never cared for his son, who hence did not benefit from it. On the contrary, he claimed, he suffered deprivations, indignities, and humiliation for being a member of the SC community.
The argument, however, failed to impress the bench of Justice Revati Mohite Dere and Justice Dr Neela Gokhale. According to the vigilance report, there was no evidence that the 18-year-old did not face the challenges suffered by a person from the Chambar community. The bench rejected the student's petition based on the vigilance report. 'His maternal grandparents neither appear to be living in a backward area nor are their living conditions bereft of necessities, food, clean water, sanitation, and health care. Their lifestyle is satisfactory,' the court said. 'The scrutiny committee, therefore, concluded that the petitioner did not suffer any humiliation nor was he deprived of a good education.'
As he had an advantageous start in life without suffering from any disability, the bench said they were unable to accept that he was eligible to be declared as a person from the Chambhar community.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
3 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Calcutta HC restraints Bengal from paying monthly stipend to sacked non-teaching staff
The Calcutta High Court on Friday directed the West Bengal government to stop paying monthly stipends to a group of non-teaching staff who had been sacked after the Supreme Court in April found irregularities in the 2016 recruitment process, Live Law reported. On June 9, Justice Amrita Sinha had reserved the judgement in the matter but had stayed the state government's plan to provide monthly stipends of Rs 20,000 to Rs 25,000 to the persons. In its Friday order, the court reinforced that restriction, prohibiting such payments till at least September 26. Sinha issued the direction on a writ petition challenging the provision of the allowance to the staff whose services had been terminated. The petition was filed by a candidate on the waitlist who was not recruited despite being on the merit list, allegedly due to irregularities in the hiring process. On April 3, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's April 2024 order terminating the appointment of about 25,000 teachers and non-teaching staff by West Bengal's School Service Commission. The bench passed the order after observing that the recruitment process was 'vitiated by manipulation and fraud'. The top court on April 17 permitted 'untainted' teachers to be retained until the end of the academic year or until fresh appointments are made, whichever was earlier. However, it did not grant relief to the non-teaching staff, or Group C and Group D employees, whose appointments were also cancelled. In response, the state government had announced in April that the sacked non-teaching staff would receive a monthly allowance until the Supreme Court delivered a verdict on its review petitions. On Friday, the High Court criticised the state for attempting to financially assist individuals whose employment had been declared fraudulent by the Supreme Court and directed 'tainted' candidates to 'refund any salary/payment received', Live Law reported. By introducing a stipend scheme, the state was undermining the Supreme Court's decision, the High Court observed. 'Once the highest court of the land has decided the issue of illegal appointment conclusively and opined that the appointments were result of fraud, no person who was the beneficiary of a fraudulent act of the statutory authority ought to be provided any support, that too, from the public exchequer,' the court said. The court also instructed the state government to submit its counter-affidavit addressing the petitioners' claims within four weeks, and allowed the petitioners two weeks after that to file their response, PTI reported. In April 2024, the High Court had passed its direction on the termination of the appointments based on the findings of a re-evaluation of the Optical Mark Recognition sheets from the 2016 recruitment examination in the case. The re-evaluation found that the selected teachers had been recruited against blank Optical Mark Recognition sheets.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC refuses to confer mother's caste status to 18-yr-old student as his father belongs to Agri community
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Friday refused to grant an 18-year-old student the Scheduled Category (SC) status of his mother as his estranged father belonged to the Other Backward Class (OBC) category. The bench said the student 'was never discriminated against and did not suffer any disadvantages on account of his mother belonging to a Scheduled Caste community.' (Shutterstock) In his petition, the teenager stated that his parents married on April 22, 2004, in Pali, Raigad district. Due to a matrimonial discord, they annulled their marriage by a decree of divorce passed by the Alibag court on July 2, 2016. In 2022-23, when the petitioner enrolled in junior college, his mother applied for his caste certificate as she belonged to the Chambhar community. The competent authority issued a certificate on February 7, 2023, declaring the student belonged to the Chambhar community. The petitioner's college forwarded the caste certificate to the caste scrutiny committee in Raigad for validation, as per the prevailing rules. On April 15, 2024, the scrutiny committee invalidated the caste claim and cancelled the caste certificate, prompting the student to approach the high court. He contended his father belonged to the Hindu Agri community; however, he never cared for his son, who hence did not benefit from it. On the contrary, he claimed, he suffered deprivations, indignities, and humiliation for being a member of the SC community. The argument, however, failed to impress the bench of Justice Revati Mohite Dere and Justice Dr Neela Gokhale. According to the vigilance report, there was no evidence that the 18-year-old did not face the challenges suffered by a person from the Chambar community. The bench rejected the student's petition based on the vigilance report. 'His maternal grandparents neither appear to be living in a backward area nor are their living conditions bereft of necessities, food, clean water, sanitation, and health care. Their lifestyle is satisfactory,' the court said. 'The scrutiny committee, therefore, concluded that the petitioner did not suffer any humiliation nor was he deprived of a good education.' As he had an advantageous start in life without suffering from any disability, the bench said they were unable to accept that he was eligible to be declared as a person from the Chambhar community.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Land dispute case: Telangana HC reserves order on A Revanth's plea to quash 2016 FIR; order reserved till July 18
HYDERABAD: Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya of the Telangana high court on Friday reserved orders to July 18 on a plea filed by former Congress MP and chief minister A Revanth Reddy seeking quashing of a 2016 FIR registered against him at the Gachibowli police station. The case was filed based on a complaint by N Peddi Raju, president of the Razole Constituency SC Cooperative Housing Society, alleging trespass and caste-based abuse during a land dispute in Gopanapalli, Rangareddy district. The matter is pending before a special court under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. According to the FIR, Peddi Raju claimed Revanth's brother Kondal Reddy and one E Laxmaiah forcibly entered around two acres of land claimed by the society, demolished a compound wall and other structures, and abused him in the name of caste-allegedly at Revanth's behest. The 2019 chargesheet noted that though Raju claimed purchase of land for the society, the sellers lacked clear title. Meanwhile, Kondal Reddy claimed to have purchased 31 acres in the same survey number in 2005, registered in his name. The chargesheet concluded that the accused trespassed into land in possession of the society and carried out the demolition. Counsel Nimma Narayana, appearing for Peddi Raju, argued: "Though the chargesheet was filed five years ago, charges have not been framed, and crucial provisions under the Atrocities Act were left out." He reiterated that Kondal Reddy used caste abuse, allegedly on Revanth's instructions. The judge reserved her orders and posted the case to July 18.
