Thousands of people still get abortions in states with bans. This Texas bill aims to stop it.
Sarah ordered her first set of abortion pills in early December, as soon as she realized the condom had broken.
She wasn't ready to be a parent. She was in a committed relationship but didn't want a baby to be what kept her tied to her partner. She was still trying to develop her career as an energy analyst, and she didn't earn enough money to support a child in Austin.
And she simply didn't want to be a mom — at least not at this stage of her life.
'This is my personal choice, and I'm not ready right now,' she said. 'It's a shift in identity that I wasn't ready for.'
Abortion is illegal in Texas, so Sarah searched Google, browsed Reddit and even asked ChatGPT about her options. Her research led her to Aid Access, an online mail-order service that would connect her to health professionals in states where abortion remains legal. She verified her identity, paid $150 and received abortion pills in a few days.
About 10 days after the broken condom, she saw a faint positive line on a pregnancy test. A few days later, she took the abortion pills.
For Sarah, whose full name is being withheld because of the legal risks of ordering abortion pills in Texas, the process of terminating her pregnancy was isolating and arduous. She kept getting positive pregnancy tests after she took the abortion pills, and weeks later, a visit to a local reproductive health center confirmed her suspicions: Hers was one of the 2 to 5 percent cases in which a medication abortion had failed. But Sarah couldn't find any medical professionals who would talk to her about her options — or even whether it was safe to stay pregnant after a failed abortion. Every time she brought up abortion, she said, they said it was something they couldn't discuss.
Her only source of support, she realized, was the internet — the people online who shared their stories and resources with her, and websites like Aid Access, which told her where and how to find pills, what the process felt like and the signs that might indicate if the abortion had worked.
'Reddit was my doctor,' she said. 'That was the scariest thing about this all. That was my only source of information.'
Sarah, like hundreds of thousands of Americans living in states with abortion bans, would ultimately find her way around her state's law, relying once again on Aid Access and her community on Reddit to terminate her pregnancy safely and successfully. Since the fall of Roe v. Wade, online services such as Aid Access and the Massachusetts Medication Abortion Project have emerged as pivotal abortion suppliers for people living in states with bans — which helps illustrate why, despite 12 states banning abortion almost entirely, the number of abortions in the United States has continued to rise. An October report from the Society of Family Planning estimated that close to 10,000 abortions per month were the result of health care providers in states with 'shield laws' — statutes meant to protect them from prosecution under bans like Texas' — mailing pills to people in states with restrictions.
This telehealth 'loophole,' as abortion opponents would call it, has vexed the anti-abortion movement. But now in Texas, the largest state to have banned abortion in most circumstances, state lawmakers are championing a bill that would target those same provider networks Sarah relied on. Senate Bill 2880 received approval from the Texas Senate on Tuesday night; a companion bill is working its way through the House, with weeks to go before the state's June deadline.
Health care professionals and abortion law scholars are still deciphering the possible impact of the bill. So, too, are people like Sarah.
'It would be terrifying not having that access,' Sarah said. 'If I don't have access, I don't have choice.'
SB 2880, a top priority of anti-abortion group Texas Right to Life, focuses specifically on people who manufacture, distribute, mail or otherwise provide abortion medication in Texas.
The bill's structure — relying on civil lawsuits filed by private citizens, and wrongful death suits from 'the mother or father of an unborn child' — means it's still not fully clear who ultimately could be held liable, and how far-reaching the threats could be. But in interviews and on the Senate floor, the bill's backers have said they intend to target the medical professionals mailing abortion pills through websites like Aid Access.
It's a step back from the version lawmakers first introduced in March, which would have gone after all aspects of the abortion support: the funds that give people money to leave the state for travel and the websites that help people find information about out-of-state abortion options.
'It's still extremely effective,' said John Seago, the head of Texas Right to Life. 'It gives us the option to go after our main targets — the ones running the websites.'
The latest version of the bill authorizes civil lawsuits against distributors of abortion pills, allowing private citizens to sue anyone who distributes the medications for at least $100,000 in damages. The bill asserts that another state's shield laws, including those in states like New York, Massachusetts and California, are not a valid defense against such suits.
'The state of Texas is effectively deputizing all of its citizens with the ability to bring perhaps frivolous and perhaps unconstitutional lawsuits,' said Jenna Lauter, a policy counsel at the New York Civil Liberties Union who focuses on reproductive rights. 'New York will do everything it can under the law to refuse to cooperate or share information that would facilitate these kinds of harassing lawsuits. But the law in theory would create an opportunity for anyone — an ex-partner, an anti-abortion activist, anyone — to interfere with someone's reproductive health care decisions.'
Lawmakers elsewhere are similarly weighing how to curb abortion by mail. In Alabama, a bill filed in April would ban phone service and internet companies from taking people to websites with information about online abortion medication services, and would make it a felony to prescribe and mail those pills — though that proposal has yet to make it through a committee vote and is up against a May 15 deadline before the legislature adjourns.
Legal scholars and abortion providers said it's fundamentally unclear how the Texas bill would work in practice — who might be in legal jeopardy, what kind of risks they might face, and whether the new penalties proposed by SB 2880 would survive legal challenges.
Texas has successfully flouted federal protections before, notably, with a 2021 statute that effectively banned abortion at six weeks of pregnancy even before Roe v. Wade was overturned. That law, like SB 2880, relied on a private lawsuit mechanism, which deterred people from offering otherwise legal services and allowed it to survive extensive legal challenges, including in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Said Rachel Rebouché, dean at the Temple University law school and an expert in abortion law, 'This is Texas legislators trying the same strategy to try to circumvent a federal constitutional challenge.'
Outside of Texas, some health care providers said that even if the state enacts new restrictions, they won't change their practices. They are counting on their own states to protect them.
'We continue to believe that what we are doing is legal and protected by our shield law, and Massachusetts would protect us,' said Dr. Angel Foster, who provides telehealth abortions through the Massachusetts Medication Abortion Project.
But the shield laws these doctors are counting on have already come under scrutiny. Dr. Margaret Carpenter, a New York-based physician, has been subject to criminal charges filed in Louisiana and civil charges filed in Texas for allegedly mailing abortion medication to people in those states.
So far, New York has declined to enforce a Texas-based civil penalty and has refused to extradite Carpenter to Louisiana, citing the Empire State shield law in both cases. In the long term, the strength of those laws — against existing abortion bans and possibly new legislation like Texas' — will be settled through the federal courts.
Even now, there are questions about shield laws' ability to protect health professionals from civil lawsuits like the ones SB 2880 would further enable. The U.S. Constitution holds that states must enforce the civil judgments enacted by other courts in other states, though there can be exceptions to that rule.
But some health care providers, including in Texas, said that the impact will be felt regardless of if it takes effect.
'Whether these bills are successful or not, they cause such great fear, and we see that. We know that,' said Kathy Kleinfeld, whose Houston-based reproductive health clinic advises pregnant patients on their out-of-state abortion options. 'We hear it on the phones. We encounter it when people come in seeking our help.'
Kleinfeld fears that if the bill is enacted, abortion-seeking patients who come to clinics like hers — Houston, one of the country's most diverse cities, is a drive of at least nine and a half hours from the closest clinic — will be left without recourse.
'It will be devastating for the state of Texas,' Kleinfeld said.
Services like Aid Access have played a critical role in enabling abortion in Texas and other states with strict bans, offering an option that can be much more affordable than travel.
When Mariah learned she was pregnant just over a year ago, she turned immediately to the internet. She works full-time at a UPS warehouse and has two small children: a 7-year-old son and 4-year-old daughter.
Mariah, who also asked to have her full name withheld, was shocked to learn an option like Aid Access existed. She wouldn't need to drive almost 400 miles from her home in Arlington to Wichita, Kansas, the closest option for an in-person abortion. She wouldn't need to find child care, or take time off from work. And the $150 cost was a fraction of what she would have had to spend if she traveled to a clinic.
Her abortion was easy; she completed it at home on a weekend. If something like Aid Access hadn't been available, she said, she wasn't sure what she would have done — maybe try to end her pregnancy at home, with whatever she could find in the house.
Despite the growing prevalence of telehealth abortion, research published in 2022, before Aid Access expanded its American footprint, found that many people seeking to end their pregnancies at home relied on methods that are ineffective, such as herbs, or that involve self-harm. It's not clear what would happen if Texans could no longer find information online about how to order abortion pills, and to what extent they might turn to options that risk their health and safety.
'Abortion saves lives at times,' Mariah said. 'It really helps out families who can't afford a plethora of children.'
Already, Texans seeking abortions said it's difficult to know whom to trust. Mariah told a few of her friends when she ordered her medications. But she didn't say anything to her doctor. She wasn't sure if it would be safe, given the state's strict abortion bans.
The idea that the state might try to keep people from the options she used 'is like a dictatorship,' she said.
The post Thousands of people still get abortions in states with bans. This Texas bill aims to stop it. appeared first on The 19th.
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
"Maintaining Strong Bones Has Less To Do With Drinking Tons Of Milk": Experts Are Sharing What To Foods May Negatively Impact Your Bone Density
My grandmother has osteoporosis, along with 10 million other Americans diagnosed with the disease and 43 million others with low bone mass. Not wanting to follow in her hobbled footsteps, the rest of the women in the family are taking precautions, including consuming the recommended amount of calcium (more isn't necessarily better), adding weight-bearing exercises to our exercise regimens and attending regular doctor checkups. But according to orthopedic specialists, protecting and maintaining strong bones has less to do with drinking tons of milk (those Got Milk campaigns certainly had their intended effect) and more to do with avoiding foods and beverages that can impact our bone density. Folks concerned about osteoporosis often add calcium and vitamin D to their diets, but these supplements could hurt your bone health rather than help if not taken as needed. Dr. Liz Matzkin, associate professor at Brigham and Women's Hospital in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery in Boston, explained: 'Although calcium and Vitamin D is important to maintain bone health, exceeding the recommended doses per day can backfire and be harmful rather than beneficial. Calcium and vitamin D requirements are age dependent, so make sure you are aware of the optimal dose for you.' She advised that, for ages 50 and over, the recommendations are 1,000 milligrams per day of calcium and 800 to 1000 international units per day of vitamin D. Below, orthopedic surgeons and specialists share the foods they avoid to help lessen their risk of osteoporosis. Alcohol Related: This Picky Eater Showdown Will Be Tough For People Without Refined Palates We don't blame you if you're totally confused about whether alcohol is a healthy or unhealthy addition to your diet. Whether you've heard it's beneficial for heart health or are concerned about its effect on the liver, Matzkin cautions that sipping a few glasses of pinot or chugging lagers can negatively affect bone health. 'An increased consumption of alcohol can alter the body's ability to absorb important nutrients that are actually beneficial to bone health, such as calcium, vitamin D and magnesium,' she explained. While calcium and vitamin D often get the spotlight in this area, our sex hormones, like testosterone in men and estrogen in women, are also critical for ensuring strong bones. Angelina Waller, a physician assistant at Advanced Orthopedics in Denver, explained that alcohol 'slows the bone remodeling cycle and disrupts hormone levels.' If you do like to imbibe, Matzkin recommends no more than one alcoholic beverage per day (which is the maximum amount women should be drinking anyway, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Older folks and those who are at risk of bone breakage should be especially cautious. 'Lastly, if you consume too much alcohol, there is a higher risk of falling and injuring or fracturing a bone,' Matzkin said. A 2018 study found a link between alcohol consumption and hip fractures. Caffeine Related: If Your Fruit And Vegetable Knowledge Is Actually Good, Prove It By Getting 22/27 Of These Questions Right While America runs on coffee, it doesn't fuel our bones. And not just coffee. Add energy drinks, soda, tea and supplements or any product with caffeine to the hit list. Just like alcohol, the idea isn't abstention but moderation. 'Caffeine has been shown to increase calcium loss and decrease calcium absorption, both of which negatively influence bone health,' Matzkin said. 'Consider decaffeinated coffee or tea options if you just need something to warm you up or, even better, a tall glass of water.' The Food and Drug Administration recommends no more than 400 milligrams of caffeine a day (about 4-5 cups of coffee), which is a good guideline to use for bone health too. The bone builder vitamin D is also affected by caffeine, which can interfere with absorption. 'Caffeine causes decreased calcium absorption and increased calcium loss in the urine,' Waller said. Soda, particularly cola, is also a culprit of bad bone health. A 2006 comparative study found that drinking cola (including diet versions!) was associated with significantly lower bone mineral density in women. The level of consumption is related to the problem: The more cola the women drank, the more significant its impact. 'Soda contains sugars and can also contain phosphoric acid and caffeine,' Matzkin said. 'All of which fail to have any health benefits and, if consumed in large quantities, will result in negative health consequences.' Wheat Bran It may come as a surprise that heart-healthy wheat bran can have a negative effect on bone health. 'Wheat bran has high levels of phytates, which can prevent calcium absorption,' Matzkin explained. Many people eat wheat bran because it's high in dietary fiber, which is essential for keeping you regular, decreasing heart disease and even preventing colon cancer, all important considerations for many Americans. Thankfully, if you're a consumer of oat bran (which is different from wheat bran), it doesn't have the same deleterious effects on bones as wheat bran, according to Matzkin, as it doesn't contain high levels of phytates. Phytates are a type of anti-nutrient naturally found in plants. Many of your favorite veggies and legumes (from kale and cabbage to beans and peanuts) contain compounds that reduce the absorption of other nutrients. Pseudoscience makes a big deal out of avoiding these compounds, but for the most part, there's no reason to avoid these otherwise-healthy foods. Beans, spinach and beets also contain anti-nutrients that can decrease calcium absorption, but soaking (in the case of dried beans) or cooking (for raw spinach and beets) lessens their impact, according to Waller. 'Beans and wheat bran contain phytates, and spinach and beets contain oxalates that decrease calcium absorption as they bind to the calcium,' she said. If you want to reduce the phytates in wheat bran, you can try soaking, sprouting or fermenting it. Since it has tons of other benefits, there's no need to completely remove it from your diet, just moderate your intake. 'As with almost all foods, moderation is key,' Matzkin said. 'No need to completely eliminate wheat bran from the diet, but understanding that it can affect [calcium] absorption should prompt supplementation with other [calcium]-rich foods.' Salt Whether your tastes run salty or sweet or salty-sweet, the white stuff is typically associated with high blood pressure rather than bone loss. But it really should be a consideration for bone health, especially for older and at-risk groups. 'Be aware of salt that can be hidden in meats, snacks and processed foods such as cold cuts,' Matzkin said. 'Consuming excessive amounts of salt (more than 2,300 milligrams per day) can lead to calcium loss from your bones.' According to a 2018 study by the Journal of the American College of Nutrition, increased sodium consumption significantly increased the risk of osteoporosis. To put that in perspective, 2,300 milligrams per day is equal to 1 teaspoon of table salt, according to the FDA. On average, Americans are eating 1.5 times that amount. This post originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in Food: I'm Not Calling You Uncultured, But If You Can't Pass This International Food Also in Food: People Are Sharing The "Unneccessary" Cooking Rules They Stopped Following Ages Ago Also in Food: If You Can't Name At Least 10 Of These Fruits, You've Got The Taste Buds Of A Toddler
Forbes
10 hours ago
- Forbes
Stressed, Scrolling On Social, And Stuck? Here's What To Do About It.
Have you ever found your focus and your mood completely derailed after getting sucked into a social media scrolling session? Maybe it started innocently enough with something like researching vacation destinations. Maybe you went looking for a dinner recipe. Or maybe you found yourself going down a rabbit hole looking up physical or mental health symptoms you've been having. Social media scrolling has been linked to poorer mental and physical health and decreased work ... More productivity. LifeStance Health recently surveyed over 1,000 U.S. adults to uncover how being constantly online connectivity impacts Americans' mental well-being and relationships. One of the most startling findings was that so many participants reported relying on social media for mental health advice, despite concerns about its credibility, with a whopping 50% of Gen Z-ers self-diagnosing mental health conditions based on social media content (but sometimes hesitating to actually seek professional help afterwards). And then before you know it, forty-six minutes have passed and you're totally overstimulated, treading water in a puddle of your own stress-sweat and you somehow need to get yourself back on track so you can get on with your day. As becoming 'chronically online' has become the norm for so many, this can play a big role in wellbeing. 26% of respondents shared that they check social media within five minutes of waking up, and the same portion spends four hours or more daily on social media. Gen Z (45%) and millennial respondents (39%) were found to be the most likely to be constantly connected, compared to Gen X (25%) and baby boomer (14%) respondents. These social media time-sucks and mood-dips can be disruptive no matter what time of day or night they occur, but when they hit in the middle of your day, it can significantly throw you off course. Here, experts share their insights and tips for how to cope when you're overstimulated by social media. Health experts agree that spending too much time on social media can have a negative impact on ... More overall wellbeing. Dr. Caroline Fleck, a psychologist and author of Validation, quips, 'If i wanted to set up conditions that would lead someone to develop major depression disorder, I'd have them lie down, limit their sunlight exposure, and put them in a space where it's very easy to compare themselves to other people—social media offers all of those things.' According to Srini Pillay, M.D., a Harvard-trained psychiatrist, chief medical officer of Reulay and author of 'Tinker Dabble Doodle Try: Unlock the Power of The Unfocused Mind', being chronically online can cause severe cognitive decline. He cites a March 2025 article published in Brain Science indicating that excessive exposure to low-quality digital content, especially through social media and video platforms, causes a phenomenon known as 'brain rot'—a term recently crowned Oxford's Word of the Year. 'Symptoms include emotional numbness or fogginess, memory issues, poor decision-making, and a distorted sense of self—fueled by dopamine-driven feedback loops that keep users locked in.' Other researchers have found that chronic online users usually multitask and get side-tracked by constant notifications, which can lead to poor attention, memory, and decision-making, he adds. Physical health issues like increases in inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), more physical symptoms and more visits to a doctor or health center for physical illness have also been noted in research. 'While social media can foster connection and provide emotional support, especially for marginalized groups,' explains Dr. Pillay, it is also linked to a range of potential health challenges. These include increased risk of anxiety, depression, sleep disruption, and body dissatisfaction—especially among girls—largely due to social comparison, problematic use, and content exposure.' He adds that excessive use may displace vital health-promoting activities 'like sleep, physical activity, and real-world social interaction.' The neglect of physical health can contribute to or exacerbate mental health issues. And by the way, this isn't just impacting individual wellbeing. Pillay, who is also a leadership development expert who works with Fortune 500 companies to help them build more resilient, agile, creative and productive teams, shares that according to research from McKinsey & Co., employee disengagement and attrition could cost a median-size S&P 500 company between $228 million and $355 million a year in lost productivity. 'Over five years, that's at least $1.1 billion in lost value per company. The multitasking that occurs while working and engaging social media may slow people down, hamper creativity, and increase anxiety, thereby impacting engagement.' Taking breaks and getting outside can help you get back on track with your day after a disruptive ... More scrolling session. Prentis Hemphill, a therapist focused on embodiment and the author of What It Takes to Heal, encourages starting by acknowledging how social media is actually designed to hijack your attention. 'I think it's good for us to know and understand that the design of social media has us consuming a lot of information and experiences of other people, but the speed at which we can do that doesn't align with the speed at which our body processes emotion and experiences. So if we end up in that scrolling vortex, we usually experience some kind of overwhelm.' That information about your mental state gives you a starting place. 'Once we notice we're triggered or overwhelmed, that's a time to take a step back.' They encourage checking in with yourself about exactly what you're feeling. 'This can give you clues as to which actions you can take. Discern exactly what it is you feel.' When we recognize what we're feeling and what's contributing to the uncomfortable feelings, explains Dr. Fleck, 'we get some information about what the antidote would be.' In many cases, she says, the inverse can be helpful. If you're scrolling inside, get outdoors, if you're in a climate with sun. 'You can even just sit outside without your phone.' Or if you've been sitting down while scrolling, 'flip that on its head and get some movement. These are just some physiological ways of regulating your body.' Considering how social media impacts your thoughts is also helpful, she says. 'On social media, you're being told to buy this and do that. You're getting the fundamental messaging that you're not enough. Self-validation is so important. You can say to yourself, 'I don't need anything other than what I am and what I have. I am enough.' You can validate, of course I'm feeling bad—I'm comparing myself to people who are photoshopped to the nth degree. Recognize that it's a distorted reality.' Sometimes being honest with yourself about what you're looking for on social media can also offer valuable clues, explains Dr. Fleck. 'If you're getting into scrolling while you're working, most likely what you need in that moment is a break from the mental stimulation of the work you're doing.' However, instead of giving ourselves a break, we flood our nervous system with these messages, she says, 'and it makes us feel keyed up and burnt out at the same time. Instead of restoring our faculties, we've exhausted them. So if the function is to regulate or distract, if you notice this pattern more than once, it becomes about, 'What can I do' to change this pattern.' Hemphill adds, 'Carving out some time and space to be with your focus and train your focus as best you can makes it a little easier to you do have to refocus or shift, having a mini ritual, such as a mini meditation, to help you be intentional about that transition to where you're back in the driver's seat of your attention can help you. A lot of us don't transition back—our minds are still in that other space but we have work to do. This helps us get back into our bodies.' Some other examples they share are taking a deep breath and going outside to connect with nature and your body. Dr. Pillay adds that deliberately seeking positive online experiences can help in the shrt term too. 'For example, if laughing babies make a person happy, they might search for a video online to switch their mood instantly. Or if a particular song puts them in a better mood, they might listen to that song immediately.' He also points to a study that demonstrated that affirming one's values is rewarding to the brain. 'This works especially if you think about what you want to honor in the future.' Your mindset around social media has been shown to play a role in how it impacts you. Dr Fleck encourages being honest with yourself about why you're scrolling. To go back to the example of someone looking up symptoms, she says, 'When we look up symptoms on social media, sometimes we're seeking some degree of, 'Is there anybody out there who's feeling what I feel?' What we're seeking there is some signal that what we're going through is real and overwhelming and hard. But that isn't always the type of validation that serves us. It would be so much healthier to have someone to talk to rather than validation that things are as bad as they seem.' If you've noticed that some people you know will tell you they find social media uplifting while others find it draining, the reason for that likely lies within, explains Dr. Pillay. 'Recent research suggests the answer lies not in the platforms themselves, but in the mindsets we bring to them. In a large-scale, multi-study investigation involving over 2,000 participants, scientists introduced the concept of social media mindsets—core beliefs about how much control people feel over their use and whether they view it as helpful or harmful to their lives.' 'The study found that people with a sense of agency and a positive outlook on social media's role in their lives tend to enjoy greater psychological and relational well-being,' he says. 'In contrast, those who feel out of control and believe social media harms them report higher levels of distress.' Those who felt like they could control when they scrolled and could take a break whenever they wanted fared better than those who felt like it was out of their control. 'As you rethink your digital health behaviors,' says Dr. Pillay, 'consider that changing your mindset may just change your relationship with social media—and yourself. Health experts recommend setting healthy boundaries with social media and building in restorative ... More daily practices. The Lifestance survey data reflects that an increasing number of people are considering using digital detoxes as ways to disconnect, with 76% of respondents reporting that they find the idea of a digital detox appealing, with Gen Z (84%) and millennial (83%) respondents most interested compared to respondents from other generations. Over a quarter of respondents stated that they actually believe a permanent TikTok ban would positively impact their mental health. 'I think these questions of how we manage social media in our lives are so important,' says Hemphill. 'I think it's so important for us to have identities and lives that are full beyond social media.' They encourage exploring how you can cultivate a sense of autonomy when we have such strong algorithms driving negative emotions like insecurity and fear. Hemphill recommends designating specific times and spaces for social media. 'Setting blocks of time can help you set a reliable place and time where you know you can go in and come out. There are also places that are sacred spaces. I don't scroll on social media when I'm with my kid or my partner. I also try to have other practices during my day and hold certain spaces sacred where social media can't enter. You can also fill out your own social media experience with the types of content you want to see.' Matthew Solit, LCSW, Executive Clinical Director at LifeStance Health, adds, 'Be careful with online mental health content and self-diagnosis. While it may seem more comfortable, it is not reliable. Wellness takes work and that work is most likely actualized through working in direct partnership with mental health professionals. The mental health challenges that can be fueled by excessive internet use, 'doom-scrolling' and overstimulation are real. If your thoughts involve harming yourself or others, please seek help immediately.'
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Concerned Father Believes His Son, 23, Hasn't Left His Apartment in Over a Year
A father on Reddit is worried about his son, who he thinks has not left his apartment in a year The dad visited his son to check in on him, though his son refused to go outside and talk with him The poster is considering calling another wellness check on his son out of concern over his isolating behaviorA father on Reddit has grown increasingly worried about his son, who he believes hasn't left his apartment in a year. On Reddit's r/AmIOverreacting forum, the 47-year-old father writes that he hasn't seen his son in a year, with their last in-person interaction taking place at his graduation. Though he's extended invites to family holiday gatherings, like Thanksgiving and Christmas, his son has declined the invites or not responded at all. "I started getting really worried after Easter, mid April," the dad writes, noting that he called for a wellness check soon after. "They said that he 'seemed fine.' I tried to go out there to talk to him, and he would not open the door," the dad continues. "He only talked to me through the crack of the door. Hearing his voice actually calmed me a bit. But even then he just told me that he couldn't go outside to talk to me." The father notes that he and his son "used to be pretty close," but now feels like his son is trying to "cut [him] off" without explicitly saying so. He and his wife last heard from the 23-year-old on Mother's Day, when the college graduate reached out with a "simple text." "We tried to get him to engage in a conversation. We asked if he'd be coming for dinner. No response," the dad writes. "Now it's been over a year since we think he last left the house," he continues, admitting that "this might be where I'm starting to overreact." The Redditor also asked some of his son's longtime friends "if they've been out with him in the past year," but they told him "they haven't even been able to reach him." "This was a pattern across the friends I asked," the dad writes. "One even said he told her to flat out stop calling." The Reddit user's wife insists that their son may just be busy trying to find a job, prompting his distance, though he's hesitant to believe that's the only factor in their son's sudden reclusive behavior. "I understand that online interviews exist but I cannot grasp the idea that he is looking for a job," the father continues. "If he didn't go outside to talk to me then it's not likely that he would leave to go to a job interview." The worried father also notes that he and his wife have been paying for their son's apartment. In replies to the comments on the post, he explains that their original intention was to "cut him off" after he graduated, though their concern has stopped them from pulling the plug financially. "He has no sense of urgency as my wife and I have been paying for the apartment since he started college so we could make sure he was safe and didn't have debts," he continues. "Before this, my son was very extroverted and active. I don't think we ever spent the majority of a day inside when he was growing up." Read the original article on People
