Thousands of people still get abortions in states with bans. This Texas bill aims to stop it.
Sarah ordered her first set of abortion pills in early December, as soon as she realized the condom had broken.
She wasn't ready to be a parent. She was in a committed relationship but didn't want a baby to be what kept her tied to her partner. She was still trying to develop her career as an energy analyst, and she didn't earn enough money to support a child in Austin.
And she simply didn't want to be a mom — at least not at this stage of her life.
'This is my personal choice, and I'm not ready right now,' she said. 'It's a shift in identity that I wasn't ready for.'
Abortion is illegal in Texas, so Sarah searched Google, browsed Reddit and even asked ChatGPT about her options. Her research led her to Aid Access, an online mail-order service that would connect her to health professionals in states where abortion remains legal. She verified her identity, paid $150 and received abortion pills in a few days.
About 10 days after the broken condom, she saw a faint positive line on a pregnancy test. A few days later, she took the abortion pills.
For Sarah, whose full name is being withheld because of the legal risks of ordering abortion pills in Texas, the process of terminating her pregnancy was isolating and arduous. She kept getting positive pregnancy tests after she took the abortion pills, and weeks later, a visit to a local reproductive health center confirmed her suspicions: Hers was one of the 2 to 5 percent cases in which a medication abortion had failed. But Sarah couldn't find any medical professionals who would talk to her about her options — or even whether it was safe to stay pregnant after a failed abortion. Every time she brought up abortion, she said, they said it was something they couldn't discuss.
Her only source of support, she realized, was the internet — the people online who shared their stories and resources with her, and websites like Aid Access, which told her where and how to find pills, what the process felt like and the signs that might indicate if the abortion had worked.
'Reddit was my doctor,' she said. 'That was the scariest thing about this all. That was my only source of information.'
Sarah, like hundreds of thousands of Americans living in states with abortion bans, would ultimately find her way around her state's law, relying once again on Aid Access and her community on Reddit to terminate her pregnancy safely and successfully. Since the fall of Roe v. Wade, online services such as Aid Access and the Massachusetts Medication Abortion Project have emerged as pivotal abortion suppliers for people living in states with bans — which helps illustrate why, despite 12 states banning abortion almost entirely, the number of abortions in the United States has continued to rise. An October report from the Society of Family Planning estimated that close to 10,000 abortions per month were the result of health care providers in states with 'shield laws' — statutes meant to protect them from prosecution under bans like Texas' — mailing pills to people in states with restrictions.
This telehealth 'loophole,' as abortion opponents would call it, has vexed the anti-abortion movement. But now in Texas, the largest state to have banned abortion in most circumstances, state lawmakers are championing a bill that would target those same provider networks Sarah relied on. Senate Bill 2880 received approval from the Texas Senate on Tuesday night; a companion bill is working its way through the House, with weeks to go before the state's June deadline.
Health care professionals and abortion law scholars are still deciphering the possible impact of the bill. So, too, are people like Sarah.
'It would be terrifying not having that access,' Sarah said. 'If I don't have access, I don't have choice.'
SB 2880, a top priority of anti-abortion group Texas Right to Life, focuses specifically on people who manufacture, distribute, mail or otherwise provide abortion medication in Texas.
The bill's structure — relying on civil lawsuits filed by private citizens, and wrongful death suits from 'the mother or father of an unborn child' — means it's still not fully clear who ultimately could be held liable, and how far-reaching the threats could be. But in interviews and on the Senate floor, the bill's backers have said they intend to target the medical professionals mailing abortion pills through websites like Aid Access.
It's a step back from the version lawmakers first introduced in March, which would have gone after all aspects of the abortion support: the funds that give people money to leave the state for travel and the websites that help people find information about out-of-state abortion options.
'It's still extremely effective,' said John Seago, the head of Texas Right to Life. 'It gives us the option to go after our main targets — the ones running the websites.'
The latest version of the bill authorizes civil lawsuits against distributors of abortion pills, allowing private citizens to sue anyone who distributes the medications for at least $100,000 in damages. The bill asserts that another state's shield laws, including those in states like New York, Massachusetts and California, are not a valid defense against such suits.
'The state of Texas is effectively deputizing all of its citizens with the ability to bring perhaps frivolous and perhaps unconstitutional lawsuits,' said Jenna Lauter, a policy counsel at the New York Civil Liberties Union who focuses on reproductive rights. 'New York will do everything it can under the law to refuse to cooperate or share information that would facilitate these kinds of harassing lawsuits. But the law in theory would create an opportunity for anyone — an ex-partner, an anti-abortion activist, anyone — to interfere with someone's reproductive health care decisions.'
Lawmakers elsewhere are similarly weighing how to curb abortion by mail. In Alabama, a bill filed in April would ban phone service and internet companies from taking people to websites with information about online abortion medication services, and would make it a felony to prescribe and mail those pills — though that proposal has yet to make it through a committee vote and is up against a May 15 deadline before the legislature adjourns.
Legal scholars and abortion providers said it's fundamentally unclear how the Texas bill would work in practice — who might be in legal jeopardy, what kind of risks they might face, and whether the new penalties proposed by SB 2880 would survive legal challenges.
Texas has successfully flouted federal protections before, notably, with a 2021 statute that effectively banned abortion at six weeks of pregnancy even before Roe v. Wade was overturned. That law, like SB 2880, relied on a private lawsuit mechanism, which deterred people from offering otherwise legal services and allowed it to survive extensive legal challenges, including in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Said Rachel Rebouché, dean at the Temple University law school and an expert in abortion law, 'This is Texas legislators trying the same strategy to try to circumvent a federal constitutional challenge.'
Outside of Texas, some health care providers said that even if the state enacts new restrictions, they won't change their practices. They are counting on their own states to protect them.
'We continue to believe that what we are doing is legal and protected by our shield law, and Massachusetts would protect us,' said Dr. Angel Foster, who provides telehealth abortions through the Massachusetts Medication Abortion Project.
But the shield laws these doctors are counting on have already come under scrutiny. Dr. Margaret Carpenter, a New York-based physician, has been subject to criminal charges filed in Louisiana and civil charges filed in Texas for allegedly mailing abortion medication to people in those states.
So far, New York has declined to enforce a Texas-based civil penalty and has refused to extradite Carpenter to Louisiana, citing the Empire State shield law in both cases. In the long term, the strength of those laws — against existing abortion bans and possibly new legislation like Texas' — will be settled through the federal courts.
Even now, there are questions about shield laws' ability to protect health professionals from civil lawsuits like the ones SB 2880 would further enable. The U.S. Constitution holds that states must enforce the civil judgments enacted by other courts in other states, though there can be exceptions to that rule.
But some health care providers, including in Texas, said that the impact will be felt regardless of if it takes effect.
'Whether these bills are successful or not, they cause such great fear, and we see that. We know that,' said Kathy Kleinfeld, whose Houston-based reproductive health clinic advises pregnant patients on their out-of-state abortion options. 'We hear it on the phones. We encounter it when people come in seeking our help.'
Kleinfeld fears that if the bill is enacted, abortion-seeking patients who come to clinics like hers — Houston, one of the country's most diverse cities, is a drive of at least nine and a half hours from the closest clinic — will be left without recourse.
'It will be devastating for the state of Texas,' Kleinfeld said.
Services like Aid Access have played a critical role in enabling abortion in Texas and other states with strict bans, offering an option that can be much more affordable than travel.
When Mariah learned she was pregnant just over a year ago, she turned immediately to the internet. She works full-time at a UPS warehouse and has two small children: a 7-year-old son and 4-year-old daughter.
Mariah, who also asked to have her full name withheld, was shocked to learn an option like Aid Access existed. She wouldn't need to drive almost 400 miles from her home in Arlington to Wichita, Kansas, the closest option for an in-person abortion. She wouldn't need to find child care, or take time off from work. And the $150 cost was a fraction of what she would have had to spend if she traveled to a clinic.
Her abortion was easy; she completed it at home on a weekend. If something like Aid Access hadn't been available, she said, she wasn't sure what she would have done — maybe try to end her pregnancy at home, with whatever she could find in the house.
Despite the growing prevalence of telehealth abortion, research published in 2022, before Aid Access expanded its American footprint, found that many people seeking to end their pregnancies at home relied on methods that are ineffective, such as herbs, or that involve self-harm. It's not clear what would happen if Texans could no longer find information online about how to order abortion pills, and to what extent they might turn to options that risk their health and safety.
'Abortion saves lives at times,' Mariah said. 'It really helps out families who can't afford a plethora of children.'
Already, Texans seeking abortions said it's difficult to know whom to trust. Mariah told a few of her friends when she ordered her medications. But she didn't say anything to her doctor. She wasn't sure if it would be safe, given the state's strict abortion bans.
The idea that the state might try to keep people from the options she used 'is like a dictatorship,' she said.
The post Thousands of people still get abortions in states with bans. This Texas bill aims to stop it. appeared first on The 19th.
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr.'s newest CDC vaccine panel includes critics of COVID shots, lockdowns
The Brief U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has replaced the government's vaccine advisory panel with eight new appointees. The new members include vocal critics of COVID-19 vaccines and pandemic lockdowns, such as Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Martin Kulldorff. Public health groups have raised concerns that Kennedy's changes could undermine long-standing vaccination policies. NEW YORK - U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week. His selections include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and transformed into a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, and a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns. RELATED: RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel Kennedy made the announcement in a social media post on Wednesday. The backstory Kennedy's decision to "retire" the previous 17-member panel was widely decried by doctors' groups and public health organizations, who feared the advisers would be replaced by a group aligned with Kennedy's desire to reassess — and possibly end — longstanding vaccination recommendations. Dig deeper The new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices include Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. Malone, who runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, rose to popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic as he relayed conspiracy theories around the outbreak and the vaccines that followed. He has appeared on podcasts and other conservative news outlets where he's promoted unproven and alternative treatments for measles and COVID-19. He has claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the COVID-19 shots. He's even suggested that those vaccines cause a form of AIDS. He's downplayed deaths related to one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in years. Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. Dr. Cody Meissner, a former ACIP member, also was named. Big picture view The committee, created in 1964, makes recommendations to the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC directors almost always approve those recommendations on how Food and Drug Administration-cleared vaccines should be used. The CDC's final recommendations are widely heeded by doctors and determine the scope of vaccination programs. The Source The Associated Press contributed to this report. The information in this story comes from a social media announcement made by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday, in which he introduced eight new members to the federal vaccine advisory panel. This story was reported from Los Angeles.

an hour ago
Kennedy's new CDC panel includes members who have criticized vaccines and spread misinformation
NEW YORK -- U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday named eight new vaccine policy advisers to replace the panel that he abruptly dismissed earlier this week. They include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and became a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, a leading critic of pandemic-era lockdowns, and a professor of operations management. Kennedy's decision to 'retire' the previous 17-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices was widely decried by doctors' groups and public health organizations, who feared the advisers would be replaced by a group aligned with Kennedy's desire to reassess — and possibly end — longstanding vaccination recommendations. On Tuesday, before he announced his picks, Kennedy said: 'We're going to bring great people onto the ACIP panel – not anti-vaxxers – bringing people on who are credentialed scientists.' The new appointees include Vicky Pebsworth, a regional director for the National Association of Catholic Nurses, who has been listed as a board member and volunteer director for the National Vaccine Information Center, a group that is widely considered to be a leading source of vaccine misinformation. Another is Dr. Robert Malone, the former mRNA researcher who emerged as a close adviser to Kennedy during the measles outbreak. Malone, who runs a wellness institute and a popular blog, rose to prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic as he relayed conspiracy theories around the outbreak and the vaccines that followed. He has appeared on podcasts and other conservative news outlets where he's promoted unproven and alternative treatments for measles and COVID-19. He has claimed that millions of Americans were hypnotized into taking the COVID-19 shots and has suggested that those vaccines cause a form of AIDS. He's downplayed deaths related to one of the largest measles outbreaks in the U.S. in years. Other appointees include Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who was a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, an October 2020 letter maintaining that pandemic shutdowns were causing irreparable harm. Dr. Cody Meissner, a former ACIP member, also was named. Abram Wagner of the University of Michigan's school of public health, who investigates vaccination programs, said he's not satisfied with the composition of the committee. 'The previous ACIP was made up of technical experts who have spent their lives studying vaccines,' he said. Most people on the current list 'don't have the technical capacity that we would expect out of people who would have to make really complicated decisions involving interpreting complicated scientific data.' He said having Pebsworth on the board is 'incredibly problematic' since she is involved in an organization that 'distributes a lot of misinformation.' Kennedy made the announcement in a social media post on Wednesday. The committee, created in 1964, makes recommendations to the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC directors almost always approve those recommendations on how vaccines that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration should be used. The CDC's final recommendations are widely heeded by doctors and guide vaccination programs. The other appointees are: —Dr. James Hibbeln, who formerly headed a National Institutes of Health group focused on nutritional neurosciences and who studies how nutrition affects the brain, including the potential benefits of seafood consumption during pregnancy. —Retsef Levi, a professor of operations management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies business issues related to supply chain, logistics, pricing optimization and health and health care management. In a 2023 video pinned to an X profile under his name, Levi called for the end of the COVID-19 vaccination program, claiming the vaccines were ineffective and dangerous despite evidence they saved millions of lives. —Dr. James Pagano, an emergency medicine physician from Los Angeles. —Dr. Michael Ross, a Virginia-based obstetrician and gynecologist. Of the eight named by Kennedy, perhaps the most experienced in vaccine policy is Meissner, an expert in pediatric infectious diseases at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, who has previously served as a member of both ACIP and the Food and Drug Administration's vaccine advisory panel. During his five-year term as an FDA adviser, the committee was repeatedly asked to review and vote on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines that were rapidly developed to fight the pandemic. In September 2021, he joined the majority of panelists who voted against a plan from the Biden administration to offer an extra vaccine dose to all American adults. The panel instead recommended that the extra shot should be limited to seniors and those at higher risk of the disease. Ultimately, the FDA disregarded the panel's recommendation and OK'd an extra vaccine dose for all adults. In addition to serving on government panels, Meissner has helped author policy statements and vaccination schedules for the American Academy of Pediatrics. ACIP members typically serve in staggered four-year terms, although several appointments were delayed during the Biden administration before positions were filled last year. The voting members all have scientific or clinical expertise in immunization, except for one 'consumer representative' who can bring perspective on community and social facets of vaccine programs. Kennedy, a leading voice in the anti-vaccine movement before becoming the U.S. government's top health official, has accused the committee of being too closely aligned with vaccine manufacturers and of rubber-stamping vaccines. ACIP policies require members to state past collaborations with vaccine companies and to recuse themselves from votes in which they had a conflict of interest, but Kennedy has dismissed those safeguards as weak. Most of the people who best understand vaccines are those who have researched them, which usually requires some degree of collaboration with the companies that develop and sell them, said Jason Schwartz, a Yale University health policy researcher. 'If you are to exclude any reputable, respected vaccine expert who has ever engaged even in a limited way with the vaccine industry, you're likely to have a very small pool of folks to draw from,' Schwartz said. The U.S. Senate confirmed Kennedy in February after he promised he would not change the vaccination schedule. But less than a week later, he vowed to investigate childhood vaccines that prevent measles, polio and other dangerous diseases. Kennedy has ignored some of the recommendations ACIP voted for in April, including the endorsement of a new combination shot that protects against five strains of meningococcal bacteria and the expansion of vaccinations against RSV. In late May, Kennedy disregarded the committee and announced the government would change the recommendation for children and pregnant women to get COVID-19 shots. On Monday, Kennedy ousted all 17 members of the ACIP, saying he would appoint a new group before the next scheduled meeting in late June. The agenda for that meeting has not yet been posted, but a recent federal notice said votes are expected on vaccinations against flu, COVID-19, HPV, RSV and meningococcal bacteria. A HHS spokesman did not respond to a question about whether there would be only eight ACIP members, or whether more will be named later. ___ ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 Drinks High in Magnesium, Say Dietitians
Magnesium plays a direct role in more than 300 enzymatic processes in the body, from brain function to muscle contractions to energy production and more. Jaclyn London, MS, RD, CDN, explains that, despite its critical nature, unfortunately, most of us do not get enough magnesium in our diets. 'Magnesium is an electrolyte that plays a role in blood pressure regulation, muscle and nerve function, protein synthesis, and bone cell regeneration,' says London. 'While its role in the body is crucial — it's involved in hundreds of chemical reactions in the body! — it's estimated that about half of Americans aren't consuming enough of it.' There are lots of supplements and health products that can boost your magnesium intake and help support these vital life processes. Pureboost, for example, is an all-natural energy drink that boasts an impressive 25% of the recommended daily magnesium intake. There are also electrolyte mixes and drinks, like this one from Protekt and this canned watermelon water Mela Water, both of which feature magnesium, potassium, and sodium without added sugars. On the other end of the spectrum, there are recovery drinks like Nuun Rest, and relaxation supplements like neuroSleep, which promote natural rest and recovery with magnesium. While these kinds of supplements aid in magnesium intake, London says whole foods and natural dietary sources are still important because they provide the best format for metabolization. 'While dietary supplements can be useful as exactly that — to supplement, not replace, dietary intake — food sources of magnesium are the most biologically efficient source and have the added benefit of providing additional nutrients that your body needs for you to feel your best,' explains London. Here are five drinks high in magnesium you probably already have at home that can help you get more of this mineral into your diet. Related: Time for a spot of tea and a boost of magnesium. A 2021 study in Molecules concluded that the antioxidant activity of tea is related to the presence of magnesium and potassium. Of the teas studied, green tea was shown to have the highest concentration of both phenolic compounds and magnesium, and it also presented the most antioxidant activity. While supplement powders and sports drinks often do include magnesium, naturally occurring magnesium is typically a better choice. Grapefruit and orange juice both feature about 6% of the recommended daily value of magnesium, making them an excellent option to include in your regular diet. Just be sure to choose full juice options with no added sugars. Jaclyn London explains that fruit juices provide more bang for the buck than sports drinks. 'For optimizing your intake of magnesium, a 100% fruit juice without added sugar will provide more per serving and provide a wider variety of vitamins and minerals from the fruit itself,' she says. Also in the juice category, prune juice provides 30 milligrams of magnesium per cup, or about 8% of the daily recommended value, bringing prune juice in slightly higher than its citrus juice counterparts. Additionally, prune juice features fiber, sorbitol, and potassium, making it a digestive-friendly choice. Milk chocolate and dark chocolate are both good sources of magnesium; however, for a true magnesium density, consider something like raw cacao, which is thought to be among the richest sources of magnesium on the planet. This hot chocolate recipe stars cacao powder and maple syrup, a delicious and cozy choice to keep you warm all winter. Another great addition for colder months, bone broth features a slew of vitamins and minerals, making it a perfect choice for savory sipping. Kristen Carli, MS, RD, explains that bone broth provides many critical nutrients. 'Because bone broth is made from animal bones, it is high in magnesium, potassium, omega 3 fatty acids, calcium, and more.' Read next: The post 5 Drinks High in Magnesium, Say Dietitians appeared first on Clean Plates. Related Headlines Why I'll never fly without Travelzoo — savings, perks, and peace of mind 5 Energizing Snack Recipes to Make Ahead and Eat All Week